Direct displacement-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced RC frames

The experiences of past earthquakes show that the moment-resisting reinforced concrete structures suffered damage due to the inherent brittle behaviors of concrete and lack of structural stiffness. The configuration of buckling restrained brace (BRB) in RC frame is widely increased for the developme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2022-02, Vol.20 (3), p.1767-1839
Hauptverfasser: Farahani, Sina, Akhaveissy, Amir H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1839
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1767
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 20
creator Farahani, Sina
Akhaveissy, Amir H.
description The experiences of past earthquakes show that the moment-resisting reinforced concrete structures suffered damage due to the inherent brittle behaviors of concrete and lack of structural stiffness. The configuration of buckling restrained brace (BRB) in RC frame is widely increased for the development of the reinforced concrete buckling‐restrained braced (RC-BRB) dual system since the implementation of BRBs can significantly improve the dissipative capacity and lateral stiffness of the main reinforced concrete frames. On the other hand, the structural damage amount is strongly related to the induced displacements and deformations during an earthquake. Therefore, the robust design method must take into account the displacement as the main designing parameter to control the damage of the structures. To this end, researchers have proposed the direct displacement-based design (DDBD) method, which employs displacement as a main designing criterion throughout the design process. In this study, a DDBD method for dual RC-BRB frames is developed by considering the ultimate capacity of BRB elements. New yield displacement and stiffness expressions are proposed to determine the characteristics of the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system. The developed method is evaluated by designing twelve RC-BRB frames corresponding to different storey numbers and two types of BRB configurations. The Numerical model is developed and validated using available experimental data to be used in the nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA). In order to gauge the performance of the developed DDBD method, the seismic behavior of designed frames subjected to 20 real ground motions is investigated through NTHA procedure. In addition, the expressions for the design displacement profile of the RC-BRB frames are provided as a function of relative height using the average maximum displacements calculated from NTHA outputs. The developed design displacement profile leads to significant improvements in the coefficient of determination, R 2 , which is increased from 0.69 for low-rise to 0.98 for high-rise frames. The results indicate that the RC-BRB frames designed by the developed DDBD method can successfully achieve the desired performance objectives. Furthermore, the comparison between the estimated results and the corresponding ones obtained from NTHA indicates that the proposed displacement profile expressions can be found to be efficient and effective for estimating the displacemen
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-021-01290-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2626465138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2626465138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a0440f3c2bdda9b5acde9acac2671ac957eab235541d4f9768aa0ba8da3289f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Fz9FJ0jTNUdZPEBRR8BamSbpk3bZr0j3svzduBW-eZg7P887wEnLO4JIBqKvEQLKaAmcUGNdAdwdkxqQSlJWyOtzvQFXFPo7JSUorAC6Vhhl5uQnR27FwIW3WaH3n-5E2mLwrkg-pC7ZwPoVlXwxt0Wzt5zr0Sxp9GiOGPlNNzJYrXhdFG7Hz6ZQctbhO_ux3zsn73e3b4oE-Pd8_Lq6fqBVMjxShLKEVljfOoW4kWuc1WrS8Ugytlspjw4WUJXNlq1VVI0KDtUPBa90qMScXU-4mDl_b_I9ZDdvY55OGV7wqK8lEnSk-UTYOKUXfmk0MHcadYWB-mjNTcyY3Z_bNmV2WxCSlDPdLH_-i_7G-AVuYcrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626465138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct displacement-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced RC frames</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Farahani, Sina ; Akhaveissy, Amir H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farahani, Sina ; Akhaveissy, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><description>The experiences of past earthquakes show that the moment-resisting reinforced concrete structures suffered damage due to the inherent brittle behaviors of concrete and lack of structural stiffness. The configuration of buckling restrained brace (BRB) in RC frame is widely increased for the development of the reinforced concrete buckling‐restrained braced (RC-BRB) dual system since the implementation of BRBs can significantly improve the dissipative capacity and lateral stiffness of the main reinforced concrete frames. On the other hand, the structural damage amount is strongly related to the induced displacements and deformations during an earthquake. Therefore, the robust design method must take into account the displacement as the main designing parameter to control the damage of the structures. To this end, researchers have proposed the direct displacement-based design (DDBD) method, which employs displacement as a main designing criterion throughout the design process. In this study, a DDBD method for dual RC-BRB frames is developed by considering the ultimate capacity of BRB elements. New yield displacement and stiffness expressions are proposed to determine the characteristics of the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system. The developed method is evaluated by designing twelve RC-BRB frames corresponding to different storey numbers and two types of BRB configurations. The Numerical model is developed and validated using available experimental data to be used in the nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA). In order to gauge the performance of the developed DDBD method, the seismic behavior of designed frames subjected to 20 real ground motions is investigated through NTHA procedure. In addition, the expressions for the design displacement profile of the RC-BRB frames are provided as a function of relative height using the average maximum displacements calculated from NTHA outputs. The developed design displacement profile leads to significant improvements in the coefficient of determination, R 2 , which is increased from 0.69 for low-rise to 0.98 for high-rise frames. The results indicate that the RC-BRB frames designed by the developed DDBD method can successfully achieve the desired performance objectives. Furthermore, the comparison between the estimated results and the corresponding ones obtained from NTHA indicates that the proposed displacement profile expressions can be found to be efficient and effective for estimating the displacements of the RC-BRB dual frames.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01290-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bracing ; Buckling ; Civil Engineering ; Concrete ; Concrete structures ; Configurations ; Deformation ; Degrees of freedom ; Design ; Displacement ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Frames ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Original Article ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcement (structures) ; Robust design ; Seismic activity ; Seismic design ; Seismic response ; Stiffness ; Structural damage ; Structural Geology</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2022-02, Vol.20 (3), p.1767-1839</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a0440f3c2bdda9b5acde9acac2671ac957eab235541d4f9768aa0ba8da3289f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a0440f3c2bdda9b5acde9acac2671ac957eab235541d4f9768aa0ba8da3289f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4704-1112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-021-01290-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-021-01290-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farahani, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhaveissy, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct displacement-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced RC frames</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>The experiences of past earthquakes show that the moment-resisting reinforced concrete structures suffered damage due to the inherent brittle behaviors of concrete and lack of structural stiffness. The configuration of buckling restrained brace (BRB) in RC frame is widely increased for the development of the reinforced concrete buckling‐restrained braced (RC-BRB) dual system since the implementation of BRBs can significantly improve the dissipative capacity and lateral stiffness of the main reinforced concrete frames. On the other hand, the structural damage amount is strongly related to the induced displacements and deformations during an earthquake. Therefore, the robust design method must take into account the displacement as the main designing parameter to control the damage of the structures. To this end, researchers have proposed the direct displacement-based design (DDBD) method, which employs displacement as a main designing criterion throughout the design process. In this study, a DDBD method for dual RC-BRB frames is developed by considering the ultimate capacity of BRB elements. New yield displacement and stiffness expressions are proposed to determine the characteristics of the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system. The developed method is evaluated by designing twelve RC-BRB frames corresponding to different storey numbers and two types of BRB configurations. The Numerical model is developed and validated using available experimental data to be used in the nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA). In order to gauge the performance of the developed DDBD method, the seismic behavior of designed frames subjected to 20 real ground motions is investigated through NTHA procedure. In addition, the expressions for the design displacement profile of the RC-BRB frames are provided as a function of relative height using the average maximum displacements calculated from NTHA outputs. The developed design displacement profile leads to significant improvements in the coefficient of determination, R 2 , which is increased from 0.69 for low-rise to 0.98 for high-rise frames. The results indicate that the RC-BRB frames designed by the developed DDBD method can successfully achieve the desired performance objectives. Furthermore, the comparison between the estimated results and the corresponding ones obtained from NTHA indicates that the proposed displacement profile expressions can be found to be efficient and effective for estimating the displacements of the RC-BRB dual frames.</description><subject>Bracing</subject><subject>Buckling</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete structures</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Degrees of freedom</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Frames</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcement (structures)</subject><subject>Robust design</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Fz9FJ0jTNUdZPEBRR8BamSbpk3bZr0j3svzduBW-eZg7P887wEnLO4JIBqKvEQLKaAmcUGNdAdwdkxqQSlJWyOtzvQFXFPo7JSUorAC6Vhhl5uQnR27FwIW3WaH3n-5E2mLwrkg-pC7ZwPoVlXwxt0Wzt5zr0Sxp9GiOGPlNNzJYrXhdFG7Hz6ZQctbhO_ux3zsn73e3b4oE-Pd8_Lq6fqBVMjxShLKEVljfOoW4kWuc1WrS8Ugytlspjw4WUJXNlq1VVI0KDtUPBa90qMScXU-4mDl_b_I9ZDdvY55OGV7wqK8lEnSk-UTYOKUXfmk0MHcadYWB-mjNTcyY3Z_bNmV2WxCSlDPdLH_-i_7G-AVuYcrQ</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Farahani, Sina</creator><creator>Akhaveissy, Amir H.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-1112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Direct displacement-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced RC frames</title><author>Farahani, Sina ; Akhaveissy, Amir H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-a0440f3c2bdda9b5acde9acac2671ac957eab235541d4f9768aa0ba8da3289f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bracing</topic><topic>Buckling</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete structures</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Degrees of freedom</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Frames</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcement (structures)</topic><topic>Robust design</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farahani, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhaveissy, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farahani, Sina</au><au>Akhaveissy, Amir H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct displacement-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced RC frames</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1767</spage><epage>1839</epage><pages>1767-1839</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>The experiences of past earthquakes show that the moment-resisting reinforced concrete structures suffered damage due to the inherent brittle behaviors of concrete and lack of structural stiffness. The configuration of buckling restrained brace (BRB) in RC frame is widely increased for the development of the reinforced concrete buckling‐restrained braced (RC-BRB) dual system since the implementation of BRBs can significantly improve the dissipative capacity and lateral stiffness of the main reinforced concrete frames. On the other hand, the structural damage amount is strongly related to the induced displacements and deformations during an earthquake. Therefore, the robust design method must take into account the displacement as the main designing parameter to control the damage of the structures. To this end, researchers have proposed the direct displacement-based design (DDBD) method, which employs displacement as a main designing criterion throughout the design process. In this study, a DDBD method for dual RC-BRB frames is developed by considering the ultimate capacity of BRB elements. New yield displacement and stiffness expressions are proposed to determine the characteristics of the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system. The developed method is evaluated by designing twelve RC-BRB frames corresponding to different storey numbers and two types of BRB configurations. The Numerical model is developed and validated using available experimental data to be used in the nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA). In order to gauge the performance of the developed DDBD method, the seismic behavior of designed frames subjected to 20 real ground motions is investigated through NTHA procedure. In addition, the expressions for the design displacement profile of the RC-BRB frames are provided as a function of relative height using the average maximum displacements calculated from NTHA outputs. The developed design displacement profile leads to significant improvements in the coefficient of determination, R 2 , which is increased from 0.69 for low-rise to 0.98 for high-rise frames. The results indicate that the RC-BRB frames designed by the developed DDBD method can successfully achieve the desired performance objectives. Furthermore, the comparison between the estimated results and the corresponding ones obtained from NTHA indicates that the proposed displacement profile expressions can be found to be efficient and effective for estimating the displacements of the RC-BRB dual frames.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-021-01290-y</doi><tpages>73</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-1112</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2022-02, Vol.20 (3), p.1767-1839
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2626465138
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Bracing
Buckling
Civil Engineering
Concrete
Concrete structures
Configurations
Deformation
Degrees of freedom
Design
Displacement
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquake damage
Earthquakes
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Frames
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Ground motion
Hydrogeology
Mathematical models
Numerical models
Original Article
Reinforced concrete
Reinforcement (structures)
Robust design
Seismic activity
Seismic design
Seismic response
Stiffness
Structural damage
Structural Geology
title Direct displacement-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced RC frames
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T20%3A02%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20displacement-based%20seismic%20design%20of%20buckling-restrained%20braced%20RC%20frames&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Farahani,%20Sina&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1767&rft.epage=1839&rft.pages=1767-1839&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-021-01290-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2626465138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626465138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true