Diagnosis Accuracy of Baptista Depression Scale: Adult and Screening Versions
Abstract This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Baptista Depression Scale adult and screening versions (EBADEP-A and EBADEP-screening) for discrimination of people with a major depressive episode (MDE) or major depressive disorder (MDD) and to compare discriminative capacitie...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psicologia, teoria e pesquisa teoria e pesquisa, 2021, Vol.37, p.1 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Psicologia, teoria e pesquisa |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Gonçalves, André Pereira Baptista, Makilim Nunes Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco |
| description | Abstract This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Baptista Depression Scale adult and screening versions (EBADEP-A and EBADEP-screening) for discrimination of people with a major depressive episode (MDE) or major depressive disorder (MDD) and to compare discriminative capacities. Participants were 187 people, 52 patients, and 135 non-clinical individuals. Results indicated sensitivity equal to 0.92 and specificity equal to 0.88 for EBADEP-A (cut-off = 54), and 0.96 and 0.82, respectively, for EBADEP-screening (cut-off = 17). Findings suggest equivalence between the two versions of EBADEP to discriminate people with MDE or MDD. Results indicate that the two versions can provide a correct diagnostic indicative for MDE and MDD.
Resumo O objetivo da presente investigação foi verificar a acurácia diagnóstica da Escala Baptista de Depressão adulto e triagem (EBADEP-A e EBADEP- triagem) para discriminação de pessoas com episódio depressivo maior (EDM) e/ou transtorno depressivo maior (TDM), e comparar suas capacidades discriminativas. Participaram 187 pessoas, 52 pacientes e 135 do grupo não clínico. Os resultados indicaram sensibilidade igual a 0,92 e especificidade igual a 0,88 para a EBADEP-A (ponto de corte igual a 54), e 0,96 e 0,82, respectivamente, para a EBADEP-triagem (ponto de corte igual a 17). Os achados sugerem equivalência entre as duas versões da EBADEP para discriminação de pessoas com EDM e/ou TDM. Os resultados indicam que as duas versões podem fornecer um indicativo diagnóstico correto para EDM e TDM. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1590/0102.3772e37449 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2623609264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0102_37722021000100506</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_22fe144df423464bb796ff7b3fff00ab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2623609264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-14fa799fb56682f8f3337564cc19d926439877ae158395065f691a864dffc8f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUTtv2zAQJooWiOt0ziqgs-zjQ6TYzU3SNkCCDE66EhTFM2iooktKg_99pahwpsPd98B3d4TcUNjQSsMWKLANV4p5roTQH8iK1iBLLoT8SFYzWs7oFfmc8xGAqYm2Ik93wR76mEMuds6NybpzEbH4bk9DyIMt7vwp-ZxD7Iu9s53_VuzasRsK27fTIHnfh_5Q_PZppuRr8gltl_2X_3VNXn_cv9z-Kh-ffz7c7h5Lx2qhSyrQKq2xqaSsGdbIOVeVFM5R3WomBde1UtbTqua6Almh1NTWUrSIrkbga_Kw-LbRHs0phT82nU20wbwNYjoYm4bgOm8YQ0_FpBSMCymaRmmJqBqOiAC2mbw2i1d2wXfRHOOY-im82c83M_PNGDAKMLUwhZkEXxfBKcW_o8_Du4RJxiW8bbAm24XlUsw5ebzEpGDmh5mL_fIw_g9V-oNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623609264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis Accuracy of Baptista Depression Scale: Adult and Screening Versions</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Gonçalves, André Pereira ; Baptista, Makilim Nunes ; Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de ; Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, André Pereira ; Baptista, Makilim Nunes ; Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de ; Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Baptista Depression Scale adult and screening versions (EBADEP-A and EBADEP-screening) for discrimination of people with a major depressive episode (MDE) or major depressive disorder (MDD) and to compare discriminative capacities. Participants were 187 people, 52 patients, and 135 non-clinical individuals. Results indicated sensitivity equal to 0.92 and specificity equal to 0.88 for EBADEP-A (cut-off = 54), and 0.96 and 0.82, respectively, for EBADEP-screening (cut-off = 17). Findings suggest equivalence between the two versions of EBADEP to discriminate people with MDE or MDD. Results indicate that the two versions can provide a correct diagnostic indicative for MDE and MDD.
Resumo O objetivo da presente investigação foi verificar a acurácia diagnóstica da Escala Baptista de Depressão adulto e triagem (EBADEP-A e EBADEP- triagem) para discriminação de pessoas com episódio depressivo maior (EDM) e/ou transtorno depressivo maior (TDM), e comparar suas capacidades discriminativas. Participaram 187 pessoas, 52 pacientes e 135 do grupo não clínico. Os resultados indicaram sensibilidade igual a 0,92 e especificidade igual a 0,88 para a EBADEP-A (ponto de corte igual a 54), e 0,96 e 0,82, respectivamente, para a EBADEP-triagem (ponto de corte igual a 17). Os achados sugerem equivalência entre as duas versões da EBADEP para discriminação de pessoas com EDM e/ou TDM. Os resultados indicam que as duas versões podem fornecer um indicativo diagnóstico correto para EDM e TDM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0102-3772</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-3446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-3446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0102.3772e37449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brasilia DF: Universidade de Brasilia, Instituto de Psicologia</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; cutoff ; Depressive personality disorders ; Discrimination ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical screening ; Mental depression ; mental health ; PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ; psychometric properties ; psychopathology</subject><ispartof>Psicologia, teoria e pesquisa, 2021, Vol.37, p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Universidade de Brasilia, Instituto de Psicologia 2021</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-14fa799fb56682f8f3337564cc19d926439877ae158395065f691a864dffc8f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3274-9724 ; 0000-0002-2470-4040 ; 0000-0002-1815-8194 ; 0000-0001-6519-254X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,861,882,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, André Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baptista, Makilim Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis Accuracy of Baptista Depression Scale: Adult and Screening Versions</title><title>Psicologia, teoria e pesquisa</title><addtitle>Psic.: Teor. e Pesq</addtitle><description>Abstract This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Baptista Depression Scale adult and screening versions (EBADEP-A and EBADEP-screening) for discrimination of people with a major depressive episode (MDE) or major depressive disorder (MDD) and to compare discriminative capacities. Participants were 187 people, 52 patients, and 135 non-clinical individuals. Results indicated sensitivity equal to 0.92 and specificity equal to 0.88 for EBADEP-A (cut-off = 54), and 0.96 and 0.82, respectively, for EBADEP-screening (cut-off = 17). Findings suggest equivalence between the two versions of EBADEP to discriminate people with MDE or MDD. Results indicate that the two versions can provide a correct diagnostic indicative for MDE and MDD.
Resumo O objetivo da presente investigação foi verificar a acurácia diagnóstica da Escala Baptista de Depressão adulto e triagem (EBADEP-A e EBADEP- triagem) para discriminação de pessoas com episódio depressivo maior (EDM) e/ou transtorno depressivo maior (TDM), e comparar suas capacidades discriminativas. Participaram 187 pessoas, 52 pacientes e 135 do grupo não clínico. Os resultados indicaram sensibilidade igual a 0,92 e especificidade igual a 0,88 para a EBADEP-A (ponto de corte igual a 54), e 0,96 e 0,82, respectivamente, para a EBADEP-triagem (ponto de corte igual a 17). Os achados sugerem equivalência entre as duas versões da EBADEP para discriminação de pessoas com EDM e/ou TDM. Os resultados indicam que as duas versões podem fornecer um indicativo diagnóstico correto para EDM e TDM.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>cutoff</subject><subject>Depressive personality disorders</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>mental health</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><subject>psychometric properties</subject><subject>psychopathology</subject><issn>0102-3772</issn><issn>1806-3446</issn><issn>1806-3446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUTtv2zAQJooWiOt0ziqgs-zjQ6TYzU3SNkCCDE66EhTFM2iooktKg_99pahwpsPd98B3d4TcUNjQSsMWKLANV4p5roTQH8iK1iBLLoT8SFYzWs7oFfmc8xGAqYm2Ik93wR76mEMuds6NybpzEbH4bk9DyIMt7vwp-ZxD7Iu9s53_VuzasRsK27fTIHnfh_5Q_PZppuRr8gltl_2X_3VNXn_cv9z-Kh-ffz7c7h5Lx2qhSyrQKq2xqaSsGdbIOVeVFM5R3WomBde1UtbTqua6Almh1NTWUrSIrkbga_Kw-LbRHs0phT82nU20wbwNYjoYm4bgOm8YQ0_FpBSMCymaRmmJqBqOiAC2mbw2i1d2wXfRHOOY-im82c83M_PNGDAKMLUwhZkEXxfBKcW_o8_Du4RJxiW8bbAm24XlUsw5ebzEpGDmh5mL_fIw_g9V-oNQ</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Gonçalves, André Pereira</creator><creator>Baptista, Makilim Nunes</creator><creator>Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de</creator><creator>Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco</creator><general>Universidade de Brasilia, Instituto de Psicologia</general><general>Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília</general><general>Universidade de Brasília</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3274-9724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-4040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-8194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-254X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Diagnosis Accuracy of Baptista Depression Scale: Adult and Screening Versions</title><author>Gonçalves, André Pereira ; Baptista, Makilim Nunes ; Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de ; Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2849-14fa799fb56682f8f3337564cc19d926439877ae158395065f691a864dffc8f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>cutoff</topic><topic>Depressive personality disorders</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>mental health</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</topic><topic>psychometric properties</topic><topic>psychopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, André Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baptista, Makilim Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Psicologia, teoria e pesquisa</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonçalves, André Pereira</au><au>Baptista, Makilim Nunes</au><au>Villemor-Amaral, Anna Elisa de</au><au>Carvalho, Lucas de Francisco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis Accuracy of Baptista Depression Scale: Adult and Screening Versions</atitle><jtitle>Psicologia, teoria e pesquisa</jtitle><addtitle>Psic.: Teor. e Pesq</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0102-3772</issn><issn>1806-3446</issn><eissn>1806-3446</eissn><abstract>Abstract This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Baptista Depression Scale adult and screening versions (EBADEP-A and EBADEP-screening) for discrimination of people with a major depressive episode (MDE) or major depressive disorder (MDD) and to compare discriminative capacities. Participants were 187 people, 52 patients, and 135 non-clinical individuals. Results indicated sensitivity equal to 0.92 and specificity equal to 0.88 for EBADEP-A (cut-off = 54), and 0.96 and 0.82, respectively, for EBADEP-screening (cut-off = 17). Findings suggest equivalence between the two versions of EBADEP to discriminate people with MDE or MDD. Results indicate that the two versions can provide a correct diagnostic indicative for MDE and MDD.
Resumo O objetivo da presente investigação foi verificar a acurácia diagnóstica da Escala Baptista de Depressão adulto e triagem (EBADEP-A e EBADEP- triagem) para discriminação de pessoas com episódio depressivo maior (EDM) e/ou transtorno depressivo maior (TDM), e comparar suas capacidades discriminativas. Participaram 187 pessoas, 52 pacientes e 135 do grupo não clínico. Os resultados indicaram sensibilidade igual a 0,92 e especificidade igual a 0,88 para a EBADEP-A (ponto de corte igual a 54), e 0,96 e 0,82, respectivamente, para a EBADEP-triagem (ponto de corte igual a 17). Os achados sugerem equivalência entre as duas versões da EBADEP para discriminação de pessoas com EDM e/ou TDM. Os resultados indicam que as duas versões podem fornecer um indicativo diagnóstico correto para EDM e TDM.</abstract><cop>Brasilia DF</cop><pub>Universidade de Brasilia, Instituto de Psicologia</pub><doi>10.1590/0102.3772e37449</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3274-9724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-4040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-8194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-254X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0102-3772 |
| ispartof | Psicologia, teoria e pesquisa, 2021, Vol.37, p.1 |
| issn | 0102-3772 1806-3446 1806-3446 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2623609264 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy cutoff Depressive personality disorders Discrimination Medical diagnosis Medical screening Mental depression mental health PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY psychometric properties psychopathology |
| title | Diagnosis Accuracy of Baptista Depression Scale: Adult and Screening Versions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20Accuracy%20of%20Baptista%20Depression%20Scale:%20Adult%20and%20Screening%20Versions&rft.jtitle=Psicologia,%20teoria%20e%20pesquisa&rft.au=Gon%C3%A7alves,%20Andr%C3%A9%20Pereira&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=37&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0102-3772&rft.eissn=1806-3446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0102.3772e37449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2623609264%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623609264&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0102_37722021000100506&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_22fe144df423464bb796ff7b3fff00ab&rfr_iscdi=true |