Sediment Recruitment and Redistribution in Mountain Channel Networks by Post‐Wildfire Debris Flows

We used lidar differencing and field observations to map volumes, and interpret the origins of, sediment mobilized from mountain canyons by large post‐wildfire debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. The debris flows progressively entrained and partially redeposited 550,000 m3 of previously st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2021-12, Vol.48 (24), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Morell, K. D., Alessio, P., Dunne, T., Keller, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 24
container_start_page
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 48
creator Morell, K. D.
Alessio, P.
Dunne, T.
Keller, E.
description We used lidar differencing and field observations to map volumes, and interpret the origins of, sediment mobilized from mountain canyons by large post‐wildfire debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. The debris flows progressively entrained and partially redeposited 550,000 m3 of previously stored channel sediments throughout the canyon networks. The observations that scour depths and volumes were highest where the largest volumes of bouldery colluvium and debris‐flow deposits had accumulated, and that scour persisted beyond the mountain front, indicates that debris‐flow volumes in this extreme event were ultimately controlled by the coarse sediment reservoir available for scour. Because the volumes of available stored sediment result from the stochastic interaction of colluvial mass wasting, the magnitude and frequency of previous debris flows, and the accommodation space provided by valley morphology, the study reinforces the importance of estimating stored sediment volumes when developing debris‐flow hazard assessments. Plain Language Summary We measured the volumes, and identified the origins of, sediment evacuated from a mountain range by large debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. We measured sediment volumes by subtracting the ground surface topography of creek bottoms estimated using lidar scanning equipment before and after the events. We conducted field campaigns to investigate the type of sediment removed during the debris flows. The flows evacuated and partially redeposited a total of 550,000 m3 of material, with the greatest removal occurring in large canyons where previous boulder‐rich debris‐flow deposits had accumulated. Our results indicate that estimates of stored sediment are necessary when assessing debris‐flow hazard in similar high‐value environments. Key Points Lidar differencing reveals range‐wide volumes of scour and re‐deposition by post‐wildfire debris flows within Santa Ynez Range canyons Scoured coarse‐grained sediment, emplaced by prior colluvial and debris‐flow processes, constituted ∼70% of the entire debris‐flow volumes Volumes of sediment available for debris‐flow scour depend on the stochastic interaction of accumulation processes and large scouring events
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021GL095549
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2614324733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2614324733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3297-3969427d679db17ef4ffd36733470a888d0bc31e6173d3d939833352fbcdca1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKs7HyDg1mqSm04mS6m2CuMPVXE5ZCYJpk4zmmQo3fkIPqNP4mhduHJ1vwsf58BB6JCSE0qYPGWE0VlB5HjM5RYaUMn5KCdEbKMBIbJnJrJdtBfjghACBOgA6Xuj3dL4hOemDp1LP6y87n_tYgqu6pJrPXYeX7edT6qHybPy3jT4xqRVG14irtb4ro3p8_3jyTXaumDwuamCi3jatKu4j3asaqI5-L1D9Di9eJhcjorb2dXkrBgpYFKMQGaSM6EzIXVFhbHcWg2ZAOCCqDzPNalqoCajAjRoCTIHgDGzVa1rRS0M0dEm9zW0b52JqVy0XfB9ZckyyoHxPqu3jjdWHdoYg7Hla3BLFdYlJeX3juXfHXudbfSVa8z6X7eczYsMuBTwBWKPdNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614324733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sediment Recruitment and Redistribution in Mountain Channel Networks by Post‐Wildfire Debris Flows</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Morell, K. D. ; Alessio, P. ; Dunne, T. ; Keller, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morell, K. D. ; Alessio, P. ; Dunne, T. ; Keller, E.</creatorcontrib><description>We used lidar differencing and field observations to map volumes, and interpret the origins of, sediment mobilized from mountain canyons by large post‐wildfire debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. The debris flows progressively entrained and partially redeposited 550,000 m3 of previously stored channel sediments throughout the canyon networks. The observations that scour depths and volumes were highest where the largest volumes of bouldery colluvium and debris‐flow deposits had accumulated, and that scour persisted beyond the mountain front, indicates that debris‐flow volumes in this extreme event were ultimately controlled by the coarse sediment reservoir available for scour. Because the volumes of available stored sediment result from the stochastic interaction of colluvial mass wasting, the magnitude and frequency of previous debris flows, and the accommodation space provided by valley morphology, the study reinforces the importance of estimating stored sediment volumes when developing debris‐flow hazard assessments. Plain Language Summary We measured the volumes, and identified the origins of, sediment evacuated from a mountain range by large debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. We measured sediment volumes by subtracting the ground surface topography of creek bottoms estimated using lidar scanning equipment before and after the events. We conducted field campaigns to investigate the type of sediment removed during the debris flows. The flows evacuated and partially redeposited a total of 550,000 m3 of material, with the greatest removal occurring in large canyons where previous boulder‐rich debris‐flow deposits had accumulated. Our results indicate that estimates of stored sediment are necessary when assessing debris‐flow hazard in similar high‐value environments. Key Points Lidar differencing reveals range‐wide volumes of scour and re‐deposition by post‐wildfire debris flows within Santa Ynez Range canyons Scoured coarse‐grained sediment, emplaced by prior colluvial and debris‐flow processes, constituted ∼70% of the entire debris‐flow volumes Volumes of sediment available for debris‐flow scour depend on the stochastic interaction of accumulation processes and large scouring events</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021GL095549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Canyons ; channel scou ; Coastal inlets ; Debris flow ; debris‐flow growth ; Detritus ; Hazard assessment ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; Lidar ; lidar differencing ; Mass wasting ; Mountains ; Ocean surface topography ; Origins ; Post‐wildfire debris flow ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2021-12, Vol.48 (24), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3297-3969427d679db17ef4ffd36733470a888d0bc31e6173d3d939833352fbcdca1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3297-3969427d679db17ef4ffd36733470a888d0bc31e6173d3d939833352fbcdca1f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8464-3553 ; 0000-0002-5281-6517 ; 0000-0002-6821-0288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021GL095549$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021GL095549$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,11495,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46449,46814,46873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morell, K. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessio, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Sediment Recruitment and Redistribution in Mountain Channel Networks by Post‐Wildfire Debris Flows</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>We used lidar differencing and field observations to map volumes, and interpret the origins of, sediment mobilized from mountain canyons by large post‐wildfire debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. The debris flows progressively entrained and partially redeposited 550,000 m3 of previously stored channel sediments throughout the canyon networks. The observations that scour depths and volumes were highest where the largest volumes of bouldery colluvium and debris‐flow deposits had accumulated, and that scour persisted beyond the mountain front, indicates that debris‐flow volumes in this extreme event were ultimately controlled by the coarse sediment reservoir available for scour. Because the volumes of available stored sediment result from the stochastic interaction of colluvial mass wasting, the magnitude and frequency of previous debris flows, and the accommodation space provided by valley morphology, the study reinforces the importance of estimating stored sediment volumes when developing debris‐flow hazard assessments. Plain Language Summary We measured the volumes, and identified the origins of, sediment evacuated from a mountain range by large debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. We measured sediment volumes by subtracting the ground surface topography of creek bottoms estimated using lidar scanning equipment before and after the events. We conducted field campaigns to investigate the type of sediment removed during the debris flows. The flows evacuated and partially redeposited a total of 550,000 m3 of material, with the greatest removal occurring in large canyons where previous boulder‐rich debris‐flow deposits had accumulated. Our results indicate that estimates of stored sediment are necessary when assessing debris‐flow hazard in similar high‐value environments. Key Points Lidar differencing reveals range‐wide volumes of scour and re‐deposition by post‐wildfire debris flows within Santa Ynez Range canyons Scoured coarse‐grained sediment, emplaced by prior colluvial and debris‐flow processes, constituted ∼70% of the entire debris‐flow volumes Volumes of sediment available for debris‐flow scour depend on the stochastic interaction of accumulation processes and large scouring events</description><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>channel scou</subject><subject>Coastal inlets</subject><subject>Debris flow</subject><subject>debris‐flow growth</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>lidar differencing</subject><subject>Mass wasting</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Ocean surface topography</subject><subject>Origins</subject><subject>Post‐wildfire debris flow</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKs7HyDg1mqSm04mS6m2CuMPVXE5ZCYJpk4zmmQo3fkIPqNP4mhduHJ1vwsf58BB6JCSE0qYPGWE0VlB5HjM5RYaUMn5KCdEbKMBIbJnJrJdtBfjghACBOgA6Xuj3dL4hOemDp1LP6y87n_tYgqu6pJrPXYeX7edT6qHybPy3jT4xqRVG14irtb4ro3p8_3jyTXaumDwuamCi3jatKu4j3asaqI5-L1D9Di9eJhcjorb2dXkrBgpYFKMQGaSM6EzIXVFhbHcWg2ZAOCCqDzPNalqoCajAjRoCTIHgDGzVa1rRS0M0dEm9zW0b52JqVy0XfB9ZckyyoHxPqu3jjdWHdoYg7Hla3BLFdYlJeX3juXfHXudbfSVa8z6X7eczYsMuBTwBWKPdNg</recordid><startdate>20211228</startdate><enddate>20211228</enddate><creator>Morell, K. D.</creator><creator>Alessio, P.</creator><creator>Dunne, T.</creator><creator>Keller, E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-3553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-6517</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-0288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211228</creationdate><title>Sediment Recruitment and Redistribution in Mountain Channel Networks by Post‐Wildfire Debris Flows</title><author>Morell, K. D. ; Alessio, P. ; Dunne, T. ; Keller, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3297-3969427d679db17ef4ffd36733470a888d0bc31e6173d3d939833352fbcdca1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>channel scou</topic><topic>Coastal inlets</topic><topic>Debris flow</topic><topic>debris‐flow growth</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>lidar differencing</topic><topic>Mass wasting</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Ocean surface topography</topic><topic>Origins</topic><topic>Post‐wildfire debris flow</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morell, K. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessio, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morell, K. D.</au><au>Alessio, P.</au><au>Dunne, T.</au><au>Keller, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sediment Recruitment and Redistribution in Mountain Channel Networks by Post‐Wildfire Debris Flows</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2021-12-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>24</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>We used lidar differencing and field observations to map volumes, and interpret the origins of, sediment mobilized from mountain canyons by large post‐wildfire debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. The debris flows progressively entrained and partially redeposited 550,000 m3 of previously stored channel sediments throughout the canyon networks. The observations that scour depths and volumes were highest where the largest volumes of bouldery colluvium and debris‐flow deposits had accumulated, and that scour persisted beyond the mountain front, indicates that debris‐flow volumes in this extreme event were ultimately controlled by the coarse sediment reservoir available for scour. Because the volumes of available stored sediment result from the stochastic interaction of colluvial mass wasting, the magnitude and frequency of previous debris flows, and the accommodation space provided by valley morphology, the study reinforces the importance of estimating stored sediment volumes when developing debris‐flow hazard assessments. Plain Language Summary We measured the volumes, and identified the origins of, sediment evacuated from a mountain range by large debris flows near Montecito, CA, USA in 2018. We measured sediment volumes by subtracting the ground surface topography of creek bottoms estimated using lidar scanning equipment before and after the events. We conducted field campaigns to investigate the type of sediment removed during the debris flows. The flows evacuated and partially redeposited a total of 550,000 m3 of material, with the greatest removal occurring in large canyons where previous boulder‐rich debris‐flow deposits had accumulated. Our results indicate that estimates of stored sediment are necessary when assessing debris‐flow hazard in similar high‐value environments. Key Points Lidar differencing reveals range‐wide volumes of scour and re‐deposition by post‐wildfire debris flows within Santa Ynez Range canyons Scoured coarse‐grained sediment, emplaced by prior colluvial and debris‐flow processes, constituted ∼70% of the entire debris‐flow volumes Volumes of sediment available for debris‐flow scour depend on the stochastic interaction of accumulation processes and large scouring events</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2021GL095549</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-3553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-6517</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-0288</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2021-12, Vol.48 (24), p.n/a
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2614324733
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Canyons
channel scou
Coastal inlets
Debris flow
debris‐flow growth
Detritus
Hazard assessment
Landslides & mudslides
Lidar
lidar differencing
Mass wasting
Mountains
Ocean surface topography
Origins
Post‐wildfire debris flow
Sediment
Sediments
Wildfires
title Sediment Recruitment and Redistribution in Mountain Channel Networks by Post‐Wildfire Debris Flows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sediment%20Recruitment%20and%20Redistribution%20in%20Mountain%20Channel%20Networks%20by%20Post%E2%80%90Wildfire%20Debris%20Flows&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Morell,%20K.%20D.&rft.date=2021-12-28&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=24&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021GL095549&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614324733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614324733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true