Evaluation of a self‐care education program for older adults in Iran using a lifestyle improvement model

Background Older adults and their caregivers often believe it is either too late or too difficult to make health‐focused lifestyle changes. However, this is inaccurate, as older adults can make health promotion focused lifestyle changes thereby improving their health. This study developed and evalua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of older people nursing 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e12419-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Tavakkoli Oskuei, Mehrnaz, Barzanjeh Atri, Shirin, Davoodi, Arefeh, Van Son, Catherine, Asghari‐Jafarabadi, Mohammad, Hosseinzadeh, Mina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Older adults and their caregivers often believe it is either too late or too difficult to make health‐focused lifestyle changes. However, this is inaccurate, as older adults can make health promotion focused lifestyle changes thereby improving their health. This study developed and evaluated a self‐care education program using Pender's Health Promotion Model and its influence on health‐focused behaviour changes among older Iranians. Method This was a quasi‐experimental study with a convenience sample of 136 community‐living older adults from Tabriz, Iran. The participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention (n = 69) or control (n = 67) group. Chi‐square test, independent t tests and Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) statistical methods were used to compare pre‐ and post‐intervention data, control and intervention groups and changes over time. The intervention was an eight‐week educational program with pre‐ and post‐intervention data collected using the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II) questionnaire. Results The mean difference and confidence limits of the older adults' health behaviours pre‐ and post‐intervention scores were 2.228 (−5.450 – 9.916) and ‐ 35.820 (−32.051 – 39.588). The covariance analysis adjusting for the baseline values showed significant differences post‐intervention (p
ISSN:1748-3735
1748-3743
DOI:10.1111/opn.12419