Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93
Abstract A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trusts & trustees 2021-11, Vol.27 (9), p.949-956 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 956 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 949 |
container_title | Trusts & trustees |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Rimmer, John |
description | Abstract
A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy? |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/tandt/ttab079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2626899645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A697862282</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/tandt/ttab079</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A697862282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-9a068fd56cef16f4f76c063a0a52682656f1451b3f00805ae7c5703ce74a8dd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AiCg7d0XvAy4TV5UeTtMcy1AkTB85zyNrERtqmJqnif2_cBh49vXf4vPd43yS5QvAWwYIsguzrsAhB7iAvTpIJ4hSnGCF4GnvCSIp4Ds-TqfdmBzPOMoRpNkmal86EBsRhsGlMO9gQwCcoQ2NbUNad6Y0PTgZje7A2kap6b63zcxAaBZ5Mq76sjdOjG6xXYOtGH8AMQ4xu5mC52sQOLgpymZxp2Xo1PdaL5PX-brtcpevnh8dluU4rjHBICwlZrmvKKqUR05nmrIKMSCgpZjlmlGmUUbQjGsIcUql4RTkkleKZzOsakYvk-rB3cPZjVD6Idzu6Pp4UmMUVRcEy-qfeZKuE6bWNX1ad8ZUoWcFzhnGOo0oPqnLWe6e0GJzppPsWCIrf1MU-dXFMPfrZwdtx-If-AFfTgQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626899645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Rimmer, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Rimmer, John</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-1780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-2110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tandt/ttab079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Case law ; Common law ; Consideration (Law) ; Courts ; Disposition of assets ; Impossibility of performance ; Jurisdiction ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Mistake (Law) ; Remedies ; Stock transfer ; Tax planning ; Taxation ; Transfer taxes</subject><ispartof>Trusts & trustees, 2021-11, Vol.27 (9), p.949-956</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rimmer, John</creatorcontrib><title>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</title><title>Trusts & trustees</title><description>Abstract
A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Common law</subject><subject>Consideration (Law)</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Disposition of assets</subject><subject>Impossibility of performance</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Mistake (Law)</subject><subject>Remedies</subject><subject>Stock transfer</subject><subject>Tax planning</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Transfer taxes</subject><issn>1363-1780</issn><issn>1752-2110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AiCg7d0XvAy4TV5UeTtMcy1AkTB85zyNrERtqmJqnif2_cBh49vXf4vPd43yS5QvAWwYIsguzrsAhB7iAvTpIJ4hSnGCF4GnvCSIp4Ds-TqfdmBzPOMoRpNkmal86EBsRhsGlMO9gQwCcoQ2NbUNad6Y0PTgZje7A2kap6b63zcxAaBZ5Mq76sjdOjG6xXYOtGH8AMQ4xu5mC52sQOLgpymZxp2Xo1PdaL5PX-brtcpevnh8dluU4rjHBICwlZrmvKKqUR05nmrIKMSCgpZjlmlGmUUbQjGsIcUql4RTkkleKZzOsakYvk-rB3cPZjVD6Idzu6Pp4UmMUVRcEy-qfeZKuE6bWNX1ad8ZUoWcFzhnGOo0oPqnLWe6e0GJzppPsWCIrf1MU-dXFMPfrZwdtx-If-AFfTgQI</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Rimmer, John</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</title><author>Rimmer, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-9a068fd56cef16f4f76c063a0a52682656f1451b3f00805ae7c5703ce74a8dd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Common law</topic><topic>Consideration (Law)</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Disposition of assets</topic><topic>Impossibility of performance</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Mistake (Law)</topic><topic>Remedies</topic><topic>Stock transfer</topic><topic>Tax planning</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Transfer taxes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rimmer, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Trusts & trustees</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rimmer, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</atitle><jtitle>Trusts & trustees</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>949</spage><epage>956</epage><pages>949-956</pages><issn>1363-1780</issn><eissn>1752-2110</eissn><abstract>Abstract
A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/tandt/ttab079</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1363-1780 |
ispartof | Trusts & trustees, 2021-11, Vol.27 (9), p.949-956 |
issn | 1363-1780 1752-2110 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2626899645 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Analysis Case law Common law Consideration (Law) Courts Disposition of assets Impossibility of performance Jurisdiction Laws, regulations and rules Mistake (Law) Remedies Stock transfer Tax planning Taxation Transfer taxes |
title | Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A16%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smith%20and%20Philpott%20v%20Athol%20Administration%20Limited%20and%20ors,%20the%20Milewood%20Purpose%20Trust%20(2021),%20CHP2020/93&rft.jtitle=Trusts%20&%20trustees&rft.au=Rimmer,%20John&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=949&rft.epage=956&rft.pages=949-956&rft.issn=1363-1780&rft.eissn=1752-2110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tandt/ttab079&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA697862282%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626899645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A697862282&rft_oup_id=10.1093/tandt/ttab079&rfr_iscdi=true |