Quantitative easing and economic growth in Japan: A meta‐analysis
We present an original meta‐probit analysis for the effect of the Bank of Japan monetary policy on economic growth for the period 2001–2020, using 45 studies. We use impulse response functions in VAR type models to assess if the effects on output of unconventional monetary policies are significant (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic surveys 2022-02, Vol.36 (1), p.235-268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 268 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | Journal of economic surveys |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra Linhares, Pedro Martins, Luís Filipe Sequeira, Tiago Neves |
description | We present an original meta‐probit analysis for the effect of the Bank of Japan monetary policy on economic growth for the period 2001–2020, using 45 studies. We use impulse response functions in VAR type models to assess if the effects on output of unconventional monetary policies are significant (positive or negative) or not. Funnel asymmetry and precision effect tests do not provide a striking evidence of publication bias. Additionally, we do not find a consensus regarding the output growth effects during the quantitative easing years. Besides variables linked with the studies’ methodological features, other variables such as industrial production and the price level have a greater effect on the probability of reporting statistically significant (positive) effects of quantitative easing on output growth. However, one of the most important (policy) implications of our study is that the evidence for a significant real effect of unconventional monetary policy is weak. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joes.12449 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2619734384</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619734384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-7ee5173517245d2a17b956dbc2beea6e2570545040e6ad73283d37b2535f06cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsbnyDgTpiaeybuSvFWCkXUdchkTmtKm6mTqaU7H8Fn9EmcOoI7DxzO5uPnPx9C55QMaDtXiwrSgDIhzAHqUaF0pgQ1h6hHjCQZyYk4RicpLQghWmvWQ6PHjYtNaFwT3gGDSyHOsYslBl_FahU8ntfVtnnFIeKxW7t4jYd4BY37-vh00S13KaRTdDRzywRnv7ePXm5vnkf32WR69zAaTjIvJDeZBpBU83aZkCVzVBdGqrLwrABwCpjURApJBAHlSs1ZzkuuCya5nBHlPe-jiy53XVdvG0iNXVSbui2RLFPUaC54LlrqsqN8XaVUw8yu67By9c5SYveS7F6S_ZHUwriD9--G9Ifq3CiWt1VbhHbINixh90-YHU9vnrrYbw9Lc38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619734384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative easing and economic growth in Japan: A meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra ; Linhares, Pedro ; Martins, Luís Filipe ; Sequeira, Tiago Neves</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra ; Linhares, Pedro ; Martins, Luís Filipe ; Sequeira, Tiago Neves</creatorcontrib><description>We present an original meta‐probit analysis for the effect of the Bank of Japan monetary policy on economic growth for the period 2001–2020, using 45 studies. We use impulse response functions in VAR type models to assess if the effects on output of unconventional monetary policies are significant (positive or negative) or not. Funnel asymmetry and precision effect tests do not provide a striking evidence of publication bias. Additionally, we do not find a consensus regarding the output growth effects during the quantitative easing years. Besides variables linked with the studies’ methodological features, other variables such as industrial production and the price level have a greater effect on the probability of reporting statistically significant (positive) effects of quantitative easing on output growth. However, one of the most important (policy) implications of our study is that the evidence for a significant real effect of unconventional monetary policy is weak.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-6419</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joes.12449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bank of Japan ; Economic growth ; Industrial production ; Meta-analysis ; meta‐probit ; Monetary policy ; Price levels ; quantitative easing</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic surveys, 2022-02, Vol.36 (1), p.235-268</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-7ee5173517245d2a17b956dbc2beea6e2570545040e6ad73283d37b2535f06cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-7ee5173517245d2a17b956dbc2beea6e2570545040e6ad73283d37b2535f06cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9034-846X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoes.12449$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoes.12449$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Luís Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Tiago Neves</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative easing and economic growth in Japan: A meta‐analysis</title><title>Journal of economic surveys</title><description>We present an original meta‐probit analysis for the effect of the Bank of Japan monetary policy on economic growth for the period 2001–2020, using 45 studies. We use impulse response functions in VAR type models to assess if the effects on output of unconventional monetary policies are significant (positive or negative) or not. Funnel asymmetry and precision effect tests do not provide a striking evidence of publication bias. Additionally, we do not find a consensus regarding the output growth effects during the quantitative easing years. Besides variables linked with the studies’ methodological features, other variables such as industrial production and the price level have a greater effect on the probability of reporting statistically significant (positive) effects of quantitative easing on output growth. However, one of the most important (policy) implications of our study is that the evidence for a significant real effect of unconventional monetary policy is weak.</description><subject>Bank of Japan</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>meta‐probit</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Price levels</subject><subject>quantitative easing</subject><issn>0950-0804</issn><issn>1467-6419</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsbnyDgTpiaeybuSvFWCkXUdchkTmtKm6mTqaU7H8Fn9EmcOoI7DxzO5uPnPx9C55QMaDtXiwrSgDIhzAHqUaF0pgQ1h6hHjCQZyYk4RicpLQghWmvWQ6PHjYtNaFwT3gGDSyHOsYslBl_FahU8ntfVtnnFIeKxW7t4jYd4BY37-vh00S13KaRTdDRzywRnv7ePXm5vnkf32WR69zAaTjIvJDeZBpBU83aZkCVzVBdGqrLwrABwCpjURApJBAHlSs1ZzkuuCya5nBHlPe-jiy53XVdvG0iNXVSbui2RLFPUaC54LlrqsqN8XaVUw8yu67By9c5SYveS7F6S_ZHUwriD9--G9Ifq3CiWt1VbhHbINixh90-YHU9vnrrYbw9Lc38</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra</creator><creator>Linhares, Pedro</creator><creator>Martins, Luís Filipe</creator><creator>Sequeira, Tiago Neves</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-846X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Quantitative easing and economic growth in Japan: A meta‐analysis</title><author>Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra ; Linhares, Pedro ; Martins, Luís Filipe ; Sequeira, Tiago Neves</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-7ee5173517245d2a17b956dbc2beea6e2570545040e6ad73283d37b2535f06cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bank of Japan</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>meta‐probit</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Price levels</topic><topic>quantitative easing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhares, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Luís Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Tiago Neves</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic surveys</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferreira‐Lopes, Alexandra</au><au>Linhares, Pedro</au><au>Martins, Luís Filipe</au><au>Sequeira, Tiago Neves</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative easing and economic growth in Japan: A meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic surveys</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>235-268</pages><issn>0950-0804</issn><eissn>1467-6419</eissn><abstract>We present an original meta‐probit analysis for the effect of the Bank of Japan monetary policy on economic growth for the period 2001–2020, using 45 studies. We use impulse response functions in VAR type models to assess if the effects on output of unconventional monetary policies are significant (positive or negative) or not. Funnel asymmetry and precision effect tests do not provide a striking evidence of publication bias. Additionally, we do not find a consensus regarding the output growth effects during the quantitative easing years. Besides variables linked with the studies’ methodological features, other variables such as industrial production and the price level have a greater effect on the probability of reporting statistically significant (positive) effects of quantitative easing on output growth. However, one of the most important (policy) implications of our study is that the evidence for a significant real effect of unconventional monetary policy is weak.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/joes.12449</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-846X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-0804 |
ispartof | Journal of economic surveys, 2022-02, Vol.36 (1), p.235-268 |
issn | 0950-0804 1467-6419 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2619734384 |
source | Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Bank of Japan Economic growth Industrial production Meta-analysis meta‐probit Monetary policy Price levels quantitative easing |
title | Quantitative easing and economic growth in Japan: A meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20easing%20and%20economic%20growth%20in%20Japan:%20A%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20surveys&rft.au=Ferreira%E2%80%90Lopes,%20Alexandra&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=235-268&rft.issn=0950-0804&rft.eissn=1467-6419&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joes.12449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2619734384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619734384&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |