Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed

Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been ap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2018-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1961-1976
Hauptverfasser: Dauphinais, Justine D., Miller, Loren M., Swanson, Reid G., Sorensen, Peter W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1976
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1961
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 20
creator Dauphinais, Justine D.
Miller, Loren M.
Swanson, Reid G.
Sorensen, Peter W.
description Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2620838416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993584273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1OAzEQhVcIJCBwADpL1Avjv9hbIsSfBKIAasuxZ8GQ9S52AqTjAHTckJNgCAUNVDMaf--N7VdVOxT2KIDazxQkhxqorulYQb1YqTaoVLymYixWS8-1qrkUar3azPkeABoFcqN6u-rnyeHH63sO8YH4RbRdcJngyzC1IZLZHRIf8iyFyXwW-khs9GTAlMsMo0PSt2VEQnyyOTwhGfphPrXfZDlxfdeVztk0EOtSnzOxpOs9TslF8M9YPFIkz7aUfId-q1pr7TTj9k8dVTfHR9eHp_X55cnZ4cF57bgQs1oomDDuvGQSmNNovfIgW1AcUWnGWkEFSuG5c1pySpkAJXXTCE_FBJjmo2p36Tuk_nFebmHuyy_EstKwMQPNtaDj_yjaNFxqwRQvFF1S389L2Johhc6mhaFgvqIxy2hMicZ8RWMWRcOWmlzYeIvpl_Ofok_NcJP6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993584273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Dauphinais, Justine D. ; Miller, Loren M. ; Swanson, Reid G. ; Sorensen, Peter W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dauphinais, Justine D. ; Miller, Loren M. ; Swanson, Reid G. ; Sorensen, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><description>Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Breeding success ; Carp ; Culling ; Cyprinus carpio ; Demographics ; Developmental Biology ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Habitats ; Introduced species ; Invasive fish ; Invasive species ; Lakes ; Landscape preservation ; Life Sciences ; Marking and tracking techniques ; Microsatellites ; Migration ; Nonnative species ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Ponds ; Population structure ; Reproduction ; River basins ; Rivers ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Source-sink relationships ; Tagging ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2018-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1961-1976</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Biological Invasions is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dauphinais, Justine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Loren M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Reid G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><title>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.</description><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Carp</subject><subject>Culling</subject><subject>Cyprinus carpio</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive fish</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marking and tracking techniques</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Source-sink relationships</subject><subject>Tagging</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1OAzEQhVcIJCBwADpL1Avjv9hbIsSfBKIAasuxZ8GQ9S52AqTjAHTckJNgCAUNVDMaf--N7VdVOxT2KIDazxQkhxqorulYQb1YqTaoVLymYixWS8-1qrkUar3azPkeABoFcqN6u-rnyeHH63sO8YH4RbRdcJngyzC1IZLZHRIf8iyFyXwW-khs9GTAlMsMo0PSt2VEQnyyOTwhGfphPrXfZDlxfdeVztk0EOtSnzOxpOs9TslF8M9YPFIkz7aUfId-q1pr7TTj9k8dVTfHR9eHp_X55cnZ4cF57bgQs1oomDDuvGQSmNNovfIgW1AcUWnGWkEFSuG5c1pySpkAJXXTCE_FBJjmo2p36Tuk_nFebmHuyy_EstKwMQPNtaDj_yjaNFxqwRQvFF1S389L2Johhc6mhaFgvqIxy2hMicZ8RWMWRcOWmlzYeIvpl_Ofok_NcJP6</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Dauphinais, Justine D.</creator><creator>Miller, Loren M.</creator><creator>Swanson, Reid G.</creator><creator>Sorensen, Peter W.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</title><author>Dauphinais, Justine D. ; Miller, Loren M. ; Swanson, Reid G. ; Sorensen, Peter W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Carp</topic><topic>Culling</topic><topic>Cyprinus carpio</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive fish</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marking and tracking techniques</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Source-sink relationships</topic><topic>Tagging</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dauphinais, Justine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Loren M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Reid G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dauphinais, Justine D.</au><au>Miller, Loren M.</au><au>Swanson, Reid G.</au><au>Sorensen, Peter W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1961</spage><epage>1976</epage><pages>1961-1976</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2018-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1961-1976
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2620838416
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Breeding success
Carp
Culling
Cyprinus carpio
Demographics
Developmental Biology
Dispersal
Dispersion
Ecology
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Habitats
Introduced species
Invasive fish
Invasive species
Lakes
Landscape preservation
Life Sciences
Marking and tracking techniques
Microsatellites
Migration
Nonnative species
Original Paper
Plant Sciences
Ponds
Population structure
Reproduction
River basins
Rivers
Sampling
Sampling methods
Source-sink relationships
Tagging
Watersheds
title Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A14%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%E2%80%93sink%20dynamics%20explain%20the%20distribution%20and%20persistence%20of%20an%20invasive%20population%20of%20common%20carp%20across%20a%20model%20Midwestern%20watershed&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Dauphinais,%20Justine%20D.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1961&rft.epage=1976&rft.pages=1961-1976&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993584273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993584273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true