Restudying With the Quiz in Hand: When Correct-Answer Feedback is No Better Than Minimal Feedback
Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' metacognitive accuracy, restudy behaviors, and final test performance. Researchers have not examined, however, the effect of quiz feedback and the availability of the quiz during restudy on these indirect effects of quizzing. We examined three types of q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied research in memory and cognition 2021-06, Vol.10 (2), p.278-288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 278 |
container_title | Journal of applied research in memory and cognition |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Anderson, Francis T. McDaniel, Mark A. |
description | Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' metacognitive accuracy, restudy behaviors, and final test performance. Researchers have not examined, however, the effect of quiz feedback and the availability of the quiz during restudy on these indirect effects of quizzing. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer, right/wrong, and minimal. In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during restudy, participants in all three conditions followed a discrepancy reduction study policy. There were no differences in final test performance in Experiment 1, implying that the degree of feedback elaboration did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing and restudy. In Experiment 2, when we retracted access to the quiz and feedback during restudy, restudy was impaired, and the minimal condition performed worse on the final test than the correct-answer condition. It appears that correct-answer feedback is critical if quizzes are unavailable; if they are available, the type of feedback has much less impact.
General Audience Summary
Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' later exam performance by directly strengthening one's memory for the information, and is often referred to as retrieval practice. Quizzing can also benefit students' understanding of what they do and do not know, especially when they are given feedback regarding which answers are correct or incorrect, and thereby increase the effectiveness of students' restudying. However, researchers have not examined how the nature of the quiz feedback and whether the presence of the quiz during restudy might affect restudy and performance on a final test. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer (i.e., if a question is incorrect, participants are given the correct answer), right/wrong (i.e., participants are only told whether a question is correct or incorrect), or minimal (i.e., participants are not given any feedback about individual questions, but are instead only given a score on the quiz, e.g., 34/40). In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during a restudy period, participants in all three conditions were successfully able to focus their restudy on items answered incorrectly on the previous quiz. There were no differences in final test performance among conditions in Experiment 1, implying that the type of feedback did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing. In Experiment 2, when we took away the quiz and feedback during the restudy period, rest |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.10.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2624965851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2211368120300991</els_id><sourcerecordid>2624965851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-5be24a1a8a0d6af9f152a117d0a01a2095fb2d3004de781c1cc386ea1a4cb7253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUXERBUf-Bh4BH2ZpkP-tBqMVawQ-USr2F1-Stzdpma5JV6q83y4pX3yWPYWZeZqLohNEBoyw_rwc12DXIAae8gwaUpjvRAeeMxUk-fN3920u2Hx07V9MwOWUBPYjgGZ1v1VabNzLXfkn8EslTq7-JNmQKRl2Q-RINGTfWovTxyLgvtGSCqBYg34l25KEhV-h9QGdLMOReG72G1R_lKNqrYOXw-Pc9jF4m17PxNL57vLkdj-5iSArq42yBPAUGJVCVQzWsWMaBsUJRoAw4HWbVgqskhFNYlEwyKZMyx6BI5aLgWXIYnfa-G9t8tCGVqJvWmnBS8JynwzwrMxZYac-StnHOYiU2NnzXbgWjoutT1KLvU3R9dmg4GWSXvQxDgk-NVjip0UhUuqtFqEb_Z3DWG8AGxMZtJViv5QqdbEOxxotOELhc8KJMfgCeX44f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624965851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Restudying With the Quiz in Hand: When Correct-Answer Feedback is No Better Than Minimal Feedback</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Anderson, Francis T. ; McDaniel, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Francis T. ; McDaniel, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' metacognitive accuracy, restudy behaviors, and final test performance. Researchers have not examined, however, the effect of quiz feedback and the availability of the quiz during restudy on these indirect effects of quizzing. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer, right/wrong, and minimal. In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during restudy, participants in all three conditions followed a discrepancy reduction study policy. There were no differences in final test performance in Experiment 1, implying that the degree of feedback elaboration did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing and restudy. In Experiment 2, when we retracted access to the quiz and feedback during restudy, restudy was impaired, and the minimal condition performed worse on the final test than the correct-answer condition. It appears that correct-answer feedback is critical if quizzes are unavailable; if they are available, the type of feedback has much less impact.
General Audience Summary
Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' later exam performance by directly strengthening one's memory for the information, and is often referred to as retrieval practice. Quizzing can also benefit students' understanding of what they do and do not know, especially when they are given feedback regarding which answers are correct or incorrect, and thereby increase the effectiveness of students' restudying. However, researchers have not examined how the nature of the quiz feedback and whether the presence of the quiz during restudy might affect restudy and performance on a final test. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer (i.e., if a question is incorrect, participants are given the correct answer), right/wrong (i.e., participants are only told whether a question is correct or incorrect), or minimal (i.e., participants are not given any feedback about individual questions, but are instead only given a score on the quiz, e.g., 34/40). In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during a restudy period, participants in all three conditions were successfully able to focus their restudy on items answered incorrectly on the previous quiz. There were no differences in final test performance among conditions in Experiment 1, implying that the type of feedback did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing. In Experiment 2, when we took away the quiz and feedback during the restudy period, restudy was impaired relative to Experiment 1-participants focused less on previously incorrect quiz items, and the minimal condition performed worse on the final test than the correct-answer condition. The implication for educators is clear: It appears that correct-answer feedback is critical if graded quizzes are unavailable to students when they restudy; if quizzes are returned for use during restudy, the type of feedback has less impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-3681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-369X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.10.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washigton: Elsevier Science</publisher><subject>Discrepancy reduction ; Feedback ; Human ; Metacognition ; Policy Making ; Quiz presence ; Restudy ; Test Performance ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2021-06, Vol.10 (2), p.278-288</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-5be24a1a8a0d6af9f152a117d0a01a2095fb2d3004de781c1cc386ea1a4cb7253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-5be24a1a8a0d6af9f152a117d0a01a2095fb2d3004de781c1cc386ea1a4cb7253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Francis T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Restudying With the Quiz in Hand: When Correct-Answer Feedback is No Better Than Minimal Feedback</title><title>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition</title><description>Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' metacognitive accuracy, restudy behaviors, and final test performance. Researchers have not examined, however, the effect of quiz feedback and the availability of the quiz during restudy on these indirect effects of quizzing. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer, right/wrong, and minimal. In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during restudy, participants in all three conditions followed a discrepancy reduction study policy. There were no differences in final test performance in Experiment 1, implying that the degree of feedback elaboration did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing and restudy. In Experiment 2, when we retracted access to the quiz and feedback during restudy, restudy was impaired, and the minimal condition performed worse on the final test than the correct-answer condition. It appears that correct-answer feedback is critical if quizzes are unavailable; if they are available, the type of feedback has much less impact.
General Audience Summary
Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' later exam performance by directly strengthening one's memory for the information, and is often referred to as retrieval practice. Quizzing can also benefit students' understanding of what they do and do not know, especially when they are given feedback regarding which answers are correct or incorrect, and thereby increase the effectiveness of students' restudying. However, researchers have not examined how the nature of the quiz feedback and whether the presence of the quiz during restudy might affect restudy and performance on a final test. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer (i.e., if a question is incorrect, participants are given the correct answer), right/wrong (i.e., participants are only told whether a question is correct or incorrect), or minimal (i.e., participants are not given any feedback about individual questions, but are instead only given a score on the quiz, e.g., 34/40). In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during a restudy period, participants in all three conditions were successfully able to focus their restudy on items answered incorrectly on the previous quiz. There were no differences in final test performance among conditions in Experiment 1, implying that the type of feedback did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing. In Experiment 2, when we took away the quiz and feedback during the restudy period, restudy was impaired relative to Experiment 1-participants focused less on previously incorrect quiz items, and the minimal condition performed worse on the final test than the correct-answer condition. The implication for educators is clear: It appears that correct-answer feedback is critical if graded quizzes are unavailable to students when they restudy; if quizzes are returned for use during restudy, the type of feedback has less impact.</description><subject>Discrepancy reduction</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Quiz presence</subject><subject>Restudy</subject><subject>Test Performance</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>2211-3681</issn><issn>2211-369X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUXERBUf-Bh4BH2ZpkP-tBqMVawQ-USr2F1-Stzdpma5JV6q83y4pX3yWPYWZeZqLohNEBoyw_rwc12DXIAae8gwaUpjvRAeeMxUk-fN3920u2Hx07V9MwOWUBPYjgGZ1v1VabNzLXfkn8EslTq7-JNmQKRl2Q-RINGTfWovTxyLgvtGSCqBYg34l25KEhV-h9QGdLMOReG72G1R_lKNqrYOXw-Pc9jF4m17PxNL57vLkdj-5iSArq42yBPAUGJVCVQzWsWMaBsUJRoAw4HWbVgqskhFNYlEwyKZMyx6BI5aLgWXIYnfa-G9t8tCGVqJvWmnBS8JynwzwrMxZYac-StnHOYiU2NnzXbgWjoutT1KLvU3R9dmg4GWSXvQxDgk-NVjip0UhUuqtFqEb_Z3DWG8AGxMZtJViv5QqdbEOxxotOELhc8KJMfgCeX44f</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Anderson, Francis T.</creator><creator>McDaniel, Mark A.</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Restudying With the Quiz in Hand: When Correct-Answer Feedback is No Better Than Minimal Feedback</title><author>Anderson, Francis T. ; McDaniel, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-5be24a1a8a0d6af9f152a117d0a01a2095fb2d3004de781c1cc386ea1a4cb7253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Discrepancy reduction</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Quiz presence</topic><topic>Restudy</topic><topic>Test Performance</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Francis T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Francis T.</au><au>McDaniel, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Restudying With the Quiz in Hand: When Correct-Answer Feedback is No Better Than Minimal Feedback</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied research in memory and cognition</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>278-288</pages><issn>2211-3681</issn><eissn>2211-369X</eissn><abstract>Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' metacognitive accuracy, restudy behaviors, and final test performance. Researchers have not examined, however, the effect of quiz feedback and the availability of the quiz during restudy on these indirect effects of quizzing. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer, right/wrong, and minimal. In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during restudy, participants in all three conditions followed a discrepancy reduction study policy. There were no differences in final test performance in Experiment 1, implying that the degree of feedback elaboration did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing and restudy. In Experiment 2, when we retracted access to the quiz and feedback during restudy, restudy was impaired, and the minimal condition performed worse on the final test than the correct-answer condition. It appears that correct-answer feedback is critical if quizzes are unavailable; if they are available, the type of feedback has much less impact.
General Audience Summary
Quizzing (testing) can enhance students' later exam performance by directly strengthening one's memory for the information, and is often referred to as retrieval practice. Quizzing can also benefit students' understanding of what they do and do not know, especially when they are given feedback regarding which answers are correct or incorrect, and thereby increase the effectiveness of students' restudying. However, researchers have not examined how the nature of the quiz feedback and whether the presence of the quiz during restudy might affect restudy and performance on a final test. We examined three types of quiz feedback: correct-answer (i.e., if a question is incorrect, participants are given the correct answer), right/wrong (i.e., participants are only told whether a question is correct or incorrect), or minimal (i.e., participants are not given any feedback about individual questions, but are instead only given a score on the quiz, e.g., 34/40). In Experiment 1, when the quiz and feedback were available during a restudy period, participants in all three conditions were successfully able to focus their restudy on items answered incorrectly on the previous quiz. There were no differences in final test performance among conditions in Experiment 1, implying that the type of feedback did not impact learners' benefit from quizzing. In Experiment 2, when we took away the quiz and feedback during the restudy period, restudy was impaired relative to Experiment 1-participants focused less on previously incorrect quiz items, and the minimal condition performed worse on the final test than the correct-answer condition. The implication for educators is clear: It appears that correct-answer feedback is critical if graded quizzes are unavailable to students when they restudy; if quizzes are returned for use during restudy, the type of feedback has less impact.</abstract><cop>Washigton</cop><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.10.004</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2211-3681 |
ispartof | Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2021-06, Vol.10 (2), p.278-288 |
issn | 2211-3681 2211-369X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2624965851 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Discrepancy reduction Feedback Human Metacognition Policy Making Quiz presence Restudy Test Performance Testing |
title | Restudying With the Quiz in Hand: When Correct-Answer Feedback is No Better Than Minimal Feedback |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A26%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Restudying%20With%20the%20Quiz%20in%20Hand:%20When%20Correct-Answer%20Feedback%20is%20No%20Better%20Than%20Minimal%20Feedback&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20research%20in%20memory%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Anderson,%20Francis%20T.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=278-288&rft.issn=2211-3681&rft.eissn=2211-369X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624965851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624965851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S2211368120300991&rfr_iscdi=true |