Estimating expansion of the range of oak processionary moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) in the UK from 2006 to 2019
The expansion of oak processionary moth (OPM) in South‐East England continues despite ongoing efforts to control the pest since its introduction in 2006. Using locations of OPM larval nests, supplied by the Forestry Commission and recorded as part of ongoing surveillance and control measures from 20...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural and forest entomology 2022-02, Vol.24 (1), p.53-62 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 62 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 53 |
| container_title | Agricultural and forest entomology |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Suprunenko, Yevhen F. Castle, Matthew D. Webb, Cerian R. Branson, Julia Hoppit, Andrew Gilligan, Christopher A. |
| description | The expansion of oak processionary moth (OPM) in South‐East England continues despite ongoing efforts to control the pest since its introduction in 2006.
Using locations of OPM larval nests, supplied by the Forestry Commission and recorded as part of ongoing surveillance and control measures from 2006 onwards, we show that the expansion of the range of OPM in South‐East England up to 2019 was biphasic with a higher rate of expansion from 2015 onwards.
The maximum rate of OPM range expansion in the United Kingdom from 2006 to 2014 was estimated as 1.66 km/year (95% CI = [1.22, 2.09]), whereas the 2015–2019 expansion rate was estimated as 6.17 km/year (95% CI = [5.49, 6.84]). This corresponds to an estimated species range distribution area of 7077 km2 in 2019.
To explain the faster expansion of OPM range from 2015 onwards, we discuss potential reasons that include: natural capability of species of both short‐ and long‐distance dispersal; external factors such as environmental heterogeneity; a reduction of active control. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/afe.12468 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2618804392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618804392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-e940d1b5f34f0a61d2d1b9fd214b84c066a0f1a7690aca9c7568e9d5f1dde5273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw4A0icWGHbknaps1xmjZATOKynSOvdbaOtRlJJ9jbk60IccEX2_Ln39ZPyD1nQx5iBAaHXCQyvyA9nkgeqVTGl791ml6TG--3jHGRZXmP-KlvqxraqllT_NpD4yvbUGtou0HqoFnjqbHwTvfOFuhPY3BHWtt2Qx8XGzjU2Nq9RfgDIAxo1Zwllq_UOFtTwZikrQ2Zq1tyZWDn8e4n98lyNl1MnqP529PLZDyPCqGyPEKVsJKvUhMnhoHkpQidMqXgySpPCiYlMMMhk4pBAarIUpmjKlPDyxJTkcV98tDphs8-DuhbvbUH14STWkie5yyJlQjUoKMKZ713aPTeBUfcUXOmT57q4Kk-exrYUcd-Vjs8_g_q8WzabXwD-xV3WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618804392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating expansion of the range of oak processionary moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) in the UK from 2006 to 2019</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Suprunenko, Yevhen F. ; Castle, Matthew D. ; Webb, Cerian R. ; Branson, Julia ; Hoppit, Andrew ; Gilligan, Christopher A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Suprunenko, Yevhen F. ; Castle, Matthew D. ; Webb, Cerian R. ; Branson, Julia ; Hoppit, Andrew ; Gilligan, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><description>The expansion of oak processionary moth (OPM) in South‐East England continues despite ongoing efforts to control the pest since its introduction in 2006.
Using locations of OPM larval nests, supplied by the Forestry Commission and recorded as part of ongoing surveillance and control measures from 2006 onwards, we show that the expansion of the range of OPM in South‐East England up to 2019 was biphasic with a higher rate of expansion from 2015 onwards.
The maximum rate of OPM range expansion in the United Kingdom from 2006 to 2014 was estimated as 1.66 km/year (95% CI = [1.22, 2.09]), whereas the 2015–2019 expansion rate was estimated as 6.17 km/year (95% CI = [5.49, 6.84]). This corresponds to an estimated species range distribution area of 7077 km2 in 2019.
To explain the faster expansion of OPM range from 2015 onwards, we discuss potential reasons that include: natural capability of species of both short‐ and long‐distance dispersal; external factors such as environmental heterogeneity; a reduction of active control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-9555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-9563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/afe.12468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Active control ; Biological invasions ; Butterflies & moths ; Dispersal ; Expansion ; expansion rate ; Geographical distribution ; Heterogeneity ; invasive forest pest ; long‐distance dispersal ; Nests ; Oak ; oak processionary moth ; Pest control ; range expansion ; Range extension ; short‐distance dispersal ; spatial spread ; Thaumetopoea processionea</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and forest entomology, 2022-02, Vol.24 (1), p.53-62</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Entomological Society.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-e940d1b5f34f0a61d2d1b9fd214b84c066a0f1a7690aca9c7568e9d5f1dde5273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-e940d1b5f34f0a61d2d1b9fd214b84c066a0f1a7690aca9c7568e9d5f1dde5273</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5927-7571 ; 0000-0002-7511-1026 ; 0000-0002-0640-3666 ; 0000-0002-9439-552X ; 0000-0002-6845-0003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fafe.12468$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fafe.12468$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suprunenko, Yevhen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castle, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Cerian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branson, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppit, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilligan, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating expansion of the range of oak processionary moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) in the UK from 2006 to 2019</title><title>Agricultural and forest entomology</title><description>The expansion of oak processionary moth (OPM) in South‐East England continues despite ongoing efforts to control the pest since its introduction in 2006.
Using locations of OPM larval nests, supplied by the Forestry Commission and recorded as part of ongoing surveillance and control measures from 2006 onwards, we show that the expansion of the range of OPM in South‐East England up to 2019 was biphasic with a higher rate of expansion from 2015 onwards.
The maximum rate of OPM range expansion in the United Kingdom from 2006 to 2014 was estimated as 1.66 km/year (95% CI = [1.22, 2.09]), whereas the 2015–2019 expansion rate was estimated as 6.17 km/year (95% CI = [5.49, 6.84]). This corresponds to an estimated species range distribution area of 7077 km2 in 2019.
To explain the faster expansion of OPM range from 2015 onwards, we discuss potential reasons that include: natural capability of species of both short‐ and long‐distance dispersal; external factors such as environmental heterogeneity; a reduction of active control.</description><subject>Active control</subject><subject>Biological invasions</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Expansion</subject><subject>expansion rate</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>invasive forest pest</subject><subject>long‐distance dispersal</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Oak</subject><subject>oak processionary moth</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>range expansion</subject><subject>Range extension</subject><subject>short‐distance dispersal</subject><subject>spatial spread</subject><subject>Thaumetopoea processionea</subject><issn>1461-9555</issn><issn>1461-9563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw4A0icWGHbknaps1xmjZATOKynSOvdbaOtRlJJ9jbk60IccEX2_Ln39ZPyD1nQx5iBAaHXCQyvyA9nkgeqVTGl791ml6TG--3jHGRZXmP-KlvqxraqllT_NpD4yvbUGtou0HqoFnjqbHwTvfOFuhPY3BHWtt2Qx8XGzjU2Nq9RfgDIAxo1Zwllq_UOFtTwZikrQ2Zq1tyZWDn8e4n98lyNl1MnqP529PLZDyPCqGyPEKVsJKvUhMnhoHkpQidMqXgySpPCiYlMMMhk4pBAarIUpmjKlPDyxJTkcV98tDphs8-DuhbvbUH14STWkie5yyJlQjUoKMKZ713aPTeBUfcUXOmT57q4Kk-exrYUcd-Vjs8_g_q8WzabXwD-xV3WA</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Suprunenko, Yevhen F.</creator><creator>Castle, Matthew D.</creator><creator>Webb, Cerian R.</creator><creator>Branson, Julia</creator><creator>Hoppit, Andrew</creator><creator>Gilligan, Christopher A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-7571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-1026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-3666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-552X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-0003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Estimating expansion of the range of oak processionary moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) in the UK from 2006 to 2019</title><author>Suprunenko, Yevhen F. ; Castle, Matthew D. ; Webb, Cerian R. ; Branson, Julia ; Hoppit, Andrew ; Gilligan, Christopher A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-e940d1b5f34f0a61d2d1b9fd214b84c066a0f1a7690aca9c7568e9d5f1dde5273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Active control</topic><topic>Biological invasions</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Expansion</topic><topic>expansion rate</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>invasive forest pest</topic><topic>long‐distance dispersal</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Oak</topic><topic>oak processionary moth</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>range expansion</topic><topic>Range extension</topic><topic>short‐distance dispersal</topic><topic>spatial spread</topic><topic>Thaumetopoea processionea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suprunenko, Yevhen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castle, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Cerian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branson, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppit, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilligan, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suprunenko, Yevhen F.</au><au>Castle, Matthew D.</au><au>Webb, Cerian R.</au><au>Branson, Julia</au><au>Hoppit, Andrew</au><au>Gilligan, Christopher A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating expansion of the range of oak processionary moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) in the UK from 2006 to 2019</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>53-62</pages><issn>1461-9555</issn><eissn>1461-9563</eissn><abstract>The expansion of oak processionary moth (OPM) in South‐East England continues despite ongoing efforts to control the pest since its introduction in 2006.
Using locations of OPM larval nests, supplied by the Forestry Commission and recorded as part of ongoing surveillance and control measures from 2006 onwards, we show that the expansion of the range of OPM in South‐East England up to 2019 was biphasic with a higher rate of expansion from 2015 onwards.
The maximum rate of OPM range expansion in the United Kingdom from 2006 to 2014 was estimated as 1.66 km/year (95% CI = [1.22, 2.09]), whereas the 2015–2019 expansion rate was estimated as 6.17 km/year (95% CI = [5.49, 6.84]). This corresponds to an estimated species range distribution area of 7077 km2 in 2019.
To explain the faster expansion of OPM range from 2015 onwards, we discuss potential reasons that include: natural capability of species of both short‐ and long‐distance dispersal; external factors such as environmental heterogeneity; a reduction of active control.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/afe.12468</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-7571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-1026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-3666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-552X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-0003</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1461-9555 |
| ispartof | Agricultural and forest entomology, 2022-02, Vol.24 (1), p.53-62 |
| issn | 1461-9555 1461-9563 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2618804392 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Active control Biological invasions Butterflies & moths Dispersal Expansion expansion rate Geographical distribution Heterogeneity invasive forest pest long‐distance dispersal Nests Oak oak processionary moth Pest control range expansion Range extension short‐distance dispersal spatial spread Thaumetopoea processionea |
| title | Estimating expansion of the range of oak processionary moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) in the UK from 2006 to 2019 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20expansion%20of%20the%20range%20of%20oak%20processionary%20moth%20(Thaumetopoea%20processionea)%20in%20the%20UK%20from%202006%20to%202019&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20forest%20entomology&rft.au=Suprunenko,%20Yevhen%20F.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=53-62&rft.issn=1461-9555&rft.eissn=1461-9563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/afe.12468&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2618804392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618804392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |