Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor
•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan. In the late 1980s, the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear engineering and design 2022-01, Vol.386, p.111585, Article 111585 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111585 |
container_title | Nuclear engineering and design |
container_volume | 386 |
creator | Ono, Masato Shimizu, Atsushi Ohashi, Hirofumi Hamamoto, Shimpei Inoi, Hiroyuki Tokuhara, Kazumi Nomoto, Yasunobu Shimazaki, Yosuke Iigaki, Kazuhiko Shinozaki, Masayuki |
description | •A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan.
In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2628816684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029549321005379</els_id><sourcerecordid>2628816684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-c9f29e4bf91cce53ce1f2a03874b048194e14fbea3b07978f9eda406230e417e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BgueWzNp2ibHZfEfCB5U8BbSdLKbspuuSSv47c1S8epcBob33sz8CLkGWgCF-rYv_GTQbzqMBaMMCgCoRHVCFiAaljeV_DglC0qZzCsuy3NyEWNPjyXZgqxf0cW9M5nZ6RiddUaPbvDZYLOt22yzEfcHDHqcAmZpifOIwflNmscxC6jNOIRLcmb1LuLVb1-S9_u7t_Vj_vzy8LRePeeGCTnmRlomkbdWgjFYlQbBMk1L0fCWcgGSI3Dboi5b2shGWImd5rRmJUUODZZLcjPnHsLwOaUDVD9MwaeVitVMCKhrwZOqmVUmDDEGtOoQ3F6HbwVUHYmpXv0RU0diaiaWnKvZiemJL4dBRePQG-xcQDOqbnD_ZvwAG4l5Vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628816684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ono, Masato ; Shimizu, Atsushi ; Ohashi, Hirofumi ; Hamamoto, Shimpei ; Inoi, Hiroyuki ; Tokuhara, Kazumi ; Nomoto, Yasunobu ; Shimazaki, Yosuke ; Iigaki, Kazuhiko ; Shinozaki, Masayuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Ono, Masato ; Shimizu, Atsushi ; Ohashi, Hirofumi ; Hamamoto, Shimpei ; Inoi, Hiroyuki ; Tokuhara, Kazumi ; Nomoto, Yasunobu ; Shimazaki, Yosuke ; Iigaki, Kazuhiko ; Shinozaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><description>•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan.
In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-759X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Classification ; Earthquakes ; Engineering test reactors ; Evaluation ; High temperature ; High temperature gas cooled reactors ; HTGR ; HTTR ; Light water reactors ; Nuclear reactors ; Nuclear safety ; Radiation ; Radiation effects ; Reactor safety ; Reactors ; Regulatory agencies ; Safety ; Seismic activity ; Seismic classification ; VHTR</subject><ispartof>Nuclear engineering and design, 2022-01, Vol.386, p.111585, Article 111585</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-c9f29e4bf91cce53ce1f2a03874b048194e14fbea3b07978f9eda406230e417e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549321005379$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ono, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamamoto, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoi, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokuhara, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomoto, Yasunobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazaki, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinozaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</title><title>Nuclear engineering and design</title><description>•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan.
In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Engineering test reactors</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>High temperature gas cooled reactors</subject><subject>HTGR</subject><subject>HTTR</subject><subject>Light water reactors</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Nuclear safety</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Reactor safety</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic classification</subject><subject>VHTR</subject><issn>0029-5493</issn><issn>1872-759X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BgueWzNp2ibHZfEfCB5U8BbSdLKbspuuSSv47c1S8epcBob33sz8CLkGWgCF-rYv_GTQbzqMBaMMCgCoRHVCFiAaljeV_DglC0qZzCsuy3NyEWNPjyXZgqxf0cW9M5nZ6RiddUaPbvDZYLOt22yzEfcHDHqcAmZpifOIwflNmscxC6jNOIRLcmb1LuLVb1-S9_u7t_Vj_vzy8LRePeeGCTnmRlomkbdWgjFYlQbBMk1L0fCWcgGSI3Dboi5b2shGWImd5rRmJUUODZZLcjPnHsLwOaUDVD9MwaeVitVMCKhrwZOqmVUmDDEGtOoQ3F6HbwVUHYmpXv0RU0diaiaWnKvZiemJL4dBRePQG-xcQDOqbnD_ZvwAG4l5Vg</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Ono, Masato</creator><creator>Shimizu, Atsushi</creator><creator>Ohashi, Hirofumi</creator><creator>Hamamoto, Shimpei</creator><creator>Inoi, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Tokuhara, Kazumi</creator><creator>Nomoto, Yasunobu</creator><creator>Shimazaki, Yosuke</creator><creator>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</creator><creator>Shinozaki, Masayuki</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</title><author>Ono, Masato ; Shimizu, Atsushi ; Ohashi, Hirofumi ; Hamamoto, Shimpei ; Inoi, Hiroyuki ; Tokuhara, Kazumi ; Nomoto, Yasunobu ; Shimazaki, Yosuke ; Iigaki, Kazuhiko ; Shinozaki, Masayuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-c9f29e4bf91cce53ce1f2a03874b048194e14fbea3b07978f9eda406230e417e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Engineering test reactors</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>High temperature gas cooled reactors</topic><topic>HTGR</topic><topic>HTTR</topic><topic>Light water reactors</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Nuclear safety</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Reactor safety</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic classification</topic><topic>VHTR</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ono, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamamoto, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoi, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokuhara, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomoto, Yasunobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazaki, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinozaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ono, Masato</au><au>Shimizu, Atsushi</au><au>Ohashi, Hirofumi</au><au>Hamamoto, Shimpei</au><au>Inoi, Hiroyuki</au><au>Tokuhara, Kazumi</au><au>Nomoto, Yasunobu</au><au>Shimazaki, Yosuke</au><au>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</au><au>Shinozaki, Masayuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>386</volume><spage>111585</spage><pages>111585-</pages><artnum>111585</artnum><issn>0029-5493</issn><eissn>1872-759X</eissn><abstract>•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan.
In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-5493 |
ispartof | Nuclear engineering and design, 2022-01, Vol.386, p.111585, Article 111585 |
issn | 0029-5493 1872-759X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2628816684 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Classification Earthquakes Engineering test reactors Evaluation High temperature High temperature gas cooled reactors HTGR HTTR Light water reactors Nuclear reactors Nuclear safety Radiation Radiation effects Reactor safety Reactors Regulatory agencies Safety Seismic activity Seismic classification VHTR |
title | Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T08%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20classification%20of%20high%20temperature%20engineering%20test%20reactor&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20engineering%20and%20design&rft.au=Ono,%20Masato&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=386&rft.spage=111585&rft.pages=111585-&rft.artnum=111585&rft.issn=0029-5493&rft.eissn=1872-759X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628816684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628816684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029549321005379&rfr_iscdi=true |