The story of two historical textile fragments: Technical analysis and reconstruction of the lost textile pattern
Cultural heritage textile artifacts that have been preserved only in their smaller fragmented remains represent a very interesting and complex matter, very rarely analyzed and studied individually as a separate entity. This case study covers multidisciplinary research conducted on two 18th century s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Textile research journal 2021-12, Vol.91 (23-24), p.2859-2871 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2871 |
---|---|
container_issue | 23-24 |
container_start_page | 2859 |
container_title | Textile research journal |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M Penava, Željko Jemo, Danijela |
description | Cultural heritage textile artifacts that have been preserved only in their smaller fragmented remains represent a very interesting and complex matter, very rarely analyzed and studied individually as a separate entity. This case study covers multidisciplinary research conducted on two 18th century silk fragments with a seemingly identical pattern. Demonstrating the possibilities and challenges which arise when analyzing and interpreting incomplete cultural heritage textile materials, this study can serve as a stimulus for creating a large-scale database of historical fabrics which would allow comparison based on their differences or common characteristics. By applying only non-destructive and micro-analytical methods it has been determined that the fragments were made of the same material and using the same manufacturing techniques. It has been proven that fragments were not part of the same historical fabric, but most likely originated from different parts of the same liturgical vestment. The reverse engineering process applied to preserved fragments has resulted in a detailed technical documentation and a complete reconstruction of the lost original pattern. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00405175211017403 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2624615121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00405175211017403</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2624615121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4d6552ab37cd478362a35fbe56eebcde10c6901ca4711c657e355009b8ec6a943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4pzidfxIuaGKl1SJSzlHjrNpU6VxsF1B_j1Ji-CAOO2uZubTagi5BjYD0PqWMcEkaMkBGGjB0hMyGaZKtBbZKZmMejIazslFCFvGWJbpbEK61QZpiM731FU0fji6qceztqahET9j3SCtvFnvsI3hjq7QbtqDaFrT9KEOw1JSj9a1Ifq9jbVrD6iB27gQfyCdiRF9e0nOKtMEvPqeU_L2-LBaPCfL16eXxf0ysSnwmIhSSclNkWpbCp2liptUVgVKhVjYEoFZNWdgjdAAVkmNqZSMzYsMrTJzkU7JzZHbefe-xxDzrdv74eeQc8WFAgkcBhccXda7EDxWeefrnfF9Diwfi83_FDtkZsdMMGv8pf4f-ALQ_3lz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624615121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The story of two historical textile fragments: Technical analysis and reconstruction of the lost textile pattern</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M ; Penava, Željko ; Jemo, Danijela</creator><creatorcontrib>Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M ; Penava, Željko ; Jemo, Danijela</creatorcontrib><description>Cultural heritage textile artifacts that have been preserved only in their smaller fragmented remains represent a very interesting and complex matter, very rarely analyzed and studied individually as a separate entity. This case study covers multidisciplinary research conducted on two 18th century silk fragments with a seemingly identical pattern. Demonstrating the possibilities and challenges which arise when analyzing and interpreting incomplete cultural heritage textile materials, this study can serve as a stimulus for creating a large-scale database of historical fabrics which would allow comparison based on their differences or common characteristics. By applying only non-destructive and micro-analytical methods it has been determined that the fragments were made of the same material and using the same manufacturing techniques. It has been proven that fragments were not part of the same historical fabric, but most likely originated from different parts of the same liturgical vestment. The reverse engineering process applied to preserved fragments has resulted in a detailed technical documentation and a complete reconstruction of the lost original pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-7748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00405175211017403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cultural heritage ; Cultural resources ; Fragments ; Historic artifacts ; Multidisciplinary research ; Nondestructive testing ; Reconstruction ; Reverse engineering ; Silk ; Technical information</subject><ispartof>Textile research journal, 2021-12, Vol.91 (23-24), p.2859-2871</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4d6552ab37cd478362a35fbe56eebcde10c6901ca4711c657e355009b8ec6a943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4d6552ab37cd478362a35fbe56eebcde10c6901ca4711c657e355009b8ec6a943</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4097-6230 ; 0000-0001-8147-2840</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00405175211017403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00405175211017403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penava, Željko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemo, Danijela</creatorcontrib><title>The story of two historical textile fragments: Technical analysis and reconstruction of the lost textile pattern</title><title>Textile research journal</title><description>Cultural heritage textile artifacts that have been preserved only in their smaller fragmented remains represent a very interesting and complex matter, very rarely analyzed and studied individually as a separate entity. This case study covers multidisciplinary research conducted on two 18th century silk fragments with a seemingly identical pattern. Demonstrating the possibilities and challenges which arise when analyzing and interpreting incomplete cultural heritage textile materials, this study can serve as a stimulus for creating a large-scale database of historical fabrics which would allow comparison based on their differences or common characteristics. By applying only non-destructive and micro-analytical methods it has been determined that the fragments were made of the same material and using the same manufacturing techniques. It has been proven that fragments were not part of the same historical fabric, but most likely originated from different parts of the same liturgical vestment. The reverse engineering process applied to preserved fragments has resulted in a detailed technical documentation and a complete reconstruction of the lost original pattern.</description><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Cultural resources</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Historic artifacts</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary research</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Reverse engineering</subject><subject>Silk</subject><subject>Technical information</subject><issn>0040-5175</issn><issn>1746-7748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4pzidfxIuaGKl1SJSzlHjrNpU6VxsF1B_j1Ji-CAOO2uZubTagi5BjYD0PqWMcEkaMkBGGjB0hMyGaZKtBbZKZmMejIazslFCFvGWJbpbEK61QZpiM731FU0fji6qceztqahET9j3SCtvFnvsI3hjq7QbtqDaFrT9KEOw1JSj9a1Ifq9jbVrD6iB27gQfyCdiRF9e0nOKtMEvPqeU_L2-LBaPCfL16eXxf0ysSnwmIhSSclNkWpbCp2liptUVgVKhVjYEoFZNWdgjdAAVkmNqZSMzYsMrTJzkU7JzZHbefe-xxDzrdv74eeQc8WFAgkcBhccXda7EDxWeefrnfF9Diwfi83_FDtkZsdMMGv8pf4f-ALQ_3lz</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M</creator><creator>Penava, Željko</creator><creator>Jemo, Danijela</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-6230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-2840</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>The story of two historical textile fragments: Technical analysis and reconstruction of the lost textile pattern</title><author>Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M ; Penava, Željko ; Jemo, Danijela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4d6552ab37cd478362a35fbe56eebcde10c6901ca4711c657e355009b8ec6a943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Cultural resources</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Historic artifacts</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary research</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Reverse engineering</topic><topic>Silk</topic><topic>Technical information</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penava, Željko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jemo, Danijela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kodrič Kesovia, Mateo M</au><au>Penava, Željko</au><au>Jemo, Danijela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The story of two historical textile fragments: Technical analysis and reconstruction of the lost textile pattern</atitle><jtitle>Textile research journal</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>23-24</issue><spage>2859</spage><epage>2871</epage><pages>2859-2871</pages><issn>0040-5175</issn><eissn>1746-7748</eissn><abstract>Cultural heritage textile artifacts that have been preserved only in their smaller fragmented remains represent a very interesting and complex matter, very rarely analyzed and studied individually as a separate entity. This case study covers multidisciplinary research conducted on two 18th century silk fragments with a seemingly identical pattern. Demonstrating the possibilities and challenges which arise when analyzing and interpreting incomplete cultural heritage textile materials, this study can serve as a stimulus for creating a large-scale database of historical fabrics which would allow comparison based on their differences or common characteristics. By applying only non-destructive and micro-analytical methods it has been determined that the fragments were made of the same material and using the same manufacturing techniques. It has been proven that fragments were not part of the same historical fabric, but most likely originated from different parts of the same liturgical vestment. The reverse engineering process applied to preserved fragments has resulted in a detailed technical documentation and a complete reconstruction of the lost original pattern.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00405175211017403</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-6230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-2840</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-5175 |
ispartof | Textile research journal, 2021-12, Vol.91 (23-24), p.2859-2871 |
issn | 0040-5175 1746-7748 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2624615121 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Cultural heritage Cultural resources Fragments Historic artifacts Multidisciplinary research Nondestructive testing Reconstruction Reverse engineering Silk Technical information |
title | The story of two historical textile fragments: Technical analysis and reconstruction of the lost textile pattern |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T06%3A27%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20story%20of%20two%20historical%20textile%20fragments:%20Technical%20analysis%20and%20reconstruction%20of%20the%20lost%20textile%20pattern&rft.jtitle=Textile%20research%20journal&rft.au=Kodri%C4%8D%20Kesovia,%20Mateo%20M&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=23-24&rft.spage=2859&rft.epage=2871&rft.pages=2859-2871&rft.issn=0040-5175&rft.eissn=1746-7748&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00405175211017403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624615121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624615121&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00405175211017403&rfr_iscdi=true |