Effects of ungulate density and sociality on landscape heterogeneity: a mechanistic modeling approach

Animals can be important vectors of nutrient transfer within and across landscapes, with important implications for ecosystem productivity and composition. While it is presumed large ungulates are agents of nutrient dispersal via movement and activity, research analyzing their net effects on landsca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecography (Copenhagen) 2022-02, Vol.2022 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ferraro, Kristy M., Schmitz, Oswald J., McCary, Matthew A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Ecography (Copenhagen)
container_volume 2022
creator Ferraro, Kristy M.
Schmitz, Oswald J.
McCary, Matthew A.
description Animals can be important vectors of nutrient transfer within and across landscapes, with important implications for ecosystem productivity and composition. While it is presumed large ungulates are agents of nutrient dispersal via movement and activity, research analyzing their net effects on landscapes remains scarce. We present an individual‐based model that investigates how caribou affect the distribution of nutrients on a landscape through consumption only, as well through the cumulative effects of consumption and nutrient deposition (i.e. fecal waste and carcass deposition). We explored these dynamics in simulations that altered the context of environments, either initially containing heterogeneous or homogeneous nutrient distributions, animal densities and sociality of caribou behavior. In the consumption‐only simulations, caribou density and sociality created different patterns of heterogeneity at both the landscape and local scale depending on the initial landscape conditions. In these simulations, caribou populations crashed at high densities because the lack of animal deposition resulted in low resources across the landscape. This was not the case when considering the cumulative effects of consumption and deposition, indicating the return of nutrients from animals may be important for population stability. Additionally, in simulations considering the cumulative effects of caribou, increasing caribou density increased landscape heterogeneity irrespective of the initial condition (i.e. heterogeneous and homogeneous landscapes), and maintained or increased local heterogeneity in heterogeneous and homogenous landscape, respectively. Importantly, in all simulations the net impact of caribou at the individual patch level was extremely variable, suggesting that animal inputs are highly varied throughout the landscape. Our results indicate the movement of large ungulates such as caribou can increase the heterogeneity of available nutrients within a landscape and provide an important feedback for population stability. Thus, the loss of large ungulates from natural ecosystems via anthropogenic activity is likely to result in less heterogeneous natural landscapes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ecog.06039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2623982499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2623982499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-7a4aa13dab4a0ebe543a2071d48708d9f3f724ad1e06ad7af3a773644d01e2013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv_oIFb0Lq7EeyWW9SahUKveg5THcnaUqardkE6b83tZ6dyzAzD_PCw9i9gJkY64lcqGaQgbIXbCIygATS3FyyCVjIEpNauGY3Me4AhLRZPmG0KEtyfeSh5ENbDQ32xD21se6PHFvPY3A1NqcptLwZN9HhgfiWeupCRS2Np2eOfE9ui20d-9rxffDU1G3F8XDoArrtLbsqsYl099en7PN18TF_S1br5fv8ZZU4pUyaGNSIQnncaATaUKoVSjDC69xA7m2pSiM1ekGQoTdYKjRGZVp7ECRBqCl7OP8dY78Gin2xC0PXjpGFzKSyudTWjtTjmXJdiLGjsjh09R67YyGgOGksThqLX40jLM7wd93Q8R-yWMzXSyFzlaof1x12JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623982499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of ungulate density and sociality on landscape heterogeneity: a mechanistic modeling approach</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ferraro, Kristy M. ; Schmitz, Oswald J. ; McCary, Matthew A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Kristy M. ; Schmitz, Oswald J. ; McCary, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><description>Animals can be important vectors of nutrient transfer within and across landscapes, with important implications for ecosystem productivity and composition. While it is presumed large ungulates are agents of nutrient dispersal via movement and activity, research analyzing their net effects on landscapes remains scarce. We present an individual‐based model that investigates how caribou affect the distribution of nutrients on a landscape through consumption only, as well through the cumulative effects of consumption and nutrient deposition (i.e. fecal waste and carcass deposition). We explored these dynamics in simulations that altered the context of environments, either initially containing heterogeneous or homogeneous nutrient distributions, animal densities and sociality of caribou behavior. In the consumption‐only simulations, caribou density and sociality created different patterns of heterogeneity at both the landscape and local scale depending on the initial landscape conditions. In these simulations, caribou populations crashed at high densities because the lack of animal deposition resulted in low resources across the landscape. This was not the case when considering the cumulative effects of consumption and deposition, indicating the return of nutrients from animals may be important for population stability. Additionally, in simulations considering the cumulative effects of caribou, increasing caribou density increased landscape heterogeneity irrespective of the initial condition (i.e. heterogeneous and homogeneous landscapes), and maintained or increased local heterogeneity in heterogeneous and homogenous landscape, respectively. Importantly, in all simulations the net impact of caribou at the individual patch level was extremely variable, suggesting that animal inputs are highly varied throughout the landscape. Our results indicate the movement of large ungulates such as caribou can increase the heterogeneity of available nutrients within a landscape and provide an important feedback for population stability. Thus, the loss of large ungulates from natural ecosystems via anthropogenic activity is likely to result in less heterogeneous natural landscapes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-7590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0587</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecog.06039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Caribou ; Density ; Deposition ; Dispersal ; Ecosystems ; Expression vectors ; Heterogeneity ; Human influences ; individual-based modeling ; Nutrient availability ; Nutrients ; Population ; population dynamics ; Population stability ; Productivity ; Simulation ; Stability ; Taiga &amp; tundra ; Ungulates ; zoogeochemistry</subject><ispartof>Ecography (Copenhagen), 2022-02, Vol.2022 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-7a4aa13dab4a0ebe543a2071d48708d9f3f724ad1e06ad7af3a773644d01e2013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-7a4aa13dab4a0ebe543a2071d48708d9f3f724ad1e06ad7af3a773644d01e2013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0884-7826 ; 0000-0003-1515-2667 ; 0000-0002-7846-7159</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecog.06039$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecog.06039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,1411,11542,27903,27904,45553,45554,46031,46455</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Oswald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCary, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of ungulate density and sociality on landscape heterogeneity: a mechanistic modeling approach</title><title>Ecography (Copenhagen)</title><description>Animals can be important vectors of nutrient transfer within and across landscapes, with important implications for ecosystem productivity and composition. While it is presumed large ungulates are agents of nutrient dispersal via movement and activity, research analyzing their net effects on landscapes remains scarce. We present an individual‐based model that investigates how caribou affect the distribution of nutrients on a landscape through consumption only, as well through the cumulative effects of consumption and nutrient deposition (i.e. fecal waste and carcass deposition). We explored these dynamics in simulations that altered the context of environments, either initially containing heterogeneous or homogeneous nutrient distributions, animal densities and sociality of caribou behavior. In the consumption‐only simulations, caribou density and sociality created different patterns of heterogeneity at both the landscape and local scale depending on the initial landscape conditions. In these simulations, caribou populations crashed at high densities because the lack of animal deposition resulted in low resources across the landscape. This was not the case when considering the cumulative effects of consumption and deposition, indicating the return of nutrients from animals may be important for population stability. Additionally, in simulations considering the cumulative effects of caribou, increasing caribou density increased landscape heterogeneity irrespective of the initial condition (i.e. heterogeneous and homogeneous landscapes), and maintained or increased local heterogeneity in heterogeneous and homogenous landscape, respectively. Importantly, in all simulations the net impact of caribou at the individual patch level was extremely variable, suggesting that animal inputs are highly varied throughout the landscape. Our results indicate the movement of large ungulates such as caribou can increase the heterogeneity of available nutrients within a landscape and provide an important feedback for population stability. Thus, the loss of large ungulates from natural ecosystems via anthropogenic activity is likely to result in less heterogeneous natural landscapes.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Caribou</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Expression vectors</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>individual-based modeling</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>Population stability</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Taiga &amp; tundra</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>zoogeochemistry</subject><issn>0906-7590</issn><issn>1600-0587</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYv_oIFb0Lq7EeyWW9SahUKveg5THcnaUqardkE6b83tZ6dyzAzD_PCw9i9gJkY64lcqGaQgbIXbCIygATS3FyyCVjIEpNauGY3Me4AhLRZPmG0KEtyfeSh5ENbDQ32xD21se6PHFvPY3A1NqcptLwZN9HhgfiWeupCRS2Np2eOfE9ui20d-9rxffDU1G3F8XDoArrtLbsqsYl099en7PN18TF_S1br5fv8ZZU4pUyaGNSIQnncaATaUKoVSjDC69xA7m2pSiM1ekGQoTdYKjRGZVp7ECRBqCl7OP8dY78Gin2xC0PXjpGFzKSyudTWjtTjmXJdiLGjsjh09R67YyGgOGksThqLX40jLM7wd93Q8R-yWMzXSyFzlaof1x12JQ</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Ferraro, Kristy M.</creator><creator>Schmitz, Oswald J.</creator><creator>McCary, Matthew A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0884-7826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-2667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-7159</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Effects of ungulate density and sociality on landscape heterogeneity: a mechanistic modeling approach</title><author>Ferraro, Kristy M. ; Schmitz, Oswald J. ; McCary, Matthew A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-7a4aa13dab4a0ebe543a2071d48708d9f3f724ad1e06ad7af3a773644d01e2013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Caribou</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Expression vectors</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>individual-based modeling</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>Population stability</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Taiga &amp; tundra</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>zoogeochemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Oswald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCary, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferraro, Kristy M.</au><au>Schmitz, Oswald J.</au><au>McCary, Matthew A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of ungulate density and sociality on landscape heterogeneity: a mechanistic modeling approach</atitle><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2022</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0906-7590</issn><eissn>1600-0587</eissn><abstract>Animals can be important vectors of nutrient transfer within and across landscapes, with important implications for ecosystem productivity and composition. While it is presumed large ungulates are agents of nutrient dispersal via movement and activity, research analyzing their net effects on landscapes remains scarce. We present an individual‐based model that investigates how caribou affect the distribution of nutrients on a landscape through consumption only, as well through the cumulative effects of consumption and nutrient deposition (i.e. fecal waste and carcass deposition). We explored these dynamics in simulations that altered the context of environments, either initially containing heterogeneous or homogeneous nutrient distributions, animal densities and sociality of caribou behavior. In the consumption‐only simulations, caribou density and sociality created different patterns of heterogeneity at both the landscape and local scale depending on the initial landscape conditions. In these simulations, caribou populations crashed at high densities because the lack of animal deposition resulted in low resources across the landscape. This was not the case when considering the cumulative effects of consumption and deposition, indicating the return of nutrients from animals may be important for population stability. Additionally, in simulations considering the cumulative effects of caribou, increasing caribou density increased landscape heterogeneity irrespective of the initial condition (i.e. heterogeneous and homogeneous landscapes), and maintained or increased local heterogeneity in heterogeneous and homogenous landscape, respectively. Importantly, in all simulations the net impact of caribou at the individual patch level was extremely variable, suggesting that animal inputs are highly varied throughout the landscape. Our results indicate the movement of large ungulates such as caribou can increase the heterogeneity of available nutrients within a landscape and provide an important feedback for population stability. Thus, the loss of large ungulates from natural ecosystems via anthropogenic activity is likely to result in less heterogeneous natural landscapes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecog.06039</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0884-7826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-2667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-7159</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0906-7590
ispartof Ecography (Copenhagen), 2022-02, Vol.2022 (2), p.n/a
issn 0906-7590
1600-0587
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2623982499
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Anthropogenic factors
Caribou
Density
Deposition
Dispersal
Ecosystems
Expression vectors
Heterogeneity
Human influences
individual-based modeling
Nutrient availability
Nutrients
Population
population dynamics
Population stability
Productivity
Simulation
Stability
Taiga & tundra
Ungulates
zoogeochemistry
title Effects of ungulate density and sociality on landscape heterogeneity: a mechanistic modeling approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A04%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20ungulate%20density%20and%20sociality%20on%20landscape%20heterogeneity:%20a%20mechanistic%20modeling%20approach&rft.jtitle=Ecography%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Ferraro,%20Kristy%20M.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=2022&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0906-7590&rft.eissn=1600-0587&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecog.06039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2623982499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623982499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true