Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis
Introduction Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women’s Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP). Objective The purpo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug safety 2022, Vol.45 (1), p.19-26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Drug safety |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Alkazemi, Afrah McLaughlin, Kevin C. Chan, Michael G. Schontz, Michael J. Anger, Kevin E. Szumita, Paul M. |
description | Introduction
Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women’s Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP).
Objective
The purpose of this analysis was to compare the safety profile of IVP to intravenous piggyback (IVPB) levetiracetam administration.
Methods
This institutional review board-approved, single-center, pre-post analysis was performed between 1 November, 2019 and 30 May, 2020. The electronic health record was used to identify all administrations of intravenous levetiracetam greater than 1000 mg in patients ≥ 18 years old. The major safety outcomes included hypotension, bradycardia, drug-induced sedation, and intravenous site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration. The major efficiency outcome was the time from pharmacy order verification to first-dose administration.
Results
A total of 498 administrations in 162 patients were included in the analysis: 252 administrations in 84 patients in the IVP group and 246 administrations in 78 patients in the IVPB group. The incidence of bradycardia was 7 vs 3 (3.2% vs 1.5%,
p
= 0.34); hypotension 10 vs 6 (5.2% vs 3.5%,
p
= 0.44); sedation 21 vs 36 (19.3% vs 27.9%,
p
= 0.12); and peripheral IV site reactions 0 vs 1 (0% vs 0.6%,
p
= 0.39) in the IVP vs IVPB groups, respectively. The median time between order verification and first-dose administration was significantly reduced in the IVP vs IVPB group (23.5 vs 55 min,
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
Intravenous push levetiracetam administration of doses up to 4000 mg was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, sedation, and infusion site-related adverse events compared to IVPB and resulted in a significant reduction in time to first-dose administration. Intravenous push levetiracetam in doses as high as 4000 mg may be considered safe with appropriate monitoring. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40264-021-01122-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2622303339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2622303339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b5a434b47dc19f8f04e72983e413e3c814740816fb8b7d713fe2d846002335b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxAyyQJdYBvxIn7KqKR6UiEJS15TiTktIkxXYq5Rf4agwtIDasLI3P3Jk5CJ1Qck4JkRdOEJaIiDAaEUoZi-QOGlIqs4hmgu2iYaiKKM5oMkAHzi0IISlL0n004ELSJE7YEL0_6RJ8j9sSTxpv9RqatnP4oXMveApr8JXVBryu8bitV9pCgX37F63m8z7X5hVrjzWegfWVtj0eGV1AXRl8B0Vl9BKPofFgL_EIP4K3rVuB8dUa8KjRy95V7gjtlXrp4Hj7HqLn66vZ-Daa3t9MxqNpZLiMfZTHWnCRC1kYmpVpSQRIlqUcBOXATUqFFCSlSZmnuSwk5SWwIhUJIYzzOI_5ITrb5K5s-9aB82rRdjYs4RRLGOOEc54Fim0oE1Z1Fkq1slUdDlOUqE_9aqNfBf3qS7-Soel0G93lNRQ_Ld--A8A3gAtfzRzs7-x_Yj8ALkGQiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622303339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Alkazemi, Afrah ; McLaughlin, Kevin C. ; Chan, Michael G. ; Schontz, Michael J. ; Anger, Kevin E. ; Szumita, Paul M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alkazemi, Afrah ; McLaughlin, Kevin C. ; Chan, Michael G. ; Schontz, Michael J. ; Anger, Kevin E. ; Szumita, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women’s Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP).
Objective
The purpose of this analysis was to compare the safety profile of IVP to intravenous piggyback (IVPB) levetiracetam administration.
Methods
This institutional review board-approved, single-center, pre-post analysis was performed between 1 November, 2019 and 30 May, 2020. The electronic health record was used to identify all administrations of intravenous levetiracetam greater than 1000 mg in patients ≥ 18 years old. The major safety outcomes included hypotension, bradycardia, drug-induced sedation, and intravenous site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration. The major efficiency outcome was the time from pharmacy order verification to first-dose administration.
Results
A total of 498 administrations in 162 patients were included in the analysis: 252 administrations in 84 patients in the IVP group and 246 administrations in 78 patients in the IVPB group. The incidence of bradycardia was 7 vs 3 (3.2% vs 1.5%,
p
= 0.34); hypotension 10 vs 6 (5.2% vs 3.5%,
p
= 0.44); sedation 21 vs 36 (19.3% vs 27.9%,
p
= 0.12); and peripheral IV site reactions 0 vs 1 (0% vs 0.6%,
p
= 0.39) in the IVP vs IVPB groups, respectively. The median time between order verification and first-dose administration was significantly reduced in the IVP vs IVPB group (23.5 vs 55 min,
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
Intravenous push levetiracetam administration of doses up to 4000 mg was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, sedation, and infusion site-related adverse events compared to IVPB and resulted in a significant reduction in time to first-dose administration. Intravenous push levetiracetam in doses as high as 4000 mg may be considered safe with appropriate monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0114-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1942</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01122-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34716562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Administration, Intravenous ; Adolescent ; Anesthesia ; Binding sites ; Blood pressure ; Bradycardia ; Bradycardia - chemically induced ; Bradycardia - epidemiology ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Drug administration ; Drug dosages ; Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance ; Drug stores ; Efficiency ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Etiracetam ; FDA approval ; Female ; Health care facilities ; Heart rate ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Hypotension - chemically induced ; Hypotension - epidemiology ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Intravenous administration ; Levetiracetam - adverse effects ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Research Article ; Patients ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacy ; Phlebitis ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety ; Side effects ; Verification ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Drug safety, 2022, Vol.45 (1), p.19-26</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b5a434b47dc19f8f04e72983e413e3c814740816fb8b7d713fe2d846002335b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b5a434b47dc19f8f04e72983e413e3c814740816fb8b7d713fe2d846002335b53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2456-8736</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40264-021-01122-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-021-01122-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alkazemi, Afrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schontz, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anger, Kevin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szumita, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis</title><title>Drug safety</title><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><description>Introduction
Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women’s Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP).
Objective
The purpose of this analysis was to compare the safety profile of IVP to intravenous piggyback (IVPB) levetiracetam administration.
Methods
This institutional review board-approved, single-center, pre-post analysis was performed between 1 November, 2019 and 30 May, 2020. The electronic health record was used to identify all administrations of intravenous levetiracetam greater than 1000 mg in patients ≥ 18 years old. The major safety outcomes included hypotension, bradycardia, drug-induced sedation, and intravenous site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration. The major efficiency outcome was the time from pharmacy order verification to first-dose administration.
Results
A total of 498 administrations in 162 patients were included in the analysis: 252 administrations in 84 patients in the IVP group and 246 administrations in 78 patients in the IVPB group. The incidence of bradycardia was 7 vs 3 (3.2% vs 1.5%,
p
= 0.34); hypotension 10 vs 6 (5.2% vs 3.5%,
p
= 0.44); sedation 21 vs 36 (19.3% vs 27.9%,
p
= 0.12); and peripheral IV site reactions 0 vs 1 (0% vs 0.6%,
p
= 0.39) in the IVP vs IVPB groups, respectively. The median time between order verification and first-dose administration was significantly reduced in the IVP vs IVPB group (23.5 vs 55 min,
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
Intravenous push levetiracetam administration of doses up to 4000 mg was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, sedation, and infusion site-related adverse events compared to IVPB and resulted in a significant reduction in time to first-dose administration. Intravenous push levetiracetam in doses as high as 4000 mg may be considered safe with appropriate monitoring.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Bradycardia</subject><subject>Bradycardia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Bradycardia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Drug administration</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Etiracetam</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>Hypotension - chemically induced</subject><subject>Hypotension - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Levetiracetam - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Phlebitis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Verification</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0114-5916</issn><issn>1179-1942</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxAyyQJdYBvxIn7KqKR6UiEJS15TiTktIkxXYq5Rf4agwtIDasLI3P3Jk5CJ1Qck4JkRdOEJaIiDAaEUoZi-QOGlIqs4hmgu2iYaiKKM5oMkAHzi0IISlL0n004ELSJE7YEL0_6RJ8j9sSTxpv9RqatnP4oXMveApr8JXVBryu8bitV9pCgX37F63m8z7X5hVrjzWegfWVtj0eGV1AXRl8B0Vl9BKPofFgL_EIP4K3rVuB8dUa8KjRy95V7gjtlXrp4Hj7HqLn66vZ-Daa3t9MxqNpZLiMfZTHWnCRC1kYmpVpSQRIlqUcBOXATUqFFCSlSZmnuSwk5SWwIhUJIYzzOI_5ITrb5K5s-9aB82rRdjYs4RRLGOOEc54Fim0oE1Z1Fkq1slUdDlOUqE_9aqNfBf3qS7-Soel0G93lNRQ_Ld--A8A3gAtfzRzs7-x_Yj8ALkGQiA</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Alkazemi, Afrah</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Kevin C.</creator><creator>Chan, Michael G.</creator><creator>Schontz, Michael J.</creator><creator>Anger, Kevin E.</creator><creator>Szumita, Paul M.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-8736</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis</title><author>Alkazemi, Afrah ; McLaughlin, Kevin C. ; Chan, Michael G. ; Schontz, Michael J. ; Anger, Kevin E. ; Szumita, Paul M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b5a434b47dc19f8f04e72983e413e3c814740816fb8b7d713fe2d846002335b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Bradycardia</topic><topic>Bradycardia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Bradycardia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Drug administration</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Etiracetam</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>Hypotension - chemically induced</topic><topic>Hypotension - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Levetiracetam - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Phlebitis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Verification</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alkazemi, Afrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schontz, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anger, Kevin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szumita, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alkazemi, Afrah</au><au>McLaughlin, Kevin C.</au><au>Chan, Michael G.</au><au>Schontz, Michael J.</au><au>Anger, Kevin E.</au><au>Szumita, Paul M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle><stitle>Drug Saf</stitle><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>19-26</pages><issn>0114-5916</issn><eissn>1179-1942</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women’s Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP).
Objective
The purpose of this analysis was to compare the safety profile of IVP to intravenous piggyback (IVPB) levetiracetam administration.
Methods
This institutional review board-approved, single-center, pre-post analysis was performed between 1 November, 2019 and 30 May, 2020. The electronic health record was used to identify all administrations of intravenous levetiracetam greater than 1000 mg in patients ≥ 18 years old. The major safety outcomes included hypotension, bradycardia, drug-induced sedation, and intravenous site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration. The major efficiency outcome was the time from pharmacy order verification to first-dose administration.
Results
A total of 498 administrations in 162 patients were included in the analysis: 252 administrations in 84 patients in the IVP group and 246 administrations in 78 patients in the IVPB group. The incidence of bradycardia was 7 vs 3 (3.2% vs 1.5%,
p
= 0.34); hypotension 10 vs 6 (5.2% vs 3.5%,
p
= 0.44); sedation 21 vs 36 (19.3% vs 27.9%,
p
= 0.12); and peripheral IV site reactions 0 vs 1 (0% vs 0.6%,
p
= 0.39) in the IVP vs IVPB groups, respectively. The median time between order verification and first-dose administration was significantly reduced in the IVP vs IVPB group (23.5 vs 55 min,
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
Intravenous push levetiracetam administration of doses up to 4000 mg was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, sedation, and infusion site-related adverse events compared to IVPB and resulted in a significant reduction in time to first-dose administration. Intravenous push levetiracetam in doses as high as 4000 mg may be considered safe with appropriate monitoring.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>34716562</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40264-021-01122-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-8736</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0114-5916 |
ispartof | Drug safety, 2022, Vol.45 (1), p.19-26 |
issn | 0114-5916 1179-1942 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2622303339 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers Administration, Intravenous Adolescent Anesthesia Binding sites Blood pressure Bradycardia Bradycardia - chemically induced Bradycardia - epidemiology Cardiac arrhythmia Drug administration Drug dosages Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Drug stores Efficiency Electronic health records Electronic medical records Etiracetam FDA approval Female Health care facilities Heart rate Hospitals Humans Hypotension Hypotension - chemically induced Hypotension - epidemiology Infusions, Intravenous Intravenous administration Levetiracetam - adverse effects Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research Article Patients Pharmacology/Toxicology Pharmacy Phlebitis Retrospective Studies Safety Side effects Verification Womens health |
title | Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T12%3A01%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20Intravenous%20Push%20Levetiracetam%20Compared%20to%20Intravenous%20Piggyback%20at%20a%20Tertiary%20Academic%20Medical%20Center:%20A%20Retrospective%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Drug%20safety&rft.au=Alkazemi,%20Afrah&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=19-26&rft.issn=0114-5916&rft.eissn=1179-1942&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40264-021-01122-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2622303339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622303339&rft_id=info:pmid/34716562&rfr_iscdi=true |