Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending
This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Italian economic journal 2022-03, Vol.8 (1), p.49-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 76 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Italian economic journal |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Di Gioacchino, Debora Sabani, Laura Usai, Stefano |
description | This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2628786475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2628786475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFXAjS5G8zvJLKVULRQs1EJ3ITPJlJR2MiYziG9v2hG7c3UP3O-cyz0A3GL0iBEST5EhUYgMEZwhhHlSF2BEcFFklFB5-afJ5hpMYtwhhIigTBAxApt509mwtY0NunO-0Xu4br90MPB-fng4-NLtXfcNdWPg0ifpqkSs-rb1oYO-hsu-3LsKzkxfnfxw1drGuGZ7A65qvY928jvHYP0y-5i-ZYv31_n0eZFVjNMuE7WmrOYYFYaL0pbSMIx5iTSzhlDBKSuIKWwuCS-1ZqKsc0qtrDRj3BqG6BjcDblt8J-9jZ3a-T6kP6IiOZFC5iyljAEZqCr4GIOtVRvcQYdvhZE6lqiGElUqUZ1KVMdoOJhs5RsXz5YEIimpzBNCBySmZbO14Xz9n-AfItt-7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628786475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Di Gioacchino, Debora ; Sabani, Laura ; Usai, Stefano</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Debora ; Sabani, Laura ; Usai, Stefano</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2199-322X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-3238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Budgets ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Education expenses ; European Integration ; Expenditures ; Income inequality ; Political economy ; Public schools ; Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Italian economic journal, 2022-03, Vol.8 (1), p.49-76</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3832-0347</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabani, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usai, Stefano</creatorcontrib><title>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</title><title>Italian economic journal</title><addtitle>Ital Econ J</addtitle><description>This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.</description><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Education expenses</subject><subject>European Integration</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>2199-322X</issn><issn>2199-3238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFXAjS5G8zvJLKVULRQs1EJ3ITPJlJR2MiYziG9v2hG7c3UP3O-cyz0A3GL0iBEST5EhUYgMEZwhhHlSF2BEcFFklFB5-afJ5hpMYtwhhIigTBAxApt509mwtY0NunO-0Xu4br90MPB-fng4-NLtXfcNdWPg0ifpqkSs-rb1oYO-hsu-3LsKzkxfnfxw1drGuGZ7A65qvY928jvHYP0y-5i-ZYv31_n0eZFVjNMuE7WmrOYYFYaL0pbSMIx5iTSzhlDBKSuIKWwuCS-1ZqKsc0qtrDRj3BqG6BjcDblt8J-9jZ3a-T6kP6IiOZFC5iyljAEZqCr4GIOtVRvcQYdvhZE6lqiGElUqUZ1KVMdoOJhs5RsXz5YEIimpzBNCBySmZbO14Xz9n-AfItt-7A</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Di Gioacchino, Debora</creator><creator>Sabani, Laura</creator><creator>Usai, Stefano</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-0347</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</title><author>Di Gioacchino, Debora ; Sabani, Laura ; Usai, Stefano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7fa34f5109d57beb8d4115b0a4ed23753492d9e6825baa47bf633e8ca445ed403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Education expenses</topic><topic>European Integration</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Gioacchino, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabani, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usai, Stefano</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Italian economic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Gioacchino, Debora</au><au>Sabani, Laura</au><au>Usai, Stefano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending</atitle><jtitle>Italian economic journal</jtitle><stitle>Ital Econ J</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>49-76</pages><issn>2199-322X</issn><eissn>2199-3238</eissn><abstract>This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-0347</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2199-322X |
ispartof | Italian economic journal, 2022-03, Vol.8 (1), p.49-76 |
issn | 2199-322X 2199-3238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2628786475 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Budgets Economic theory Economics Economics and Finance Education expenses European Integration Expenditures Income inequality Political economy Public schools Research Paper |
title | Intergenerational Upward (Im)mobility and Political Support of Public Education Spending |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T17%3A42%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intergenerational%20Upward%20(Im)mobility%20and%20Political%20Support%20of%20Public%20Education%20Spending&rft.jtitle=Italian%20economic%20journal&rft.au=Di%20Gioacchino,%20Debora&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=49-76&rft.issn=2199-322X&rft.eissn=2199-3238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40797-021-00157-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628786475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628786475&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |