Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of Collins cycle
Many large scientific projects are emerging worldwide with the development of high energy physics nowadays. The indispensable subsystem, helium cryo-plants for such projects require extremely high energy consumption and total annual cost (TAC). In order to reduce energy consumption and TAC, multi-ob...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2022-01, Vol.239, p.122269, Article 122269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 122269 |
container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
container_volume | 239 |
creator | Chen, Shuhang Liu, Dongli Li, Sizhuo Gan, Zhihua Qiu, Min |
description | Many large scientific projects are emerging worldwide with the development of high energy physics nowadays. The indispensable subsystem, helium cryo-plants for such projects require extremely high energy consumption and total annual cost (TAC). In order to reduce energy consumption and TAC, multi-objective thermo-economic optimization that adopted non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) for helium cryo-plants is proposed in this work. As a typical helium liquefaction cycle, Collins cycle is selected as the optimization object. Both the exergetic efficiency (ηEx) and the TAC are set as objective parameters. The decision parameters, which include discharge pressure of compressor, flow fraction of expanders and effectiveness of heat exchangers, are optimized simultaneously. Linear programming technology of multidimensional analysis preference (LINMAP) is utilized as an example to select the optimal solution from the multi-objective optimization results. Compared to the maximum ηEx result, the LINMAP result reduces the TAC by 23.95% at the cost of 9.03% reduction in ηEx. In the proposed approach, eight decision parameters can be optimized simultaneously and the designed cryo-plant considers both economic and thermodynamic criteria, which is feasible for practical engineering project. Besides, alternative solution under limited investment situation is provided.
•A multi-objective optimization method for Collins cycle is presented.•More reasonable solutions for real engineering application are found.•Annual cost distribution is analyzed.•Optimizations of ηEx, Csl and PCsl are proved to be equivalent.•Optimization of y is not equivalent with ηEx. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122269 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2624987158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544221025172</els_id><sourcerecordid>2624987158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9d4f425a49075d94b76ed584f474ca4bdfcf358c52836505ccd3c007d781c1c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcF1615NulCQQZfMOJG16Fzc6spbTMmHWH89Xaoa1cHLuecy_kIuWS0YJSV122BA8aPfcEpZwXjnJfVEVkwo0VeaqOOyYKKkuZKSn5KzlJqKaXKVNWC3LzsutHnYdMijP4bs_ETYx9yhDCE3kMWtqPv_U89-jBkoclWoev8kDLYQ4fn5KSpu4QXf7ok7w_3b6unfP36-Ly6W-cghBzzyslGclXLimrlKrnRJTplpqOWUMuNa6ARyoDiRpSKKgAngFLttGHAgIsluZp7tzF87TCNtg27OEwvLS-5rIxmykwuObsghpQiNnYbfV_HvWXUHkDZ1s6g7AGUnUFNsds5htOCb4_RJvA4ADofJyjWBf9_wS-EmnLj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624987158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of Collins cycle</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chen, Shuhang ; Liu, Dongli ; Li, Sizhuo ; Gan, Zhihua ; Qiu, Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuhang ; Liu, Dongli ; Li, Sizhuo ; Gan, Zhihua ; Qiu, Min</creatorcontrib><description>Many large scientific projects are emerging worldwide with the development of high energy physics nowadays. The indispensable subsystem, helium cryo-plants for such projects require extremely high energy consumption and total annual cost (TAC). In order to reduce energy consumption and TAC, multi-objective thermo-economic optimization that adopted non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) for helium cryo-plants is proposed in this work. As a typical helium liquefaction cycle, Collins cycle is selected as the optimization object. Both the exergetic efficiency (ηEx) and the TAC are set as objective parameters. The decision parameters, which include discharge pressure of compressor, flow fraction of expanders and effectiveness of heat exchangers, are optimized simultaneously. Linear programming technology of multidimensional analysis preference (LINMAP) is utilized as an example to select the optimal solution from the multi-objective optimization results. Compared to the maximum ηEx result, the LINMAP result reduces the TAC by 23.95% at the cost of 9.03% reduction in ηEx. In the proposed approach, eight decision parameters can be optimized simultaneously and the designed cryo-plant considers both economic and thermodynamic criteria, which is feasible for practical engineering project. Besides, alternative solution under limited investment situation is provided.
•A multi-objective optimization method for Collins cycle is presented.•More reasonable solutions for real engineering application are found.•Annual cost distribution is analyzed.•Optimizations of ηEx, Csl and PCsl are proved to be equivalent.•Optimization of y is not equivalent with ηEx.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Collins cycle ; Economics ; Energy consumption ; Exergetic efficiency ; Exergy ; Expanders ; Genetic algorithms ; Heat exchangers ; Helium ; Helium cryo-plant ; Linear programming ; Liquefaction ; Multi-objective optimization ; Multiple objective analysis ; Optimization ; Parameters ; Project feasibility ; Sorting algorithms ; Subsystems ; Total annual cost</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2022-01, Vol.239, p.122269, Article 122269</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 15, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9d4f425a49075d94b76ed584f474ca4bdfcf358c52836505ccd3c007d781c1c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9d4f425a49075d94b76ed584f474ca4bdfcf358c52836505ccd3c007d781c1c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221025172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Dongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Sizhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Zhihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Min</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of Collins cycle</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Many large scientific projects are emerging worldwide with the development of high energy physics nowadays. The indispensable subsystem, helium cryo-plants for such projects require extremely high energy consumption and total annual cost (TAC). In order to reduce energy consumption and TAC, multi-objective thermo-economic optimization that adopted non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) for helium cryo-plants is proposed in this work. As a typical helium liquefaction cycle, Collins cycle is selected as the optimization object. Both the exergetic efficiency (ηEx) and the TAC are set as objective parameters. The decision parameters, which include discharge pressure of compressor, flow fraction of expanders and effectiveness of heat exchangers, are optimized simultaneously. Linear programming technology of multidimensional analysis preference (LINMAP) is utilized as an example to select the optimal solution from the multi-objective optimization results. Compared to the maximum ηEx result, the LINMAP result reduces the TAC by 23.95% at the cost of 9.03% reduction in ηEx. In the proposed approach, eight decision parameters can be optimized simultaneously and the designed cryo-plant considers both economic and thermodynamic criteria, which is feasible for practical engineering project. Besides, alternative solution under limited investment situation is provided.
•A multi-objective optimization method for Collins cycle is presented.•More reasonable solutions for real engineering application are found.•Annual cost distribution is analyzed.•Optimizations of ηEx, Csl and PCsl are proved to be equivalent.•Optimization of y is not equivalent with ηEx.</description><subject>Collins cycle</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Exergetic efficiency</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Expanders</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Heat exchangers</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Helium cryo-plant</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>Multi-objective optimization</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Project feasibility</subject><subject>Sorting algorithms</subject><subject>Subsystems</subject><subject>Total annual cost</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxcF1615NulCQQZfMOJG16Fzc6spbTMmHWH89Xaoa1cHLuecy_kIuWS0YJSV122BA8aPfcEpZwXjnJfVEVkwo0VeaqOOyYKKkuZKSn5KzlJqKaXKVNWC3LzsutHnYdMijP4bs_ETYx9yhDCE3kMWtqPv_U89-jBkoclWoev8kDLYQ4fn5KSpu4QXf7ok7w_3b6unfP36-Ly6W-cghBzzyslGclXLimrlKrnRJTplpqOWUMuNa6ARyoDiRpSKKgAngFLttGHAgIsluZp7tzF87TCNtg27OEwvLS-5rIxmykwuObsghpQiNnYbfV_HvWXUHkDZ1s6g7AGUnUFNsds5htOCb4_RJvA4ADofJyjWBf9_wS-EmnLj</recordid><startdate>20220115</startdate><enddate>20220115</enddate><creator>Chen, Shuhang</creator><creator>Liu, Dongli</creator><creator>Li, Sizhuo</creator><creator>Gan, Zhihua</creator><creator>Qiu, Min</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220115</creationdate><title>Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of Collins cycle</title><author>Chen, Shuhang ; Liu, Dongli ; Li, Sizhuo ; Gan, Zhihua ; Qiu, Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9d4f425a49075d94b76ed584f474ca4bdfcf358c52836505ccd3c007d781c1c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Collins cycle</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Exergetic efficiency</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Expanders</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Heat exchangers</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Helium cryo-plant</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>Multi-objective optimization</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Project feasibility</topic><topic>Sorting algorithms</topic><topic>Subsystems</topic><topic>Total annual cost</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Dongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Sizhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Zhihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Min</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Shuhang</au><au>Liu, Dongli</au><au>Li, Sizhuo</au><au>Gan, Zhihua</au><au>Qiu, Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of Collins cycle</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2022-01-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>239</volume><spage>122269</spage><pages>122269-</pages><artnum>122269</artnum><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>Many large scientific projects are emerging worldwide with the development of high energy physics nowadays. The indispensable subsystem, helium cryo-plants for such projects require extremely high energy consumption and total annual cost (TAC). In order to reduce energy consumption and TAC, multi-objective thermo-economic optimization that adopted non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) for helium cryo-plants is proposed in this work. As a typical helium liquefaction cycle, Collins cycle is selected as the optimization object. Both the exergetic efficiency (ηEx) and the TAC are set as objective parameters. The decision parameters, which include discharge pressure of compressor, flow fraction of expanders and effectiveness of heat exchangers, are optimized simultaneously. Linear programming technology of multidimensional analysis preference (LINMAP) is utilized as an example to select the optimal solution from the multi-objective optimization results. Compared to the maximum ηEx result, the LINMAP result reduces the TAC by 23.95% at the cost of 9.03% reduction in ηEx. In the proposed approach, eight decision parameters can be optimized simultaneously and the designed cryo-plant considers both economic and thermodynamic criteria, which is feasible for practical engineering project. Besides, alternative solution under limited investment situation is provided.
•A multi-objective optimization method for Collins cycle is presented.•More reasonable solutions for real engineering application are found.•Annual cost distribution is analyzed.•Optimizations of ηEx, Csl and PCsl are proved to be equivalent.•Optimization of y is not equivalent with ηEx.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2021.122269</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2022-01, Vol.239, p.122269, Article 122269 |
issn | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2624987158 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Collins cycle Economics Energy consumption Exergetic efficiency Exergy Expanders Genetic algorithms Heat exchangers Helium Helium cryo-plant Linear programming Liquefaction Multi-objective optimization Multiple objective analysis Optimization Parameters Project feasibility Sorting algorithms Subsystems Total annual cost |
title | Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of Collins cycle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-objective%20thermo-economic%20optimization%20of%20Collins%20cycle&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Chen,%20Shuhang&rft.date=2022-01-15&rft.volume=239&rft.spage=122269&rft.pages=122269-&rft.artnum=122269&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624987158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624987158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544221025172&rfr_iscdi=true |