IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits
To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Automation in construction 2022-02, Vol.134, p.104097, Article 104097 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104097 |
container_title | Automation in construction |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Noardo, Francesca Wu, Teng Arroyo Ohori, Ken Krijnen, Thomas Stoter, Jantien |
description | To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing.
•IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2627856624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0926580521005483</els_id><sourcerecordid>2627856624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcF1x3zTrMRZPAxMuBG1yG9TTW1bWrSCv57O9a1q8s5nHMufAhdErwhmMjrZmOnEUK_oZiS2eJYqyO0IoWiuSo0OUYrrKnMRYHFKTpLqcEYKyz1Cj3t7rdZFyrXpqwOMUuu8_m8Fjo7-v4tg9B1oc-G1vb9r3538LFEy8m31cEbXOz8mM7RSW3b5C7-7hq93t-9bB_z_fPDbnu7z4FqofJSkIIRojiwiuKSC1Zoq5mzSoCsKyk4UCA14yCqupDAFeElOEZKyYSWkq3R1bI7xPA5uTSaJkyxn18aKqkqhJSUzym-pCCGlKKrzRB9Z-O3IdgcqJnGLNTMgZpZqM21m6U2A3Ff3kWTwLseXOWjg9FUwf8_8AM4knaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627856624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Noardo, Francesca ; Wu, Teng ; Arroyo Ohori, Ken ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Stoter, Jantien</creator><creatorcontrib>Noardo, Francesca ; Wu, Teng ; Arroyo Ohori, Ken ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Stoter, Jantien</creatorcontrib><description>To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing.
•IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-5805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Automation ; BIM ; Building information modeling ; Building permits ; Data quality ; Digital building permit ; Industry foundation classes ; Regulations ; Urban planning compliance</subject><ispartof>Automation in construction, 2022-02, Vol.134, p.104097, Article 104097</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noardo, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoter, Jantien</creatorcontrib><title>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</title><title>Automation in construction</title><description>To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing.
•IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>BIM</subject><subject>Building information modeling</subject><subject>Building permits</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>Digital building permit</subject><subject>Industry foundation classes</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Urban planning compliance</subject><issn>0926-5805</issn><issn>1872-7891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcF1x3zTrMRZPAxMuBG1yG9TTW1bWrSCv57O9a1q8s5nHMufAhdErwhmMjrZmOnEUK_oZiS2eJYqyO0IoWiuSo0OUYrrKnMRYHFKTpLqcEYKyz1Cj3t7rdZFyrXpqwOMUuu8_m8Fjo7-v4tg9B1oc-G1vb9r3538LFEy8m31cEbXOz8mM7RSW3b5C7-7hq93t-9bB_z_fPDbnu7z4FqofJSkIIRojiwiuKSC1Zoq5mzSoCsKyk4UCA14yCqupDAFeElOEZKyYSWkq3R1bI7xPA5uTSaJkyxn18aKqkqhJSUzym-pCCGlKKrzRB9Z-O3IdgcqJnGLNTMgZpZqM21m6U2A3Ff3kWTwLseXOWjg9FUwf8_8AM4knaI</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Noardo, Francesca</creator><creator>Wu, Teng</creator><creator>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</creator><creator>Krijnen, Thomas</creator><creator>Stoter, Jantien</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</title><author>Noardo, Francesca ; Wu, Teng ; Arroyo Ohori, Ken ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Stoter, Jantien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>BIM</topic><topic>Building information modeling</topic><topic>Building permits</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>Digital building permit</topic><topic>Industry foundation classes</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Urban planning compliance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noardo, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoter, Jantien</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Automation in construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noardo, Francesca</au><au>Wu, Teng</au><au>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</au><au>Krijnen, Thomas</au><au>Stoter, Jantien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</atitle><jtitle>Automation in construction</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>134</volume><spage>104097</spage><pages>104097-</pages><artnum>104097</artnum><issn>0926-5805</issn><eissn>1872-7891</eissn><abstract>To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing.
•IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0926-5805 |
ispartof | Automation in construction, 2022-02, Vol.134, p.104097, Article 104097 |
issn | 0926-5805 1872-7891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2627856624 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Automation BIM Building information modeling Building permits Data quality Digital building permit Industry foundation classes Regulations Urban planning compliance |
title | IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T05%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IFC%20models%20for%20semi-automating%20common%20planning%20checks%20for%20building%20permits&rft.jtitle=Automation%20in%20construction&rft.au=Noardo,%20Francesca&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=134&rft.spage=104097&rft.pages=104097-&rft.artnum=104097&rft.issn=0926-5805&rft.eissn=1872-7891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627856624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627856624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0926580521005483&rfr_iscdi=true |