Water quality and juvenile development of mullet Mugil liza in a biofloc system with an additional carbon source: Dextrose, liquid molasses or rice bran?
This work investigates the effect of adding different sources of organic carbon in biofloc systems on water quality, microorganisms' density and zootechnical performance of juvenile Mugil liza raised in the biofloc system indoors over 45 days. Fish (±7.99 g) were stored at a density of 15 fish...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture research 2022-02, Vol.53 (3), p.870-883 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 883 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 870 |
| container_title | Aquaculture research |
| container_volume | 53 |
| creator | Rocha, Andréa Ferretto Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães Wasielesky, Wilson Abreu, Paulo César Lisboa, Viviana Cavalli, Lissandra Tesser, Marcelo Borges |
| description | This work investigates the effect of adding different sources of organic carbon in biofloc systems on water quality, microorganisms' density and zootechnical performance of juvenile Mugil liza raised in the biofloc system indoors over 45 days. Fish (±7.99 g) were stored at a density of 15 fish per tank and fed a commercial feed of 42% protein. The study was arranged in three treatments according to the carbon source: dextrose—DE, liquid molasses—LM and rice bran—RB, and one control with no bioflocs (clear water—CW), all in triplicate. The treatments had no influence (p > 0.05) on the performance parameters of the animals, survival (over 90%), as well on the productivity (between 0.35 and 0.6 kg/m3). Overall mean of total ammonia was lower (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/are.15628 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2621017542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2621017542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-a0ab06ab85e52888471b9b547b2c1067483d1b1590b932eb4b11b4e476028c5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoso-HnwHwx4EuyapE3b9SKyfsKKIIreStJONUva7Cbprus_8d8arVfnMnN45uXliaJDSkY0zKmwOKI8Y8VGtEOTjMeMkvHmz815zHn-uh3tOjcjhKYkoTvR14vwaGHRC638GkRXw6xfYqc0Qo1L1GbeYufBNND2WqOH-_5NadDqU4DqQIBUptGmArd2HltYKf8eYkDUtfLKdEJDJaw0HTjT2wrP4BI_vDUOT0LIolc1tEYL59CBsWBVhSCt6M73o61GaIcHf3sver6-eprcxtOHm7vJxTSukoQVsSBCkkzIgiNnRVGkOZVjydNcsoqSLE-LpKaS8jGR44ShTCWlMsU0zwgrKi6TvehoyJ1bs-jR-XIWiobermRZsEdznrJAHQ9UFao7i005t6oVdl1SUv6YL4P58td8YE8HdhUsrv8Hy4vHq-HjG2Grhm0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621017542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water quality and juvenile development of mullet Mugil liza in a biofloc system with an additional carbon source: Dextrose, liquid molasses or rice bran?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rocha, Andréa Ferretto ; Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães ; Wasielesky, Wilson ; Abreu, Paulo César ; Lisboa, Viviana ; Cavalli, Lissandra ; Tesser, Marcelo Borges</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Andréa Ferretto ; Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães ; Wasielesky, Wilson ; Abreu, Paulo César ; Lisboa, Viviana ; Cavalli, Lissandra ; Tesser, Marcelo Borges</creatorcontrib><description>This work investigates the effect of adding different sources of organic carbon in biofloc systems on water quality, microorganisms' density and zootechnical performance of juvenile Mugil liza raised in the biofloc system indoors over 45 days. Fish (±7.99 g) were stored at a density of 15 fish per tank and fed a commercial feed of 42% protein. The study was arranged in three treatments according to the carbon source: dextrose—DE, liquid molasses—LM and rice bran—RB, and one control with no bioflocs (clear water—CW), all in triplicate. The treatments had no influence (p > 0.05) on the performance parameters of the animals, survival (over 90%), as well on the productivity (between 0.35 and 0.6 kg/m3). Overall mean of total ammonia was lower (p < 0.05) in the biofloc systems than in clear water (CW). Nitrite average was lower (p < 0.05) in the bioflocs fertilized with LM and RB carbon sources, having a concentration of 1.3 ± 1.9 mg/L and 0.6 ± 0.6 mg/L respectively. RB also had the smallest range in nitrite levels throughout the study, from 0.04 to 2.5 mg/L. The LM and RB provided a greater (p < 0.05) abundance of total adhered and coccus bacteria. Water consumption was higher (p < 0.05) in the CW (1.87 m3 per tank) compared with the biofloc treatments (0.41 and 0.44 m3 per tank). Liquid molasses contributed to maintaining water quality compared with clear water, providing savings of around 80% of water.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.15628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; aquaculture ; Biofloc technology ; Carbon ; Carbon sources ; Density ; Dextrose ; Fish ; heterotrophic system ; Juveniles ; liquid molasses ; Marine fishes ; Microorganisms ; Molasses ; Mugil liza ; Mullet ; Organic carbon ; Rice ; Rice bran ; Survival ; sustainability ; Syrups & sweeteners ; Water conservation ; Water consumption ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2022-02, Vol.53 (3), p.870-883</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-a0ab06ab85e52888471b9b547b2c1067483d1b1590b932eb4b11b4e476028c5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-a0ab06ab85e52888471b9b547b2c1067483d1b1590b932eb4b11b4e476028c5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5408-7784 ; 0000-0001-8531-7362 ; 0000-0002-4960-9648 ; 0000-0002-7657-1112 ; 0000-0002-0445-1277 ; 0000-0002-7267-4755 ; 0000-0003-4818-9829</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.15628$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.15628$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Andréa Ferretto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasielesky, Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Paulo César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Viviana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Lissandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesser, Marcelo Borges</creatorcontrib><title>Water quality and juvenile development of mullet Mugil liza in a biofloc system with an additional carbon source: Dextrose, liquid molasses or rice bran?</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>This work investigates the effect of adding different sources of organic carbon in biofloc systems on water quality, microorganisms' density and zootechnical performance of juvenile Mugil liza raised in the biofloc system indoors over 45 days. Fish (±7.99 g) were stored at a density of 15 fish per tank and fed a commercial feed of 42% protein. The study was arranged in three treatments according to the carbon source: dextrose—DE, liquid molasses—LM and rice bran—RB, and one control with no bioflocs (clear water—CW), all in triplicate. The treatments had no influence (p > 0.05) on the performance parameters of the animals, survival (over 90%), as well on the productivity (between 0.35 and 0.6 kg/m3). Overall mean of total ammonia was lower (p < 0.05) in the biofloc systems than in clear water (CW). Nitrite average was lower (p < 0.05) in the bioflocs fertilized with LM and RB carbon sources, having a concentration of 1.3 ± 1.9 mg/L and 0.6 ± 0.6 mg/L respectively. RB also had the smallest range in nitrite levels throughout the study, from 0.04 to 2.5 mg/L. The LM and RB provided a greater (p < 0.05) abundance of total adhered and coccus bacteria. Water consumption was higher (p < 0.05) in the CW (1.87 m3 per tank) compared with the biofloc treatments (0.41 and 0.44 m3 per tank). Liquid molasses contributed to maintaining water quality compared with clear water, providing savings of around 80% of water.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>aquaculture</subject><subject>Biofloc technology</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sources</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dextrose</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>heterotrophic system</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>liquid molasses</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Molasses</subject><subject>Mugil liza</subject><subject>Mullet</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Rice bran</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>Syrups & sweeteners</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoso-HnwHwx4EuyapE3b9SKyfsKKIIreStJONUva7Cbprus_8d8arVfnMnN45uXliaJDSkY0zKmwOKI8Y8VGtEOTjMeMkvHmz815zHn-uh3tOjcjhKYkoTvR14vwaGHRC638GkRXw6xfYqc0Qo1L1GbeYufBNND2WqOH-_5NadDqU4DqQIBUptGmArd2HltYKf8eYkDUtfLKdEJDJaw0HTjT2wrP4BI_vDUOT0LIolc1tEYL59CBsWBVhSCt6M73o61GaIcHf3sver6-eprcxtOHm7vJxTSukoQVsSBCkkzIgiNnRVGkOZVjydNcsoqSLE-LpKaS8jGR44ShTCWlMsU0zwgrKi6TvehoyJ1bs-jR-XIWiobermRZsEdznrJAHQ9UFao7i005t6oVdl1SUv6YL4P58td8YE8HdhUsrv8Hy4vHq-HjG2Grhm0</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Rocha, Andréa Ferretto</creator><creator>Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães</creator><creator>Wasielesky, Wilson</creator><creator>Abreu, Paulo César</creator><creator>Lisboa, Viviana</creator><creator>Cavalli, Lissandra</creator><creator>Tesser, Marcelo Borges</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5408-7784</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4960-9648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-1112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-1277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-4755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-9829</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Water quality and juvenile development of mullet Mugil liza in a biofloc system with an additional carbon source: Dextrose, liquid molasses or rice bran?</title><author>Rocha, Andréa Ferretto ; Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães ; Wasielesky, Wilson ; Abreu, Paulo César ; Lisboa, Viviana ; Cavalli, Lissandra ; Tesser, Marcelo Borges</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-a0ab06ab85e52888471b9b547b2c1067483d1b1590b932eb4b11b4e476028c5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>aquaculture</topic><topic>Biofloc technology</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sources</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dextrose</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>heterotrophic system</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>liquid molasses</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Molasses</topic><topic>Mugil liza</topic><topic>Mullet</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Rice bran</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>Syrups & sweeteners</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Andréa Ferretto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasielesky, Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, Paulo César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Viviana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Lissandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesser, Marcelo Borges</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocha, Andréa Ferretto</au><au>Barbosa, Vitalina Magalhães</au><au>Wasielesky, Wilson</au><au>Abreu, Paulo César</au><au>Lisboa, Viviana</au><au>Cavalli, Lissandra</au><au>Tesser, Marcelo Borges</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water quality and juvenile development of mullet Mugil liza in a biofloc system with an additional carbon source: Dextrose, liquid molasses or rice bran?</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>870</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>870-883</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>This work investigates the effect of adding different sources of organic carbon in biofloc systems on water quality, microorganisms' density and zootechnical performance of juvenile Mugil liza raised in the biofloc system indoors over 45 days. Fish (±7.99 g) were stored at a density of 15 fish per tank and fed a commercial feed of 42% protein. The study was arranged in three treatments according to the carbon source: dextrose—DE, liquid molasses—LM and rice bran—RB, and one control with no bioflocs (clear water—CW), all in triplicate. The treatments had no influence (p > 0.05) on the performance parameters of the animals, survival (over 90%), as well on the productivity (between 0.35 and 0.6 kg/m3). Overall mean of total ammonia was lower (p < 0.05) in the biofloc systems than in clear water (CW). Nitrite average was lower (p < 0.05) in the bioflocs fertilized with LM and RB carbon sources, having a concentration of 1.3 ± 1.9 mg/L and 0.6 ± 0.6 mg/L respectively. RB also had the smallest range in nitrite levels throughout the study, from 0.04 to 2.5 mg/L. The LM and RB provided a greater (p < 0.05) abundance of total adhered and coccus bacteria. Water consumption was higher (p < 0.05) in the CW (1.87 m3 per tank) compared with the biofloc treatments (0.41 and 0.44 m3 per tank). Liquid molasses contributed to maintaining water quality compared with clear water, providing savings of around 80% of water.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/are.15628</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5408-7784</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4960-9648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-1112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-1277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-4755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-9829</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1355-557X |
| ispartof | Aquaculture research, 2022-02, Vol.53 (3), p.870-883 |
| issn | 1355-557X 1365-2109 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2621017542 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Ammonia aquaculture Biofloc technology Carbon Carbon sources Density Dextrose Fish heterotrophic system Juveniles liquid molasses Marine fishes Microorganisms Molasses Mugil liza Mullet Organic carbon Rice Rice bran Survival sustainability Syrups & sweeteners Water conservation Water consumption Water quality |
| title | Water quality and juvenile development of mullet Mugil liza in a biofloc system with an additional carbon source: Dextrose, liquid molasses or rice bran? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20quality%20and%20juvenile%20development%20of%20mullet%20Mugil%20liza%20in%20a%20biofloc%20system%20with%20an%20additional%20carbon%20source:%20Dextrose,%20liquid%20molasses%20or%20rice%20bran?&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Rocha,%20Andr%C3%A9a%20Ferretto&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=870&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=870-883&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.15628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2621017542%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621017542&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |