Germany’s Agricultural Land Footprint and the Impact of Import Pattern Allocation
Footprints are powerful indicators for evaluating the impacts of a country’s bioeconomy on environmental goods, both domestic and abroad. We apply a hybrid approach combining a multi-regional input-output model and land use modelling to compute the agricultural land footprint (aLF). Furthermore, we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-01, Vol.14 (1), p.105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Hennenberg, Klaus Josef Gebhardt, Swantje Wimmer, Florian Distelkamp, Martin Lutz, Christian Böttcher, Hannes Schaldach, Rüdiger |
description | Footprints are powerful indicators for evaluating the impacts of a country’s bioeconomy on environmental goods, both domestic and abroad. We apply a hybrid approach combining a multi-regional input-output model and land use modelling to compute the agricultural land footprint (aLF). Furthermore, we added information on land-use change to the analysis and allocated land conversion to specific commodities. Using Germany as a case study, we show that the aLF abroad is 2.5 to 3 times larger compared to impacts within the country. When allocating land conversion of natural and semi-natural land-cover types in 2005 and 2010 to import increases by Germany, conversion rates were found to be 2.5 times higher than for the global average. Import increases to Germany slowed down in 2015 and 2020, reducing land conversion attributed to the German bioeconomy as well. Our results indicate that looking at a static import pattern is not sufficient to draw a realistic picture of the land footprint of a country. For a more detailed assessment that also considers temporal dynamics and impacts of biomass use and trade, our newly developed set of indicators also captures changes of import patterns over time. The case study shows that our enhanced land footprint provides clear and meaningful information for policymakers and other stakeholders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su14010105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2618269826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A815705670</galeid><sourcerecordid>A815705670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8ca1e2c437a42ac4eba6d0e866f3812f5fbfdb250096759f62e9897997cefd3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1KAzEQx4MoWGovPkHAk0JrPnazm-NStBYKitVzSLNJ3bKb1CQL9uZr-Ho-iSkVtDMM-c_wmwzMAHCJ0YRSjm5DjzOEk-cnYEBQgcdJotN_-hyMQtigZJRijtkALGfad9Luvj-_AqzWvlF9G3svW7iQtob3zsWtb2yE-yy-aTjvtlJF6MxeOR_hk4xRewurtnVKxsbZC3BmZBv06Pcdgtf7u5fpw3jxOJtPq8VYUVbGcakk1kRltJAZkSrTK8lqpEvGDC0xMblZmXpFcoQ4K3JuGNG85AXnhdKmpooOwdXh3613770OUWxc720aKQjDJWE8RaImB2otWy0aa1z0UiWvddcoZ7VpUr0qcV6gnBUoNVwfNSQm6o-4ln0IYr58PmZvDqzyLgSvjUjb6qTfCYzE_iji7yj0B8iJfhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618269826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Germany’s Agricultural Land Footprint and the Impact of Import Pattern Allocation</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hennenberg, Klaus Josef ; Gebhardt, Swantje ; Wimmer, Florian ; Distelkamp, Martin ; Lutz, Christian ; Böttcher, Hannes ; Schaldach, Rüdiger</creator><creatorcontrib>Hennenberg, Klaus Josef ; Gebhardt, Swantje ; Wimmer, Florian ; Distelkamp, Martin ; Lutz, Christian ; Böttcher, Hannes ; Schaldach, Rüdiger</creatorcontrib><description>Footprints are powerful indicators for evaluating the impacts of a country’s bioeconomy on environmental goods, both domestic and abroad. We apply a hybrid approach combining a multi-regional input-output model and land use modelling to compute the agricultural land footprint (aLF). Furthermore, we added information on land-use change to the analysis and allocated land conversion to specific commodities. Using Germany as a case study, we show that the aLF abroad is 2.5 to 3 times larger compared to impacts within the country. When allocating land conversion of natural and semi-natural land-cover types in 2005 and 2010 to import increases by Germany, conversion rates were found to be 2.5 times higher than for the global average. Import increases to Germany slowed down in 2015 and 2020, reducing land conversion attributed to the German bioeconomy as well. Our results indicate that looking at a static import pattern is not sufficient to draw a realistic picture of the land footprint of a country. For a more detailed assessment that also considers temporal dynamics and impacts of biomass use and trade, our newly developed set of indicators also captures changes of import patterns over time. The case study shows that our enhanced land footprint provides clear and meaningful information for policymakers and other stakeholders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14010105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Case studies ; Consumption ; Conversion ; Crops ; Ecological footprint ; Ecosystems ; Emissions ; Environment ; Environmental aspects ; Food ; Forestry ; Germany ; Grasslands ; Greenhouse gases ; Imports ; Indicators ; Land cover ; Land use ; Sustainability ; Trends ; Value added</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-01, Vol.14 (1), p.105</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8ca1e2c437a42ac4eba6d0e866f3812f5fbfdb250096759f62e9897997cefd3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8ca1e2c437a42ac4eba6d0e866f3812f5fbfdb250096759f62e9897997cefd3c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7927-2356 ; 0000-0001-8849-8197 ; 0000-0003-2359-4035 ; 0000-0001-8238-3006</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hennenberg, Klaus Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebhardt, Swantje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Distelkamp, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böttcher, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaldach, Rüdiger</creatorcontrib><title>Germany’s Agricultural Land Footprint and the Impact of Import Pattern Allocation</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Footprints are powerful indicators for evaluating the impacts of a country’s bioeconomy on environmental goods, both domestic and abroad. We apply a hybrid approach combining a multi-regional input-output model and land use modelling to compute the agricultural land footprint (aLF). Furthermore, we added information on land-use change to the analysis and allocated land conversion to specific commodities. Using Germany as a case study, we show that the aLF abroad is 2.5 to 3 times larger compared to impacts within the country. When allocating land conversion of natural and semi-natural land-cover types in 2005 and 2010 to import increases by Germany, conversion rates were found to be 2.5 times higher than for the global average. Import increases to Germany slowed down in 2015 and 2020, reducing land conversion attributed to the German bioeconomy as well. Our results indicate that looking at a static import pattern is not sufficient to draw a realistic picture of the land footprint of a country. For a more detailed assessment that also considers temporal dynamics and impacts of biomass use and trade, our newly developed set of indicators also captures changes of import patterns over time. The case study shows that our enhanced land footprint provides clear and meaningful information for policymakers and other stakeholders.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Value added</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1KAzEQx4MoWGovPkHAk0JrPnazm-NStBYKitVzSLNJ3bKb1CQL9uZr-Ho-iSkVtDMM-c_wmwzMAHCJ0YRSjm5DjzOEk-cnYEBQgcdJotN_-hyMQtigZJRijtkALGfad9Luvj-_AqzWvlF9G3svW7iQtob3zsWtb2yE-yy-aTjvtlJF6MxeOR_hk4xRewurtnVKxsbZC3BmZBv06Pcdgtf7u5fpw3jxOJtPq8VYUVbGcakk1kRltJAZkSrTK8lqpEvGDC0xMblZmXpFcoQ4K3JuGNG85AXnhdKmpooOwdXh3613770OUWxc720aKQjDJWE8RaImB2otWy0aa1z0UiWvddcoZ7VpUr0qcV6gnBUoNVwfNSQm6o-4ln0IYr58PmZvDqzyLgSvjUjb6qTfCYzE_iji7yj0B8iJfhc</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Hennenberg, Klaus Josef</creator><creator>Gebhardt, Swantje</creator><creator>Wimmer, Florian</creator><creator>Distelkamp, Martin</creator><creator>Lutz, Christian</creator><creator>Böttcher, Hannes</creator><creator>Schaldach, Rüdiger</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-2356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-8197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2359-4035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-3006</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Germany’s Agricultural Land Footprint and the Impact of Import Pattern Allocation</title><author>Hennenberg, Klaus Josef ; Gebhardt, Swantje ; Wimmer, Florian ; Distelkamp, Martin ; Lutz, Christian ; Böttcher, Hannes ; Schaldach, Rüdiger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8ca1e2c437a42ac4eba6d0e866f3812f5fbfdb250096759f62e9897997cefd3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Value added</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hennenberg, Klaus Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebhardt, Swantje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimmer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Distelkamp, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böttcher, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaldach, Rüdiger</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hennenberg, Klaus Josef</au><au>Gebhardt, Swantje</au><au>Wimmer, Florian</au><au>Distelkamp, Martin</au><au>Lutz, Christian</au><au>Böttcher, Hannes</au><au>Schaldach, Rüdiger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Germany’s Agricultural Land Footprint and the Impact of Import Pattern Allocation</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><pages>105-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Footprints are powerful indicators for evaluating the impacts of a country’s bioeconomy on environmental goods, both domestic and abroad. We apply a hybrid approach combining a multi-regional input-output model and land use modelling to compute the agricultural land footprint (aLF). Furthermore, we added information on land-use change to the analysis and allocated land conversion to specific commodities. Using Germany as a case study, we show that the aLF abroad is 2.5 to 3 times larger compared to impacts within the country. When allocating land conversion of natural and semi-natural land-cover types in 2005 and 2010 to import increases by Germany, conversion rates were found to be 2.5 times higher than for the global average. Import increases to Germany slowed down in 2015 and 2020, reducing land conversion attributed to the German bioeconomy as well. Our results indicate that looking at a static import pattern is not sufficient to draw a realistic picture of the land footprint of a country. For a more detailed assessment that also considers temporal dynamics and impacts of biomass use and trade, our newly developed set of indicators also captures changes of import patterns over time. The case study shows that our enhanced land footprint provides clear and meaningful information for policymakers and other stakeholders.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14010105</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-2356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-8197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2359-4035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-3006</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-01, Vol.14 (1), p.105 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2618269826 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural production Agriculture Biodiversity Biomass Case studies Consumption Conversion Crops Ecological footprint Ecosystems Emissions Environment Environmental aspects Food Forestry Germany Grasslands Greenhouse gases Imports Indicators Land cover Land use Sustainability Trends Value added |
title | Germany’s Agricultural Land Footprint and the Impact of Import Pattern Allocation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Germany%E2%80%99s%20Agricultural%20Land%20Footprint%20and%20the%20Impact%20of%20Import%20Pattern%20Allocation&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Hennenberg,%20Klaus%20Josef&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.pages=105-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14010105&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA815705670%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618269826&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A815705670&rfr_iscdi=true |