Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed
Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been ap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological invasions 2018-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1961-1976 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1976 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1961 |
container_title | Biological invasions |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Dauphinais, Justine D. Miller, Loren M. Swanson, Reid G. Sorensen, Peter W. |
description | Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2620838416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993584273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1OAzEQhVcIJCBwADpL1Avjv9hbIsSfBKIAasuxZ8GQ9S52AqTjAHTckJNgCAUNVDMaf--N7VdVOxT2KIDazxQkhxqorulYQb1YqTaoVLymYixWS8-1qrkUar3azPkeABoFcqN6u-rnyeHH63sO8YH4RbRdcJngyzC1IZLZHRIf8iyFyXwW-khs9GTAlMsMo0PSt2VEQnyyOTwhGfphPrXfZDlxfdeVztk0EOtSnzOxpOs9TslF8M9YPFIkz7aUfId-q1pr7TTj9k8dVTfHR9eHp_X55cnZ4cF57bgQs1oomDDuvGQSmNNovfIgW1AcUWnGWkEFSuG5c1pySpkAJXXTCE_FBJjmo2p36Tuk_nFebmHuyy_EstKwMQPNtaDj_yjaNFxqwRQvFF1S389L2Johhc6mhaFgvqIxy2hMicZ8RWMWRcOWmlzYeIvpl_Ofok_NcJP6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993584273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Dauphinais, Justine D. ; Miller, Loren M. ; Swanson, Reid G. ; Sorensen, Peter W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dauphinais, Justine D. ; Miller, Loren M. ; Swanson, Reid G. ; Sorensen, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><description>Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Breeding success ; Carp ; Culling ; Cyprinus carpio ; Demographics ; Developmental Biology ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Habitats ; Introduced species ; Invasive fish ; Invasive species ; Lakes ; Landscape preservation ; Life Sciences ; Marking and tracking techniques ; Microsatellites ; Migration ; Nonnative species ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Ponds ; Population structure ; Reproduction ; River basins ; Rivers ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Source-sink relationships ; Tagging ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2018-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1961-1976</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Biological Invasions is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dauphinais, Justine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Loren M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Reid G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><title>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.</description><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Carp</subject><subject>Culling</subject><subject>Cyprinus carpio</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive fish</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marking and tracking techniques</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Source-sink relationships</subject><subject>Tagging</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1OAzEQhVcIJCBwADpL1Avjv9hbIsSfBKIAasuxZ8GQ9S52AqTjAHTckJNgCAUNVDMaf--N7VdVOxT2KIDazxQkhxqorulYQb1YqTaoVLymYixWS8-1qrkUar3azPkeABoFcqN6u-rnyeHH63sO8YH4RbRdcJngyzC1IZLZHRIf8iyFyXwW-khs9GTAlMsMo0PSt2VEQnyyOTwhGfphPrXfZDlxfdeVztk0EOtSnzOxpOs9TslF8M9YPFIkz7aUfId-q1pr7TTj9k8dVTfHR9eHp_X55cnZ4cF57bgQs1oomDDuvGQSmNNovfIgW1AcUWnGWkEFSuG5c1pySpkAJXXTCE_FBJjmo2p36Tuk_nFebmHuyy_EstKwMQPNtaDj_yjaNFxqwRQvFF1S389L2Johhc6mhaFgvqIxy2hMicZ8RWMWRcOWmlzYeIvpl_Ofok_NcJP6</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Dauphinais, Justine D.</creator><creator>Miller, Loren M.</creator><creator>Swanson, Reid G.</creator><creator>Sorensen, Peter W.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</title><author>Dauphinais, Justine D. ; Miller, Loren M. ; Swanson, Reid G. ; Sorensen, Peter W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-470b23cd52502c8ead7d05f073ee7822f414e54d3cc85311240758994d14b0283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Carp</topic><topic>Culling</topic><topic>Cyprinus carpio</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive fish</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marking and tracking techniques</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Source-sink relationships</topic><topic>Tagging</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dauphinais, Justine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Loren M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Reid G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dauphinais, Justine D.</au><au>Miller, Loren M.</au><au>Swanson, Reid G.</au><au>Sorensen, Peter W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1961</spage><epage>1976</epage><pages>1961-1976</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Source–sink theory is an ecological framework that describes how site and habitat-specific demographic rates and patch connectivity can explain population structure and persistence across heterogeneous landscapes. Although commonly used in conservation planning, source–sink theory has rarely been applied to the management of invasive species. This study tested whether the common carp, one of the world’s most invasive species, exhibits source–sink dynamics in a representative watershed in the Upper Mississippi River Basin comprised of a dozen interconnected ponds and lakes. To test for source–sink population structure, we used standard fish sampling techniques, tagging, and genetic assignment methods to describe habitat-specific recruitment rates and dispersal. Five years of sampling revealed that while adult carp were found across the entire watershed, reproductive success (the presence of young carp) was restricted to shallow ponds. Additionally, nearly a third of the carp tagged in a representative pond dispersed into the connected deeper lakes, suggesting that ponds in this system serve as sources and lakes as sinks. This possibility was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of carp tissue samples (n = 1041) which revealed the presence of two distinct strains of carp cohabitating in the lakes, whose natal origins could be traced back to one of two pond systems, with many adult carp attempting to migrate back into these natal ponds to spawn. We conclude that the distribution and persistence of invasive carp in complex interconnected systems may often be driven by source–sink dynamics and that their populations could be controlled by suppressing reproduction in source habitats or by disrupting dispersal pathways, instead of culling individuals from sink habitats.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-3547 |
ispartof | Biological invasions, 2018-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1961-1976 |
issn | 1387-3547 1573-1464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2620838416 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Breeding success Carp Culling Cyprinus carpio Demographics Developmental Biology Dispersal Dispersion Ecology Freshwater & Marine Ecology Habitats Introduced species Invasive fish Invasive species Lakes Landscape preservation Life Sciences Marking and tracking techniques Microsatellites Migration Nonnative species Original Paper Plant Sciences Ponds Population structure Reproduction River basins Rivers Sampling Sampling methods Source-sink relationships Tagging Watersheds |
title | Source–sink dynamics explain the distribution and persistence of an invasive population of common carp across a model Midwestern watershed |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A14%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%E2%80%93sink%20dynamics%20explain%20the%20distribution%20and%20persistence%20of%20an%20invasive%20population%20of%20common%20carp%20across%20a%20model%20Midwestern%20watershed&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Dauphinais,%20Justine%20D.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1961&rft.epage=1976&rft.pages=1961-1976&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-018-1670-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993584273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993584273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |