Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night

Most students have interacted with scientific representations that are used as teaching resources in schools. Often these external representations present challenges for understanding. By utilizing a framework based on an inferential, epistemic approach to scientific representations, we have analyze...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science & education 2022-01, Vol.31 (1), p.35-54
Hauptverfasser: Gallegos-Cázares Leticia, Flores-Camacho, Fernando, Calderón-Canales, Elena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Science & education
container_volume 31
creator Gallegos-Cázares Leticia
Flores-Camacho, Fernando
Calderón-Canales, Elena
description Most students have interacted with scientific representations that are used as teaching resources in schools. Often these external representations present challenges for understanding. By utilizing a framework based on an inferential, epistemic approach to scientific representations, we have analyzed students’ representational constructions of the day/night process. This study identified the ways students build their representations or models based on their interpretations of school representations. The study participants were 151 students from a semi-urban primary school. Data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Analysis utilized the inferential approach to identify intentionality, interpretation, denotation, reasoning, and coordination rules in students’ constructions. The results showed that only a few students were able to integrate school representations coherently as intended, and most of these students were in the upper grades. Even when students in the middle grades constructed reasoning processes, they did so use other elements of interpretation and denotation that are not equivalent to those in the school representations. We also found that most children failed to establish any discernible process that would indicate whether they used elements from the school model to infer explanations for the day/night process; that is, they had fragmented elements of representations that prevented them from making valid inferences. Finally, the approach described in this paper is useful for identifying difficulties that students face when dealing with scientific school representations since it offers elements for reconsidering the usual external representations that are used to teach science.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11191-021-00230-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2622616483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2622616483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c773-efb42c005a81d708c94576dee885c4f4b8bb903fc53d4d0c1d5397ea51941cc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjs1KxDAURoMoWEdfwFXAdfXe_DbgRmpHhUEXzn5Ik9R2qM3YdMDZ-Rq-nk9iQRcfZ3fOR8glwjUC6JuEiAZzYPOAccjxiGQoNc_RAB6TDAxTuWYMTslZSlsA4AZYRm6rPryHYbLjgb66Nsaelm3X-zEMP1_fiVafu94OdurikGhs6L09UDt4-ty9tdM5OWlsn8LFPxdkvazW5WO-enl4Ku9WudPzg9DUgjkAaQv0GgpnhNTKh1AU0olG1EVdG-CNk9wLDw695EYHK9EIdE7xBbn60-7G-LEPadps434c5uKGKcYUKlFw_gv44kov</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622616483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Gallegos-Cázares Leticia ; Flores-Camacho, Fernando ; Calderón-Canales, Elena</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallegos-Cázares Leticia ; Flores-Camacho, Fernando ; Calderón-Canales, Elena</creatorcontrib><description>Most students have interacted with scientific representations that are used as teaching resources in schools. Often these external representations present challenges for understanding. By utilizing a framework based on an inferential, epistemic approach to scientific representations, we have analyzed students’ representational constructions of the day/night process. This study identified the ways students build their representations or models based on their interpretations of school representations. The study participants were 151 students from a semi-urban primary school. Data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Analysis utilized the inferential approach to identify intentionality, interpretation, denotation, reasoning, and coordination rules in students’ constructions. The results showed that only a few students were able to integrate school representations coherently as intended, and most of these students were in the upper grades. Even when students in the middle grades constructed reasoning processes, they did so use other elements of interpretation and denotation that are not equivalent to those in the school representations. We also found that most children failed to establish any discernible process that would indicate whether they used elements from the school model to infer explanations for the day/night process; that is, they had fragmented elements of representations that prevented them from making valid inferences. Finally, the approach described in this paper is useful for identifying difficulties that students face when dealing with scientific school representations since it offers elements for reconsidering the usual external representations that are used to teach science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-7220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11191-021-00230-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Children ; Night ; Reasoning ; Representations ; Schools ; Students</subject><ispartof>Science &amp; education, 2022-01, Vol.31 (1), p.35-54</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c773-efb42c005a81d708c94576dee885c4f4b8bb903fc53d4d0c1d5397ea51941cc63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallegos-Cázares Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores-Camacho, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderón-Canales, Elena</creatorcontrib><title>Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night</title><title>Science &amp; education</title><description>Most students have interacted with scientific representations that are used as teaching resources in schools. Often these external representations present challenges for understanding. By utilizing a framework based on an inferential, epistemic approach to scientific representations, we have analyzed students’ representational constructions of the day/night process. This study identified the ways students build their representations or models based on their interpretations of school representations. The study participants were 151 students from a semi-urban primary school. Data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Analysis utilized the inferential approach to identify intentionality, interpretation, denotation, reasoning, and coordination rules in students’ constructions. The results showed that only a few students were able to integrate school representations coherently as intended, and most of these students were in the upper grades. Even when students in the middle grades constructed reasoning processes, they did so use other elements of interpretation and denotation that are not equivalent to those in the school representations. We also found that most children failed to establish any discernible process that would indicate whether they used elements from the school model to infer explanations for the day/night process; that is, they had fragmented elements of representations that prevented them from making valid inferences. Finally, the approach described in this paper is useful for identifying difficulties that students face when dealing with scientific school representations since it offers elements for reconsidering the usual external representations that are used to teach science.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0926-7220</issn><issn>1573-1901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjs1KxDAURoMoWEdfwFXAdfXe_DbgRmpHhUEXzn5Ik9R2qM3YdMDZ-Rq-nk9iQRcfZ3fOR8glwjUC6JuEiAZzYPOAccjxiGQoNc_RAB6TDAxTuWYMTslZSlsA4AZYRm6rPryHYbLjgb66Nsaelm3X-zEMP1_fiVafu94OdurikGhs6L09UDt4-ty9tdM5OWlsn8LFPxdkvazW5WO-enl4Ku9WudPzg9DUgjkAaQv0GgpnhNTKh1AU0olG1EVdG-CNk9wLDw695EYHK9EIdE7xBbn60-7G-LEPadps434c5uKGKcYUKlFw_gv44kov</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Gallegos-Cázares Leticia</creator><creator>Flores-Camacho, Fernando</creator><creator>Calderón-Canales, Elena</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night</title><author>Gallegos-Cázares Leticia ; Flores-Camacho, Fernando ; Calderón-Canales, Elena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c773-efb42c005a81d708c94576dee885c4f4b8bb903fc53d4d0c1d5397ea51941cc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallegos-Cázares Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores-Camacho, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderón-Canales, Elena</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Science &amp; education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallegos-Cázares Leticia</au><au>Flores-Camacho, Fernando</au><au>Calderón-Canales, Elena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night</atitle><jtitle>Science &amp; education</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>35-54</pages><issn>0926-7220</issn><eissn>1573-1901</eissn><abstract>Most students have interacted with scientific representations that are used as teaching resources in schools. Often these external representations present challenges for understanding. By utilizing a framework based on an inferential, epistemic approach to scientific representations, we have analyzed students’ representational constructions of the day/night process. This study identified the ways students build their representations or models based on their interpretations of school representations. The study participants were 151 students from a semi-urban primary school. Data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Analysis utilized the inferential approach to identify intentionality, interpretation, denotation, reasoning, and coordination rules in students’ constructions. The results showed that only a few students were able to integrate school representations coherently as intended, and most of these students were in the upper grades. Even when students in the middle grades constructed reasoning processes, they did so use other elements of interpretation and denotation that are not equivalent to those in the school representations. We also found that most children failed to establish any discernible process that would indicate whether they used elements from the school model to infer explanations for the day/night process; that is, they had fragmented elements of representations that prevented them from making valid inferences. Finally, the approach described in this paper is useful for identifying difficulties that students face when dealing with scientific school representations since it offers elements for reconsidering the usual external representations that are used to teach science.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s11191-021-00230-1</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-7220
ispartof Science & education, 2022-01, Vol.31 (1), p.35-54
issn 0926-7220
1573-1901
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2622616483
source SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Children
Night
Reasoning
Representations
Schools
Students
title Elementary School Children’s Explanations of Day and Night
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A25%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elementary%20School%20Children%E2%80%99s%20Explanations%20of%20Day%20and%20Night&rft.jtitle=Science%20&%20education&rft.au=Gallegos-C%C3%A1zares%20Leticia&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=35-54&rft.issn=0926-7220&rft.eissn=1573-1901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11191-021-00230-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2622616483%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622616483&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true