Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending

This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Italian economic journal 2022-03, Vol.8 (1), p.49-76
Hauptverfasser: Di Gioacchino, Debora, Sabani, Laura, Usai, Stefano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Italian economic journal
container_volume 8
creator Di Gioacchino, Debora
Sabani, Laura
Usai, Stefano
description This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2628786475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2628786475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFXAjS5G8zvJLKVULRQs1EJ3ITPJlJR2MiYziG9v2hG7c3UP3O-cyz0A3GL0iBEST5EhUYgMEZwhhHlSF2BEcFFklFB5-afJ5hpMYtwhhIigTBAxApt509mwtY0NunO-0Xu4br90MPB-fng4-NLtXfcNdWPg0ifpqkSs-rb1oYO-hsu-3LsKzkxfnfxw1drGuGZ7A65qvY928jvHYP0y-5i-ZYv31_n0eZFVjNMuE7WmrOYYFYaL0pbSMIx5iTSzhlDBKSuIKWwuCS-1ZqKsc0qtrDRj3BqG6BjcDblt8J-9jZ3a-T6kP6IiOZFC5iyljAEZqCr4GIOtVRvcQYdvhZE6lqiGElUqUZ1KVMdoOJhs5RsXz5YEIimpzBNCBySmZbO14Xz9n-AfItt-7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628786475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Di Gioacchino, Debora ; Sabani, Laura ; Usai, Stefano</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Debora ; Sabani, Laura ; Usai, Stefano</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-322X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-3238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Budgets ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Education expenses ; European Integration ; Expenditures ; Income inequality ; Political economy ; Public schools ; Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Italian economic journal, 2022-03, Vol.8 (1), p.49-76</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3832-0347</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabani, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usai, Stefano</creatorcontrib><title>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</title><title>Italian economic journal</title><addtitle>Ital Econ J</addtitle><description>This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.</description><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Education expenses</subject><subject>European Integration</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>2199-322X</issn><issn>2199-3238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFXAjS5G8zvJLKVULRQs1EJ3ITPJlJR2MiYziG9v2hG7c3UP3O-cyz0A3GL0iBEST5EhUYgMEZwhhHlSF2BEcFFklFB5-afJ5hpMYtwhhIigTBAxApt509mwtY0NunO-0Xu4br90MPB-fng4-NLtXfcNdWPg0ifpqkSs-rb1oYO-hsu-3LsKzkxfnfxw1drGuGZ7A65qvY928jvHYP0y-5i-ZYv31_n0eZFVjNMuE7WmrOYYFYaL0pbSMIx5iTSzhlDBKSuIKWwuCS-1ZqKsc0qtrDRj3BqG6BjcDblt8J-9jZ3a-T6kP6IiOZFC5iyljAEZqCr4GIOtVRvcQYdvhZE6lqiGElUqUZ1KVMdoOJhs5RsXz5YEIimpzBNCBySmZbO14Xz9n-AfItt-7A</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Di Gioacchino, Debora</creator><creator>Sabani, Laura</creator><creator>Usai, Stefano</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-0347</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</title><author>Di Gioacchino, Debora ; Sabani, Laura ; Usai, Stefano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Education expenses</topic><topic>European Integration</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabani, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usai, Stefano</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Italian economic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Gioacchino, Debora</au><au>Sabani, Laura</au><au>Usai, Stefano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</atitle><jtitle>Italian economic journal</jtitle><stitle>Ital Econ J</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>49-76</pages><issn>2199-322X</issn><eissn>2199-3238</eissn><abstract>This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-0347</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2199-322X
ispartof Italian economic journal, 2022-03, Vol.8 (1), p.49-76
issn 2199-322X
2199-3238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2628786475
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Budgets
Economic theory
Economics
Economics and Finance
Education expenses
European Integration
Expenditures
Income inequality
Political economy
Public schools
Research Paper
title Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T17%3A42%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intergenerational%20Upward%20(Im)mobility%20and%20Political%20Support%20of%20Public%20Education%20Spending&rft.jtitle=Italian%20economic%20journal&rft.au=Di%20Gioacchino,%20Debora&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=49-76&rft.issn=2199-322X&rft.eissn=2199-3238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628786475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628786475&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true