Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality

Background Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure. Objective To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric radiology 2022, Vol.52 (1), p.85-96
Hauptverfasser: Barreto, Izabella L., Tuna, Ibrahim S., Rajderkar, Dhanashree A., Ching, Jessica A., Governale, Lance S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Pediatric radiology
container_volume 52
creator Barreto, Izabella L.
Tuna, Ibrahim S.
Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.
Ching, Jessica A.
Governale, Lance S.
description Background Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure. Objective To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution. Materials and methods The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols ( n =22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol ( n =135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset ( n =50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose. Results During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI vol was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies ( n =50) by both radiologists. Conclusion Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2617592619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617592619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9OHSEYxYlpU6-2L-CiIel6lD8DXLprTNUmJnaha8LA54i5AyMwqfcxfONye227cwEszu87BzgInVBySglRZ4UQ1quOMNoRwYjo5AFa0Z6zjmq9fodWhJMm9b0-REelPBJCuKD8AzrkveKUreUKvfwEH2zNwWGXbQypbGMqNZVQsEvTvFTwuKYpjdnOD9uv2EYcYqmhLjWkaDcYnmfIAaKDJuAMfnEhjjjbnW9DsE8F8K-HsAE82RBrWzugyeMuqiWHyY6Anxa7CXX7Eb2_t5sCn17PY3R38f32_Kq7vrn8cf7tunNcidqptdOSDlZLoFJaLaQfmOaWOTHoYWAg_HpQyvVUOSYV9V70nmllvZSCWMqP0Ze975zT0wKlmse05PaiYpikSui260axPeVyKiXDvZlzu27eGkrMrgWzb8G0FsyfFoxsQ59frZdhAv9v5O-3N4DvgdKkOEL-n_2G7W8_NJam</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617592619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Barreto, Izabella L. ; Tuna, Ibrahim S. ; Rajderkar, Dhanashree A. ; Ching, Jessica A. ; Governale, Lance S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Izabella L. ; Tuna, Ibrahim S. ; Rajderkar, Dhanashree A. ; Ching, Jessica A. ; Governale, Lance S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure. Objective To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution. Materials and methods The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols ( n =22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol ( n =135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset ( n =50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose. Results During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI vol was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies ( n =50) by both radiologists. Conclusion Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34731286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Birth defects ; Brain ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Computed tomography ; Cranial sutures ; Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging ; Craniosynostosis ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Evaluation ; Head ; Humans ; Image quality ; Imaging ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Iterative methods ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pediatrics ; Radiation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation effects ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Radiography ; Radiology ; Skull ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Pediatric radiology, 2022, Vol.52 (1), p.85-96</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6845-3688</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34731286$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Izabella L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ching, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Governale, Lance S.</creatorcontrib><title>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</title><title>Pediatric radiology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><description>Background Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure. Objective To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution. Materials and methods The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols ( n =22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol ( n =135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset ( n =50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose. Results During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI vol was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies ( n =50) by both radiologists. Conclusion Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.</description><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cranial sutures</subject><subject>Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Craniosynostosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0301-0449</issn><issn>1432-1998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9OHSEYxYlpU6-2L-CiIel6lD8DXLprTNUmJnaha8LA54i5AyMwqfcxfONye227cwEszu87BzgInVBySglRZ4UQ1quOMNoRwYjo5AFa0Z6zjmq9fodWhJMm9b0-REelPBJCuKD8AzrkveKUreUKvfwEH2zNwWGXbQypbGMqNZVQsEvTvFTwuKYpjdnOD9uv2EYcYqmhLjWkaDcYnmfIAaKDJuAMfnEhjjjbnW9DsE8F8K-HsAE82RBrWzugyeMuqiWHyY6Anxa7CXX7Eb2_t5sCn17PY3R38f32_Kq7vrn8cf7tunNcidqptdOSDlZLoFJaLaQfmOaWOTHoYWAg_HpQyvVUOSYV9V70nmllvZSCWMqP0Ze975zT0wKlmse05PaiYpikSui260axPeVyKiXDvZlzu27eGkrMrgWzb8G0FsyfFoxsQ59frZdhAv9v5O-3N4DvgdKkOEL-n_2G7W8_NJam</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Barreto, Izabella L.</creator><creator>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</creator><creator>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</creator><creator>Ching, Jessica A.</creator><creator>Governale, Lance S.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6845-3688</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</title><author>Barreto, Izabella L. ; Tuna, Ibrahim S. ; Rajderkar, Dhanashree A. ; Ching, Jessica A. ; Governale, Lance S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cranial sutures</topic><topic>Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Craniosynostosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Izabella L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ching, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Governale, Lance S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barreto, Izabella L.</au><au>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</au><au>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</au><au>Ching, Jessica A.</au><au>Governale, Lance S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>85-96</pages><issn>0301-0449</issn><eissn>1432-1998</eissn><abstract>Background Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure. Objective To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution. Materials and methods The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols ( n =22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol ( n =135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset ( n =50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose. Results During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI vol was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies ( n =50) by both radiologists. Conclusion Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34731286</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6845-3688</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0449
ispartof Pediatric radiology, 2022, Vol.52 (1), p.85-96
issn 0301-0449
1432-1998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2617592619
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Birth defects
Brain
Child
Child, Preschool
Computed tomography
Cranial sutures
Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging
Craniosynostosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Evaluation
Head
Humans
Image quality
Imaging
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Iterative methods
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Original Article
Pediatrics
Radiation
Radiation Dosage
Radiation effects
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiography
Radiology
Skull
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasound
title Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric%20craniosynostosis%20computed%20tomography:%20an%20institutional%20experience%20in%20reducing%20radiation%20dose%20while%20maintaining%20diagnostic%20image%20quality&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20radiology&rft.au=Barreto,%20Izabella%20L.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=85-96&rft.issn=0301-0449&rft.eissn=1432-1998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2617592619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617592619&rft_id=info:pmid/34731286&rfr_iscdi=true