Investigating constraints on direct seeding for native revegetation in the Tasmanian Midlands
Summary Direct‐seeding trials in Tasmania tested the effectiveness of five treatments: a clear polymer film removed at three time intervals; insecticide; wetting agent; irrigation; and caging to exclude all mammal herbivores. The most effective treatment in improving early establishment of 15 native...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological management & restoration 2021-12, Vol.22 (S2), p.106-117 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 117 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S2 |
| container_start_page | 106 |
| container_title | Ecological management & restoration |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Bailey, Tanya G. Harrison, Peter A. Hanusch, Yolanda Ranyard, Claire Hooghkirk, Charles J. Davidson, Neil Pinkard, Elizabeth A. Potts, Brad M. |
| description | Summary
Direct‐seeding trials in Tasmania tested the effectiveness of five treatments: a clear polymer film removed at three time intervals; insecticide; wetting agent; irrigation; and caging to exclude all mammal herbivores. The most effective treatment in improving early establishment of 15 native species across 2 years and at five sites was the application of the insecticide Bifenthrin to reduce seed predation by ants. The polymer film removed after 10 weeks also improved germination of a range of shrubby but not tree species. However, these early advantages were eroded over time at the first trial site due to damage from herbivores and at subsequent sites due to weed competition and mortality of seedlings over summer. Caging was beneficial to the ongoing persistence of tree and shrub species but also protected weeds. Further work on seed testing and timely weed control is needed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/emr.12498 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2615318512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2615318512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-59bb40408f50a7a4d978b00cf7c41ae6d09e2b3f392953f3ac29a873fadcc99a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4B9E4sShWz7atTmiacCkTUhoHFHkpm7JtKUj6Yb278norvjy2vJjW34JuedsxGOMcetHXKSquCADnqYiKRSTl-c8Z4xfk5sQ1jHJ5UQNyOfcHTB0toHOuoaa1oXOg3VdoK2jlfVoOhoQq1O3bj11ETwg9XjABrtYRMw62n0hXUHYgrPg6NJWG3BVuCVXNWwC3p11SD6eZ6vpa7J4e5lPnxaJkVIUSabKMmUpK-qMQQ5ppfKiZMzUuUk54KRiCkUpa6mEyqKAEQqKXNZQGaMUyCF56PfufPu9j__odbv3Lp7UYsIzyYuMi0g99pTxbQgea73zdgv-qDnTJ_d0dE__uRfZcc_-2A0e_wf1bPneT_wC6lpyRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2615318512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating constraints on direct seeding for native revegetation in the Tasmanian Midlands</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Bailey, Tanya G. ; Harrison, Peter A. ; Hanusch, Yolanda ; Ranyard, Claire ; Hooghkirk, Charles ; J. Davidson, Neil ; Pinkard, Elizabeth A. ; Potts, Brad M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Tanya G. ; Harrison, Peter A. ; Hanusch, Yolanda ; Ranyard, Claire ; Hooghkirk, Charles ; J. Davidson, Neil ; Pinkard, Elizabeth A. ; Potts, Brad M.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Direct‐seeding trials in Tasmania tested the effectiveness of five treatments: a clear polymer film removed at three time intervals; insecticide; wetting agent; irrigation; and caging to exclude all mammal herbivores. The most effective treatment in improving early establishment of 15 native species across 2 years and at five sites was the application of the insecticide Bifenthrin to reduce seed predation by ants. The polymer film removed after 10 weeks also improved germination of a range of shrubby but not tree species. However, these early advantages were eroded over time at the first trial site due to damage from herbivores and at subsequent sites due to weed competition and mortality of seedlings over summer. Caging was beneficial to the ongoing persistence of tree and shrub species but also protected weeds. Further work on seed testing and timely weed control is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-7001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-8903</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emr.12498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>clear polymer film ; direct seeding ; Germination ; Herbivores ; herbivory ; Indigenous species ; insecticide ; Insecticides ; Plant species ; Polymer films ; Polymers ; Predation ; Protected species ; Revegetation ; Seed predation ; Seedlings ; Weed control ; Weeds ; Wetting ; Wetting agents</subject><ispartof>Ecological management & restoration, 2021-12, Vol.22 (S2), p.106-117</ispartof><rights>2021 Ecological Society of Australia and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Ecological Society of Australia and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-59bb40408f50a7a4d978b00cf7c41ae6d09e2b3f392953f3ac29a873fadcc99a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-59bb40408f50a7a4d978b00cf7c41ae6d09e2b3f392953f3ac29a873fadcc99a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6905-9807 ; 0000-0002-3502-0242 ; 0000-0001-8194-9661</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Femr.12498$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Femr.12498$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Tanya G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanusch, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranyard, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooghkirk, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J. Davidson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkard, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Brad M.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating constraints on direct seeding for native revegetation in the Tasmanian Midlands</title><title>Ecological management & restoration</title><description>Summary
Direct‐seeding trials in Tasmania tested the effectiveness of five treatments: a clear polymer film removed at three time intervals; insecticide; wetting agent; irrigation; and caging to exclude all mammal herbivores. The most effective treatment in improving early establishment of 15 native species across 2 years and at five sites was the application of the insecticide Bifenthrin to reduce seed predation by ants. The polymer film removed after 10 weeks also improved germination of a range of shrubby but not tree species. However, these early advantages were eroded over time at the first trial site due to damage from herbivores and at subsequent sites due to weed competition and mortality of seedlings over summer. Caging was beneficial to the ongoing persistence of tree and shrub species but also protected weeds. Further work on seed testing and timely weed control is needed.</description><subject>clear polymer film</subject><subject>direct seeding</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>herbivory</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>insecticide</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Polymer films</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Revegetation</subject><subject>Seed predation</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Wetting</subject><subject>Wetting agents</subject><issn>1442-7001</issn><issn>1442-8903</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4B9E4sShWz7atTmiacCkTUhoHFHkpm7JtKUj6Yb278norvjy2vJjW34JuedsxGOMcetHXKSquCADnqYiKRSTl-c8Z4xfk5sQ1jHJ5UQNyOfcHTB0toHOuoaa1oXOg3VdoK2jlfVoOhoQq1O3bj11ETwg9XjABrtYRMw62n0hXUHYgrPg6NJWG3BVuCVXNWwC3p11SD6eZ6vpa7J4e5lPnxaJkVIUSabKMmUpK-qMQQ5ppfKiZMzUuUk54KRiCkUpa6mEyqKAEQqKXNZQGaMUyCF56PfufPu9j__odbv3Lp7UYsIzyYuMi0g99pTxbQgea73zdgv-qDnTJ_d0dE__uRfZcc_-2A0e_wf1bPneT_wC6lpyRQ</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Bailey, Tanya G.</creator><creator>Harrison, Peter A.</creator><creator>Hanusch, Yolanda</creator><creator>Ranyard, Claire</creator><creator>Hooghkirk, Charles</creator><creator>J. Davidson, Neil</creator><creator>Pinkard, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Potts, Brad M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-9807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-0242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-9661</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Investigating constraints on direct seeding for native revegetation in the Tasmanian Midlands</title><author>Bailey, Tanya G. ; Harrison, Peter A. ; Hanusch, Yolanda ; Ranyard, Claire ; Hooghkirk, Charles ; J. Davidson, Neil ; Pinkard, Elizabeth A. ; Potts, Brad M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-59bb40408f50a7a4d978b00cf7c41ae6d09e2b3f392953f3ac29a873fadcc99a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>clear polymer film</topic><topic>direct seeding</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>herbivory</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>insecticide</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Polymer films</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Revegetation</topic><topic>Seed predation</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Wetting</topic><topic>Wetting agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Tanya G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanusch, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranyard, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooghkirk, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J. Davidson, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkard, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Brad M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological management & restoration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bailey, Tanya G.</au><au>Harrison, Peter A.</au><au>Hanusch, Yolanda</au><au>Ranyard, Claire</au><au>Hooghkirk, Charles</au><au>J. Davidson, Neil</au><au>Pinkard, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Potts, Brad M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating constraints on direct seeding for native revegetation in the Tasmanian Midlands</atitle><jtitle>Ecological management & restoration</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>106-117</pages><issn>1442-7001</issn><eissn>1442-8903</eissn><abstract>Summary
Direct‐seeding trials in Tasmania tested the effectiveness of five treatments: a clear polymer film removed at three time intervals; insecticide; wetting agent; irrigation; and caging to exclude all mammal herbivores. The most effective treatment in improving early establishment of 15 native species across 2 years and at five sites was the application of the insecticide Bifenthrin to reduce seed predation by ants. The polymer film removed after 10 weeks also improved germination of a range of shrubby but not tree species. However, these early advantages were eroded over time at the first trial site due to damage from herbivores and at subsequent sites due to weed competition and mortality of seedlings over summer. Caging was beneficial to the ongoing persistence of tree and shrub species but also protected weeds. Further work on seed testing and timely weed control is needed.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/emr.12498</doi><tpages>117</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-9807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-0242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-9661</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1442-7001 |
| ispartof | Ecological management & restoration, 2021-12, Vol.22 (S2), p.106-117 |
| issn | 1442-7001 1442-8903 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2615318512 |
| source | Wiley Journals |
| subjects | clear polymer film direct seeding Germination Herbivores herbivory Indigenous species insecticide Insecticides Plant species Polymer films Polymers Predation Protected species Revegetation Seed predation Seedlings Weed control Weeds Wetting Wetting agents |
| title | Investigating constraints on direct seeding for native revegetation in the Tasmanian Midlands |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A28%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20constraints%20on%20direct%20seeding%20for%20native%20revegetation%20in%20the%20Tasmanian%20Midlands&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20management%20&%20restoration&rft.au=Bailey,%20Tanya%20G.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=106-117&rft.issn=1442-7001&rft.eissn=1442-8903&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emr.12498&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2615318512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2615318512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |