Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire

Parenting styles have been shown to have direct and indirect influences on child, adolescent, and adult psychosocial outcomes. The Parents as Social Context Questionnaire assesses how well an individual’s parenting style provides for their child’s psychological needs on six unipolar subscales: warmt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of child and family studies 2022-02, Vol.31 (2), p.507-517
Hauptverfasser: Lang, Amy C., Ankney, Rachel L., Berlin, Kristoffer S., Davies, W. Hobart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 517
container_issue 2
container_start_page 507
container_title Journal of child and family studies
container_volume 31
creator Lang, Amy C.
Ankney, Rachel L.
Berlin, Kristoffer S.
Davies, W. Hobart
description Parenting styles have been shown to have direct and indirect influences on child, adolescent, and adult psychosocial outcomes. The Parents as Social Context Questionnaire assesses how well an individual’s parenting style provides for their child’s psychological needs on six unipolar subscales: warmth, rejection, structure, chaos, autonomy, support, and coercion. The aim of the present study was to increase the clinical and research utility of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire by: (1) establishing a short form; (2) evaluating the fit of the established short form with the unipolar, six dimensional and the bipolar, three-dimensional frameworks of parenting styles; and (3) assessing the reliability and validity of the established short form. Three-hundred and fifty-one parents of a child between the ages of 1 and 12 years were recruited by university students in the United States and completed the current study as part of a larger online survey. First, the number of items per latent factor in the 30-item Parents as Social Context Questionnaire was reduced. A unipolar, six-dimensional structure with positive and negative higher-order factors demonstrated good fit, while a bipolar, three-dimensional structure did not. Results demonstrated adequate to good internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity. The current study produced preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar, six-dimensional short form of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire (i.e., PASCQ-18), which has the potential to allow for more widespread assessment of parenting styles in clinical and research settings by decreasing patient and participant burden and promoting a higher response rate. Highlights Parenting styles impact child outcomes and should be more regularly assessed in clinical and research settings. Shortening measures of parenting styles would decrease patient/participant burden and promote a higher response rate. Results provide preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar six-dimensional Parents as Social Context Questionnaire.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10826-021-02177-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2625412698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2625412698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-1d32e9a833b089107dc8378e1460d778bb3e48571023326e1a8fc12162f5509c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gsMRvOdhI7IyoUKlUCVGA1buLQVElcbBeFf49DkNgYTnfD-97dPYTOKVxSAHHlKUiWEWB0KCFIf4AmNBWcMJnwwzhDxggFlhyjE--3AJBLlk_Q2435NI3dtaYLWHclftVNXepQ2w7bClNJFsG0eLWxLuC5dS2urMNhY_CjdpHxWHu8skWtGzyzXTB9wE974weDTtfOnKKjSjfenP32KXqZ3z7P7sny4W4xu16SggkIhJacmVxLztcgcwqiLCQX0tAkg1IIuV5zk8hUxBc4Z5mhWlYFZTRjVZpCXvApuhh9d85-DAeord27Lq5ULGNpQlmWy6hio6pw1ntnKrVzdavdl6KghiTVmKSKKaqfJFUfIT5CPoq7d-P-rP-hvgHrGHVF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625412698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Lang, Amy C. ; Ankney, Rachel L. ; Berlin, Kristoffer S. ; Davies, W. Hobart</creator><creatorcontrib>Lang, Amy C. ; Ankney, Rachel L. ; Berlin, Kristoffer S. ; Davies, W. Hobart</creatorcontrib><description>Parenting styles have been shown to have direct and indirect influences on child, adolescent, and adult psychosocial outcomes. The Parents as Social Context Questionnaire assesses how well an individual’s parenting style provides for their child’s psychological needs on six unipolar subscales: warmth, rejection, structure, chaos, autonomy, support, and coercion. The aim of the present study was to increase the clinical and research utility of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire by: (1) establishing a short form; (2) evaluating the fit of the established short form with the unipolar, six dimensional and the bipolar, three-dimensional frameworks of parenting styles; and (3) assessing the reliability and validity of the established short form. Three-hundred and fifty-one parents of a child between the ages of 1 and 12 years were recruited by university students in the United States and completed the current study as part of a larger online survey. First, the number of items per latent factor in the 30-item Parents as Social Context Questionnaire was reduced. A unipolar, six-dimensional structure with positive and negative higher-order factors demonstrated good fit, while a bipolar, three-dimensional structure did not. Results demonstrated adequate to good internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity. The current study produced preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar, six-dimensional short form of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire (i.e., PASCQ-18), which has the potential to allow for more widespread assessment of parenting styles in clinical and research settings by decreasing patient and participant burden and promoting a higher response rate. Highlights Parenting styles impact child outcomes and should be more regularly assessed in clinical and research settings. Shortening measures of parenting styles would decrease patient/participant burden and promote a higher response rate. Results provide preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar six-dimensional Parents as Social Context Questionnaire.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-1024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10826-021-02177-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Bipolar disorder ; Child and School Psychology ; Child Rearing ; Children ; Clinical assessment ; Clinical research ; Coercion ; College students ; Convergent validity ; Online Surveys ; Original Paper ; Parenting style ; Parenting Styles ; Parents ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Predictive Validity ; Psychological needs ; Psychology ; Psychosocial factors ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Response rates ; Response Rates (Questionnaires) ; Social environment ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of child and family studies, 2022-02, Vol.31 (2), p.507-517</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-1d32e9a833b089107dc8378e1460d778bb3e48571023326e1a8fc12162f5509c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1905-8013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10826-021-02177-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10826-021-02177-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27924,27925,30999,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lang, Amy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ankney, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berlin, Kristoffer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, W. Hobart</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire</title><title>Journal of child and family studies</title><addtitle>J Child Fam Stud</addtitle><description>Parenting styles have been shown to have direct and indirect influences on child, adolescent, and adult psychosocial outcomes. The Parents as Social Context Questionnaire assesses how well an individual’s parenting style provides for their child’s psychological needs on six unipolar subscales: warmth, rejection, structure, chaos, autonomy, support, and coercion. The aim of the present study was to increase the clinical and research utility of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire by: (1) establishing a short form; (2) evaluating the fit of the established short form with the unipolar, six dimensional and the bipolar, three-dimensional frameworks of parenting styles; and (3) assessing the reliability and validity of the established short form. Three-hundred and fifty-one parents of a child between the ages of 1 and 12 years were recruited by university students in the United States and completed the current study as part of a larger online survey. First, the number of items per latent factor in the 30-item Parents as Social Context Questionnaire was reduced. A unipolar, six-dimensional structure with positive and negative higher-order factors demonstrated good fit, while a bipolar, three-dimensional structure did not. Results demonstrated adequate to good internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity. The current study produced preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar, six-dimensional short form of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire (i.e., PASCQ-18), which has the potential to allow for more widespread assessment of parenting styles in clinical and research settings by decreasing patient and participant burden and promoting a higher response rate. Highlights Parenting styles impact child outcomes and should be more regularly assessed in clinical and research settings. Shortening measures of parenting styles would decrease patient/participant burden and promote a higher response rate. Results provide preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar six-dimensional Parents as Social Context Questionnaire.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parenting style</subject><subject>Parenting Styles</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Predictive Validity</subject><subject>Psychological needs</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</subject><subject>Social environment</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1062-1024</issn><issn>1573-2843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwB5gsMRvOdhI7IyoUKlUCVGA1buLQVElcbBeFf49DkNgYTnfD-97dPYTOKVxSAHHlKUiWEWB0KCFIf4AmNBWcMJnwwzhDxggFlhyjE--3AJBLlk_Q2435NI3dtaYLWHclftVNXepQ2w7bClNJFsG0eLWxLuC5dS2urMNhY_CjdpHxWHu8skWtGzyzXTB9wE974weDTtfOnKKjSjfenP32KXqZ3z7P7sny4W4xu16SggkIhJacmVxLztcgcwqiLCQX0tAkg1IIuV5zk8hUxBc4Z5mhWlYFZTRjVZpCXvApuhh9d85-DAeord27Lq5ULGNpQlmWy6hio6pw1ntnKrVzdavdl6KghiTVmKSKKaqfJFUfIT5CPoq7d-P-rP-hvgHrGHVF</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Lang, Amy C.</creator><creator>Ankney, Rachel L.</creator><creator>Berlin, Kristoffer S.</creator><creator>Davies, W. Hobart</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-8013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire</title><author>Lang, Amy C. ; Ankney, Rachel L. ; Berlin, Kristoffer S. ; Davies, W. Hobart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-1d32e9a833b089107dc8378e1460d778bb3e48571023326e1a8fc12162f5509c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parenting style</topic><topic>Parenting Styles</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Predictive Validity</topic><topic>Psychological needs</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</topic><topic>Social environment</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lang, Amy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ankney, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berlin, Kristoffer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, W. Hobart</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lang, Amy C.</au><au>Ankney, Rachel L.</au><au>Berlin, Kristoffer S.</au><au>Davies, W. Hobart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle><stitle>J Child Fam Stud</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>507-517</pages><issn>1062-1024</issn><eissn>1573-2843</eissn><abstract>Parenting styles have been shown to have direct and indirect influences on child, adolescent, and adult psychosocial outcomes. The Parents as Social Context Questionnaire assesses how well an individual’s parenting style provides for their child’s psychological needs on six unipolar subscales: warmth, rejection, structure, chaos, autonomy, support, and coercion. The aim of the present study was to increase the clinical and research utility of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire by: (1) establishing a short form; (2) evaluating the fit of the established short form with the unipolar, six dimensional and the bipolar, three-dimensional frameworks of parenting styles; and (3) assessing the reliability and validity of the established short form. Three-hundred and fifty-one parents of a child between the ages of 1 and 12 years were recruited by university students in the United States and completed the current study as part of a larger online survey. First, the number of items per latent factor in the 30-item Parents as Social Context Questionnaire was reduced. A unipolar, six-dimensional structure with positive and negative higher-order factors demonstrated good fit, while a bipolar, three-dimensional structure did not. Results demonstrated adequate to good internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity. The current study produced preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar, six-dimensional short form of the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire (i.e., PASCQ-18), which has the potential to allow for more widespread assessment of parenting styles in clinical and research settings by decreasing patient and participant burden and promoting a higher response rate. Highlights Parenting styles impact child outcomes and should be more regularly assessed in clinical and research settings. Shortening measures of parenting styles would decrease patient/participant burden and promote a higher response rate. Results provide preliminary support for an 18-item, unipolar six-dimensional Parents as Social Context Questionnaire.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10826-021-02177-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-8013</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-1024
ispartof Journal of child and family studies, 2022-02, Vol.31 (2), p.507-517
issn 1062-1024
1573-2843
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2625412698
source SpringerNature Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source
subjects Autonomy
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Bipolar disorder
Child and School Psychology
Child Rearing
Children
Clinical assessment
Clinical research
Coercion
College students
Convergent validity
Online Surveys
Original Paper
Parenting style
Parenting Styles
Parents
Parents & parenting
Predictive Validity
Psychological needs
Psychology
Psychosocial factors
Questionnaires
Reliability
Response rates
Response Rates (Questionnaires)
Social environment
Social Sciences
Sociology
Validity
title Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%2018-Item%20Short%20Form%20for%20the%20Parents%20as%20Social%20Context%20Questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20and%20family%20studies&rft.au=Lang,%20Amy%20C.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=507-517&rft.issn=1062-1024&rft.eissn=1573-2843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10826-021-02177-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2625412698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625412698&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true