An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval

Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth science informatics 2022-03, Vol.15 (1), p.473-484
Hauptverfasser: Behnia, Negin, Zare, Mohammad, Moosavi, Vahid, Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 484
container_issue 1
container_start_page 473
container_title Earth science informatics
container_volume 15
creator Behnia, Negin
Zare, Mohammad
Moosavi, Vahid
Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin
description Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R 2 of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R 2 of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2627009521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2627009521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsNT-AVcB19E85rksxRcUKqjrkKY3bWRmMt6kgvrnjR3Rnav74Hznck-WnXN2yRmrrgIXPC8oE5ymMa9odZRNeF2mVV7z49--kqfZLAS3ZpKLUgpRT7LPeU9cHwGp8d2g0QXfE2_JxlkLCH0kD48r6ofoOvcBG6IxOuuM0-0Ba1u3hd4A0e3Wo4u7LhDrkcQdYKdbutYhQcG7lnTehbhHIAgRHbzp9iw7sboNMPup0-z55vppcUeXq9v7xXxJjeRNpJJLA2xd2JqxXDSlbApepscBTJnLSgvGtDSCc26rUm8M1KaRBTOFzIWuG5DT7GL0HdC_7iFE9eL32KeTSpSiYqwpBE8qMaoM-hAQrBrQdRrfFWfqO2c15qxSzuqQs6oSJEcoJHG_Bfyz_of6AsNegaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627009521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Behnia, Negin ; Zare, Mohammad ; Moosavi, Vahid ; Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creator><creatorcontrib>Behnia, Negin ; Zare, Mohammad ; Moosavi, Vahid ; Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creatorcontrib><description>Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R 2 of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R 2 of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-0473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-0481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth System Sciences ; Group method of data handling ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Landsat ; Landslides ; Modelling ; Ontology ; Optimization techniques ; Particle swarm optimization ; Remote sensing ; Research Article ; Satellite imagery ; Simulation and Modeling ; Soil moisture ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Swarm intelligence ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Earth science informatics, 2022-03, Vol.15 (1), p.473-484</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behnia, Negin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zare, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosavi, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creatorcontrib><title>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</title><title>Earth science informatics</title><addtitle>Earth Sci Inform</addtitle><description>Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R 2 of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R 2 of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth System Sciences</subject><subject>Group method of data handling</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Simulation and Modeling</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Swarm intelligence</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>1865-0473</issn><issn>1865-0481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsNT-AVcB19E85rksxRcUKqjrkKY3bWRmMt6kgvrnjR3Rnav74Hznck-WnXN2yRmrrgIXPC8oE5ymMa9odZRNeF2mVV7z49--kqfZLAS3ZpKLUgpRT7LPeU9cHwGp8d2g0QXfE2_JxlkLCH0kD48r6ofoOvcBG6IxOuuM0-0Ba1u3hd4A0e3Wo4u7LhDrkcQdYKdbutYhQcG7lnTehbhHIAgRHbzp9iw7sboNMPup0-z55vppcUeXq9v7xXxJjeRNpJJLA2xd2JqxXDSlbApepscBTJnLSgvGtDSCc26rUm8M1KaRBTOFzIWuG5DT7GL0HdC_7iFE9eL32KeTSpSiYqwpBE8qMaoM-hAQrBrQdRrfFWfqO2c15qxSzuqQs6oSJEcoJHG_Bfyz_of6AsNegaI</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Behnia, Negin</creator><creator>Zare, Mohammad</creator><creator>Moosavi, Vahid</creator><creator>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</title><author>Behnia, Negin ; Zare, Mohammad ; Moosavi, Vahid ; Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth System Sciences</topic><topic>Group method of data handling</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Simulation and Modeling</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Swarm intelligence</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behnia, Negin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zare, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosavi, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Earth science informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behnia, Negin</au><au>Zare, Mohammad</au><au>Moosavi, Vahid</au><au>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</atitle><jtitle>Earth science informatics</jtitle><stitle>Earth Sci Inform</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>473-484</pages><issn>1865-0473</issn><eissn>1865-0481</eissn><abstract>Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R 2 of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R 2 of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1865-0473
ispartof Earth science informatics, 2022-03, Vol.15 (1), p.473-484
issn 1865-0473
1865-0481
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2627009521
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agriculture
Algorithms
Artificial intelligence
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth System Sciences
Group method of data handling
Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
Landsat
Landslides
Modelling
Ontology
Optimization techniques
Particle swarm optimization
Remote sensing
Research Article
Satellite imagery
Simulation and Modeling
Soil moisture
Space Exploration and Astronautics
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics
Swarm intelligence
Water resources
title An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A19%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20inter-comparison%20of%20different%20PSO-optimized%20artificial%20intelligence%20algorithms%20for%20thermal-based%20soil%20moisture%20retrieval&rft.jtitle=Earth%20science%20informatics&rft.au=Behnia,%20Negin&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=473-484&rft.issn=1865-0473&rft.eissn=1865-0481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627009521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627009521&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true