Systematic evaluation of 1,2-dichloropropane emissions from do-it-yourself spray foam insulation products

Previous studies found 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) emitted from spray foam insulation (SPF) products and it was hypothesised that 1,2-DCP is emitted from cured SPF due to thermal degradation of flame retardants. This study experimentally tested this hypothesis using qualitative and quantitative ga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2022-01, Vol.207, p.108439, Article 108439
Hauptverfasser: Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio, Mumovic, Dejan, Strlič, Matija
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108439
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 207
creator Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio
Mumovic, Dejan
Strlič, Matija
description Previous studies found 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) emitted from spray foam insulation (SPF) products and it was hypothesised that 1,2-DCP is emitted from cured SPF due to thermal degradation of flame retardants. This study experimentally tested this hypothesis using qualitative and quantitative gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) of 1,2-DCP in thirteen SPF products. Multiple batches of each product were tested and 1,2-DCP was found in all samples: raw material (n = 1), emitted during application and curing (n = 12) and emitted from cured products (n = 3). The flame retardants previously hypothesised as the source of 1,2-DCP were spiked onto Tenax-TA tubes and analysed, but no 1,2-DCP was detected. Our experimental data needs a new hypothesis to fully explain the presence of 1,2-DCP. We hypothesise that 1,2-DCP could be present in raw materials used in industrial processing or potentially enter as an impurity resulting from the production process of SPF materials. Our results provide the first experimental evidence of 1,2-DCP emissions during application of do-it-yourself SPF products. 1,2-dichloropropane was classified as a Class 1 carcinogen in 2014, however most occupational exposure limits were developed prior to the re-classification. Further research focusing on health risks is recommended to evaluate optimal balance between energy conservation, chemical exposure, ventilation strategies and materials selection. •1,2-DCP detected during spraying and curing of DIY spray foams.•1,2-DCP may be in raw products, but further data needed to prove hypothesis.•Although 1,2-DCP classified as carcinogen in 2014, few exposure limits have been revised since.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2621880571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132321008350</els_id><sourcerecordid>2621880571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-d4d134e5627374da9524ae62372b2da0f70d95545863d5c9c74464b0041ea7e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLguvoXJODVrvlq0t4U8QsWPKjgLWSTKaa0zZq0C_vvzVI9CwMzzMx7b-YhdEnJihIqb9rVZvKdg2G3YoTR3KwEr4_QglaKF7ISn8doQbgkBeWMn6KzlFqSgTUXC-Tf9mmE3ozeYtiZbspVGHBoML1mhfP2qwsxbHOYATD0PqU8T7iJoccuFH4s9mGKCboGp200e9wE02M_pKmbqTLWTXZM5-ikMV2Ci9-8RB-PD-_3z8X69enl_m5dWM7LsXDCUS6glExxJZypSyYMSMYV2zBnSKOIq8tSlJXkrrS1VUJIsSFEUDAKBF-iq5k3C39PkEbd5gOHLKmZZLSqSKlo3pLzlo0hpQiN3kbfm7jXlOiDrbrVf7bqg616tjUDb2cg5B92HqJO1sNgwfkIdtQu-P8ofgCLVoVd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621880571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic evaluation of 1,2-dichloropropane emissions from do-it-yourself spray foam insulation products</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio ; Mumovic, Dejan ; Strlič, Matija</creator><creatorcontrib>Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio ; Mumovic, Dejan ; Strlič, Matija</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies found 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) emitted from spray foam insulation (SPF) products and it was hypothesised that 1,2-DCP is emitted from cured SPF due to thermal degradation of flame retardants. This study experimentally tested this hypothesis using qualitative and quantitative gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) of 1,2-DCP in thirteen SPF products. Multiple batches of each product were tested and 1,2-DCP was found in all samples: raw material (n = 1), emitted during application and curing (n = 12) and emitted from cured products (n = 3). The flame retardants previously hypothesised as the source of 1,2-DCP were spiked onto Tenax-TA tubes and analysed, but no 1,2-DCP was detected. Our experimental data needs a new hypothesis to fully explain the presence of 1,2-DCP. We hypothesise that 1,2-DCP could be present in raw materials used in industrial processing or potentially enter as an impurity resulting from the production process of SPF materials. Our results provide the first experimental evidence of 1,2-DCP emissions during application of do-it-yourself SPF products. 1,2-dichloropropane was classified as a Class 1 carcinogen in 2014, however most occupational exposure limits were developed prior to the re-classification. Further research focusing on health risks is recommended to evaluate optimal balance between energy conservation, chemical exposure, ventilation strategies and materials selection. •1,2-DCP detected during spraying and curing of DIY spray foams.•1,2-DCP may be in raw products, but further data needed to prove hypothesis.•Although 1,2-DCP classified as carcinogen in 2014, few exposure limits have been revised since.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Carcinogen ; Carcinogens ; Cured products ; Emissions ; Energy conservation ; Evaluation ; Exposure limits ; Flame retardant ; Flame retardants ; Gas chromatography ; Health risks ; Hypotheses ; Insulation ; Materials selection ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational health ; Polyurethane ; Raw materials ; Spectrometry ; Thermal degradation ; Tubes ; Volatile organic compound</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2022-01, Vol.207, p.108439, Article 108439</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-d4d134e5627374da9524ae62372b2da0f70d95545863d5c9c74464b0041ea7e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3536-8839 ; 0000-0001-9036-9773</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumovic, Dejan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strlič, Matija</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic evaluation of 1,2-dichloropropane emissions from do-it-yourself spray foam insulation products</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Previous studies found 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) emitted from spray foam insulation (SPF) products and it was hypothesised that 1,2-DCP is emitted from cured SPF due to thermal degradation of flame retardants. This study experimentally tested this hypothesis using qualitative and quantitative gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) of 1,2-DCP in thirteen SPF products. Multiple batches of each product were tested and 1,2-DCP was found in all samples: raw material (n = 1), emitted during application and curing (n = 12) and emitted from cured products (n = 3). The flame retardants previously hypothesised as the source of 1,2-DCP were spiked onto Tenax-TA tubes and analysed, but no 1,2-DCP was detected. Our experimental data needs a new hypothesis to fully explain the presence of 1,2-DCP. We hypothesise that 1,2-DCP could be present in raw materials used in industrial processing or potentially enter as an impurity resulting from the production process of SPF materials. Our results provide the first experimental evidence of 1,2-DCP emissions during application of do-it-yourself SPF products. 1,2-dichloropropane was classified as a Class 1 carcinogen in 2014, however most occupational exposure limits were developed prior to the re-classification. Further research focusing on health risks is recommended to evaluate optimal balance between energy conservation, chemical exposure, ventilation strategies and materials selection. •1,2-DCP detected during spraying and curing of DIY spray foams.•1,2-DCP may be in raw products, but further data needed to prove hypothesis.•Although 1,2-DCP classified as carcinogen in 2014, few exposure limits have been revised since.</description><subject>Carcinogen</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Cured products</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exposure limits</subject><subject>Flame retardant</subject><subject>Flame retardants</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Polyurethane</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Spectrometry</subject><subject>Thermal degradation</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><subject>Volatile organic compound</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLguvoXJODVrvlq0t4U8QsWPKjgLWSTKaa0zZq0C_vvzVI9CwMzzMx7b-YhdEnJihIqb9rVZvKdg2G3YoTR3KwEr4_QglaKF7ISn8doQbgkBeWMn6KzlFqSgTUXC-Tf9mmE3ozeYtiZbspVGHBoML1mhfP2qwsxbHOYATD0PqU8T7iJoccuFH4s9mGKCboGp200e9wE02M_pKmbqTLWTXZM5-ikMV2Ci9-8RB-PD-_3z8X69enl_m5dWM7LsXDCUS6glExxJZypSyYMSMYV2zBnSKOIq8tSlJXkrrS1VUJIsSFEUDAKBF-iq5k3C39PkEbd5gOHLKmZZLSqSKlo3pLzlo0hpQiN3kbfm7jXlOiDrbrVf7bqg616tjUDb2cg5B92HqJO1sNgwfkIdtQu-P8ofgCLVoVd</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio</creator><creator>Mumovic, Dejan</creator><creator>Strlič, Matija</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3536-8839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-9773</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Systematic evaluation of 1,2-dichloropropane emissions from do-it-yourself spray foam insulation products</title><author>Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio ; Mumovic, Dejan ; Strlič, Matija</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-d4d134e5627374da9524ae62372b2da0f70d95545863d5c9c74464b0041ea7e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carcinogen</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Cured products</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exposure limits</topic><topic>Flame retardant</topic><topic>Flame retardants</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Polyurethane</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Spectrometry</topic><topic>Thermal degradation</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><topic>Volatile organic compound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumovic, Dejan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strlič, Matija</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naldzhiev, Dzhordzhio</au><au>Mumovic, Dejan</au><au>Strlič, Matija</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic evaluation of 1,2-dichloropropane emissions from do-it-yourself spray foam insulation products</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>207</volume><spage>108439</spage><pages>108439-</pages><artnum>108439</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Previous studies found 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) emitted from spray foam insulation (SPF) products and it was hypothesised that 1,2-DCP is emitted from cured SPF due to thermal degradation of flame retardants. This study experimentally tested this hypothesis using qualitative and quantitative gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) of 1,2-DCP in thirteen SPF products. Multiple batches of each product were tested and 1,2-DCP was found in all samples: raw material (n = 1), emitted during application and curing (n = 12) and emitted from cured products (n = 3). The flame retardants previously hypothesised as the source of 1,2-DCP were spiked onto Tenax-TA tubes and analysed, but no 1,2-DCP was detected. Our experimental data needs a new hypothesis to fully explain the presence of 1,2-DCP. We hypothesise that 1,2-DCP could be present in raw materials used in industrial processing or potentially enter as an impurity resulting from the production process of SPF materials. Our results provide the first experimental evidence of 1,2-DCP emissions during application of do-it-yourself SPF products. 1,2-dichloropropane was classified as a Class 1 carcinogen in 2014, however most occupational exposure limits were developed prior to the re-classification. Further research focusing on health risks is recommended to evaluate optimal balance between energy conservation, chemical exposure, ventilation strategies and materials selection. •1,2-DCP detected during spraying and curing of DIY spray foams.•1,2-DCP may be in raw products, but further data needed to prove hypothesis.•Although 1,2-DCP classified as carcinogen in 2014, few exposure limits have been revised since.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108439</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3536-8839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-9773</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2022-01, Vol.207, p.108439, Article 108439
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2621880571
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Carcinogen
Carcinogens
Cured products
Emissions
Energy conservation
Evaluation
Exposure limits
Flame retardant
Flame retardants
Gas chromatography
Health risks
Hypotheses
Insulation
Materials selection
Occupational exposure
Occupational health
Polyurethane
Raw materials
Spectrometry
Thermal degradation
Tubes
Volatile organic compound
title Systematic evaluation of 1,2-dichloropropane emissions from do-it-yourself spray foam insulation products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20evaluation%20of%201,2-dichloropropane%20emissions%20from%20do-it-yourself%20spray%20foam%20insulation%20products&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Naldzhiev,%20Dzhordzhio&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=207&rft.spage=108439&rft.pages=108439-&rft.artnum=108439&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621880571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621880571&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132321008350&rfr_iscdi=true