Sewer orientated framework for ensemble‐based chance‐constrained model predictive control

In this work, we present a framework for ensemble‐based (E) chance‐constrained (CC) model predictive control (MPC) in sewer systems. The framework considers the availability of ensemble forecasts and the difficulties with propagation of distributions; through distribution estimation. Utilizing a cas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advanced control for applications 2021-12, Vol.3 (4), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Lorenz Svensen, Jan, Henrik Niemann, Hans, Falk, Anne Katrine V., Poulsen, Niels K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Advanced control for applications
container_volume 3
creator Lorenz Svensen, Jan
Henrik Niemann, Hans
Falk, Anne Katrine V.
Poulsen, Niels K.
description In this work, we present a framework for ensemble‐based (E) chance‐constrained (CC) model predictive control (MPC) in sewer systems. The framework considers the availability of ensemble forecasts and the difficulties with propagation of distributions; through distribution estimation. Utilizing a case study of the sewer network of the city of Aarhus in Denmark, the performance of the ECC‐MPC framework is evaluated through simulations. The evaluations were based on linear models of the case study and compare the ECC‐MPC performance with the performance of CC‐MPC. Based on the simulations, it was found that the ECC‐MPC performed comparable to the performance of the CC‐MPC, not only in the context of overflow and outflow but also with respect to behavior in response to changes in different aspects of forecast uncertainties. Regarding the aspects, it was found that expectation offset biases in the forecast were affecting the performance of the CC‐ and ECC‐MPC the most. While other aspects only had a reduced effect on the performances, within the ranges tested. With the comparable performances, it was found that ECC‐MPC would work as an alternative approach to CC‐MPC. Ensemble‐based Chance‐Constrained (CC) Model Predictive Control (MPC): An alternative to CC‐MPC given ensemble forecasts and difficulties with propagation of stochastic distributions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/adc2.68
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2614967798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2614967798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-a3598e216795829390031e61c8666501a329a7d07149e8d2f0502a53c53e954f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsNTiKwRcuJDUuWRuy1KvUHChLmWYTk4wNcnUmdTSnY_gM_okTqgLN67O5f_OhR-hU4KnBGN6aUtHp0IdoBHlUuVYUnn4Jz9GkxhXOJGkKDiVI_TyCFsImQ81dL3tocyqYFvY-vCWVT5k0EVolw18f34tbUyye7WdG0rnu9gHW3ep2foSmmwdoKxdX39AlsQ--OYEHVW2iTD5jWP0fHP9NL_LFw-39_PZIneUpdcs41oBJUJqrqhmGmNGQBCnhBAcE8uotrLEkhQaVEkrzDG1nDnOQPOiYmN0tt-7Dv59A7E3K78JXTppqEhDQkqtEnW-p1zwMQaozDrUrQ07Q7AZ7DODfUYM5MWe3NYN7P7DzOxqThP9A4BOcQk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614967798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sewer orientated framework for ensemble‐based chance‐constrained model predictive control</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lorenz Svensen, Jan ; Henrik Niemann, Hans ; Falk, Anne Katrine V. ; Poulsen, Niels K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lorenz Svensen, Jan ; Henrik Niemann, Hans ; Falk, Anne Katrine V. ; Poulsen, Niels K.</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, we present a framework for ensemble‐based (E) chance‐constrained (CC) model predictive control (MPC) in sewer systems. The framework considers the availability of ensemble forecasts and the difficulties with propagation of distributions; through distribution estimation. Utilizing a case study of the sewer network of the city of Aarhus in Denmark, the performance of the ECC‐MPC framework is evaluated through simulations. The evaluations were based on linear models of the case study and compare the ECC‐MPC performance with the performance of CC‐MPC. Based on the simulations, it was found that the ECC‐MPC performed comparable to the performance of the CC‐MPC, not only in the context of overflow and outflow but also with respect to behavior in response to changes in different aspects of forecast uncertainties. Regarding the aspects, it was found that expectation offset biases in the forecast were affecting the performance of the CC‐ and ECC‐MPC the most. While other aspects only had a reduced effect on the performances, within the ranges tested. With the comparable performances, it was found that ECC‐MPC would work as an alternative approach to CC‐MPC. Ensemble‐based Chance‐Constrained (CC) Model Predictive Control (MPC): An alternative to CC‐MPC given ensemble forecasts and difficulties with propagation of stochastic distributions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2578-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2578-0727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/adc2.68</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Case studies ; chance‐constrained ; combined sewer overflow ; ensemble ; Mathematical models ; Predictive control ; sewer system ; Sewer systems ; stochastic MPC</subject><ispartof>Advanced control for applications, 2021-12, Vol.3 (4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-a3598e216795829390031e61c8666501a329a7d07149e8d2f0502a53c53e954f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-a3598e216795829390031e61c8666501a329a7d07149e8d2f0502a53c53e954f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9185-7605 ; 0000-0002-1518-4979</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fadc2.68$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fadc2.68$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lorenz Svensen, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrik Niemann, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falk, Anne Katrine V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Niels K.</creatorcontrib><title>Sewer orientated framework for ensemble‐based chance‐constrained model predictive control</title><title>Advanced control for applications</title><description>In this work, we present a framework for ensemble‐based (E) chance‐constrained (CC) model predictive control (MPC) in sewer systems. The framework considers the availability of ensemble forecasts and the difficulties with propagation of distributions; through distribution estimation. Utilizing a case study of the sewer network of the city of Aarhus in Denmark, the performance of the ECC‐MPC framework is evaluated through simulations. The evaluations were based on linear models of the case study and compare the ECC‐MPC performance with the performance of CC‐MPC. Based on the simulations, it was found that the ECC‐MPC performed comparable to the performance of the CC‐MPC, not only in the context of overflow and outflow but also with respect to behavior in response to changes in different aspects of forecast uncertainties. Regarding the aspects, it was found that expectation offset biases in the forecast were affecting the performance of the CC‐ and ECC‐MPC the most. While other aspects only had a reduced effect on the performances, within the ranges tested. With the comparable performances, it was found that ECC‐MPC would work as an alternative approach to CC‐MPC. Ensemble‐based Chance‐Constrained (CC) Model Predictive Control (MPC): An alternative to CC‐MPC given ensemble forecasts and difficulties with propagation of stochastic distributions.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>chance‐constrained</subject><subject>combined sewer overflow</subject><subject>ensemble</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Predictive control</subject><subject>sewer system</subject><subject>Sewer systems</subject><subject>stochastic MPC</subject><issn>2578-0727</issn><issn>2578-0727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsNTiKwRcuJDUuWRuy1KvUHChLmWYTk4wNcnUmdTSnY_gM_okTqgLN67O5f_OhR-hU4KnBGN6aUtHp0IdoBHlUuVYUnn4Jz9GkxhXOJGkKDiVI_TyCFsImQ81dL3tocyqYFvY-vCWVT5k0EVolw18f34tbUyye7WdG0rnu9gHW3ep2foSmmwdoKxdX39AlsQ--OYEHVW2iTD5jWP0fHP9NL_LFw-39_PZIneUpdcs41oBJUJqrqhmGmNGQBCnhBAcE8uotrLEkhQaVEkrzDG1nDnOQPOiYmN0tt-7Dv59A7E3K78JXTppqEhDQkqtEnW-p1zwMQaozDrUrQ07Q7AZ7DODfUYM5MWe3NYN7P7DzOxqThP9A4BOcQk</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Lorenz Svensen, Jan</creator><creator>Henrik Niemann, Hans</creator><creator>Falk, Anne Katrine V.</creator><creator>Poulsen, Niels K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9185-7605</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-4979</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Sewer orientated framework for ensemble‐based chance‐constrained model predictive control</title><author>Lorenz Svensen, Jan ; Henrik Niemann, Hans ; Falk, Anne Katrine V. ; Poulsen, Niels K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-a3598e216795829390031e61c8666501a329a7d07149e8d2f0502a53c53e954f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>chance‐constrained</topic><topic>combined sewer overflow</topic><topic>ensemble</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Predictive control</topic><topic>sewer system</topic><topic>Sewer systems</topic><topic>stochastic MPC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lorenz Svensen, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrik Niemann, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falk, Anne Katrine V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Niels K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Advanced control for applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lorenz Svensen, Jan</au><au>Henrik Niemann, Hans</au><au>Falk, Anne Katrine V.</au><au>Poulsen, Niels K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sewer orientated framework for ensemble‐based chance‐constrained model predictive control</atitle><jtitle>Advanced control for applications</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2578-0727</issn><eissn>2578-0727</eissn><abstract>In this work, we present a framework for ensemble‐based (E) chance‐constrained (CC) model predictive control (MPC) in sewer systems. The framework considers the availability of ensemble forecasts and the difficulties with propagation of distributions; through distribution estimation. Utilizing a case study of the sewer network of the city of Aarhus in Denmark, the performance of the ECC‐MPC framework is evaluated through simulations. The evaluations were based on linear models of the case study and compare the ECC‐MPC performance with the performance of CC‐MPC. Based on the simulations, it was found that the ECC‐MPC performed comparable to the performance of the CC‐MPC, not only in the context of overflow and outflow but also with respect to behavior in response to changes in different aspects of forecast uncertainties. Regarding the aspects, it was found that expectation offset biases in the forecast were affecting the performance of the CC‐ and ECC‐MPC the most. While other aspects only had a reduced effect on the performances, within the ranges tested. With the comparable performances, it was found that ECC‐MPC would work as an alternative approach to CC‐MPC. Ensemble‐based Chance‐Constrained (CC) Model Predictive Control (MPC): An alternative to CC‐MPC given ensemble forecasts and difficulties with propagation of stochastic distributions.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/adc2.68</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9185-7605</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-4979</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2578-0727
ispartof Advanced control for applications, 2021-12, Vol.3 (4), p.n/a
issn 2578-0727
2578-0727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2614967798
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Case studies
chance‐constrained
combined sewer overflow
ensemble
Mathematical models
Predictive control
sewer system
Sewer systems
stochastic MPC
title Sewer orientated framework for ensemble‐based chance‐constrained model predictive control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A01%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sewer%20orientated%20framework%20for%20ensemble%E2%80%90based%20chance%E2%80%90constrained%20model%20predictive%20control&rft.jtitle=Advanced%20control%20for%20applications&rft.au=Lorenz%20Svensen,%20Jan&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2578-0727&rft.eissn=2578-0727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/adc2.68&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614967798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614967798&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true