Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains

Aim Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biogeography 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.22-37
Hauptverfasser: Rudgers, Jennifer A., Fox, Sam, Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea, Herrera, Jose, Reazin, Chris, Kent, Dylan R., Souza, Lara, Chung, YanYi Anny, Jumpponen, Ari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title Journal of biogeography
container_volume 49
creator Rudgers, Jennifer A.
Fox, Sam
Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea
Herrera, Jose
Reazin, Chris
Kent, Dylan R.
Souza, Lara
Chung, YanYi Anny
Jumpponen, Ari
description Aim Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure. Location North American plains grasslands. Taxon Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi. Methods At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots. Results Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species. Main conclusions Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jbi.14260
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2615437979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2615437979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EEqUw8AaWmBjSnuMmrscW8aeoggVYLSe-tK7aONiJUDcegWfkSXAJK7_llu93d_oIuWQwYjHjTWFHbJLmcEQGjOdZkuZSHpMBcMgSSAWckrMQNgAgMz4ZkLe5dSt0K6-b9Z66inrn2u_PLx2CK61u0dCqq1eW2ppWrquNbq2raeRDwHAoPDnfrulsh96WuqbNVts6nJOTSm8DXvzNIXm9u325eUiWz_eLm9kyKVMpIDEMDS-ZNtwUXKS6yktAbcQUp2Kqq_g0QoEGijTLkAkegwUzTJYoJQfDh-Sq39t4995haNXGdb6OJ1Was2zChRQyUtc9VXoXgsdKNd7utN8rBuqgTUVt6ldbZMc9-2G3uP8fVI_zRd_4AU1dcGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2615437979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rudgers, Jennifer A. ; Fox, Sam ; Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea ; Herrera, Jose ; Reazin, Chris ; Kent, Dylan R. ; Souza, Lara ; Chung, YanYi Anny ; Jumpponen, Ari</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudgers, Jennifer A. ; Fox, Sam ; Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea ; Herrera, Jose ; Reazin, Chris ; Kent, Dylan R. ; Souza, Lara ; Chung, YanYi Anny ; Jumpponen, Ari</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure. Location North American plains grasslands. Taxon Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi. Methods At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots. Results Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species. Main conclusions Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jbi.14260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ascomycota ; Biogeography ; Changing environments ; climate change ; Climate effects ; Community structure ; Composition ; dark septate endophytes ; distance decay ; diversity ; Flowers &amp; plants ; foundation species ; Fungi ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Host plants ; latitudinal gradient ; Microbial activity ; microbiome ; Microbiomes ; Microorganisms ; mycobiome ; Phenotypes ; Plant species ; rhizobiome ; Roots ; Species ; Tolerances</subject><ispartof>Journal of biogeography, 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.22-37</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6005-8667 ; 0000-0001-6978-6353 ; 0000-0003-1200-8192 ; 0000-0002-6770-2563 ; 0000-0001-7094-4857 ; 0000-0002-9053-7973 ; 0000-0001-5207-2872 ; 0000-0002-1876-6093</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjbi.14260$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjbi.14260$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reazin, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Dylan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, YanYi Anny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jumpponen, Ari</creatorcontrib><title>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</title><title>Journal of biogeography</title><description>Aim Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure. Location North American plains grasslands. Taxon Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi. Methods At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots. Results Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species. Main conclusions Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate.</description><subject>Ascomycota</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Changing environments</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>dark septate endophytes</subject><subject>distance decay</subject><subject>diversity</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>foundation species</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>latitudinal gradient</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>mycobiome</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>rhizobiome</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Tolerances</subject><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EEqUw8AaWmBjSnuMmrscW8aeoggVYLSe-tK7aONiJUDcegWfkSXAJK7_llu93d_oIuWQwYjHjTWFHbJLmcEQGjOdZkuZSHpMBcMgSSAWckrMQNgAgMz4ZkLe5dSt0K6-b9Z66inrn2u_PLx2CK61u0dCqq1eW2ppWrquNbq2raeRDwHAoPDnfrulsh96WuqbNVts6nJOTSm8DXvzNIXm9u325eUiWz_eLm9kyKVMpIDEMDS-ZNtwUXKS6yktAbcQUp2Kqq_g0QoEGijTLkAkegwUzTJYoJQfDh-Sq39t4995haNXGdb6OJ1Was2zChRQyUtc9VXoXgsdKNd7utN8rBuqgTUVt6ldbZMc9-2G3uP8fVI_zRd_4AU1dcGw</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Fox, Sam</creator><creator>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</creator><creator>Herrera, Jose</creator><creator>Reazin, Chris</creator><creator>Kent, Dylan R.</creator><creator>Souza, Lara</creator><creator>Chung, YanYi Anny</creator><creator>Jumpponen, Ari</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-8667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6353</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-8192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-4857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-6093</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</title><author>Rudgers, Jennifer A. ; Fox, Sam ; Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea ; Herrera, Jose ; Reazin, Chris ; Kent, Dylan R. ; Souza, Lara ; Chung, YanYi Anny ; Jumpponen, Ari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ascomycota</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Changing environments</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>dark septate endophytes</topic><topic>distance decay</topic><topic>diversity</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>foundation species</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>latitudinal gradient</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>mycobiome</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>rhizobiome</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Tolerances</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reazin, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Dylan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, YanYi Anny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jumpponen, Ari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</au><au>Fox, Sam</au><au>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</au><au>Herrera, Jose</au><au>Reazin, Chris</au><au>Kent, Dylan R.</au><au>Souza, Lara</au><au>Chung, YanYi Anny</au><au>Jumpponen, Ari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>22-37</pages><issn>0305-0270</issn><eissn>1365-2699</eissn><abstract>Aim Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure. Location North American plains grasslands. Taxon Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi. Methods At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots. Results Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species. Main conclusions Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jbi.14260</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-8667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6353</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-8192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-4857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-6093</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0270
ispartof Journal of biogeography, 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.22-37
issn 0305-0270
1365-2699
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2615437979
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Ascomycota
Biogeography
Changing environments
climate change
Climate effects
Community structure
Composition
dark septate endophytes
distance decay
diversity
Flowers & plants
foundation species
Fungi
Grasses
Grasslands
Host plants
latitudinal gradient
Microbial activity
microbiome
Microbiomes
Microorganisms
mycobiome
Phenotypes
Plant species
rhizobiome
Roots
Species
Tolerances
title Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A57%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biogeography%20of%20root%E2%80%90associated%20fungi%20in%20foundation%20grasses%20of%20North%20American%20plains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biogeography&rft.au=Rudgers,%20Jennifer%20A.&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=22-37&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.eissn=1365-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jbi.14260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2615437979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2615437979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true