Experimental Assessment of Controlled Rocking Masonry Shear Walls without Post-tensioning

AbstractSeveral research studies have recently evaluated the seismic response of controlled rocking masonry walls (CRMWs) with unbonded post-tensioning (PT) tendons. These studies demonstrated that such walls typically have both low damage and the ability to self-center, thus presenting an enhanced...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2022-04, Vol.148 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Yassin, Ahmed, Ezzeldin, Mohamed, Wiebe, Lydell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 148
creator Yassin, Ahmed
Ezzeldin, Mohamed
Wiebe, Lydell
description AbstractSeveral research studies have recently evaluated the seismic response of controlled rocking masonry walls (CRMWs) with unbonded post-tensioning (PT) tendons. These studies demonstrated that such walls typically have both low damage and the ability to self-center, thus presenting an enhanced seismic response compared to conventional fixed-base shear walls. However, practical difficulties related to PT implementation during construction, coupled with the problem of PT losses that subsequently affect the wall’s self-centering ability, point to an opportunity to develop an alternative approach to control rocking walls. In response, the current study introduces controlled rocking masonry shear walls without PT tendons and with an energy dissipation (ED) device of embedded unbonded axial yielding dog-bone bars, named as ED-CRMWs. Experimental results are presented herein from six half-scale two-story fully grouted ED-CRMWs that were tested under displacement-controlled cyclic loading. All six walls were designed to have the same lateral resistance to facilitate investigating the influence of different design parameters, including toe confinement strategies through steel plates or boundary elements, axial compressive stress levels, ED device locations, and horizontal reinforcement ratios. The experimental results are presented in terms of the failure modes and damage levels, force-displacement response, residual drifts, and ductility capacities. The results show that even with no PT, all ED-CRMWs preserved the intended self-centering behavior with a flag-shaped hysteretic response, having a maximum residual drift ratio of 0.15%, except for one unconfined wall. In addition, the strategy of using end-confined boundary elements produced the most effective performance of the system pertaining to strength degradation, self-centering, and displacement ductility with a drift ratio of 2.35% being reached before strength degradation. In general, all walls exhibited limited and localized damage at the wall toes, thus demonstrating the promising concept of relying on gravity loads and ED devices in CRMWs, without the need for unbonded PT tendons.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003307
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2624131448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2624131448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-a4d47b093e71106f6bc7482780605dce6eb105a4ae855f1a86535298cba2afa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwHyy4wCHFjl8Jt6oqD6kIRIqAk-WkDk0JcfG6gv57ErXAidNqVzOzmg-hY0oGlEh6fjrMRuOzbDqgKWeR4PR5QAhhjKgd1Pu97aIeUYxFKediHx0ALFqREjTpoZfx19L66t02wdR4CGABugW7Eo9cE7yrazvDD654q5pXfGvANX6Ns7k1Hj-Zugb8WYW5WwV87yBEwTZQuabVHqK90tRgj7azjx4vx9PRdTS5u7oZDSeRiaUKkeEzrnKSMqtoW6mUeaF4EquESCJmhZU2p0QYbmwiRElNIgUTcZoUuYlNaSjro5NN7tK7j5WFoBdu5Zv2pY5lzCmjnCet6mKjKrwD8LbUy7a18WtNie5Qat2h1NlUd9h0h01vUbZmuTEbKOxf_I_zf-M38I55bA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624131448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Assessment of Controlled Rocking Masonry Shear Walls without Post-tensioning</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Yassin, Ahmed ; Ezzeldin, Mohamed ; Wiebe, Lydell</creator><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Ahmed ; Ezzeldin, Mohamed ; Wiebe, Lydell</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractSeveral research studies have recently evaluated the seismic response of controlled rocking masonry walls (CRMWs) with unbonded post-tensioning (PT) tendons. These studies demonstrated that such walls typically have both low damage and the ability to self-center, thus presenting an enhanced seismic response compared to conventional fixed-base shear walls. However, practical difficulties related to PT implementation during construction, coupled with the problem of PT losses that subsequently affect the wall’s self-centering ability, point to an opportunity to develop an alternative approach to control rocking walls. In response, the current study introduces controlled rocking masonry shear walls without PT tendons and with an energy dissipation (ED) device of embedded unbonded axial yielding dog-bone bars, named as ED-CRMWs. Experimental results are presented herein from six half-scale two-story fully grouted ED-CRMWs that were tested under displacement-controlled cyclic loading. All six walls were designed to have the same lateral resistance to facilitate investigating the influence of different design parameters, including toe confinement strategies through steel plates or boundary elements, axial compressive stress levels, ED device locations, and horizontal reinforcement ratios. The experimental results are presented in terms of the failure modes and damage levels, force-displacement response, residual drifts, and ductility capacities. The results show that even with no PT, all ED-CRMWs preserved the intended self-centering behavior with a flag-shaped hysteretic response, having a maximum residual drift ratio of 0.15%, except for one unconfined wall. In addition, the strategy of using end-confined boundary elements produced the most effective performance of the system pertaining to strength degradation, self-centering, and displacement ductility with a drift ratio of 2.35% being reached before strength degradation. In general, all walls exhibited limited and localized damage at the wall toes, thus demonstrating the promising concept of relying on gravity loads and ED devices in CRMWs, without the need for unbonded PT tendons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-541X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Axial stress ; Boundary element method ; Compressive properties ; Cyclic loads ; Damage localization ; Degradation ; Design parameters ; Displacement ; Drift ; Ductility ; Earthquake damage ; Energy dissipation ; Failure modes ; Masonry ; Mathematical analysis ; Post-tensioning ; Seismic response ; Shear walls ; Steel plates ; Structural engineering ; Technical Papers ; Tendons ; Vertical loads</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2022-04, Vol.148 (4)</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-a4d47b093e71106f6bc7482780605dce6eb105a4ae855f1a86535298cba2afa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-a4d47b093e71106f6bc7482780605dce6eb105a4ae855f1a86535298cba2afa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9754-0609 ; 0000-0003-4660-9770 ; 0000-0001-6104-1031</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003307$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezzeldin, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Lydell</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Assessment of Controlled Rocking Masonry Shear Walls without Post-tensioning</title><title>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>AbstractSeveral research studies have recently evaluated the seismic response of controlled rocking masonry walls (CRMWs) with unbonded post-tensioning (PT) tendons. These studies demonstrated that such walls typically have both low damage and the ability to self-center, thus presenting an enhanced seismic response compared to conventional fixed-base shear walls. However, practical difficulties related to PT implementation during construction, coupled with the problem of PT losses that subsequently affect the wall’s self-centering ability, point to an opportunity to develop an alternative approach to control rocking walls. In response, the current study introduces controlled rocking masonry shear walls without PT tendons and with an energy dissipation (ED) device of embedded unbonded axial yielding dog-bone bars, named as ED-CRMWs. Experimental results are presented herein from six half-scale two-story fully grouted ED-CRMWs that were tested under displacement-controlled cyclic loading. All six walls were designed to have the same lateral resistance to facilitate investigating the influence of different design parameters, including toe confinement strategies through steel plates or boundary elements, axial compressive stress levels, ED device locations, and horizontal reinforcement ratios. The experimental results are presented in terms of the failure modes and damage levels, force-displacement response, residual drifts, and ductility capacities. The results show that even with no PT, all ED-CRMWs preserved the intended self-centering behavior with a flag-shaped hysteretic response, having a maximum residual drift ratio of 0.15%, except for one unconfined wall. In addition, the strategy of using end-confined boundary elements produced the most effective performance of the system pertaining to strength degradation, self-centering, and displacement ductility with a drift ratio of 2.35% being reached before strength degradation. In general, all walls exhibited limited and localized damage at the wall toes, thus demonstrating the promising concept of relying on gravity loads and ED devices in CRMWs, without the need for unbonded PT tendons.</description><subject>Axial stress</subject><subject>Boundary element method</subject><subject>Compressive properties</subject><subject>Cyclic loads</subject><subject>Damage localization</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Post-tensioning</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Shear walls</subject><subject>Steel plates</subject><subject>Structural engineering</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Vertical loads</subject><issn>0733-9445</issn><issn>1943-541X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwHyy4wCHFjl8Jt6oqD6kIRIqAk-WkDk0JcfG6gv57ErXAidNqVzOzmg-hY0oGlEh6fjrMRuOzbDqgKWeR4PR5QAhhjKgd1Pu97aIeUYxFKediHx0ALFqREjTpoZfx19L66t02wdR4CGABugW7Eo9cE7yrazvDD654q5pXfGvANX6Ns7k1Hj-Zugb8WYW5WwV87yBEwTZQuabVHqK90tRgj7azjx4vx9PRdTS5u7oZDSeRiaUKkeEzrnKSMqtoW6mUeaF4EquESCJmhZU2p0QYbmwiRElNIgUTcZoUuYlNaSjro5NN7tK7j5WFoBdu5Zv2pY5lzCmjnCet6mKjKrwD8LbUy7a18WtNie5Qat2h1NlUd9h0h01vUbZmuTEbKOxf_I_zf-M38I55bA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Yassin, Ahmed</creator><creator>Ezzeldin, Mohamed</creator><creator>Wiebe, Lydell</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-0609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-9770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-1031</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Experimental Assessment of Controlled Rocking Masonry Shear Walls without Post-tensioning</title><author>Yassin, Ahmed ; Ezzeldin, Mohamed ; Wiebe, Lydell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-a4d47b093e71106f6bc7482780605dce6eb105a4ae855f1a86535298cba2afa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Axial stress</topic><topic>Boundary element method</topic><topic>Compressive properties</topic><topic>Cyclic loads</topic><topic>Damage localization</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Post-tensioning</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Shear walls</topic><topic>Steel plates</topic><topic>Structural engineering</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Vertical loads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezzeldin, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Lydell</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yassin, Ahmed</au><au>Ezzeldin, Mohamed</au><au>Wiebe, Lydell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Assessment of Controlled Rocking Masonry Shear Walls without Post-tensioning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>0733-9445</issn><eissn>1943-541X</eissn><abstract>AbstractSeveral research studies have recently evaluated the seismic response of controlled rocking masonry walls (CRMWs) with unbonded post-tensioning (PT) tendons. These studies demonstrated that such walls typically have both low damage and the ability to self-center, thus presenting an enhanced seismic response compared to conventional fixed-base shear walls. However, practical difficulties related to PT implementation during construction, coupled with the problem of PT losses that subsequently affect the wall’s self-centering ability, point to an opportunity to develop an alternative approach to control rocking walls. In response, the current study introduces controlled rocking masonry shear walls without PT tendons and with an energy dissipation (ED) device of embedded unbonded axial yielding dog-bone bars, named as ED-CRMWs. Experimental results are presented herein from six half-scale two-story fully grouted ED-CRMWs that were tested under displacement-controlled cyclic loading. All six walls were designed to have the same lateral resistance to facilitate investigating the influence of different design parameters, including toe confinement strategies through steel plates or boundary elements, axial compressive stress levels, ED device locations, and horizontal reinforcement ratios. The experimental results are presented in terms of the failure modes and damage levels, force-displacement response, residual drifts, and ductility capacities. The results show that even with no PT, all ED-CRMWs preserved the intended self-centering behavior with a flag-shaped hysteretic response, having a maximum residual drift ratio of 0.15%, except for one unconfined wall. In addition, the strategy of using end-confined boundary elements produced the most effective performance of the system pertaining to strength degradation, self-centering, and displacement ductility with a drift ratio of 2.35% being reached before strength degradation. In general, all walls exhibited limited and localized damage at the wall toes, thus demonstrating the promising concept of relying on gravity loads and ED devices in CRMWs, without the need for unbonded PT tendons.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003307</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-0609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-9770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-1031</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9445
ispartof Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2022-04, Vol.148 (4)
issn 0733-9445
1943-541X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2624131448
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Axial stress
Boundary element method
Compressive properties
Cyclic loads
Damage localization
Degradation
Design parameters
Displacement
Drift
Ductility
Earthquake damage
Energy dissipation
Failure modes
Masonry
Mathematical analysis
Post-tensioning
Seismic response
Shear walls
Steel plates
Structural engineering
Technical Papers
Tendons
Vertical loads
title Experimental Assessment of Controlled Rocking Masonry Shear Walls without Post-tensioning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Assessment%20of%20Controlled%20Rocking%20Masonry%20Shear%20Walls%20without%20Post-tensioning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Yassin,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=0733-9445&rft.eissn=1943-541X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624131448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624131448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true