An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval
Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth science informatics 2022-03, Vol.15 (1), p.473-484 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 484 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 473 |
container_title | Earth science informatics |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Behnia, Negin Zare, Mohammad Moosavi, Vahid Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin |
description | Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R
2
of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R
2
of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2627009521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2627009521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsNT-AVcB19E85rksxRcUKqjrkKY3bWRmMt6kgvrnjR3Rnav74Hznck-WnXN2yRmrrgIXPC8oE5ymMa9odZRNeF2mVV7z49--kqfZLAS3ZpKLUgpRT7LPeU9cHwGp8d2g0QXfE2_JxlkLCH0kD48r6ofoOvcBG6IxOuuM0-0Ba1u3hd4A0e3Wo4u7LhDrkcQdYKdbutYhQcG7lnTehbhHIAgRHbzp9iw7sboNMPup0-z55vppcUeXq9v7xXxJjeRNpJJLA2xd2JqxXDSlbApepscBTJnLSgvGtDSCc26rUm8M1KaRBTOFzIWuG5DT7GL0HdC_7iFE9eL32KeTSpSiYqwpBE8qMaoM-hAQrBrQdRrfFWfqO2c15qxSzuqQs6oSJEcoJHG_Bfyz_of6AsNegaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627009521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Behnia, Negin ; Zare, Mohammad ; Moosavi, Vahid ; Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creator><creatorcontrib>Behnia, Negin ; Zare, Mohammad ; Moosavi, Vahid ; Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creatorcontrib><description>Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R
2
of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R
2
of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-0473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-0481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth System Sciences ; Group method of data handling ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Landsat ; Landslides ; Modelling ; Ontology ; Optimization techniques ; Particle swarm optimization ; Remote sensing ; Research Article ; Satellite imagery ; Simulation and Modeling ; Soil moisture ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Swarm intelligence ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Earth science informatics, 2022-03, Vol.15 (1), p.473-484</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behnia, Negin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zare, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosavi, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creatorcontrib><title>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</title><title>Earth science informatics</title><addtitle>Earth Sci Inform</addtitle><description>Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R
2
of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R
2
of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth System Sciences</subject><subject>Group method of data handling</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Simulation and Modeling</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Swarm intelligence</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>1865-0473</issn><issn>1865-0481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsNT-AVcB19E85rksxRcUKqjrkKY3bWRmMt6kgvrnjR3Rnav74Hznck-WnXN2yRmrrgIXPC8oE5ymMa9odZRNeF2mVV7z49--kqfZLAS3ZpKLUgpRT7LPeU9cHwGp8d2g0QXfE2_JxlkLCH0kD48r6ofoOvcBG6IxOuuM0-0Ba1u3hd4A0e3Wo4u7LhDrkcQdYKdbutYhQcG7lnTehbhHIAgRHbzp9iw7sboNMPup0-z55vppcUeXq9v7xXxJjeRNpJJLA2xd2JqxXDSlbApepscBTJnLSgvGtDSCc26rUm8M1KaRBTOFzIWuG5DT7GL0HdC_7iFE9eL32KeTSpSiYqwpBE8qMaoM-hAQrBrQdRrfFWfqO2c15qxSzuqQs6oSJEcoJHG_Bfyz_of6AsNegaI</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Behnia, Negin</creator><creator>Zare, Mohammad</creator><creator>Moosavi, Vahid</creator><creator>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</title><author>Behnia, Negin ; Zare, Mohammad ; Moosavi, Vahid ; Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-313ce0b5f800429639516100eec6437a200a3c2111f76adce8c9350c5342a89e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth System Sciences</topic><topic>Group method of data handling</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Simulation and Modeling</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Swarm intelligence</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behnia, Negin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zare, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosavi, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Earth science informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behnia, Negin</au><au>Zare, Mohammad</au><au>Moosavi, Vahid</au><au>Khajeddin, Seyed Jamaleddin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval</atitle><jtitle>Earth science informatics</jtitle><stitle>Earth Sci Inform</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>473-484</pages><issn>1865-0473</issn><eissn>1865-0481</eissn><abstract>Soil moisture is one of the most important variables which affects different aspects of human life such as agriculture, flood, landslide, water resources, etc. There are different methods for modeling soil moisture such as conceptual, empirical and physically based models. Conceptual and physically based models are robust but they need several different data and information. However data driven models can be run using limited number of data. In this study, four data driven models i.e. MLP, ANFIS, SVR and GMDH were used to model soil moisture. Particle Swarm Optimization technique was used to optimize the structure of the four aforementioned models. Several different remote sensing-based indices were calculated using Landsat Imagery e.g. NDVI, TVDI, VTCI and TVX. An extensive field survey was conducted to collect soil moisture data in the region. A 70/30 ration was used to separate train and test data. 30 additional samples were used for a final validation of produced maps. Results showed a relatively poor performance of PSO-MLP model. The performance of PSO-ANFIS and PSO-SVR was moderate with R
2
of 0.74 and 0.84 and RMSE of 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively. PSO-GMDH had a superior performance with R
2
of 0.91 and RMSE of 2.4%. Therefore, PSO-GMDH can be suggested as a powerful modeling approach to produce soil moisture maps.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-0473 |
ispartof | Earth science informatics, 2022-03, Vol.15 (1), p.473-484 |
issn | 1865-0473 1865-0481 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2627009521 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Algorithms Artificial intelligence Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earth System Sciences Group method of data handling Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Landsat Landslides Modelling Ontology Optimization techniques Particle swarm optimization Remote sensing Research Article Satellite imagery Simulation and Modeling Soil moisture Space Exploration and Astronautics Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics Swarm intelligence Water resources |
title | An inter-comparison of different PSO-optimized artificial intelligence algorithms for thermal-based soil moisture retrieval |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A19%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20inter-comparison%20of%20different%20PSO-optimized%20artificial%20intelligence%20algorithms%20for%20thermal-based%20soil%20moisture%20retrieval&rft.jtitle=Earth%20science%20informatics&rft.au=Behnia,%20Negin&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=473-484&rft.issn=1865-0473&rft.eissn=1865-0481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12145-021-00747-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627009521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627009521&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |