Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria

The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of molecular sciences 2021-12, Vol.22 (24), p.13363, Article 13363
Hauptverfasser: Lopez, Yuly, Munoz, Laura, Gargallo-Viola, Domingo, Canton, Rafael, Vila, Jordi, Zsolt, Ilonka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page 13363
container_title International journal of molecular sciences
container_volume 22
creator Lopez, Yuly
Munoz, Laura
Gargallo-Viola, Domingo
Canton, Rafael
Vila, Jordi
Zsolt, Ilonka
description The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC50) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijms222413363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2612804936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_818c9765830843f8a0dcf5a3c9a59fb3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2612804936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-760e2885d38c1521ff85861b8479cfb20613357fdde33dbdd5e286c24245c40e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rVDEUhoMoto4u3coFl3Jtvm-yEfRSa6EwCnYdcvPRZpxJxiS3Wn-9qdMOzq6rHJLnPCeHF4DXCL4nRMKTsNoUjDFFhHDyBBwjinEPIR-etppz1HMm-RF4UcoKQkwwk8_BEaGSCsTkMRgvt1X_cF3y3fKPi-m3NiF2OtpuWa9d7r7NIaZ1iq507f4s603_NZVQw43rPmlTXQ76JXjm9bq4V_fnAlx-Pv0-fukvlmfn48eL3rRhtR84dFgIZokwiGHkvWCCo0nQQRo_YcjbDmzw1jpC7GQtazg3mGLKDIWOLMD5zmuTXqltDhudb1XSQf27SPlK6VyDWTslkDBy4EwQKCjxQkNrPNPESM2kn0hzfdi5tvO0cda4WLNeH0gPX2K4VlfpRokBCoRRE7y9F-T0c3alqlWac2z7K8wRFpDKFsgC9DvK5FRKdn4_AUF1l586yK_xb_7_1p5-CKwBYgf8clPyxQQXjdtjEMKBCEapaBVEY6i6hhTHNMfaWt89vpX8BaZptjE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612804936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lopez, Yuly ; Munoz, Laura ; Gargallo-Viola, Domingo ; Canton, Rafael ; Vila, Jordi ; Zsolt, Ilonka</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Yuly ; Munoz, Laura ; Gargallo-Viola, Domingo ; Canton, Rafael ; Vila, Jordi ; Zsolt, Ilonka</creatorcontrib><description>The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC50) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1661-6596</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413363</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34948159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Aminopyridines - pharmacokinetics ; Aminopyridines - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Bacteria ; Bacterial Proteins - metabolism ; Bioassays ; Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology ; Chemistry ; Chemistry, Multidisciplinary ; Ciprofloxacin ; DNA topoisomerase ; DNA topoisomerase IV ; Drug development ; Gram-positive bacteria ; Gram-Positive Bacteria - metabolism ; Levofloxacin ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Molecular weight ; Moxifloxacin ; Mutation ; ozenoxacin ; Physical Sciences ; quinolone ; Quinolones ; Quinolones - pharmacokinetics ; Quinolones - pharmacology ; Science &amp; Technology ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus infections ; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics ; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology ; uptake</subject><ispartof>International journal of molecular sciences, 2021-12, Vol.22 (24), p.13363, Article 13363</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000738544800001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-760e2885d38c1521ff85861b8479cfb20613357fdde33dbdd5e286c24245c40e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-760e2885d38c1521ff85861b8479cfb20613357fdde33dbdd5e286c24245c40e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1675-3173 ; 0000-0002-8900-722X ; 0000-0002-8025-3926</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708121/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8708121/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Yuly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargallo-Viola, Domingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canton, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vila, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zsolt, Ilonka</creatorcontrib><title>Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria</title><title>International journal of molecular sciences</title><addtitle>INT J MOL SCI</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Mol Sci</addtitle><description>The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC50) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Aminopyridines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Aminopyridines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin</subject><subject>DNA topoisomerase</subject><subject>DNA topoisomerase IV</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Levofloxacin</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Moxifloxacin</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>ozenoxacin</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>quinolone</subject><subject>Quinolones</subject><subject>Quinolones - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Quinolones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>uptake</subject><issn>1661-6596</issn><issn>1422-0067</issn><issn>1422-0067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rVDEUhoMoto4u3coFl3Jtvm-yEfRSa6EwCnYdcvPRZpxJxiS3Wn-9qdMOzq6rHJLnPCeHF4DXCL4nRMKTsNoUjDFFhHDyBBwjinEPIR-etppz1HMm-RF4UcoKQkwwk8_BEaGSCsTkMRgvt1X_cF3y3fKPi-m3NiF2OtpuWa9d7r7NIaZ1iq507f4s603_NZVQw43rPmlTXQ76JXjm9bq4V_fnAlx-Pv0-fukvlmfn48eL3rRhtR84dFgIZokwiGHkvWCCo0nQQRo_YcjbDmzw1jpC7GQtazg3mGLKDIWOLMD5zmuTXqltDhudb1XSQf27SPlK6VyDWTslkDBy4EwQKCjxQkNrPNPESM2kn0hzfdi5tvO0cda4WLNeH0gPX2K4VlfpRokBCoRRE7y9F-T0c3alqlWac2z7K8wRFpDKFsgC9DvK5FRKdn4_AUF1l586yK_xb_7_1p5-CKwBYgf8clPyxQQXjdtjEMKBCEapaBVEY6i6hhTHNMfaWt89vpX8BaZptjE</recordid><startdate>20211212</startdate><enddate>20211212</enddate><creator>Lopez, Yuly</creator><creator>Munoz, Laura</creator><creator>Gargallo-Viola, Domingo</creator><creator>Canton, Rafael</creator><creator>Vila, Jordi</creator><creator>Zsolt, Ilonka</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1675-3173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8900-722X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-3926</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211212</creationdate><title>Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria</title><author>Lopez, Yuly ; Munoz, Laura ; Gargallo-Viola, Domingo ; Canton, Rafael ; Vila, Jordi ; Zsolt, Ilonka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-760e2885d38c1521ff85861b8479cfb20613357fdde33dbdd5e286c24245c40e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Aminopyridines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Aminopyridines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin</topic><topic>DNA topoisomerase</topic><topic>DNA topoisomerase IV</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Levofloxacin</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Moxifloxacin</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>ozenoxacin</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>quinolone</topic><topic>Quinolones</topic><topic>Quinolones - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Quinolones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Yuly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gargallo-Viola, Domingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canton, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vila, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zsolt, Ilonka</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopez, Yuly</au><au>Munoz, Laura</au><au>Gargallo-Viola, Domingo</au><au>Canton, Rafael</au><au>Vila, Jordi</au><au>Zsolt, Ilonka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria</atitle><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle><stitle>INT J MOL SCI</stitle><addtitle>Int J Mol Sci</addtitle><date>2021-12-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>13363</spage><pages>13363-</pages><artnum>13363</artnum><issn>1661-6596</issn><issn>1422-0067</issn><eissn>1422-0067</eissn><abstract>The big problem of antimicrobial resistance is that it requires great efforts in the design of improved drugs which can quickly reach their target of action. Studies of antibiotic uptake and interaction with their target it is a key factor in this important challenge. We investigated the accumulation of ozenoxacin (OZN), moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LVX), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) into the bacterial cells of 5 species, including Staphylococcus aureus (SA4-149), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SEP7602), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPY165), Streptococcus agalactiae (SAG146), and Enterococcus faecium (EF897) previously characterized.The concentration of quinolone uptake was estimated by agar disc-diffusion bioassay. Furthermore, we determined the inhibitory concentrations 50 (IC50) of OZN, MOX, LVX, and CIP against type II topoisomerases from S. aureus.The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The accumulation of OZN inside the bacterial cell was superior in comparison to MOX, LVX, and CIP in all tested species. The rapid penetration of OZN into the cell was reflected during the first minute of exposure with antibiotic values between 190 and 447 ng/mg (dry weight) of bacteria in all strains. Moreover, OZN showed the greatest inhibitory activity among the quinolones tested for both DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S. aureus with IC50 values of 10 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. OZN intracellular concentration was significantly higher than that of MOX, LVX and CIP. All of these features may explain the higher in vitro activity of OZN compared to the other tested quinolones.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><pmid>34948159</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijms222413363</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1675-3173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8900-722X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-3926</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1661-6596
ispartof International journal of molecular sciences, 2021-12, Vol.22 (24), p.13363, Article 13363
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
1422-0067
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2612804936
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects Accumulation
Aminopyridines - pharmacokinetics
Aminopyridines - pharmacology
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial resistance
Bacteria
Bacterial Proteins - metabolism
Bioassays
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Chemistry
Chemistry, Multidisciplinary
Ciprofloxacin
DNA topoisomerase
DNA topoisomerase IV
Drug development
Gram-positive bacteria
Gram-Positive Bacteria - metabolism
Levofloxacin
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Molecular weight
Moxifloxacin
Mutation
ozenoxacin
Physical Sciences
quinolone
Quinolones
Quinolones - pharmacokinetics
Quinolones - pharmacology
Science & Technology
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus infections
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacokinetics
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology
uptake
title Uptake of Ozenoxacin and Other Quinolones in Gram-Positive Bacteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T01%3A20%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uptake%20of%20Ozenoxacin%20and%20Other%20Quinolones%20in%20Gram-Positive%20Bacteria&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20molecular%20sciences&rft.au=Lopez,%20Yuly&rft.date=2021-12-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=13363&rft.pages=13363-&rft.artnum=13363&rft.issn=1661-6596&rft.eissn=1422-0067&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijms222413363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2612804936%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612804936&rft_id=info:pmid/34948159&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_818c9765830843f8a0dcf5a3c9a59fb3&rfr_iscdi=true