IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits

To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Automation in construction 2022-02, Vol.134, p.104097, Article 104097
Hauptverfasser: Noardo, Francesca, Wu, Teng, Arroyo Ohori, Ken, Krijnen, Thomas, Stoter, Jantien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 104097
container_title Automation in construction
container_volume 134
creator Noardo, Francesca
Wu, Teng
Arroyo Ohori, Ken
Krijnen, Thomas
Stoter, Jantien
description To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing. •IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2627856624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0926580521005483</els_id><sourcerecordid>2627856624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcF1x3zTrMRZPAxMuBG1yG9TTW1bWrSCv57O9a1q8s5nHMufAhdErwhmMjrZmOnEUK_oZiS2eJYqyO0IoWiuSo0OUYrrKnMRYHFKTpLqcEYKyz1Cj3t7rdZFyrXpqwOMUuu8_m8Fjo7-v4tg9B1oc-G1vb9r3538LFEy8m31cEbXOz8mM7RSW3b5C7-7hq93t-9bB_z_fPDbnu7z4FqofJSkIIRojiwiuKSC1Zoq5mzSoCsKyk4UCA14yCqupDAFeElOEZKyYSWkq3R1bI7xPA5uTSaJkyxn18aKqkqhJSUzym-pCCGlKKrzRB9Z-O3IdgcqJnGLNTMgZpZqM21m6U2A3Ff3kWTwLseXOWjg9FUwf8_8AM4knaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627856624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Noardo, Francesca ; Wu, Teng ; Arroyo Ohori, Ken ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Stoter, Jantien</creator><creatorcontrib>Noardo, Francesca ; Wu, Teng ; Arroyo Ohori, Ken ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Stoter, Jantien</creatorcontrib><description>To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing. •IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-5805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Automation ; BIM ; Building information modeling ; Building permits ; Data quality ; Digital building permit ; Industry foundation classes ; Regulations ; Urban planning compliance</subject><ispartof>Automation in construction, 2022-02, Vol.134, p.104097, Article 104097</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noardo, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoter, Jantien</creatorcontrib><title>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</title><title>Automation in construction</title><description>To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing. •IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>BIM</subject><subject>Building information modeling</subject><subject>Building permits</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>Digital building permit</subject><subject>Industry foundation classes</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Urban planning compliance</subject><issn>0926-5805</issn><issn>1872-7891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcF1x3zTrMRZPAxMuBG1yG9TTW1bWrSCv57O9a1q8s5nHMufAhdErwhmMjrZmOnEUK_oZiS2eJYqyO0IoWiuSo0OUYrrKnMRYHFKTpLqcEYKyz1Cj3t7rdZFyrXpqwOMUuu8_m8Fjo7-v4tg9B1oc-G1vb9r3538LFEy8m31cEbXOz8mM7RSW3b5C7-7hq93t-9bB_z_fPDbnu7z4FqofJSkIIRojiwiuKSC1Zoq5mzSoCsKyk4UCA14yCqupDAFeElOEZKyYSWkq3R1bI7xPA5uTSaJkyxn18aKqkqhJSUzym-pCCGlKKrzRB9Z-O3IdgcqJnGLNTMgZpZqM21m6U2A3Ff3kWTwLseXOWjg9FUwf8_8AM4knaI</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Noardo, Francesca</creator><creator>Wu, Teng</creator><creator>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</creator><creator>Krijnen, Thomas</creator><creator>Stoter, Jantien</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</title><author>Noardo, Francesca ; Wu, Teng ; Arroyo Ohori, Ken ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Stoter, Jantien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2957-b51831174c3d20b45389a93ea75c6fd654c2c1f34c5df86c4714bce31b6359663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>BIM</topic><topic>Building information modeling</topic><topic>Building permits</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>Digital building permit</topic><topic>Industry foundation classes</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Urban planning compliance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noardo, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoter, Jantien</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Automation in construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noardo, Francesca</au><au>Wu, Teng</au><au>Arroyo Ohori, Ken</au><au>Krijnen, Thomas</au><au>Stoter, Jantien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits</atitle><jtitle>Automation in construction</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>134</volume><spage>104097</spage><pages>104097-</pages><artnum>104097</artnum><issn>0926-5805</issn><eissn>1872-7891</eissn><abstract>To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing. •IFC models from practice need control and agreements before automatic processing.•A tool is developed to supports the building dimensions checks in IFC models.•Guidelines to modelers are proposed to support smoother automatic processing.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-5805
ispartof Automation in construction, 2022-02, Vol.134, p.104097, Article 104097
issn 0926-5805
1872-7891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2627856624
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Automation
BIM
Building information modeling
Building permits
Data quality
Digital building permit
Industry foundation classes
Regulations
Urban planning compliance
title IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T05%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IFC%20models%20for%20semi-automating%20common%20planning%20checks%20for%20building%20permits&rft.jtitle=Automation%20in%20construction&rft.au=Noardo,%20Francesca&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=134&rft.spage=104097&rft.pages=104097-&rft.artnum=104097&rft.issn=0926-5805&rft.eissn=1872-7891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627856624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627856624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0926580521005483&rfr_iscdi=true