Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers—a systematic review and meta-analysis
With the progressive elimination of mercury column devices for blood pressure (BP) measurement in children and adolescents, valid alternatives are needed. Oscillometric devices provide a replacement without mercury, are fully automated, and have excellent reliability among evaluators. Here, the goal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of pediatrics 2022, Vol.181 (1), p.9-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | European journal of pediatrics |
container_volume | 181 |
creator | Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne Souza, Letícia Gabrielle Mello, Gabriele Luz De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira |
description | With the progressive elimination of mercury column devices for blood pressure (BP) measurement in children and adolescents, valid alternatives are needed. Oscillometric devices provide a replacement without mercury, are fully automated, and have excellent reliability among evaluators. Here, the goal was to test the accuracy of automatic blood pressure monitor devices compared to the mercury sphygmomanometer for BP measurement in children and adolescents. Electronic databases are EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Web of Science. We selected 8974 potentially eligible articles and two authors independently. We separately reviewed 370 full papers. Potentially eligible articles were selected according to the following criteria: (a) articles published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish; (b) screening of titles; (c) screening of abstracts; and (d) retrieval and screening of the full article to determine whether it met the inclusion criteria. We included 45 articles for analysis, 28 of which were selected for meta-analysis. The systolic BP measured by automatic blood pressure monitors presents 1.17 mmHg on average (95% CI 0.85; 1.48); for diastolic BP, it produced −0.08 mmHg (95% CI −0.69; 0.54) compared with a mercury sphygmomanometer. There is high heterogeneity between studies (> 90%) in the meta-analysis, partly explained by the device model, study environment, and observer training. Only articles that reported BP measurement by both methods were included.
Conclusion
: Automatic blood pressure monitors have strong measurement validity when compared with the mercury column. Thus, these can be safely used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological studies.
What is Known:
•The “gold standard” for indirect BP measurement is the mercury sphygmomanometer.
•The accuracy of the automatic device is critical to any blood pressure measurement method.
What is New:
•Oscillometric or automatic devices can be a suitable alternative to auscultation for initial screening, consistent with current pediatric guidelines.
•The automatic devices compared to the mercury column have a good validity of measurements, which can be used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological settings, provided that international protocols are followed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00431-021-04171-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2619610283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619610283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-621d0fb6cf7fc22012f707875b98268f4a316b18c0f138c92b28a9ff6fca46683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuO1DAURS0EoouGDTBAlhgH_EnZDjNo8ZNaYgJjy3Gem7QSO_g5tDJjEb0MVsVKcHUVMGNgvYHPuX7yJeQpZy84Y_olMtZK3jBRT8s1b-Q9suOtFA1nWt0nOyZb1ijedWfkEeI1q1LHzUNyJluhRWf2O_LzzZTSQJcMiGsGOoM7zBlioWOkCwyjK3n0dEnLOrkypviK-jQvLo-YIu2h3ABE6taSZldgoAn9OE1phjttgO-jB6QuDjU7-zVvFJev29Vc8XigIOOvH7eO4oYFakSVcpXg5uQU17jopg1HfEweBDchPDnNc_Ll3dvPFx-ay0_vP168vmy81PvSKMEHFnrlgw5eCMZF0Ewbve87I5QJrZNc9dx4Frg0vhO9MK4LQQXvWqWMPCfPj7lLTt9WwGKv05rrEmhF_U7FmTCyUuJI-ZwQMwS75HF2ebOc2UNB9liQrQXZu4LsQXp2il77GYa_yp9GKiCPANareAX539v_if0N0peh7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619610283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers—a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne ; Souza, Letícia Gabrielle ; Mello, Gabriele Luz ; De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creator><creatorcontrib>Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne ; Souza, Letícia Gabrielle ; Mello, Gabriele Luz ; De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><description>With the progressive elimination of mercury column devices for blood pressure (BP) measurement in children and adolescents, valid alternatives are needed. Oscillometric devices provide a replacement without mercury, are fully automated, and have excellent reliability among evaluators. Here, the goal was to test the accuracy of automatic blood pressure monitor devices compared to the mercury sphygmomanometer for BP measurement in children and adolescents. Electronic databases are EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Web of Science. We selected 8974 potentially eligible articles and two authors independently. We separately reviewed 370 full papers. Potentially eligible articles were selected according to the following criteria: (a) articles published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish; (b) screening of titles; (c) screening of abstracts; and (d) retrieval and screening of the full article to determine whether it met the inclusion criteria. We included 45 articles for analysis, 28 of which were selected for meta-analysis. The systolic BP measured by automatic blood pressure monitors presents 1.17 mmHg on average (95% CI 0.85; 1.48); for diastolic BP, it produced −0.08 mmHg (95% CI −0.69; 0.54) compared with a mercury sphygmomanometer. There is high heterogeneity between studies (> 90%) in the meta-analysis, partly explained by the device model, study environment, and observer training. Only articles that reported BP measurement by both methods were included.
Conclusion
: Automatic blood pressure monitors have strong measurement validity when compared with the mercury column. Thus, these can be safely used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological studies.
What is Known:
•The “gold standard” for indirect BP measurement is the mercury sphygmomanometer.
•The accuracy of the automatic device is critical to any blood pressure measurement method.
What is New:
•Oscillometric or automatic devices can be a suitable alternative to auscultation for initial screening, consistent with current pediatric guidelines.
•The automatic devices compared to the mercury column have a good validity of measurements, which can be used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological settings, provided that international protocols are followed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-6199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04171-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34272985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Automation ; Blood Pressure ; Blood Pressure Determination ; Blood Pressure Monitors ; Child ; Children ; Epidemiology ; Humans ; Hypertension - diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mercury ; Meta-analysis ; Pediatrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Sphygmomanometers ; Teenagers</subject><ispartof>European journal of pediatrics, 2022, Vol.181 (1), p.9-22</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-621d0fb6cf7fc22012f707875b98268f4a316b18c0f138c92b28a9ff6fca46683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-621d0fb6cf7fc22012f707875b98268f4a316b18c0f138c92b28a9ff6fca46683</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1022-1950</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00431-021-04171-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00431-021-04171-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Letícia Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello, Gabriele Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><title>Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers—a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>European journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>Eur J Pediatr</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pediatr</addtitle><description>With the progressive elimination of mercury column devices for blood pressure (BP) measurement in children and adolescents, valid alternatives are needed. Oscillometric devices provide a replacement without mercury, are fully automated, and have excellent reliability among evaluators. Here, the goal was to test the accuracy of automatic blood pressure monitor devices compared to the mercury sphygmomanometer for BP measurement in children and adolescents. Electronic databases are EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Web of Science. We selected 8974 potentially eligible articles and two authors independently. We separately reviewed 370 full papers. Potentially eligible articles were selected according to the following criteria: (a) articles published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish; (b) screening of titles; (c) screening of abstracts; and (d) retrieval and screening of the full article to determine whether it met the inclusion criteria. We included 45 articles for analysis, 28 of which were selected for meta-analysis. The systolic BP measured by automatic blood pressure monitors presents 1.17 mmHg on average (95% CI 0.85; 1.48); for diastolic BP, it produced −0.08 mmHg (95% CI −0.69; 0.54) compared with a mercury sphygmomanometer. There is high heterogeneity between studies (> 90%) in the meta-analysis, partly explained by the device model, study environment, and observer training. Only articles that reported BP measurement by both methods were included.
Conclusion
: Automatic blood pressure monitors have strong measurement validity when compared with the mercury column. Thus, these can be safely used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological studies.
What is Known:
•The “gold standard” for indirect BP measurement is the mercury sphygmomanometer.
•The accuracy of the automatic device is critical to any blood pressure measurement method.
What is New:
•Oscillometric or automatic devices can be a suitable alternative to auscultation for initial screening, consistent with current pediatric guidelines.
•The automatic devices compared to the mercury column have a good validity of measurements, which can be used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological settings, provided that international protocols are followed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Monitors</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sphygmomanometers</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><issn>0340-6199</issn><issn>1432-1076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuO1DAURS0EoouGDTBAlhgH_EnZDjNo8ZNaYgJjy3Gem7QSO_g5tDJjEb0MVsVKcHUVMGNgvYHPuX7yJeQpZy84Y_olMtZK3jBRT8s1b-Q9suOtFA1nWt0nOyZb1ijedWfkEeI1q1LHzUNyJluhRWf2O_LzzZTSQJcMiGsGOoM7zBlioWOkCwyjK3n0dEnLOrkypviK-jQvLo-YIu2h3ABE6taSZldgoAn9OE1phjttgO-jB6QuDjU7-zVvFJev29Vc8XigIOOvH7eO4oYFakSVcpXg5uQU17jopg1HfEweBDchPDnNc_Ll3dvPFx-ay0_vP168vmy81PvSKMEHFnrlgw5eCMZF0Ewbve87I5QJrZNc9dx4Frg0vhO9MK4LQQXvWqWMPCfPj7lLTt9WwGKv05rrEmhF_U7FmTCyUuJI-ZwQMwS75HF2ebOc2UNB9liQrQXZu4LsQXp2il77GYa_yp9GKiCPANareAX539v_if0N0peh7A</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne</creator><creator>Souza, Letícia Gabrielle</creator><creator>Mello, Gabriele Luz</creator><creator>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1022-1950</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers—a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne ; Souza, Letícia Gabrielle ; Mello, Gabriele Luz ; De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-621d0fb6cf7fc22012f707875b98268f4a316b18c0f138c92b28a9ff6fca46683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Monitors</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sphygmomanometers</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Letícia Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello, Gabriele Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne</au><au>Souza, Letícia Gabrielle</au><au>Mello, Gabriele Luz</au><au>De Moraes, Augusto César Ferreira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers—a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pediatrics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Pediatr</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>9-22</pages><issn>0340-6199</issn><eissn>1432-1076</eissn><abstract>With the progressive elimination of mercury column devices for blood pressure (BP) measurement in children and adolescents, valid alternatives are needed. Oscillometric devices provide a replacement without mercury, are fully automated, and have excellent reliability among evaluators. Here, the goal was to test the accuracy of automatic blood pressure monitor devices compared to the mercury sphygmomanometer for BP measurement in children and adolescents. Electronic databases are EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Web of Science. We selected 8974 potentially eligible articles and two authors independently. We separately reviewed 370 full papers. Potentially eligible articles were selected according to the following criteria: (a) articles published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish; (b) screening of titles; (c) screening of abstracts; and (d) retrieval and screening of the full article to determine whether it met the inclusion criteria. We included 45 articles for analysis, 28 of which were selected for meta-analysis. The systolic BP measured by automatic blood pressure monitors presents 1.17 mmHg on average (95% CI 0.85; 1.48); for diastolic BP, it produced −0.08 mmHg (95% CI −0.69; 0.54) compared with a mercury sphygmomanometer. There is high heterogeneity between studies (> 90%) in the meta-analysis, partly explained by the device model, study environment, and observer training. Only articles that reported BP measurement by both methods were included.
Conclusion
: Automatic blood pressure monitors have strong measurement validity when compared with the mercury column. Thus, these can be safely used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological studies.
What is Known:
•The “gold standard” for indirect BP measurement is the mercury sphygmomanometer.
•The accuracy of the automatic device is critical to any blood pressure measurement method.
What is New:
•Oscillometric or automatic devices can be a suitable alternative to auscultation for initial screening, consistent with current pediatric guidelines.
•The automatic devices compared to the mercury column have a good validity of measurements, which can be used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological settings, provided that international protocols are followed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34272985</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00431-021-04171-3</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1022-1950</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-6199 |
ispartof | European journal of pediatrics, 2022, Vol.181 (1), p.9-22 |
issn | 0340-6199 1432-1076 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2619610283 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Automation Blood Pressure Blood Pressure Determination Blood Pressure Monitors Child Children Epidemiology Humans Hypertension - diagnosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mercury Meta-analysis Pediatrics Reproducibility of Results Review Sphygmomanometers Teenagers |
title | Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A20%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20pressure%20measurement%20in%20pediatric%20population:%20comparison%20between%20automated%20oscillometric%20devices%20and%20mercury%20sphygmomanometers%E2%80%94a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Araujo-Moura,%20Keisyanne&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=9-22&rft.issn=0340-6199&rft.eissn=1432-1076&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00431-021-04171-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2619610283%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619610283&rft_id=info:pmid/34272985&rfr_iscdi=true |