Initial Evidence for Eliciting Contrafreeloading in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) via the Opportunity for Playful Foraging
Contrafreeloading is the choice to perform a physical task to access food over freely available food, a behavior pattern contrary to the predictions of both optimal foraging and learning theories. This study examined the presence and degree of contrafreeloading in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2021-11, Vol.135 (4), p.516-533 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 533 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 516 |
container_title | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) |
container_volume | 135 |
creator | Smith, Gabriella E. Greene, Diana Hartsfield, Leigh Ann Pepperberg, Irene M. |
description | Contrafreeloading is the choice to perform a physical task to access food over freely available food, a behavior pattern contrary to the predictions of both optimal foraging and learning theories. This study examined the presence and degree of contrafreeloading in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and the possible interpretation of such behavior in the context of play. Experiment 1 presented 4 subjects, Griffin, Athena, Franco and Pepper, with container pairs holding more- or less-preferred free or enclosed food items. Degrees of contrafreeloading were classified as follows: calculated contrafreeloading (working to access preferred food over less-preferred, freely available food); classic contrafreeloading (working to access food equal in value to freely available food); and super contrafreeloading (working to access a less-preferred food over preferred, freely available food). Of these three, Griffin significantly preferred classic and calculated contrafreeloading; Athena, Pepper, and Franco significantly preferred calculated contrafreeloading. Experiment 2 examined a more ecologically relevant contrafreeloading task in 5 parrots, Griffin, Athena, Lucci, Pepper, and Franco, using shelled and unshelled nuts. Athena and Franco significantly preferred cracking the shell to obtain the nut (contrafreeloading); Griffin and Lucci did not; Pepper chose at chance. We examine numerous possible explanations for their behavior and suggest that individual differences in contrafreeloading among the Grey parrots could relate to which task each considers some form of play. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/com0000295 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2614642200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2566075870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-703f9442d2e071572f5843426efb12b5c1373f899c76bd30fbd4114d48f042643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhwg9AlrgAYsHfTo5otS2VKnUPcLYcx25dZeMwdirlxF_HYQvc8GWs0aNnNPMi9JqST5Rw_dmlI6mPtfIJ2tCWt1tGGv0UbYjmcqsJV2foRc73lVFU6OfojAuhCNN6g35ejbFEO-D9Q-z96DwOCfB-iK62x1u8S2MBG8D7Idl-7cQRX4Jf8MECpJLxu0OOpVg3Z-whlrv19x4_RIvLncc305SgzHXI8tt8GOwS5gFfJLC3VfcSPQt2yP7VYz1H3y_233Zft9c3l1e7L9dbyxtS1iVCKwTrmSeaSs2CbAQXTPnQUdZJR7nmoWlbp1XXcxK6XlAqetEEUinBz9Hbk3eC9GP2uZj7NMNYRxpWj6IEY4T8l5JKES0bvVIfTpSDlDP4YCaIRwuLocSsiZh_iVT4zaNy7o6-_4v-iaACH0-AnayZ8uIslOgGn90M4Meyygzl0ggjqeK_AHfAlXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2566075870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial Evidence for Eliciting Contrafreeloading in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) via the Opportunity for Playful Foraging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Smith, Gabriella E. ; Greene, Diana ; Hartsfield, Leigh Ann ; Pepperberg, Irene M.</creator><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gabriella E. ; Greene, Diana ; Hartsfield, Leigh Ann ; Pepperberg, Irene M. ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M</creatorcontrib><description>Contrafreeloading is the choice to perform a physical task to access food over freely available food, a behavior pattern contrary to the predictions of both optimal foraging and learning theories. This study examined the presence and degree of contrafreeloading in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and the possible interpretation of such behavior in the context of play. Experiment 1 presented 4 subjects, Griffin, Athena, Franco and Pepper, with container pairs holding more- or less-preferred free or enclosed food items. Degrees of contrafreeloading were classified as follows: calculated contrafreeloading (working to access preferred food over less-preferred, freely available food); classic contrafreeloading (working to access food equal in value to freely available food); and super contrafreeloading (working to access a less-preferred food over preferred, freely available food). Of these three, Griffin significantly preferred classic and calculated contrafreeloading; Athena, Pepper, and Franco significantly preferred calculated contrafreeloading. Experiment 2 examined a more ecologically relevant contrafreeloading task in 5 parrots, Griffin, Athena, Lucci, Pepper, and Franco, using shelled and unshelled nuts. Athena and Franco significantly preferred cracking the shell to obtain the nut (contrafreeloading); Griffin and Lucci did not; Pepper chose at chance. We examine numerous possible explanations for their behavior and suggest that individual differences in contrafreeloading among the Grey parrots could relate to which task each considers some form of play.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34460277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal Behavior ; Animal Cognition ; Animal Foraging Behavior ; Animal Play ; Animals ; Birds ; Female ; Foraging behavior ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Learning ; Learning Theory ; Male ; Parrots</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2021-11, Vol.135 (4), p.516-533</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-703f9442d2e071572f5843426efb12b5c1373f899c76bd30fbd4114d48f042643</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6136-6351 ; 0000-0002-0856-9504 ; 0000-0001-9486-7323</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gabriella E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartsfield, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepperberg, Irene M.</creatorcontrib><title>Initial Evidence for Eliciting Contrafreeloading in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) via the Opportunity for Playful Foraging</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><addtitle>J Comp Psychol</addtitle><description>Contrafreeloading is the choice to perform a physical task to access food over freely available food, a behavior pattern contrary to the predictions of both optimal foraging and learning theories. This study examined the presence and degree of contrafreeloading in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and the possible interpretation of such behavior in the context of play. Experiment 1 presented 4 subjects, Griffin, Athena, Franco and Pepper, with container pairs holding more- or less-preferred free or enclosed food items. Degrees of contrafreeloading were classified as follows: calculated contrafreeloading (working to access preferred food over less-preferred, freely available food); classic contrafreeloading (working to access food equal in value to freely available food); and super contrafreeloading (working to access a less-preferred food over preferred, freely available food). Of these three, Griffin significantly preferred classic and calculated contrafreeloading; Athena, Pepper, and Franco significantly preferred calculated contrafreeloading. Experiment 2 examined a more ecologically relevant contrafreeloading task in 5 parrots, Griffin, Athena, Lucci, Pepper, and Franco, using shelled and unshelled nuts. Athena and Franco significantly preferred cracking the shell to obtain the nut (contrafreeloading); Griffin and Lucci did not; Pepper chose at chance. We examine numerous possible explanations for their behavior and suggest that individual differences in contrafreeloading among the Grey parrots could relate to which task each considers some form of play.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal Behavior</subject><subject>Animal Cognition</subject><subject>Animal Foraging Behavior</subject><subject>Animal Play</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Theory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Parrots</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhwg9AlrgAYsHfTo5otS2VKnUPcLYcx25dZeMwdirlxF_HYQvc8GWs0aNnNPMi9JqST5Rw_dmlI6mPtfIJ2tCWt1tGGv0UbYjmcqsJV2foRc73lVFU6OfojAuhCNN6g35ejbFEO-D9Q-z96DwOCfB-iK62x1u8S2MBG8D7Idl-7cQRX4Jf8MECpJLxu0OOpVg3Z-whlrv19x4_RIvLncc305SgzHXI8tt8GOwS5gFfJLC3VfcSPQt2yP7VYz1H3y_233Zft9c3l1e7L9dbyxtS1iVCKwTrmSeaSs2CbAQXTPnQUdZJR7nmoWlbp1XXcxK6XlAqetEEUinBz9Hbk3eC9GP2uZj7NMNYRxpWj6IEY4T8l5JKES0bvVIfTpSDlDP4YCaIRwuLocSsiZh_iVT4zaNy7o6-_4v-iaACH0-AnayZ8uIslOgGn90M4Meyygzl0ggjqeK_AHfAlXw</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Smith, Gabriella E.</creator><creator>Greene, Diana</creator><creator>Hartsfield, Leigh Ann</creator><creator>Pepperberg, Irene M.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-6351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0856-9504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9486-7323</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Initial Evidence for Eliciting Contrafreeloading in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) via the Opportunity for Playful Foraging</title><author>Smith, Gabriella E. ; Greene, Diana ; Hartsfield, Leigh Ann ; Pepperberg, Irene M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-703f9442d2e071572f5843426efb12b5c1373f899c76bd30fbd4114d48f042643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal Behavior</topic><topic>Animal Cognition</topic><topic>Animal Foraging Behavior</topic><topic>Animal Play</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Theory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Parrots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gabriella E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartsfield, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepperberg, Irene M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Gabriella E.</au><au>Greene, Diana</au><au>Hartsfield, Leigh Ann</au><au>Pepperberg, Irene M.</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial Evidence for Eliciting Contrafreeloading in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) via the Opportunity for Playful Foraging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><addtitle>J Comp Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>516-533</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Contrafreeloading is the choice to perform a physical task to access food over freely available food, a behavior pattern contrary to the predictions of both optimal foraging and learning theories. This study examined the presence and degree of contrafreeloading in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and the possible interpretation of such behavior in the context of play. Experiment 1 presented 4 subjects, Griffin, Athena, Franco and Pepper, with container pairs holding more- or less-preferred free or enclosed food items. Degrees of contrafreeloading were classified as follows: calculated contrafreeloading (working to access preferred food over less-preferred, freely available food); classic contrafreeloading (working to access food equal in value to freely available food); and super contrafreeloading (working to access a less-preferred food over preferred, freely available food). Of these three, Griffin significantly preferred classic and calculated contrafreeloading; Athena, Pepper, and Franco significantly preferred calculated contrafreeloading. Experiment 2 examined a more ecologically relevant contrafreeloading task in 5 parrots, Griffin, Athena, Lucci, Pepper, and Franco, using shelled and unshelled nuts. Athena and Franco significantly preferred cracking the shell to obtain the nut (contrafreeloading); Griffin and Lucci did not; Pepper chose at chance. We examine numerous possible explanations for their behavior and suggest that individual differences in contrafreeloading among the Grey parrots could relate to which task each considers some form of play.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34460277</pmid><doi>10.1037/com0000295</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-6351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0856-9504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9486-7323</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-7036 |
ispartof | Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2021-11, Vol.135 (4), p.516-533 |
issn | 0735-7036 1939-2087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2614642200 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Animal Animal Behavior Animal Cognition Animal Foraging Behavior Animal Play Animals Birds Female Foraging behavior Humans Individual Differences Learning Learning Theory Male Parrots |
title | Initial Evidence for Eliciting Contrafreeloading in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) via the Opportunity for Playful Foraging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A56%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20Evidence%20for%20Eliciting%20Contrafreeloading%20in%20Grey%20Parrots%20(Psittacus%20erithacus)%20via%20the%20Opportunity%20for%20Playful%20Foraging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Smith,%20Gabriella%20E.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=516-533&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2566075870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2566075870&rft_id=info:pmid/34460277&rfr_iscdi=true |