Quantitative methods for predicting underground construction waste considering reuse and recycling
The construction industry has been greatly developed in the past few decades, especially in the extensive use of underground space. The increasing amount of waste (e.g., soil, sludge, and rock) generated in the underground construction constitutes an important part of construction and demolition was...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2022, Vol.29 (3), p.3394-3405 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3405 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 3394 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Chen, Rui Li, Lanxin Yang, Kai Ren, Fumin Xi, Chenggang Lin, Yang Zheng, Hai |
| description | The construction industry has been greatly developed in the past few decades, especially in the extensive use of underground space. The increasing amount of waste (e.g., soil, sludge, and rock) generated in the underground construction constitutes an important part of construction and demolition waste (CDW), but the related problems are rarely addressed in an independent quantitative study. In order to facilitate recycling of underground construction waste (UCW), quantitative methods for predicting UCW are proposed based on mass conservation in this study. Through on-site investigation and literature review, the source characteristics of UCW and corresponding recycling potential are firstly analyzed. Secondly, the corresponding quantitative method is proposed for predicting each type of UCW according to the principle of mass conservation. Finally, the proposed quantitative methods are applied in two real underground infrastructure projects to verify the accuracy. The results show that the accuracy of quantitative methods for predicting shield sludge and engineering soil is 82.03–95.79% and 94.49% respectively. The quantitative methods for predicting the amount of UCW proposed in this study is effective. In both cases, underground construction produced a large amount of construction waste with great recycling potential. UCW can theoretically reach 100% recycling, and full reuse and recycling of UCW will bring huge benefits and be conducive to the sustainable development of the construction industry. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-021-15858-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2617592651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617592651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-aec0b33119d43a9aa75fd999cb26215e0ef1acc837f94059b3d06898d35806cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBdS8Dqa0yRtcynDLxBE0OuQJuns2JqapMr-vdk69c6rA-c873vgQegcyBUQUl4HAMoLTHLAwCteYXqAplAAwyUT4hBNiWAMA2Vsgk5CWBKSE5GXx2hCGa2EYOUU1S-D6mIbVWw_bba28d2ZkDXOZ723ptWx7RbZ0BnrF96lmWnXheiHdHBd9qVCtLtVm4gt6u0QbKYS6K3e6FXanaKjRq2CPdvPGXq7u32dP-Cn5_vH-c0T1gxExMpqUlMKIAyjSihV8sYIIXSdFzlwS2wDSuuKlo1ghIuaGlJUojKUV6TQDZ2hy7G39-5jsCHKpRt8l17KvICSi7zgkKh8pLR3IXjbyN63a-U3EojcapWjVpm0yp1WSVPoYl891GtrfiM_HhNARyD0Ww3W__3-p_Ybb8qFDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617592651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative methods for predicting underground construction waste considering reuse and recycling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chen, Rui ; Li, Lanxin ; Yang, Kai ; Ren, Fumin ; Xi, Chenggang ; Lin, Yang ; Zheng, Hai</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Rui ; Li, Lanxin ; Yang, Kai ; Ren, Fumin ; Xi, Chenggang ; Lin, Yang ; Zheng, Hai</creatorcontrib><description>The construction industry has been greatly developed in the past few decades, especially in the extensive use of underground space. The increasing amount of waste (e.g., soil, sludge, and rock) generated in the underground construction constitutes an important part of construction and demolition waste (CDW), but the related problems are rarely addressed in an independent quantitative study. In order to facilitate recycling of underground construction waste (UCW), quantitative methods for predicting UCW are proposed based on mass conservation in this study. Through on-site investigation and literature review, the source characteristics of UCW and corresponding recycling potential are firstly analyzed. Secondly, the corresponding quantitative method is proposed for predicting each type of UCW according to the principle of mass conservation. Finally, the proposed quantitative methods are applied in two real underground infrastructure projects to verify the accuracy. The results show that the accuracy of quantitative methods for predicting shield sludge and engineering soil is 82.03–95.79% and 94.49% respectively. The quantitative methods for predicting the amount of UCW proposed in this study is effective. In both cases, underground construction produced a large amount of construction waste with great recycling potential. UCW can theoretically reach 100% recycling, and full reuse and recycling of UCW will bring huge benefits and be conducive to the sustainable development of the construction industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15858-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34389947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Conservation ; Construction Industry ; Construction industry wastes ; Construction Materials ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Industrial development ; Industrial Waste - analysis ; Literature reviews ; Quantitative analysis ; Quantitative research ; Recycling ; Research Article ; Sludge ; Soils ; Sustainable Development ; Underground construction ; Waste disposal ; Waste Management ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022, Vol.29 (3), p.3394-3405</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-aec0b33119d43a9aa75fd999cb26215e0ef1acc837f94059b3d06898d35806cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-aec0b33119d43a9aa75fd999cb26215e0ef1acc837f94059b3d06898d35806cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-021-15858-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-021-15858-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lanxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Fumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Hai</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative methods for predicting underground construction waste considering reuse and recycling</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>The construction industry has been greatly developed in the past few decades, especially in the extensive use of underground space. The increasing amount of waste (e.g., soil, sludge, and rock) generated in the underground construction constitutes an important part of construction and demolition waste (CDW), but the related problems are rarely addressed in an independent quantitative study. In order to facilitate recycling of underground construction waste (UCW), quantitative methods for predicting UCW are proposed based on mass conservation in this study. Through on-site investigation and literature review, the source characteristics of UCW and corresponding recycling potential are firstly analyzed. Secondly, the corresponding quantitative method is proposed for predicting each type of UCW according to the principle of mass conservation. Finally, the proposed quantitative methods are applied in two real underground infrastructure projects to verify the accuracy. The results show that the accuracy of quantitative methods for predicting shield sludge and engineering soil is 82.03–95.79% and 94.49% respectively. The quantitative methods for predicting the amount of UCW proposed in this study is effective. In both cases, underground construction produced a large amount of construction waste with great recycling potential. UCW can theoretically reach 100% recycling, and full reuse and recycling of UCW will bring huge benefits and be conducive to the sustainable development of the construction industry.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Construction Industry</subject><subject>Construction industry wastes</subject><subject>Construction Materials</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Industrial Waste - analysis</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Quantitative research</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Underground construction</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste Management</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBdS8Dqa0yRtcynDLxBE0OuQJuns2JqapMr-vdk69c6rA-c873vgQegcyBUQUl4HAMoLTHLAwCteYXqAplAAwyUT4hBNiWAMA2Vsgk5CWBKSE5GXx2hCGa2EYOUU1S-D6mIbVWw_bba28d2ZkDXOZ723ptWx7RbZ0BnrF96lmWnXheiHdHBd9qVCtLtVm4gt6u0QbKYS6K3e6FXanaKjRq2CPdvPGXq7u32dP-Cn5_vH-c0T1gxExMpqUlMKIAyjSihV8sYIIXSdFzlwS2wDSuuKlo1ghIuaGlJUojKUV6TQDZ2hy7G39-5jsCHKpRt8l17KvICSi7zgkKh8pLR3IXjbyN63a-U3EojcapWjVpm0yp1WSVPoYl891GtrfiM_HhNARyD0Ww3W__3-p_Ybb8qFDA</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Chen, Rui</creator><creator>Li, Lanxin</creator><creator>Yang, Kai</creator><creator>Ren, Fumin</creator><creator>Xi, Chenggang</creator><creator>Lin, Yang</creator><creator>Zheng, Hai</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Quantitative methods for predicting underground construction waste considering reuse and recycling</title><author>Chen, Rui ; Li, Lanxin ; Yang, Kai ; Ren, Fumin ; Xi, Chenggang ; Lin, Yang ; Zheng, Hai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-aec0b33119d43a9aa75fd999cb26215e0ef1acc837f94059b3d06898d35806cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Construction Industry</topic><topic>Construction industry wastes</topic><topic>Construction Materials</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Industrial Waste - analysis</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Quantitative research</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Underground construction</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste Management</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lanxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Fumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Hai</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Rui</au><au>Li, Lanxin</au><au>Yang, Kai</au><au>Ren, Fumin</au><au>Xi, Chenggang</au><au>Lin, Yang</au><au>Zheng, Hai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative methods for predicting underground construction waste considering reuse and recycling</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3394</spage><epage>3405</epage><pages>3394-3405</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>The construction industry has been greatly developed in the past few decades, especially in the extensive use of underground space. The increasing amount of waste (e.g., soil, sludge, and rock) generated in the underground construction constitutes an important part of construction and demolition waste (CDW), but the related problems are rarely addressed in an independent quantitative study. In order to facilitate recycling of underground construction waste (UCW), quantitative methods for predicting UCW are proposed based on mass conservation in this study. Through on-site investigation and literature review, the source characteristics of UCW and corresponding recycling potential are firstly analyzed. Secondly, the corresponding quantitative method is proposed for predicting each type of UCW according to the principle of mass conservation. Finally, the proposed quantitative methods are applied in two real underground infrastructure projects to verify the accuracy. The results show that the accuracy of quantitative methods for predicting shield sludge and engineering soil is 82.03–95.79% and 94.49% respectively. The quantitative methods for predicting the amount of UCW proposed in this study is effective. In both cases, underground construction produced a large amount of construction waste with great recycling potential. UCW can theoretically reach 100% recycling, and full reuse and recycling of UCW will bring huge benefits and be conducive to the sustainable development of the construction industry.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34389947</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-021-15858-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022, Vol.29 (3), p.3394-3405 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2617592651 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Conservation Construction Industry Construction industry wastes Construction Materials Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Industrial development Industrial Waste - analysis Literature reviews Quantitative analysis Quantitative research Recycling Research Article Sludge Soils Sustainable Development Underground construction Waste disposal Waste Management Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
| title | Quantitative methods for predicting underground construction waste considering reuse and recycling |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20methods%20for%20predicting%20underground%20construction%20waste%20considering%20reuse%20and%20recycling&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Chen,%20Rui&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3394&rft.epage=3405&rft.pages=3394-3405&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-021-15858-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2617592651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617592651&rft_id=info:pmid/34389947&rfr_iscdi=true |