Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93

Abstract A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trusts & trustees 2021-11, Vol.27 (9), p.949-956
1. Verfasser: Rimmer, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 956
container_issue 9
container_start_page 949
container_title Trusts & trustees
container_volume 27
creator Rimmer, John
description Abstract A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?
doi_str_mv 10.1093/tandt/ttab079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2626899645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A697862282</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/tandt/ttab079</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A697862282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-9a068fd56cef16f4f76c063a0a52682656f1451b3f00805ae7c5703ce74a8dd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AiCg7d0XvAy4TV5UeTtMcy1AkTB85zyNrERtqmJqnif2_cBh49vXf4vPd43yS5QvAWwYIsguzrsAhB7iAvTpIJ4hSnGCF4GnvCSIp4Ds-TqfdmBzPOMoRpNkmal86EBsRhsGlMO9gQwCcoQ2NbUNad6Y0PTgZje7A2kap6b63zcxAaBZ5Mq76sjdOjG6xXYOtGH8AMQ4xu5mC52sQOLgpymZxp2Xo1PdaL5PX-brtcpevnh8dluU4rjHBICwlZrmvKKqUR05nmrIKMSCgpZjlmlGmUUbQjGsIcUql4RTkkleKZzOsakYvk-rB3cPZjVD6Idzu6Pp4UmMUVRcEy-qfeZKuE6bWNX1ad8ZUoWcFzhnGOo0oPqnLWe6e0GJzppPsWCIrf1MU-dXFMPfrZwdtx-If-AFfTgQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626899645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Rimmer, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Rimmer, John</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-1780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-2110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tandt/ttab079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Case law ; Common law ; Consideration (Law) ; Courts ; Disposition of assets ; Impossibility of performance ; Jurisdiction ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Mistake (Law) ; Remedies ; Stock transfer ; Tax planning ; Taxation ; Transfer taxes</subject><ispartof>Trusts &amp; trustees, 2021-11, Vol.27 (9), p.949-956</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rimmer, John</creatorcontrib><title>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</title><title>Trusts &amp; trustees</title><description>Abstract A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Common law</subject><subject>Consideration (Law)</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Disposition of assets</subject><subject>Impossibility of performance</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Mistake (Law)</subject><subject>Remedies</subject><subject>Stock transfer</subject><subject>Tax planning</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Transfer taxes</subject><issn>1363-1780</issn><issn>1752-2110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AiCg7d0XvAy4TV5UeTtMcy1AkTB85zyNrERtqmJqnif2_cBh49vXf4vPd43yS5QvAWwYIsguzrsAhB7iAvTpIJ4hSnGCF4GnvCSIp4Ds-TqfdmBzPOMoRpNkmal86EBsRhsGlMO9gQwCcoQ2NbUNad6Y0PTgZje7A2kap6b63zcxAaBZ5Mq76sjdOjG6xXYOtGH8AMQ4xu5mC52sQOLgpymZxp2Xo1PdaL5PX-brtcpevnh8dluU4rjHBICwlZrmvKKqUR05nmrIKMSCgpZjlmlGmUUbQjGsIcUql4RTkkleKZzOsakYvk-rB3cPZjVD6Idzu6Pp4UmMUVRcEy-qfeZKuE6bWNX1ad8ZUoWcFzhnGOo0oPqnLWe6e0GJzppPsWCIrf1MU-dXFMPfrZwdtx-If-AFfTgQI</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Rimmer, John</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</title><author>Rimmer, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-9a068fd56cef16f4f76c063a0a52682656f1451b3f00805ae7c5703ce74a8dd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Common law</topic><topic>Consideration (Law)</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Disposition of assets</topic><topic>Impossibility of performance</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Mistake (Law)</topic><topic>Remedies</topic><topic>Stock transfer</topic><topic>Tax planning</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Transfer taxes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rimmer, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Trusts &amp; trustees</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rimmer, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93</atitle><jtitle>Trusts &amp; trustees</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>949</spage><epage>956</epage><pages>949-956</pages><issn>1363-1780</issn><eissn>1752-2110</eissn><abstract>Abstract A body of case law has now developed in relation to the well-known jurisdiction of common law courts to intervene in voluntary dispositions where they are made on the basis of a serious mistake. But what about the situation where some consideration has been given for the disposition? Does the existence of significant, or any, consideration deny the equitable remedy?</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/tandt/ttab079</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1363-1780
ispartof Trusts & trustees, 2021-11, Vol.27 (9), p.949-956
issn 1363-1780
1752-2110
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2626899645
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Analysis
Case law
Common law
Consideration (Law)
Courts
Disposition of assets
Impossibility of performance
Jurisdiction
Laws, regulations and rules
Mistake (Law)
Remedies
Stock transfer
Tax planning
Taxation
Transfer taxes
title Smith and Philpott v Athol Administration Limited and ors, the Milewood Purpose Trust (2021), CHP2020/93
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A16%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smith%20and%20Philpott%20v%20Athol%20Administration%20Limited%20and%20ors,%20the%20Milewood%20Purpose%20Trust%20(2021),%20CHP2020/93&rft.jtitle=Trusts%20&%20trustees&rft.au=Rimmer,%20John&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=949&rft.epage=956&rft.pages=949-956&rft.issn=1363-1780&rft.eissn=1752-2110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tandt/ttab079&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA697862282%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626899645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A697862282&rft_oup_id=10.1093/tandt/ttab079&rfr_iscdi=true