A New Strategy for Benefits Transfer
This paper calls for re-focusing the analysis of existing results to evaluate whether there are stable ratios of use value to total willingness to pay for improvements in different types of environmental resources. The objective is to develop a screening tool to determine if decisions about the assu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental & resource economics 2022, Vol.81 (1), p.155-178 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 178 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 155 |
| container_title | Environmental & resource economics |
| container_volume | 81 |
| creator | Smith, V Kerry Shaw, W. Douglass Welsh, Michael P. Dixon, Chris Mc Donald, Lisa |
| description | This paper calls for re-focusing the analysis of existing results to evaluate whether there are stable ratios of use value to total willingness to pay for improvements in different types of environmental resources. The objective is to develop a screening tool to determine if decisions about the assumed number of users versus nonusers of a resource are likely to be important to aggregate benefit measures for changes in the amount or quality of different environmental resources. Four sets of applications involving different aspects of water resources are considered: nutrients in the Neuse River affecting the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary; nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay; whitewater rafting on the Colorado River; and the Deepwater Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The findings suggest a need to add the evaluation of these ratios to the research agenda in benefits transfer. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10640-021-00623-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2616480391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2616480391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b5453c2a94a92601376dce4628a3b775888f17fc8e18e08f48684fa3aef9a1ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOCXqOT7-RYi19Q9GA9hzROSovu1mSL9N8bXaE3T3OY531neAg5Z3DFAMx1YaAlUOCMAmguqDwgI6aMoEwBPyQjcFxSLTUck5NS1gDgjNQjcjlpnvCreelz6HG5a1KXmxtsMa360sxzaEvCfEqOUngvePY3x-T17nY-faCz5_vH6WRGowTX04WSSkQenAyOa2DC6LeIUnMbxMIYZa1NzKRokVkEm6TVVqYgAiYXGEYxJhdD7yZ3n1ssvV9329zWk55rpqUF4Vil-EDF3JWSMflNXn2EvPMM_I8NP9jw1Yb_teFlDTVDCGPXrso-Yqyqf2ijKiIGpNRlu8S8v_5P8TcPtmnn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616480391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A New Strategy for Benefits Transfer</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Smith, V Kerry ; Shaw, W. Douglass ; Welsh, Michael P. ; Dixon, Chris ; Mc Donald, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, V Kerry ; Shaw, W. Douglass ; Welsh, Michael P. ; Dixon, Chris ; Mc Donald, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>This paper calls for re-focusing the analysis of existing results to evaluate whether there are stable ratios of use value to total willingness to pay for improvements in different types of environmental resources. The objective is to develop a screening tool to determine if decisions about the assumed number of users versus nonusers of a resource are likely to be important to aggregate benefit measures for changes in the amount or quality of different environmental resources. Four sets of applications involving different aspects of water resources are considered: nutrients in the Neuse River affecting the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary; nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay; whitewater rafting on the Colorado River; and the Deepwater Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The findings suggest a need to add the evaluation of these ratios to the research agenda in benefits transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-6460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10640-021-00623-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Environmental Management ; Estimates ; Estuaries ; Evaluation ; Nutrients ; Oil spills ; Pollutants ; Rivers ; Water quality ; Water resources ; White water ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Environmental & resource economics, 2022, Vol.81 (1), p.155-178</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b5453c2a94a92601376dce4628a3b775888f17fc8e18e08f48684fa3aef9a1ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b5453c2a94a92601376dce4628a3b775888f17fc8e18e08f48684fa3aef9a1ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10640-021-00623-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-021-00623-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, V Kerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, W. Douglass</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mc Donald, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>A New Strategy for Benefits Transfer</title><title>Environmental & resource economics</title><addtitle>Environ Resource Econ</addtitle><description>This paper calls for re-focusing the analysis of existing results to evaluate whether there are stable ratios of use value to total willingness to pay for improvements in different types of environmental resources. The objective is to develop a screening tool to determine if decisions about the assumed number of users versus nonusers of a resource are likely to be important to aggregate benefit measures for changes in the amount or quality of different environmental resources. Four sets of applications involving different aspects of water resources are considered: nutrients in the Neuse River affecting the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary; nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay; whitewater rafting on the Colorado River; and the Deepwater Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The findings suggest a need to add the evaluation of these ratios to the research agenda in benefits transfer.</description><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Oil spills</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>White water</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0924-6460</issn><issn>1573-1502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOCXqOT7-RYi19Q9GA9hzROSovu1mSL9N8bXaE3T3OY531neAg5Z3DFAMx1YaAlUOCMAmguqDwgI6aMoEwBPyQjcFxSLTUck5NS1gDgjNQjcjlpnvCreelz6HG5a1KXmxtsMa360sxzaEvCfEqOUngvePY3x-T17nY-faCz5_vH6WRGowTX04WSSkQenAyOa2DC6LeIUnMbxMIYZa1NzKRokVkEm6TVVqYgAiYXGEYxJhdD7yZ3n1ssvV9329zWk55rpqUF4Vil-EDF3JWSMflNXn2EvPMM_I8NP9jw1Yb_teFlDTVDCGPXrso-Yqyqf2ijKiIGpNRlu8S8v_5P8TcPtmnn</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Smith, V Kerry</creator><creator>Shaw, W. Douglass</creator><creator>Welsh, Michael P.</creator><creator>Dixon, Chris</creator><creator>Mc Donald, Lisa</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>A New Strategy for Benefits Transfer</title><author>Smith, V Kerry ; Shaw, W. Douglass ; Welsh, Michael P. ; Dixon, Chris ; Mc Donald, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-b5453c2a94a92601376dce4628a3b775888f17fc8e18e08f48684fa3aef9a1ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Oil spills</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>White water</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, V Kerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, W. Douglass</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mc Donald, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental & resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, V Kerry</au><au>Shaw, W. Douglass</au><au>Welsh, Michael P.</au><au>Dixon, Chris</au><au>Mc Donald, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A New Strategy for Benefits Transfer</atitle><jtitle>Environmental & resource economics</jtitle><stitle>Environ Resource Econ</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>155-178</pages><issn>0924-6460</issn><eissn>1573-1502</eissn><abstract>This paper calls for re-focusing the analysis of existing results to evaluate whether there are stable ratios of use value to total willingness to pay for improvements in different types of environmental resources. The objective is to develop a screening tool to determine if decisions about the assumed number of users versus nonusers of a resource are likely to be important to aggregate benefit measures for changes in the amount or quality of different environmental resources. Four sets of applications involving different aspects of water resources are considered: nutrients in the Neuse River affecting the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary; nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay; whitewater rafting on the Colorado River; and the Deepwater Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The findings suggest a need to add the evaluation of these ratios to the research agenda in benefits transfer.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10640-021-00623-4</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0924-6460 |
| ispartof | Environmental & resource economics, 2022, Vol.81 (1), p.155-178 |
| issn | 0924-6460 1573-1502 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2616480391 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Economic Policy Economics Economics and Finance Environmental Economics Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Environmental Management Estimates Estuaries Evaluation Nutrients Oil spills Pollutants Rivers Water quality Water resources White water Willingness to pay |
| title | A New Strategy for Benefits Transfer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T13%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20New%20Strategy%20for%20Benefits%20Transfer&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20&%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Smith,%20V%20Kerry&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=155-178&rft.issn=0924-6460&rft.eissn=1573-1502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10640-021-00623-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2616480391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616480391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |