Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling
The article deals with the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematical modelling as part of the professional competence of pre-service teachers. With the help of a test developed for this purpose from a conceptual model, we examine whether this pedagogical content knowledge can be promoted in its...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational studies in mathematics 2022-02, Vol.109 (2), p.383-407 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 407 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 383 |
| container_title | Educational studies in mathematics |
| container_volume | 109 |
| creator | Greefrath, Gilbert Siller, Hans-Stefan Klock, Heiner Wess, Raphael |
| description | The article deals with the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematical modelling as part of the professional competence of pre-service teachers. With the help of a test developed for this purpose from a conceptual model, we examine whether this pedagogical content knowledge can be promoted in its different facets—especially knowledge about modelling tasks and about interventions—by suitable university seminars. For this purpose, the test was administered to three groups in a seminar for the teaching of mathematical modelling: (1) to those respondents who created their own modelling tasks for use with students, (2) to those trained to intervene in mathematical modelling processes, and (3) participating students who are not required to address mathematical modelling. The findings of the study—based on variance analysis—indicate that certain facets (knowledge of modelling tasks, modelling processes, and interventions) have increased significantly in both experimental groups but to varying degrees. By contrast, pre-service teachers in the control group demonstrated no significant change to their level of pedagogical content knowledge. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2623726962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A691070953</galeid><ericid>EJ1326669</ericid><sourcerecordid>A691070953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6f45538def1c9c3132a3cfa05229d5c9eb1fe1c5b98c501d75d9efa2eab2363f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha0KpA4_L4CEZKmrLtz6J3biJUJQpkICQbu2PM51JkMmntoZKLPqa_T1eJKaCaJiw8ZX9jnfvbo-CB0x-oVRWn5NjKpCE8oZyXdRkc0HNGGyFIRWTO2gCaVMEKZl8RHtpbSglFaZm6DFdQSSIN63DnACF_raxkc8gHVziOnpz1-8gto2oWmd7XDWB-gHfNeHhw7qBrAPEQ9zGIm2b3DweGnzSz62yDLU0HVZOUC73nYJDl_qPvp5fvbj9IJcXn2bnp5cElcU5UCUL6QUVQ2eOe0EE9wK5y2VnOtaOg0z5oE5OdOVk5TVpaw1eMvBzrhQwot99Gnsu4rh1xrSYBZhHfs80nDFRcmVzuXV1dgOTNv7METrlm1y5kRpRkuqpciuz29c2_1_D41dp2SmtzdvvXz0uhhSiuDNKrbL_JuGUfOckhlTMjkls03JbDJ0PEIQW_cKnH3PayuldNbFqKes9Q3E_8u80_UfHM-gHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623726962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling</title><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Greefrath, Gilbert ; Siller, Hans-Stefan ; Klock, Heiner ; Wess, Raphael</creator><creatorcontrib>Greefrath, Gilbert ; Siller, Hans-Stefan ; Klock, Heiner ; Wess, Raphael</creatorcontrib><description>The article deals with the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematical modelling as part of the professional competence of pre-service teachers. With the help of a test developed for this purpose from a conceptual model, we examine whether this pedagogical content knowledge can be promoted in its different facets—especially knowledge about modelling tasks and about interventions—by suitable university seminars. For this purpose, the test was administered to three groups in a seminar for the teaching of mathematical modelling: (1) to those respondents who created their own modelling tasks for use with students, (2) to those trained to intervene in mathematical modelling processes, and (3) participating students who are not required to address mathematical modelling. The findings of the study—based on variance analysis—indicate that certain facets (knowledge of modelling tasks, modelling processes, and interventions) have increased significantly in both experimental groups but to varying degrees. By contrast, pre-service teachers in the control group demonstrated no significant change to their level of pedagogical content knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Educational research ; Evaluation ; Knowledge ; Mathematical ability ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical Models ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Teachers ; Methods ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Pedagogy ; Preservice Teachers ; Secondary School Teachers ; Students ; Study and teaching ; Teacher Competencies ; Teachers ; Teachers, Rating of ; Teaching ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Educational studies in mathematics, 2022-02, Vol.109 (2), p.383-407</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6f45538def1c9c3132a3cfa05229d5c9eb1fe1c5b98c501d75d9efa2eab2363f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6f45538def1c9c3132a3cfa05229d5c9eb1fe1c5b98c501d75d9efa2eab2363f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1597-7108 ; 0000-0002-8322-5111 ; 0000-0002-1054-6520 ; 0000-0001-6826-1432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1326669$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greefrath, Gilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siller, Hans-Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klock, Heiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wess, Raphael</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling</title><title>Educational studies in mathematics</title><addtitle>Educ Stud Math</addtitle><description>The article deals with the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematical modelling as part of the professional competence of pre-service teachers. With the help of a test developed for this purpose from a conceptual model, we examine whether this pedagogical content knowledge can be promoted in its different facets—especially knowledge about modelling tasks and about interventions—by suitable university seminars. For this purpose, the test was administered to three groups in a seminar for the teaching of mathematical modelling: (1) to those respondents who created their own modelling tasks for use with students, (2) to those trained to intervene in mathematical modelling processes, and (3) participating students who are not required to address mathematical modelling. The findings of the study—based on variance analysis—indicate that certain facets (knowledge of modelling tasks, modelling processes, and interventions) have increased significantly in both experimental groups but to varying degrees. By contrast, pre-service teachers in the control group demonstrated no significant change to their level of pedagogical content knowledge.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mathematical ability</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical Models</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Teachers</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teacher Competencies</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teachers, Rating of</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0013-1954</issn><issn>1573-0816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha0KpA4_L4CEZKmrLtz6J3biJUJQpkICQbu2PM51JkMmntoZKLPqa_T1eJKaCaJiw8ZX9jnfvbo-CB0x-oVRWn5NjKpCE8oZyXdRkc0HNGGyFIRWTO2gCaVMEKZl8RHtpbSglFaZm6DFdQSSIN63DnACF_raxkc8gHVziOnpz1-8gto2oWmd7XDWB-gHfNeHhw7qBrAPEQ9zGIm2b3DweGnzSz62yDLU0HVZOUC73nYJDl_qPvp5fvbj9IJcXn2bnp5cElcU5UCUL6QUVQ2eOe0EE9wK5y2VnOtaOg0z5oE5OdOVk5TVpaw1eMvBzrhQwot99Gnsu4rh1xrSYBZhHfs80nDFRcmVzuXV1dgOTNv7METrlm1y5kRpRkuqpciuz29c2_1_D41dp2SmtzdvvXz0uhhSiuDNKrbL_JuGUfOckhlTMjkls03JbDJ0PEIQW_cKnH3PayuldNbFqKes9Q3E_8u80_UfHM-gHw</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Greefrath, Gilbert</creator><creator>Siller, Hans-Stefan</creator><creator>Klock, Heiner</creator><creator>Wess, Raphael</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1597-7108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-5111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-6520</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-1432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling</title><author>Greefrath, Gilbert ; Siller, Hans-Stefan ; Klock, Heiner ; Wess, Raphael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6f45538def1c9c3132a3cfa05229d5c9eb1fe1c5b98c501d75d9efa2eab2363f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mathematical ability</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical Models</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Teachers</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teacher Competencies</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teachers, Rating of</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greefrath, Gilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siller, Hans-Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klock, Heiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wess, Raphael</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>Educational studies in mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greefrath, Gilbert</au><au>Siller, Hans-Stefan</au><au>Klock, Heiner</au><au>Wess, Raphael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1326669</ericid><atitle>Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling</atitle><jtitle>Educational studies in mathematics</jtitle><stitle>Educ Stud Math</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>407</epage><pages>383-407</pages><issn>0013-1954</issn><eissn>1573-0816</eissn><abstract>The article deals with the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematical modelling as part of the professional competence of pre-service teachers. With the help of a test developed for this purpose from a conceptual model, we examine whether this pedagogical content knowledge can be promoted in its different facets—especially knowledge about modelling tasks and about interventions—by suitable university seminars. For this purpose, the test was administered to three groups in a seminar for the teaching of mathematical modelling: (1) to those respondents who created their own modelling tasks for use with students, (2) to those trained to intervene in mathematical modelling processes, and (3) participating students who are not required to address mathematical modelling. The findings of the study—based on variance analysis—indicate that certain facets (knowledge of modelling tasks, modelling processes, and interventions) have increased significantly in both experimental groups but to varying degrees. By contrast, pre-service teachers in the control group demonstrated no significant change to their level of pedagogical content knowledge.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1597-7108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-5111</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-6520</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-1432</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-1954 |
| ispartof | Educational studies in mathematics, 2022-02, Vol.109 (2), p.383-407 |
| issn | 0013-1954 1573-0816 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2623726962 |
| source | Education Source; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Education Educational research Evaluation Knowledge Mathematical ability Mathematical analysis Mathematical Models Mathematics Mathematics Education Mathematics Teachers Methods Pedagogical Content Knowledge Pedagogy Preservice Teachers Secondary School Teachers Students Study and teaching Teacher Competencies Teachers Teachers, Rating of Teaching Variance analysis |
| title | Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T10%3A52%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-service%20secondary%20teachers%E2%80%99%20pedagogical%20content%20knowledge%20for%20the%20teaching%20of%20mathematical%20modelling&rft.jtitle=Educational%20studies%20in%20mathematics&rft.au=Greefrath,%20Gilbert&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=407&rft.pages=383-407&rft.issn=0013-1954&rft.eissn=1573-0816&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA691070953%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623726962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A691070953&rft_ericid=EJ1326669&rfr_iscdi=true |