Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality
Background Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure. Objective To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric radiology 2022, Vol.52 (1), p.85-96 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 96 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Pediatric radiology |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Barreto, Izabella L. Tuna, Ibrahim S. Rajderkar, Dhanashree A. Ching, Jessica A. Governale, Lance S. |
description | Background
Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure.
Objective
To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution.
Materials and methods
The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols (
n
=22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol (
n
=135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset (
n
=50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose.
Results
During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI
vol
) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI
vol
was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies (
n
=50) by both radiologists.
Conclusion
Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2617592619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617592619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9OHSEYxYlpU6-2L-CiIel6lD8DXLprTNUmJnaha8LA54i5AyMwqfcxfONye227cwEszu87BzgInVBySglRZ4UQ1quOMNoRwYjo5AFa0Z6zjmq9fodWhJMm9b0-REelPBJCuKD8AzrkveKUreUKvfwEH2zNwWGXbQypbGMqNZVQsEvTvFTwuKYpjdnOD9uv2EYcYqmhLjWkaDcYnmfIAaKDJuAMfnEhjjjbnW9DsE8F8K-HsAE82RBrWzugyeMuqiWHyY6Anxa7CXX7Eb2_t5sCn17PY3R38f32_Kq7vrn8cf7tunNcidqptdOSDlZLoFJaLaQfmOaWOTHoYWAg_HpQyvVUOSYV9V70nmllvZSCWMqP0Ze975zT0wKlmse05PaiYpikSui260axPeVyKiXDvZlzu27eGkrMrgWzb8G0FsyfFoxsQ59frZdhAv9v5O-3N4DvgdKkOEL-n_2G7W8_NJam</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617592619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Barreto, Izabella L. ; Tuna, Ibrahim S. ; Rajderkar, Dhanashree A. ; Ching, Jessica A. ; Governale, Lance S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Izabella L. ; Tuna, Ibrahim S. ; Rajderkar, Dhanashree A. ; Ching, Jessica A. ; Governale, Lance S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure.
Objective
To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution.
Materials and methods
The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols (
n
=22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol (
n
=135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset (
n
=50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose.
Results
During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI
vol
) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI
vol
was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies (
n
=50) by both radiologists.
Conclusion
Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34731286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Birth defects ; Brain ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Computed tomography ; Cranial sutures ; Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging ; Craniosynostosis ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Evaluation ; Head ; Humans ; Image quality ; Imaging ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Iterative methods ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pediatrics ; Radiation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation effects ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Radiography ; Radiology ; Skull ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Pediatric radiology, 2022, Vol.52 (1), p.85-96</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6845-3688</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34731286$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Izabella L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ching, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Governale, Lance S.</creatorcontrib><title>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</title><title>Pediatric radiology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><description>Background
Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure.
Objective
To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution.
Materials and methods
The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols (
n
=22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol (
n
=135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset (
n
=50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose.
Results
During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI
vol
) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI
vol
was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies (
n
=50) by both radiologists.
Conclusion
Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.</description><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cranial sutures</subject><subject>Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Craniosynostosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0301-0449</issn><issn>1432-1998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9OHSEYxYlpU6-2L-CiIel6lD8DXLprTNUmJnaha8LA54i5AyMwqfcxfONye227cwEszu87BzgInVBySglRZ4UQ1quOMNoRwYjo5AFa0Z6zjmq9fodWhJMm9b0-REelPBJCuKD8AzrkveKUreUKvfwEH2zNwWGXbQypbGMqNZVQsEvTvFTwuKYpjdnOD9uv2EYcYqmhLjWkaDcYnmfIAaKDJuAMfnEhjjjbnW9DsE8F8K-HsAE82RBrWzugyeMuqiWHyY6Anxa7CXX7Eb2_t5sCn17PY3R38f32_Kq7vrn8cf7tunNcidqptdOSDlZLoFJaLaQfmOaWOTHoYWAg_HpQyvVUOSYV9V70nmllvZSCWMqP0Ze975zT0wKlmse05PaiYpikSui260axPeVyKiXDvZlzu27eGkrMrgWzb8G0FsyfFoxsQ59frZdhAv9v5O-3N4DvgdKkOEL-n_2G7W8_NJam</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Barreto, Izabella L.</creator><creator>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</creator><creator>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</creator><creator>Ching, Jessica A.</creator><creator>Governale, Lance S.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6845-3688</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</title><author>Barreto, Izabella L. ; Tuna, Ibrahim S. ; Rajderkar, Dhanashree A. ; Ching, Jessica A. ; Governale, Lance S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-78c961ba96e166a956db293a2c5b9bb2e5d8b77c417c2671dd54d297ad6650a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cranial sutures</topic><topic>Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Craniosynostosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Izabella L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ching, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Governale, Lance S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barreto, Izabella L.</au><au>Tuna, Ibrahim S.</au><au>Rajderkar, Dhanashree A.</au><au>Ching, Jessica A.</au><au>Governale, Lance S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>85-96</pages><issn>0301-0449</issn><eissn>1432-1998</eissn><abstract>Background
Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure.
Objective
To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution.
Materials and methods
The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols (
n
=22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol (
n
=135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset (
n
=50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose.
Results
During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDI
vol
) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0–9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDI
vol
was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies (
n
=50) by both radiologists.
Conclusion
Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34731286</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6845-3688</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-0449 |
ispartof | Pediatric radiology, 2022, Vol.52 (1), p.85-96 |
issn | 0301-0449 1432-1998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2617592619 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Birth defects Brain Child Child, Preschool Computed tomography Cranial sutures Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging Craniosynostosis Diagnosis Diagnostic systems Evaluation Head Humans Image quality Imaging Infant Infant, Newborn Iterative methods Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neuroradiology Nuclear Medicine Oncology Original Article Pediatrics Radiation Radiation Dosage Radiation effects Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Radiography Radiology Skull Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasound |
title | Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric%20craniosynostosis%20computed%20tomography:%20an%20institutional%20experience%20in%20reducing%20radiation%20dose%20while%20maintaining%20diagnostic%20image%20quality&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20radiology&rft.au=Barreto,%20Izabella%20L.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=85-96&rft.issn=0301-0449&rft.eissn=1432-1998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00247-021-05205-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2617592619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617592619&rft_id=info:pmid/34731286&rfr_iscdi=true |