Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains
Aim Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biogeography 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.22-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | Journal of biogeography |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Rudgers, Jennifer A. Fox, Sam Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea Herrera, Jose Reazin, Chris Kent, Dylan R. Souza, Lara Chung, YanYi Anny Jumpponen, Ari |
description | Aim
Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure.
Location
North American plains grasslands.
Taxon
Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi.
Methods
At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots.
Results
Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species.
Main conclusions
Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jbi.14260 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2615437979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2615437979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EEqUw8AaWmBjSnuMmrscW8aeoggVYLSe-tK7aONiJUDcegWfkSXAJK7_llu93d_oIuWQwYjHjTWFHbJLmcEQGjOdZkuZSHpMBcMgSSAWckrMQNgAgMz4ZkLe5dSt0K6-b9Z66inrn2u_PLx2CK61u0dCqq1eW2ppWrquNbq2raeRDwHAoPDnfrulsh96WuqbNVts6nJOTSm8DXvzNIXm9u325eUiWz_eLm9kyKVMpIDEMDS-ZNtwUXKS6yktAbcQUp2Kqq_g0QoEGijTLkAkegwUzTJYoJQfDh-Sq39t4995haNXGdb6OJ1Was2zChRQyUtc9VXoXgsdKNd7utN8rBuqgTUVt6ldbZMc9-2G3uP8fVI_zRd_4AU1dcGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2615437979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rudgers, Jennifer A. ; Fox, Sam ; Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea ; Herrera, Jose ; Reazin, Chris ; Kent, Dylan R. ; Souza, Lara ; Chung, YanYi Anny ; Jumpponen, Ari</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudgers, Jennifer A. ; Fox, Sam ; Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea ; Herrera, Jose ; Reazin, Chris ; Kent, Dylan R. ; Souza, Lara ; Chung, YanYi Anny ; Jumpponen, Ari</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure.
Location
North American plains grasslands.
Taxon
Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi.
Methods
At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots.
Results
Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species.
Main conclusions
Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jbi.14260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ascomycota ; Biogeography ; Changing environments ; climate change ; Climate effects ; Community structure ; Composition ; dark septate endophytes ; distance decay ; diversity ; Flowers & plants ; foundation species ; Fungi ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Host plants ; latitudinal gradient ; Microbial activity ; microbiome ; Microbiomes ; Microorganisms ; mycobiome ; Phenotypes ; Plant species ; rhizobiome ; Roots ; Species ; Tolerances</subject><ispartof>Journal of biogeography, 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.22-37</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6005-8667 ; 0000-0001-6978-6353 ; 0000-0003-1200-8192 ; 0000-0002-6770-2563 ; 0000-0001-7094-4857 ; 0000-0002-9053-7973 ; 0000-0001-5207-2872 ; 0000-0002-1876-6093</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjbi.14260$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjbi.14260$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reazin, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Dylan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, YanYi Anny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jumpponen, Ari</creatorcontrib><title>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</title><title>Journal of biogeography</title><description>Aim
Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure.
Location
North American plains grasslands.
Taxon
Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi.
Methods
At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots.
Results
Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species.
Main conclusions
Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate.</description><subject>Ascomycota</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Changing environments</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>dark septate endophytes</subject><subject>distance decay</subject><subject>diversity</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>foundation species</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>latitudinal gradient</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>mycobiome</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>rhizobiome</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Tolerances</subject><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL9OwzAQhy0EEqUw8AaWmBjSnuMmrscW8aeoggVYLSe-tK7aONiJUDcegWfkSXAJK7_llu93d_oIuWQwYjHjTWFHbJLmcEQGjOdZkuZSHpMBcMgSSAWckrMQNgAgMz4ZkLe5dSt0K6-b9Z66inrn2u_PLx2CK61u0dCqq1eW2ppWrquNbq2raeRDwHAoPDnfrulsh96WuqbNVts6nJOTSm8DXvzNIXm9u325eUiWz_eLm9kyKVMpIDEMDS-ZNtwUXKS6yktAbcQUp2Kqq_g0QoEGijTLkAkegwUzTJYoJQfDh-Sq39t4995haNXGdb6OJ1Was2zChRQyUtc9VXoXgsdKNd7utN8rBuqgTUVt6ldbZMc9-2G3uP8fVI_zRd_4AU1dcGw</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Fox, Sam</creator><creator>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</creator><creator>Herrera, Jose</creator><creator>Reazin, Chris</creator><creator>Kent, Dylan R.</creator><creator>Souza, Lara</creator><creator>Chung, YanYi Anny</creator><creator>Jumpponen, Ari</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-8667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6353</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-8192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-4857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-6093</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</title><author>Rudgers, Jennifer A. ; Fox, Sam ; Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea ; Herrera, Jose ; Reazin, Chris ; Kent, Dylan R. ; Souza, Lara ; Chung, YanYi Anny ; Jumpponen, Ari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2970-d1ed3c1ad3db372af6c0ead78e878af030e0bed0b255e173333eb1d19ce9930d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ascomycota</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Changing environments</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>dark septate endophytes</topic><topic>distance decay</topic><topic>diversity</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>foundation species</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>latitudinal gradient</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>mycobiome</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>rhizobiome</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Tolerances</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reazin, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kent, Dylan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, YanYi Anny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jumpponen, Ari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudgers, Jennifer A.</au><au>Fox, Sam</au><au>Porras‐Alfaro, Andrea</au><au>Herrera, Jose</au><au>Reazin, Chris</au><au>Kent, Dylan R.</au><au>Souza, Lara</au><au>Chung, YanYi Anny</au><au>Jumpponen, Ari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>22-37</pages><issn>0305-0270</issn><eissn>1365-2699</eissn><abstract>Aim
Roots and rhizospheres host diverse microbial communities that can influence the fitness, phenotypes, and environmental tolerances of plants. Documenting the biogeography of these microbiomes can detect the potential for a changing environment to disrupt host‐microbe interactions, particularly in cases where microbes buffer hosts against abiotic stressors. We evaluated whether root‐associated fungi had poleward declines in diversity, tested whether fungal communities in roots shifted near host plant range edges, and determined the relative importance of environmental and host predictors of root fungal community structure.
Location
North American plains grasslands.
Taxon
Foundation grasses – Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua dactyloides, B. eriopoda, B. gracilis, and Schizachyrium scoparium and root fungi.
Methods
At each of 24 sites representing three replicate 17°–latitudinal gradients, we collected roots from 12 individuals per species along five transects spaced 10 m apart (40 m × 40 m grid). We used next‐generation sequencing of ITS2, direct fungal culturing from roots, and microscopy to survey fungi associated with grass roots.
Results
Root‐associated fungi did not follow the poleward declines in diversity documented for many animals and plants. Instead, host plant identity had the largest influence on fungal community structure. Edaphic factors outranked climate or host plant traits as correlates of fungal community structure; however, the relative importance of environmental predictors differed among plant species. As sampling approached host species range edges, fungal composition converged in similarity among individual plants of each grass species.
Main conclusions
Environmental predictors of root‐associated fungi depended strongly on host plant species identity. Biogeographic patterns in fungal composition suggested a homogenizing influence of stressors at host plant range limits. Results predict that communities of non‐mycorrhizal, root‐associated fungi in the North American plains will be more sensitive to future changes in host plant ranges and edaphic factors than to the direct effects of climate.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jbi.14260</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-8667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6353</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-8192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-4857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-6093</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-0270 |
ispartof | Journal of biogeography, 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.22-37 |
issn | 0305-0270 1365-2699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2615437979 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Ascomycota Biogeography Changing environments climate change Climate effects Community structure Composition dark septate endophytes distance decay diversity Flowers & plants foundation species Fungi Grasses Grasslands Host plants latitudinal gradient Microbial activity microbiome Microbiomes Microorganisms mycobiome Phenotypes Plant species rhizobiome Roots Species Tolerances |
title | Biogeography of root‐associated fungi in foundation grasses of North American plains |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A57%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biogeography%20of%20root%E2%80%90associated%20fungi%20in%20foundation%20grasses%20of%20North%20American%20plains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biogeography&rft.au=Rudgers,%20Jennifer%20A.&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=22-37&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.eissn=1365-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jbi.14260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2615437979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2615437979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |