Multivariate regression and genetic programming for prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting
In bench blasting, backbreak is the unwanted result that causes instability to the highwall and can lead to safety hazards. Hence, it is utmost necessary to minimize the generation of backbreak to improve mine’s safety. It has always been difficult to predict the backbreak because of various paramet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neural computing & applications 2022-02, Vol.34 (3), p.2103-2114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2114 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2103 |
container_title | Neural computing & applications |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Sharma, Mukul Agrawal, Hemant Choudhary, B. S. |
description | In bench blasting, backbreak is the unwanted result that causes instability to the highwall and can lead to safety hazards. Hence, it is utmost necessary to minimize the generation of backbreak to improve mine’s safety. It has always been difficult to predict the backbreak because of various parameters involved, i.e. blast design, explosive properties, rock mass, etc. In this study, multivariate regression analysis (MVRA) and genetic programming (GP) techniques were performed on 70 blast data sets of previously published papers. Both the models have been developed and tested with the same mine data set. For validation of the models, a total of 14 trial blasts have been conducted in Indian coal mines with different geological strata and other parameters. The values of R
2
, RMSE, MAPE and prediction level at 25% and 90% were computed for GP and MVRA techniques. Also, the GP model is compared with the other state-of-the-art techniques. It has been found that the level of prediction for validation data set at 25% using GP is 78.57% and for MVRA is 21.42%. The mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE) value for GP and MVRA is 0.18 and 0.42, respectively. The results show that the GP is a more efficient tool for prediction of backbreak in comparison with MVRA. On performing sensitivity analysis, it has been found that stemming length and powder factor are the most influencing parameters to backbreak. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00521-021-06553-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2625411652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2625411652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f5cfe0f8d523719f9d76670e8523ce02bea4d086e5b8bcc1cae3613134d3037b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoHPAU8V1-aJm2PsvgFK170HNP0pWQ_2ppkhf33plTw5mF4DG9m3mMIuWZwywDKuwAgcpbBBCkEz44nZMEKzjMOojolC6iLaVXwc3IRwgYAClmJBfl8Peyi-9be6YjUY-cxBDf0VPct7bDH6Awd_dB5vd-7vqN28Ilj60ycZIOljTbbxqPeUpf4iH02ukibnQ4xGS7JmdW7gFe_c0k-Hh_eV8_Z-u3pZXW_zgxndcysMBbBVq3IeclqW7ellCVglbhByBvURQuVRNFUjTHMaOSSccaLlgMvG74kN3NuevbrgCGqzXDwfTqpcpmLgjGZopYkn1XGDyF4tGr0bq_9UTFQU5NqblLBhKlJdUwmPptCEvcd-r_of1w_B_B4Ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625411652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multivariate regression and genetic programming for prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Sharma, Mukul ; Agrawal, Hemant ; Choudhary, B. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mukul ; Agrawal, Hemant ; Choudhary, B. S.</creatorcontrib><description>In bench blasting, backbreak is the unwanted result that causes instability to the highwall and can lead to safety hazards. Hence, it is utmost necessary to minimize the generation of backbreak to improve mine’s safety. It has always been difficult to predict the backbreak because of various parameters involved, i.e. blast design, explosive properties, rock mass, etc. In this study, multivariate regression analysis (MVRA) and genetic programming (GP) techniques were performed on 70 blast data sets of previously published papers. Both the models have been developed and tested with the same mine data set. For validation of the models, a total of 14 trial blasts have been conducted in Indian coal mines with different geological strata and other parameters. The values of R
2
, RMSE, MAPE and prediction level at 25% and 90% were computed for GP and MVRA techniques. Also, the GP model is compared with the other state-of-the-art techniques. It has been found that the level of prediction for validation data set at 25% using GP is 78.57% and for MVRA is 21.42%. The mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE) value for GP and MVRA is 0.18 and 0.42, respectively. The results show that the GP is a more efficient tool for prediction of backbreak in comparison with MVRA. On performing sensitivity analysis, it has been found that stemming length and powder factor are the most influencing parameters to backbreak.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06553-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Blasting (explosive) ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics ; Computational Science and Engineering ; Computer Science ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Datasets ; Explosions ; Explosives ; Genetic algorithms ; Image Processing and Computer Vision ; Mathematical functions ; Mathematical models ; Mining engineering ; Multivariate analysis ; Original Article ; Parameters ; Probability and Statistics in Computer Science ; Regression analysis ; Safety ; Sensitivity analysis</subject><ispartof>Neural computing & applications, 2022-02, Vol.34 (3), p.2103-2114</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f5cfe0f8d523719f9d76670e8523ce02bea4d086e5b8bcc1cae3613134d3037b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f5cfe0f8d523719f9d76670e8523ce02bea4d086e5b8bcc1cae3613134d3037b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7482-1720</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00521-021-06553-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00521-021-06553-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mukul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Hemant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, B. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Multivariate regression and genetic programming for prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting</title><title>Neural computing & applications</title><addtitle>Neural Comput & Applic</addtitle><description>In bench blasting, backbreak is the unwanted result that causes instability to the highwall and can lead to safety hazards. Hence, it is utmost necessary to minimize the generation of backbreak to improve mine’s safety. It has always been difficult to predict the backbreak because of various parameters involved, i.e. blast design, explosive properties, rock mass, etc. In this study, multivariate regression analysis (MVRA) and genetic programming (GP) techniques were performed on 70 blast data sets of previously published papers. Both the models have been developed and tested with the same mine data set. For validation of the models, a total of 14 trial blasts have been conducted in Indian coal mines with different geological strata and other parameters. The values of R
2
, RMSE, MAPE and prediction level at 25% and 90% were computed for GP and MVRA techniques. Also, the GP model is compared with the other state-of-the-art techniques. It has been found that the level of prediction for validation data set at 25% using GP is 78.57% and for MVRA is 21.42%. The mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE) value for GP and MVRA is 0.18 and 0.42, respectively. The results show that the GP is a more efficient tool for prediction of backbreak in comparison with MVRA. On performing sensitivity analysis, it has been found that stemming length and powder factor are the most influencing parameters to backbreak.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Blasting (explosive)</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Computational Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Explosives</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Image Processing and Computer Vision</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mining engineering</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><issn>0941-0643</issn><issn>1433-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoHPAU8V1-aJm2PsvgFK170HNP0pWQ_2ppkhf33plTw5mF4DG9m3mMIuWZwywDKuwAgcpbBBCkEz44nZMEKzjMOojolC6iLaVXwc3IRwgYAClmJBfl8Peyi-9be6YjUY-cxBDf0VPct7bDH6Awd_dB5vd-7vqN28Ilj60ycZIOljTbbxqPeUpf4iH02ukibnQ4xGS7JmdW7gFe_c0k-Hh_eV8_Z-u3pZXW_zgxndcysMBbBVq3IeclqW7ellCVglbhByBvURQuVRNFUjTHMaOSSccaLlgMvG74kN3NuevbrgCGqzXDwfTqpcpmLgjGZopYkn1XGDyF4tGr0bq_9UTFQU5NqblLBhKlJdUwmPptCEvcd-r_of1w_B_B4Ug</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Sharma, Mukul</creator><creator>Agrawal, Hemant</creator><creator>Choudhary, B. S.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-1720</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Multivariate regression and genetic programming for prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting</title><author>Sharma, Mukul ; Agrawal, Hemant ; Choudhary, B. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f5cfe0f8d523719f9d76670e8523ce02bea4d086e5b8bcc1cae3613134d3037b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Blasting (explosive)</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Computational Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Explosives</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Image Processing and Computer Vision</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mining engineering</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Mukul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Hemant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, B. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Neural computing & applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Mukul</au><au>Agrawal, Hemant</au><au>Choudhary, B. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multivariate regression and genetic programming for prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting</atitle><jtitle>Neural computing & applications</jtitle><stitle>Neural Comput & Applic</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2103</spage><epage>2114</epage><pages>2103-2114</pages><issn>0941-0643</issn><eissn>1433-3058</eissn><abstract>In bench blasting, backbreak is the unwanted result that causes instability to the highwall and can lead to safety hazards. Hence, it is utmost necessary to minimize the generation of backbreak to improve mine’s safety. It has always been difficult to predict the backbreak because of various parameters involved, i.e. blast design, explosive properties, rock mass, etc. In this study, multivariate regression analysis (MVRA) and genetic programming (GP) techniques were performed on 70 blast data sets of previously published papers. Both the models have been developed and tested with the same mine data set. For validation of the models, a total of 14 trial blasts have been conducted in Indian coal mines with different geological strata and other parameters. The values of R
2
, RMSE, MAPE and prediction level at 25% and 90% were computed for GP and MVRA techniques. Also, the GP model is compared with the other state-of-the-art techniques. It has been found that the level of prediction for validation data set at 25% using GP is 78.57% and for MVRA is 21.42%. The mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE) value for GP and MVRA is 0.18 and 0.42, respectively. The results show that the GP is a more efficient tool for prediction of backbreak in comparison with MVRA. On performing sensitivity analysis, it has been found that stemming length and powder factor are the most influencing parameters to backbreak.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00521-021-06553-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-1720</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-0643 |
ispartof | Neural computing & applications, 2022-02, Vol.34 (3), p.2103-2114 |
issn | 0941-0643 1433-3058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2625411652 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Blasting (explosive) Coal mines Coal mining Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Computational Science and Engineering Computer Science Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Datasets Explosions Explosives Genetic algorithms Image Processing and Computer Vision Mathematical functions Mathematical models Mining engineering Multivariate analysis Original Article Parameters Probability and Statistics in Computer Science Regression analysis Safety Sensitivity analysis |
title | Multivariate regression and genetic programming for prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A07%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multivariate%20regression%20and%20genetic%20programming%20for%20prediction%20of%20backbreak%20in%20open-pit%20blasting&rft.jtitle=Neural%20computing%20&%20applications&rft.au=Sharma,%20Mukul&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2103&rft.epage=2114&rft.pages=2103-2114&rft.issn=0941-0643&rft.eissn=1433-3058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00521-021-06553-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2625411652%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625411652&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |