Short-stay (≤ 1 d) diverting loop ileostomy closure can be selectively implemented without an increase in readmission and complication rates: an ACS-NSQIP analysis

Background: Although short stay (< 1 d) protocols exist for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure, this practice is not widespread. The aim of this study was to identify patient and procedural factors associated with short-stay DLI closure and to study the morbidity of short-stay DLI closure, sp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Journal of Surgery 2021-12, Vol.64, p.S132-S133
Hauptverfasser: Liang, J, Vasilevsky, C, Pang, A, Ghitulescu, G, Faria, J, Morin, N, Boutros, M, Marinescu, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S133
container_issue
container_start_page S132
container_title Canadian Journal of Surgery
container_volume 64
creator Liang, J
Vasilevsky, C
Pang, A
Ghitulescu, G
Faria, J
Morin, N
Boutros, M
Marinescu, D
description Background: Although short stay (< 1 d) protocols exist for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure, this practice is not widespread. The aim of this study was to identify patient and procedural factors associated with short-stay DLI closure and to study the morbidity of short-stay DLI closure, specifically related to readmission rates. Methods: Adults (aged > 18 yr) who underwent an elective DLI closure between 2012 and 2018 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Short-stay DLI closure was defined as a postoperative stay of 1 day or less. Patients were grouped on the basis of length of stay after DLI closure (< 1 d v. > 1 d). Demographic, clinic, pathologic and operative factors were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors that were independently associated with a short stay, as well as readmission, postoperative major morbidity and mortality. Results: Of the 26 363 patients who underwent DLI closure, 1056 (4.0%) had a short postoperative stay (< 1 d). On crude analysis, short-stay patients were younger, were more likely to be male and white, had procedures with a shorter operative time and had fewer comorbidities. Short-stay patients had lower rates of surgical site infections and major postoperative morbidity. No difference was found in 30-day readmission and mortality rates. On multiple logistic regression, independent predictors of short stay were younger age, shorter operative time and the absence of comorbidities. A short-stay was not associated with readmission or 30-day mortality on multiple regression. Finally, short stay was negatively associated with postoperative major morbidity and surgical site infection. Conclusion: Short-stay (< 1 d) DLI closure can be implemented with younger, healthier patients undergoing shorter operations. A short-stay DLI closure in these patients is safe and is not associated with increased readmission and complication rates.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2626964809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2626964809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26269648093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi01KxDAUx4MoWD_u8MCNLgppppTUnQyKbmSkLtwNMX06GdKk5r0qPYL30It5EjPgAVz9v37_PVFUtdalWlRyXxRSSl3WSj8diiOirZRKNbotxHe3iYlLYjPD-c_nF1TQX0Dv3jGxC6_gYxzBeYzEcZjB-khTQrAmwDMCoUfLGfYzuGH0OGBg7OHD8SZODJlywSY0hNlANv3giFwMeerBxvxx1vCuSIaRLneXq2VX3ncPd6scjJ_J0Yk4eDGe8PRPj8XZzfXj8rYcU3ybkHi9jVPKMK1Vo5q2qbVsF_-jfgHeZ2A5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626964809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-stay (≤ 1 d) diverting loop ileostomy closure can be selectively implemented without an increase in readmission and complication rates: an ACS-NSQIP analysis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liang, J ; Vasilevsky, C ; Pang, A ; Ghitulescu, G ; Faria, J ; Morin, N ; Boutros, M ; Marinescu, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, J ; Vasilevsky, C ; Pang, A ; Ghitulescu, G ; Faria, J ; Morin, N ; Boutros, M ; Marinescu, D</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Although short stay (&lt; 1 d) protocols exist for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure, this practice is not widespread. The aim of this study was to identify patient and procedural factors associated with short-stay DLI closure and to study the morbidity of short-stay DLI closure, specifically related to readmission rates. Methods: Adults (aged &gt; 18 yr) who underwent an elective DLI closure between 2012 and 2018 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Short-stay DLI closure was defined as a postoperative stay of 1 day or less. Patients were grouped on the basis of length of stay after DLI closure (&lt; 1 d v. &gt; 1 d). Demographic, clinic, pathologic and operative factors were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors that were independently associated with a short stay, as well as readmission, postoperative major morbidity and mortality. Results: Of the 26 363 patients who underwent DLI closure, 1056 (4.0%) had a short postoperative stay (&lt; 1 d). On crude analysis, short-stay patients were younger, were more likely to be male and white, had procedures with a shorter operative time and had fewer comorbidities. Short-stay patients had lower rates of surgical site infections and major postoperative morbidity. No difference was found in 30-day readmission and mortality rates. On multiple logistic regression, independent predictors of short stay were younger age, shorter operative time and the absence of comorbidities. A short-stay was not associated with readmission or 30-day mortality on multiple regression. Finally, short stay was negatively associated with postoperative major morbidity and surgical site infection. Conclusion: Short-stay (&lt; 1 d) DLI closure can be implemented with younger, healthier patients undergoing shorter operations. A short-stay DLI closure in these patients is safe and is not associated with increased readmission and complication rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-428X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: CMA Impact, Inc</publisher><subject>Morbidity ; Mortality ; Ostomy</subject><ispartof>Canadian Journal of Surgery, 2021-12, Vol.64, p.S132-S133</ispartof><rights>Copyright Joule Inc Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilevsky, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghitulescu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morin, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinescu, D</creatorcontrib><title>Short-stay (≤ 1 d) diverting loop ileostomy closure can be selectively implemented without an increase in readmission and complication rates: an ACS-NSQIP analysis</title><title>Canadian Journal of Surgery</title><description>Background: Although short stay (&lt; 1 d) protocols exist for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure, this practice is not widespread. The aim of this study was to identify patient and procedural factors associated with short-stay DLI closure and to study the morbidity of short-stay DLI closure, specifically related to readmission rates. Methods: Adults (aged &gt; 18 yr) who underwent an elective DLI closure between 2012 and 2018 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Short-stay DLI closure was defined as a postoperative stay of 1 day or less. Patients were grouped on the basis of length of stay after DLI closure (&lt; 1 d v. &gt; 1 d). Demographic, clinic, pathologic and operative factors were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors that were independently associated with a short stay, as well as readmission, postoperative major morbidity and mortality. Results: Of the 26 363 patients who underwent DLI closure, 1056 (4.0%) had a short postoperative stay (&lt; 1 d). On crude analysis, short-stay patients were younger, were more likely to be male and white, had procedures with a shorter operative time and had fewer comorbidities. Short-stay patients had lower rates of surgical site infections and major postoperative morbidity. No difference was found in 30-day readmission and mortality rates. On multiple logistic regression, independent predictors of short stay were younger age, shorter operative time and the absence of comorbidities. A short-stay was not associated with readmission or 30-day mortality on multiple regression. Finally, short stay was negatively associated with postoperative major morbidity and surgical site infection. Conclusion: Short-stay (&lt; 1 d) DLI closure can be implemented with younger, healthier patients undergoing shorter operations. A short-stay DLI closure in these patients is safe and is not associated with increased readmission and complication rates.</description><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><issn>0008-428X</issn><issn>1488-2310</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi01KxDAUx4MoWD_u8MCNLgppppTUnQyKbmSkLtwNMX06GdKk5r0qPYL30It5EjPgAVz9v37_PVFUtdalWlRyXxRSSl3WSj8diiOirZRKNbotxHe3iYlLYjPD-c_nF1TQX0Dv3jGxC6_gYxzBeYzEcZjB-khTQrAmwDMCoUfLGfYzuGH0OGBg7OHD8SZODJlywSY0hNlANv3giFwMeerBxvxx1vCuSIaRLneXq2VX3ncPd6scjJ_J0Yk4eDGe8PRPj8XZzfXj8rYcU3ybkHi9jVPKMK1Vo5q2qbVsF_-jfgHeZ2A5</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Liang, J</creator><creator>Vasilevsky, C</creator><creator>Pang, A</creator><creator>Ghitulescu, G</creator><creator>Faria, J</creator><creator>Morin, N</creator><creator>Boutros, M</creator><creator>Marinescu, D</creator><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Short-stay (≤ 1 d) diverting loop ileostomy closure can be selectively implemented without an increase in readmission and complication rates: an ACS-NSQIP analysis</title><author>Liang, J ; Vasilevsky, C ; Pang, A ; Ghitulescu, G ; Faria, J ; Morin, N ; Boutros, M ; Marinescu, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26269648093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilevsky, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghitulescu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morin, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinescu, D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, J</au><au>Vasilevsky, C</au><au>Pang, A</au><au>Ghitulescu, G</au><au>Faria, J</au><au>Morin, N</au><au>Boutros, M</au><au>Marinescu, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-stay (≤ 1 d) diverting loop ileostomy closure can be selectively implemented without an increase in readmission and complication rates: an ACS-NSQIP analysis</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Surgery</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>S132</spage><epage>S133</epage><pages>S132-S133</pages><issn>0008-428X</issn><eissn>1488-2310</eissn><abstract>Background: Although short stay (&lt; 1 d) protocols exist for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure, this practice is not widespread. The aim of this study was to identify patient and procedural factors associated with short-stay DLI closure and to study the morbidity of short-stay DLI closure, specifically related to readmission rates. Methods: Adults (aged &gt; 18 yr) who underwent an elective DLI closure between 2012 and 2018 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Short-stay DLI closure was defined as a postoperative stay of 1 day or less. Patients were grouped on the basis of length of stay after DLI closure (&lt; 1 d v. &gt; 1 d). Demographic, clinic, pathologic and operative factors were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors that were independently associated with a short stay, as well as readmission, postoperative major morbidity and mortality. Results: Of the 26 363 patients who underwent DLI closure, 1056 (4.0%) had a short postoperative stay (&lt; 1 d). On crude analysis, short-stay patients were younger, were more likely to be male and white, had procedures with a shorter operative time and had fewer comorbidities. Short-stay patients had lower rates of surgical site infections and major postoperative morbidity. No difference was found in 30-day readmission and mortality rates. On multiple logistic regression, independent predictors of short stay were younger age, shorter operative time and the absence of comorbidities. A short-stay was not associated with readmission or 30-day mortality on multiple regression. Finally, short stay was negatively associated with postoperative major morbidity and surgical site infection. Conclusion: Short-stay (&lt; 1 d) DLI closure can be implemented with younger, healthier patients undergoing shorter operations. A short-stay DLI closure in these patients is safe and is not associated with increased readmission and complication rates.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>CMA Impact, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-428X
ispartof Canadian Journal of Surgery, 2021-12, Vol.64, p.S132-S133
issn 0008-428X
1488-2310
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2626964809
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Morbidity
Mortality
Ostomy
title Short-stay (≤ 1 d) diverting loop ileostomy closure can be selectively implemented without an increase in readmission and complication rates: an ACS-NSQIP analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-stay%20(%E2%89%A4%201%20d)%20diverting%20loop%20ileostomy%20closure%20can%20be%20selectively%20implemented%20without%20an%20increase%20in%20readmission%20and%20complication%20rates:%20an%20ACS-NSQIP%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Journal%20of%20Surgery&rft.au=Liang,%20J&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=S132&rft.epage=S133&rft.pages=S132-S133&rft.issn=0008-428X&rft.eissn=1488-2310&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2626964809%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626964809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true