Undergraduate supply chain management courses: content, coverage, assessment and gaps

Purpose This paper aims to provide the results of a survey of supply chain management (SCM) courses in higher education. This research is unique because it represents the first large-scale study of undergraduate SCM course syllabi taught at universities. Design/methodology/approach The unit of analy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supply chain management 2022-01, Vol.27 (1), p.1-11
Hauptverfasser: Birou, Laura, Lutz, Heather, Walden, Joseph L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Supply chain management
container_volume 27
creator Birou, Laura
Lutz, Heather
Walden, Joseph L
description Purpose This paper aims to provide the results of a survey of supply chain management (SCM) courses in higher education. This research is unique because it represents the first large-scale study of undergraduate SCM course syllabi taught at universities. Design/methodology/approach The unit of analysis is an SCM syllabus. Content analysis was performed on each syllabus to identify the actual course coverage including requirements, pedagogy and content emphasis. This aggregated information was used to compare historical research findings in this area, with the current skills identified as important for career success. This data provides the input for a gap analysis between offerings in higher education and those needs identified by practitioners. Findings Data gathering efforts yielded a sample of 109 undergraduate courses representing 79 schools across North America. The aggregate number of topics covered in undergraduate courses totaled 120. The primary evaluation techniques include exams, projects and homework. Details regarding content and assessment techniques are provided along with a gap analysis between the coverage of supply chain courses and the needs identified by previous academic research. Originality/value This study is the first large-scale content analysis of undergraduate SCM course syllabi. The goal is to use this data as a means of continuous improvement in the quality and value of the educational experience on a longitudinal basis. The findings are designed to foster information sharing and provide data for benchmarking efforts in the development of SCM courses and curricula in academia, as well as training, development and recruitment efforts by professionals in the field of SCM.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/SCM-07-2020-0309
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2614154305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2614154305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2f5065b7e5aa2139f62f7e0c96aca7051e3d78b696be3a6e812849345a8ea0803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwteGztJNh_rTYpfoHjQnsN0d7a2dLdrshX635vaggie8sj83kzmhbFLAddCgBu_TV44WC5BAgcFxREbCKsdN07L46SVLrjTuTllZzEuAUDkQg7YdNpWFOYBqw32lMVN1622WfmBizZrsMU5NdT2WbnehEjxJom2TxejJL4opPIow5gq8QfDtsrm2MVzdlLjKtLF4Ryy6f3d--SRP78-PE1un3mpjOu5rDUYPbOkEaVQRW1kbQnKwmCJFrQgVVk3M4WZkUJDTkiXFyrX6AjBgRqyq33fLqw_NxR7v0wPbdNIL01aUOcKdKJgT5VhHWOg2ndh0WDYegF-F55P4Xmwfhee34WXLNneQmnhRfw1WGekFYWTCRkfkCYFsar-a_rnR9Q357p6XA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614154305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Undergraduate supply chain management courses: content, coverage, assessment and gaps</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Birou, Laura ; Lutz, Heather ; Walden, Joseph L</creator><creatorcontrib>Birou, Laura ; Lutz, Heather ; Walden, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This paper aims to provide the results of a survey of supply chain management (SCM) courses in higher education. This research is unique because it represents the first large-scale study of undergraduate SCM course syllabi taught at universities. Design/methodology/approach The unit of analysis is an SCM syllabus. Content analysis was performed on each syllabus to identify the actual course coverage including requirements, pedagogy and content emphasis. This aggregated information was used to compare historical research findings in this area, with the current skills identified as important for career success. This data provides the input for a gap analysis between offerings in higher education and those needs identified by practitioners. Findings Data gathering efforts yielded a sample of 109 undergraduate courses representing 79 schools across North America. The aggregate number of topics covered in undergraduate courses totaled 120. The primary evaluation techniques include exams, projects and homework. Details regarding content and assessment techniques are provided along with a gap analysis between the coverage of supply chain courses and the needs identified by previous academic research. Originality/value This study is the first large-scale content analysis of undergraduate SCM course syllabi. The goal is to use this data as a means of continuous improvement in the quality and value of the educational experience on a longitudinal basis. The findings are designed to foster information sharing and provide data for benchmarking efforts in the development of SCM courses and curricula in academia, as well as training, development and recruitment efforts by professionals in the field of SCM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-8546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/SCM-07-2020-0309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Colleges &amp; universities ; Content analysis ; Continuous improvement ; Curricula ; Education ; Higher education ; Logistics ; Operations management ; Professionals ; Students ; Supply chain management ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Supply chain management, 2022-01, Vol.27 (1), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2f5065b7e5aa2139f62f7e0c96aca7051e3d78b696be3a6e812849345a8ea0803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2f5065b7e5aa2139f62f7e0c96aca7051e3d78b696be3a6e812849345a8ea0803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SCM-07-2020-0309/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21695,27924,27925,53244</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birou, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walden, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><title>Undergraduate supply chain management courses: content, coverage, assessment and gaps</title><title>Supply chain management</title><description>Purpose This paper aims to provide the results of a survey of supply chain management (SCM) courses in higher education. This research is unique because it represents the first large-scale study of undergraduate SCM course syllabi taught at universities. Design/methodology/approach The unit of analysis is an SCM syllabus. Content analysis was performed on each syllabus to identify the actual course coverage including requirements, pedagogy and content emphasis. This aggregated information was used to compare historical research findings in this area, with the current skills identified as important for career success. This data provides the input for a gap analysis between offerings in higher education and those needs identified by practitioners. Findings Data gathering efforts yielded a sample of 109 undergraduate courses representing 79 schools across North America. The aggregate number of topics covered in undergraduate courses totaled 120. The primary evaluation techniques include exams, projects and homework. Details regarding content and assessment techniques are provided along with a gap analysis between the coverage of supply chain courses and the needs identified by previous academic research. Originality/value This study is the first large-scale content analysis of undergraduate SCM course syllabi. The goal is to use this data as a means of continuous improvement in the quality and value of the educational experience on a longitudinal basis. The findings are designed to foster information sharing and provide data for benchmarking efforts in the development of SCM courses and curricula in academia, as well as training, development and recruitment efforts by professionals in the field of SCM.</description><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Continuous improvement</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1359-8546</issn><issn>1758-6852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwteGztJNh_rTYpfoHjQnsN0d7a2dLdrshX635vaggie8sj83kzmhbFLAddCgBu_TV44WC5BAgcFxREbCKsdN07L46SVLrjTuTllZzEuAUDkQg7YdNpWFOYBqw32lMVN1622WfmBizZrsMU5NdT2WbnehEjxJom2TxejJL4opPIow5gq8QfDtsrm2MVzdlLjKtLF4Ryy6f3d--SRP78-PE1un3mpjOu5rDUYPbOkEaVQRW1kbQnKwmCJFrQgVVk3M4WZkUJDTkiXFyrX6AjBgRqyq33fLqw_NxR7v0wPbdNIL01aUOcKdKJgT5VhHWOg2ndh0WDYegF-F55P4Xmwfhee34WXLNneQmnhRfw1WGekFYWTCRkfkCYFsar-a_rnR9Q357p6XA</recordid><startdate>20220103</startdate><enddate>20220103</enddate><creator>Birou, Laura</creator><creator>Lutz, Heather</creator><creator>Walden, Joseph L</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220103</creationdate><title>Undergraduate supply chain management courses: content, coverage, assessment and gaps</title><author>Birou, Laura ; Lutz, Heather ; Walden, Joseph L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-2f5065b7e5aa2139f62f7e0c96aca7051e3d78b696be3a6e812849345a8ea0803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Continuous improvement</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birou, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walden, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Supply chain management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birou, Laura</au><au>Lutz, Heather</au><au>Walden, Joseph L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Undergraduate supply chain management courses: content, coverage, assessment and gaps</atitle><jtitle>Supply chain management</jtitle><date>2022-01-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>1359-8546</issn><eissn>1758-6852</eissn><abstract>Purpose This paper aims to provide the results of a survey of supply chain management (SCM) courses in higher education. This research is unique because it represents the first large-scale study of undergraduate SCM course syllabi taught at universities. Design/methodology/approach The unit of analysis is an SCM syllabus. Content analysis was performed on each syllabus to identify the actual course coverage including requirements, pedagogy and content emphasis. This aggregated information was used to compare historical research findings in this area, with the current skills identified as important for career success. This data provides the input for a gap analysis between offerings in higher education and those needs identified by practitioners. Findings Data gathering efforts yielded a sample of 109 undergraduate courses representing 79 schools across North America. The aggregate number of topics covered in undergraduate courses totaled 120. The primary evaluation techniques include exams, projects and homework. Details regarding content and assessment techniques are provided along with a gap analysis between the coverage of supply chain courses and the needs identified by previous academic research. Originality/value This study is the first large-scale content analysis of undergraduate SCM course syllabi. The goal is to use this data as a means of continuous improvement in the quality and value of the educational experience on a longitudinal basis. The findings are designed to foster information sharing and provide data for benchmarking efforts in the development of SCM courses and curricula in academia, as well as training, development and recruitment efforts by professionals in the field of SCM.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/SCM-07-2020-0309</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-8546
ispartof Supply chain management, 2022-01, Vol.27 (1), p.1-11
issn 1359-8546
1758-6852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2614154305
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Colleges & universities
Content analysis
Continuous improvement
Curricula
Education
Higher education
Logistics
Operations management
Professionals
Students
Supply chain management
Supply chains
title Undergraduate supply chain management courses: content, coverage, assessment and gaps
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A18%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Undergraduate%20supply%20chain%20management%20courses:%20content,%20coverage,%20assessment%20and%20gaps&rft.jtitle=Supply%20chain%20management&rft.au=Birou,%20Laura&rft.date=2022-01-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=1359-8546&rft.eissn=1758-6852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/SCM-07-2020-0309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2614154305%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614154305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true