Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor

•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan. In the late 1980s, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear engineering and design 2022-01, Vol.386, p.111585, Article 111585
Hauptverfasser: Ono, Masato, Shimizu, Atsushi, Ohashi, Hirofumi, Hamamoto, Shimpei, Inoi, Hiroyuki, Tokuhara, Kazumi, Nomoto, Yasunobu, Shimazaki, Yosuke, Iigaki, Kazuhiko, Shinozaki, Masayuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 111585
container_title Nuclear engineering and design
container_volume 386
creator Ono, Masato
Shimizu, Atsushi
Ohashi, Hirofumi
Hamamoto, Shimpei
Inoi, Hiroyuki
Tokuhara, Kazumi
Nomoto, Yasunobu
Shimazaki, Yosuke
Iigaki, Kazuhiko
Shinozaki, Masayuki
description •A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan. In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2628816684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029549321005379</els_id><sourcerecordid>2628816684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-c9f29e4bf91cce53ce1f2a03874b048194e14fbea3b07978f9eda406230e417e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BgueWzNp2ibHZfEfCB5U8BbSdLKbspuuSSv47c1S8epcBob33sz8CLkGWgCF-rYv_GTQbzqMBaMMCgCoRHVCFiAaljeV_DglC0qZzCsuy3NyEWNPjyXZgqxf0cW9M5nZ6RiddUaPbvDZYLOt22yzEfcHDHqcAmZpifOIwflNmscxC6jNOIRLcmb1LuLVb1-S9_u7t_Vj_vzy8LRePeeGCTnmRlomkbdWgjFYlQbBMk1L0fCWcgGSI3Dboi5b2shGWImd5rRmJUUODZZLcjPnHsLwOaUDVD9MwaeVitVMCKhrwZOqmVUmDDEGtOoQ3F6HbwVUHYmpXv0RU0diaiaWnKvZiemJL4dBRePQG-xcQDOqbnD_ZvwAG4l5Vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628816684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ono, Masato ; Shimizu, Atsushi ; Ohashi, Hirofumi ; Hamamoto, Shimpei ; Inoi, Hiroyuki ; Tokuhara, Kazumi ; Nomoto, Yasunobu ; Shimazaki, Yosuke ; Iigaki, Kazuhiko ; Shinozaki, Masayuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Ono, Masato ; Shimizu, Atsushi ; Ohashi, Hirofumi ; Hamamoto, Shimpei ; Inoi, Hiroyuki ; Tokuhara, Kazumi ; Nomoto, Yasunobu ; Shimazaki, Yosuke ; Iigaki, Kazuhiko ; Shinozaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><description>•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan. In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-759X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Classification ; Earthquakes ; Engineering test reactors ; Evaluation ; High temperature ; High temperature gas cooled reactors ; HTGR ; HTTR ; Light water reactors ; Nuclear reactors ; Nuclear safety ; Radiation ; Radiation effects ; Reactor safety ; Reactors ; Regulatory agencies ; Safety ; Seismic activity ; Seismic classification ; VHTR</subject><ispartof>Nuclear engineering and design, 2022-01, Vol.386, p.111585, Article 111585</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-c9f29e4bf91cce53ce1f2a03874b048194e14fbea3b07978f9eda406230e417e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549321005379$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ono, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamamoto, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoi, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokuhara, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomoto, Yasunobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazaki, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinozaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</title><title>Nuclear engineering and design</title><description>•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan. In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Engineering test reactors</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>High temperature gas cooled reactors</subject><subject>HTGR</subject><subject>HTTR</subject><subject>Light water reactors</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Nuclear safety</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Reactor safety</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic classification</subject><subject>VHTR</subject><issn>0029-5493</issn><issn>1872-759X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BgueWzNp2ibHZfEfCB5U8BbSdLKbspuuSSv47c1S8epcBob33sz8CLkGWgCF-rYv_GTQbzqMBaMMCgCoRHVCFiAaljeV_DglC0qZzCsuy3NyEWNPjyXZgqxf0cW9M5nZ6RiddUaPbvDZYLOt22yzEfcHDHqcAmZpifOIwflNmscxC6jNOIRLcmb1LuLVb1-S9_u7t_Vj_vzy8LRePeeGCTnmRlomkbdWgjFYlQbBMk1L0fCWcgGSI3Dboi5b2shGWImd5rRmJUUODZZLcjPnHsLwOaUDVD9MwaeVitVMCKhrwZOqmVUmDDEGtOoQ3F6HbwVUHYmpXv0RU0diaiaWnKvZiemJL4dBRePQG-xcQDOqbnD_ZvwAG4l5Vg</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Ono, Masato</creator><creator>Shimizu, Atsushi</creator><creator>Ohashi, Hirofumi</creator><creator>Hamamoto, Shimpei</creator><creator>Inoi, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Tokuhara, Kazumi</creator><creator>Nomoto, Yasunobu</creator><creator>Shimazaki, Yosuke</creator><creator>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</creator><creator>Shinozaki, Masayuki</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</title><author>Ono, Masato ; Shimizu, Atsushi ; Ohashi, Hirofumi ; Hamamoto, Shimpei ; Inoi, Hiroyuki ; Tokuhara, Kazumi ; Nomoto, Yasunobu ; Shimazaki, Yosuke ; Iigaki, Kazuhiko ; Shinozaki, Masayuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-c9f29e4bf91cce53ce1f2a03874b048194e14fbea3b07978f9eda406230e417e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Engineering test reactors</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>High temperature gas cooled reactors</topic><topic>HTGR</topic><topic>HTTR</topic><topic>Light water reactors</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Nuclear safety</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Reactor safety</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic classification</topic><topic>VHTR</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ono, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Hirofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamamoto, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoi, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokuhara, Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomoto, Yasunobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazaki, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinozaki, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ono, Masato</au><au>Shimizu, Atsushi</au><au>Ohashi, Hirofumi</au><au>Hamamoto, Shimpei</au><au>Inoi, Hiroyuki</au><au>Tokuhara, Kazumi</au><au>Nomoto, Yasunobu</au><au>Shimazaki, Yosuke</au><au>Iigaki, Kazuhiko</au><au>Shinozaki, Masayuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>386</volume><spage>111585</spage><pages>111585-</pages><artnum>111585</artnum><issn>0029-5493</issn><eissn>1872-759X</eissn><abstract>•A new seismic classification of high temperature gas cooled reactors was proposed.•The reactor cooling behavior and exposure evaluations confirmed the validity of the new seismic classification.•The new classification was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan. In the late 1980s, the seismic classification of the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was formulated during its design stage. Because of the HTTR’s lack of operation experiences to sufficiently understand the safety characteristics of high temperature gas cooled reactors (HTGRs) at that time, the seismic classification of commercial light water reactors (LWRs) was applied to HTTR. However, subsequent operation experiences and test results using HTTR made it clear that the seismic classification of commercial LWRs was somewhat too conservative for the HTGRs. The seismic classification of HTTR was reevaluated using the following approach. Class S facilities with high safety requirements ensured that they maintained their function even when the safety functions of Class B and Class C facilities were lost during earthquake-triggered accidents, thereby safely controlling the accident without exposing the members of the public in the vicinity of the reactor to excessive radiation exposure. Consequently, Class S facilities were downgraded compared with the commercial LWRs. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to verify the validity of the new seismic classification under the conditions where the functions of Class B and Class C facilities are lost. It was confirmed that the reactor was stable and that the evaluated public dose was below the authorized limit. In June 2020, the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in Japan confirmed that the results of the seismic classification conformed to the standard rules of the reactor installation change.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-5493
ispartof Nuclear engineering and design, 2022-01, Vol.386, p.111585, Article 111585
issn 0029-5493
1872-759X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2628816684
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Classification
Earthquakes
Engineering test reactors
Evaluation
High temperature
High temperature gas cooled reactors
HTGR
HTTR
Light water reactors
Nuclear reactors
Nuclear safety
Radiation
Radiation effects
Reactor safety
Reactors
Regulatory agencies
Safety
Seismic activity
Seismic classification
VHTR
title Seismic classification of high temperature engineering test reactor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T08%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20classification%20of%20high%20temperature%20engineering%20test%20reactor&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20engineering%20and%20design&rft.au=Ono,%20Masato&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=386&rft.spage=111585&rft.pages=111585-&rft.artnum=111585&rft.issn=0029-5493&rft.eissn=1872-759X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628816684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628816684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029549321005379&rfr_iscdi=true