Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
Purpose Etomidate and ketamine are hemodynamically stable induction agents often used to sedate critically ill patients during emergency endotracheal intubation. In 2015, quality improvement data from our hospital suggested a survival benefit at Day 7 from avoidance of etomidate in critically ill pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intensive care medicine 2022, Vol.48 (1), p.78-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 91 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Intensive care medicine |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Matchett, Gerald Gasanova, Irina Riccio, Christina A. Nasir, Dawood Sunna, Mary C. Bravenec, Brian J. Azizad, Omaira Farrell, Brian Minhajuddin, Abu Stewart, Jesse W. Liang, Lawrence W. Moon, Tiffany Sun Fox, Pamela E. Ebeling, Callie G. Smith, Miakka N. Trousdale, Devin Ogunnaike, Babatunde O. |
description | Purpose
Etomidate and ketamine are hemodynamically stable induction agents often used to sedate critically ill patients during emergency endotracheal intubation. In 2015, quality improvement data from our hospital suggested a survival benefit at Day 7 from avoidance of etomidate in critically ill patients during emergency intubation. In this clinical trial, we hypothesized that randomization to ketamine instead of etomidate would be associated with Day 7 survival after emergency endotracheal intubation.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel assignment, single-center clinical trial performed by an anesthesiology-based Airway Team under emergent circumstances at one high-volume medical center in the United States. 801 critically ill patients requiring emergency intubation were randomly assigned 1:1 by computer-generated, pre-randomized sealed envelopes to receive etomidate (0.2–0.3 mg/kg,
n
= 400) or ketamine (1–2 mg/kg,
n
= 401) for sedation prior to intubation. The pre-specified primary endpoint of the trial was Day 7 survival. Secondary endpoints included Day 28 survival.
Results
Of the 801 enrolled patients, 396 were analyzed in the etomidate arm, and 395 in the ketamine arm. Day 7 survival was significantly lower in the etomidate arm than in the ketamine arm (77.3% versus 85.1%, difference − 7.8, 95% confidence interval − 13, − 2.4,
p
= 0.005). Day 28 survival rates for the two groups were not significantly different (etomidate 64.1%, ketamine 66.8%, difference − 2.7, 95% confidence interval − 9.3, 3.9,
p
= 0.294).
Conclusion
While the primary outcome of Day 7 survival was greater in patients randomized to ketamine, there was no significant difference in survival by Day 28. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00134-021-06577-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2616134985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A723894765</galeid><sourcerecordid>A723894765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d90bbb04e4637cc06504732eb1ddfe71ee550eeb1183dd7edc3464bda6d1ff903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9Ai4k4Dr1ZpKZvHFXSv0DBTe6E0ImufNMncnUJFNaP73XvmoRHpJFSPI7N5xzGHsp4UQCmDcFQCotoJECutYYcfOIbaRWjZCN2j5mG1C6EbrTzRF7Vsol4aZr5VN2pHQPWvawYV_P6zLH4Crya8xlLfw7VjfHhHxcMscZ8w6Tv-WYwlKz89_QTTymug6uxiW95Y5nR29z_ImB-ymm6ImoObrpOXsyuqngi_v9mH15d_757IO4-PT-49nphfB6C1WEHoZhAI26U8Z78gLaqAYHGcKIRiK2LSAd5VaFYDB4RaaG4Logx7EHdcxe7-de5eXHiqXay2XNib60TSc7Cqnftg_Uzk1oYxrv_MyxeHtqKLBeUzpEiQMUZYDZTUvCMdL1P_zJAZ5WwDn6g4JmL_B5KSXjaK9ynF2-tRLs717tvldLvdq7Xu0NiV7dO1yHGcNfyZ8iCVB7oNBT2mF-iOA_Y38BTtSuEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616134985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Matchett, Gerald ; Gasanova, Irina ; Riccio, Christina A. ; Nasir, Dawood ; Sunna, Mary C. ; Bravenec, Brian J. ; Azizad, Omaira ; Farrell, Brian ; Minhajuddin, Abu ; Stewart, Jesse W. ; Liang, Lawrence W. ; Moon, Tiffany Sun ; Fox, Pamela E. ; Ebeling, Callie G. ; Smith, Miakka N. ; Trousdale, Devin ; Ogunnaike, Babatunde O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Matchett, Gerald ; Gasanova, Irina ; Riccio, Christina A. ; Nasir, Dawood ; Sunna, Mary C. ; Bravenec, Brian J. ; Azizad, Omaira ; Farrell, Brian ; Minhajuddin, Abu ; Stewart, Jesse W. ; Liang, Lawrence W. ; Moon, Tiffany Sun ; Fox, Pamela E. ; Ebeling, Callie G. ; Smith, Miakka N. ; Trousdale, Devin ; Ogunnaike, Babatunde O. ; EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators ; the EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Etomidate and ketamine are hemodynamically stable induction agents often used to sedate critically ill patients during emergency endotracheal intubation. In 2015, quality improvement data from our hospital suggested a survival benefit at Day 7 from avoidance of etomidate in critically ill patients during emergency intubation. In this clinical trial, we hypothesized that randomization to ketamine instead of etomidate would be associated with Day 7 survival after emergency endotracheal intubation.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel assignment, single-center clinical trial performed by an anesthesiology-based Airway Team under emergent circumstances at one high-volume medical center in the United States. 801 critically ill patients requiring emergency intubation were randomly assigned 1:1 by computer-generated, pre-randomized sealed envelopes to receive etomidate (0.2–0.3 mg/kg,
n
= 400) or ketamine (1–2 mg/kg,
n
= 401) for sedation prior to intubation. The pre-specified primary endpoint of the trial was Day 7 survival. Secondary endpoints included Day 28 survival.
Results
Of the 801 enrolled patients, 396 were analyzed in the etomidate arm, and 395 in the ketamine arm. Day 7 survival was significantly lower in the etomidate arm than in the ketamine arm (77.3% versus 85.1%, difference − 7.8, 95% confidence interval − 13, − 2.4,
p
= 0.005). Day 28 survival rates for the two groups were not significantly different (etomidate 64.1%, ketamine 66.8%, difference − 2.7, 95% confidence interval − 9.3, 3.9,
p
= 0.294).
Conclusion
While the primary outcome of Day 7 survival was greater in patients randomized to ketamine, there was no significant difference in survival by Day 28.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06577-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34904190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Clinical trials ; Confidence intervals ; Critical Care Medicine ; Critical Illness ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Medicine ; Etomidate ; Etomidate - adverse effects ; Health care facilities ; Hemodynamics ; Hospital patients ; Humans ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Ketamine ; Ketamine - therapeutic use ; Medical centers ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; NCT ; NCT02643381 ; Original ; Pain Medicine ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Product development ; Prospective Studies ; Quality control ; Randomization ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2022, Vol.48 (1), p.78-91</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d90bbb04e4637cc06504732eb1ddfe71ee550eeb1183dd7edc3464bda6d1ff903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d90bbb04e4637cc06504732eb1ddfe71ee550eeb1183dd7edc3464bda6d1ff903</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0742-3121</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00134-021-06577-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-021-06577-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matchett, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasanova, Irina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riccio, Christina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Dawood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunna, Mary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravenec, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azizad, Omaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhajuddin, Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jesse W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Tiffany Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Pamela E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Callie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Miakka N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trousdale, Devin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunnaike, Babatunde O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators</creatorcontrib><title>Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
Etomidate and ketamine are hemodynamically stable induction agents often used to sedate critically ill patients during emergency endotracheal intubation. In 2015, quality improvement data from our hospital suggested a survival benefit at Day 7 from avoidance of etomidate in critically ill patients during emergency intubation. In this clinical trial, we hypothesized that randomization to ketamine instead of etomidate would be associated with Day 7 survival after emergency endotracheal intubation.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel assignment, single-center clinical trial performed by an anesthesiology-based Airway Team under emergent circumstances at one high-volume medical center in the United States. 801 critically ill patients requiring emergency intubation were randomly assigned 1:1 by computer-generated, pre-randomized sealed envelopes to receive etomidate (0.2–0.3 mg/kg,
n
= 400) or ketamine (1–2 mg/kg,
n
= 401) for sedation prior to intubation. The pre-specified primary endpoint of the trial was Day 7 survival. Secondary endpoints included Day 28 survival.
Results
Of the 801 enrolled patients, 396 were analyzed in the etomidate arm, and 395 in the ketamine arm. Day 7 survival was significantly lower in the etomidate arm than in the ketamine arm (77.3% versus 85.1%, difference − 7.8, 95% confidence interval − 13, − 2.4,
p
= 0.005). Day 28 survival rates for the two groups were not significantly different (etomidate 64.1%, ketamine 66.8%, difference − 2.7, 95% confidence interval − 9.3, 3.9,
p
= 0.294).
Conclusion
While the primary outcome of Day 7 survival was greater in patients randomized to ketamine, there was no significant difference in survival by Day 28.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Etomidate</subject><subject>Etomidate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Ketamine</subject><subject>Ketamine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Medical centers</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>NCT</subject><subject>NCT02643381</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9Ai4k4Dr1ZpKZvHFXSv0DBTe6E0ImufNMncnUJFNaP73XvmoRHpJFSPI7N5xzGHsp4UQCmDcFQCotoJECutYYcfOIbaRWjZCN2j5mG1C6EbrTzRF7Vsol4aZr5VN2pHQPWvawYV_P6zLH4Crya8xlLfw7VjfHhHxcMscZ8w6Tv-WYwlKz89_QTTymug6uxiW95Y5nR29z_ImB-ymm6ImoObrpOXsyuqngi_v9mH15d_757IO4-PT-49nphfB6C1WEHoZhAI26U8Z78gLaqAYHGcKIRiK2LSAd5VaFYDB4RaaG4Logx7EHdcxe7-de5eXHiqXay2XNib60TSc7Cqnftg_Uzk1oYxrv_MyxeHtqKLBeUzpEiQMUZYDZTUvCMdL1P_zJAZ5WwDn6g4JmL_B5KSXjaK9ynF2-tRLs717tvldLvdq7Xu0NiV7dO1yHGcNfyZ8iCVB7oNBT2mF-iOA_Y38BTtSuEA</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Matchett, Gerald</creator><creator>Gasanova, Irina</creator><creator>Riccio, Christina A.</creator><creator>Nasir, Dawood</creator><creator>Sunna, Mary C.</creator><creator>Bravenec, Brian J.</creator><creator>Azizad, Omaira</creator><creator>Farrell, Brian</creator><creator>Minhajuddin, Abu</creator><creator>Stewart, Jesse W.</creator><creator>Liang, Lawrence W.</creator><creator>Moon, Tiffany Sun</creator><creator>Fox, Pamela E.</creator><creator>Ebeling, Callie G.</creator><creator>Smith, Miakka N.</creator><creator>Trousdale, Devin</creator><creator>Ogunnaike, Babatunde O.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0742-3121</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Matchett, Gerald ; Gasanova, Irina ; Riccio, Christina A. ; Nasir, Dawood ; Sunna, Mary C. ; Bravenec, Brian J. ; Azizad, Omaira ; Farrell, Brian ; Minhajuddin, Abu ; Stewart, Jesse W. ; Liang, Lawrence W. ; Moon, Tiffany Sun ; Fox, Pamela E. ; Ebeling, Callie G. ; Smith, Miakka N. ; Trousdale, Devin ; Ogunnaike, Babatunde O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d90bbb04e4637cc06504732eb1ddfe71ee550eeb1183dd7edc3464bda6d1ff903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Etomidate</topic><topic>Etomidate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Ketamine</topic><topic>Ketamine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Medical centers</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>NCT</topic><topic>NCT02643381</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matchett, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasanova, Irina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riccio, Christina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Dawood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunna, Mary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravenec, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azizad, Omaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhajuddin, Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jesse W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Tiffany Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Pamela E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Callie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Miakka N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trousdale, Devin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunnaike, Babatunde O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matchett, Gerald</au><au>Gasanova, Irina</au><au>Riccio, Christina A.</au><au>Nasir, Dawood</au><au>Sunna, Mary C.</au><au>Bravenec, Brian J.</au><au>Azizad, Omaira</au><au>Farrell, Brian</au><au>Minhajuddin, Abu</au><au>Stewart, Jesse W.</au><au>Liang, Lawrence W.</au><au>Moon, Tiffany Sun</au><au>Fox, Pamela E.</au><au>Ebeling, Callie G.</au><au>Smith, Miakka N.</au><au>Trousdale, Devin</au><au>Ogunnaike, Babatunde O.</au><aucorp>EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators</aucorp><aucorp>the EvK Clinical Trial Collaborators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><stitle>Intensive Care Med</stitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>78-91</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Etomidate and ketamine are hemodynamically stable induction agents often used to sedate critically ill patients during emergency endotracheal intubation. In 2015, quality improvement data from our hospital suggested a survival benefit at Day 7 from avoidance of etomidate in critically ill patients during emergency intubation. In this clinical trial, we hypothesized that randomization to ketamine instead of etomidate would be associated with Day 7 survival after emergency endotracheal intubation.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel assignment, single-center clinical trial performed by an anesthesiology-based Airway Team under emergent circumstances at one high-volume medical center in the United States. 801 critically ill patients requiring emergency intubation were randomly assigned 1:1 by computer-generated, pre-randomized sealed envelopes to receive etomidate (0.2–0.3 mg/kg,
n
= 400) or ketamine (1–2 mg/kg,
n
= 401) for sedation prior to intubation. The pre-specified primary endpoint of the trial was Day 7 survival. Secondary endpoints included Day 28 survival.
Results
Of the 801 enrolled patients, 396 were analyzed in the etomidate arm, and 395 in the ketamine arm. Day 7 survival was significantly lower in the etomidate arm than in the ketamine arm (77.3% versus 85.1%, difference − 7.8, 95% confidence interval − 13, − 2.4,
p
= 0.005). Day 28 survival rates for the two groups were not significantly different (etomidate 64.1%, ketamine 66.8%, difference − 2.7, 95% confidence interval − 9.3, 3.9,
p
= 0.294).
Conclusion
While the primary outcome of Day 7 survival was greater in patients randomized to ketamine, there was no significant difference in survival by Day 28.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34904190</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00134-021-06577-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0742-3121</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-4642 |
ispartof | Intensive care medicine, 2022, Vol.48 (1), p.78-91 |
issn | 0342-4642 1432-1238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2616134985 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Anesthesiology Clinical trials Confidence intervals Critical Care Medicine Critical Illness Emergency medical services Emergency Medicine Etomidate Etomidate - adverse effects Health care facilities Hemodynamics Hospital patients Humans Intensive Intensive care Intubation Intubation, Intratracheal Ketamine Ketamine - therapeutic use Medical centers Medicine Medicine & Public Health NCT NCT02643381 Original Pain Medicine Patients Pediatrics Pneumology/Respiratory System Product development Prospective Studies Quality control Randomization Survival |
title | Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A22%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Etomidate%20versus%20ketamine%20for%20emergency%20endotracheal%20intubation:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Matchett,%20Gerald&rft.aucorp=EvK%20Clinical%20Trial%20Collaborators&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=78-91&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00134-021-06577-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA723894765%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616134985&rft_id=info:pmid/34904190&rft_galeid=A723894765&rfr_iscdi=true |