Factors influencing envelope airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses built in the Czech Republic in the period of 2006–2019

In this research, 558 family timber-frame houses newly built in the period of 2006–2019 in the Czech Republic were assessed in terms of their airtightness. The air leakage through the building envelope was evaluated via the ‘blower-door’ method, and the most important parameters affecting the airtig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2021-05, Vol.194, p.107687, Article 107687
Hauptverfasser: Böhm, Martin, Beránková, Jitka, Brich, Jiří, Polášek, Marek, Srba, Jaromír, Němcová, Dana, Černý, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107687
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 194
creator Böhm, Martin
Beránková, Jitka
Brich, Jiří
Polášek, Marek
Srba, Jaromír
Němcová, Dana
Černý, Robert
description In this research, 558 family timber-frame houses newly built in the period of 2006–2019 in the Czech Republic were assessed in terms of their airtightness. The air leakage through the building envelope was evaluated via the ‘blower-door’ method, and the most important parameters affecting the airtightness of these types of buildings were simultaneously evaluated. In low-energy houses with natural ventilation, the mean air change rate at a pressure difference of 50 Pa (ACH50) was ascertained as 1.03 h−1, and in low-energy houses with mechanical ventilation and heat recovery, the average ACH50 value was 1.07 h−1. Passive houses had an average ACH50 value of 0.44 h−1. The positive effects of mandatory regulations and government subsidies were demonstrated. The ACH50 values improved with each new year of construction; this trend was especially evident for low-energy houses. A very significant influence was also found from the company conducting the construction and the construction technology being employed; an on-site construction method achieved lower ACH50 values than a method based on panel construction with a higher degree of prefabrication. The ACH50 values were also affected by the presence of a chimney and/or type of the interior airtight vapour barrier. In particular, a brick chimney body impaired the ACH50 values. Timber-frame houses with a vapour-permeable air barrier systems generally had smaller air leakage rate values than houses with a polyethylene vapour barrier. However, neither the internal building volume nor the envelope area were found to be significant parameters in terms of airtightness for the lightweight timber-frame residential houses. •The airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses was assessed.•The air change rate at 50 Pa was significantly lower than that in the past.•The value of the air change rate ascertained at 50 Pa was 0.92 h−1 for 558 houses.•A very significant influence was found in terms of the company conducting the construction.•An on-site construction method can be used to build houses with very low ACH50 values.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107687
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2611916908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132321000986</els_id><sourcerecordid>2611916908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ab37f30c675c42239e0f0d1fd653aa9a79659d08cd02ad49c567e5d3c53c80673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9q3DAQh0VpoJs_r1AEPXs7kmzZvrUsTVIIFEICuQmtNN7V4rVcSU5oTrnkCfKGfZLKbPbci4SG-X0z-gj5zGDJgMmvu-V6cr3F4XHJgbNcrGVTfyAL1tSikE358JEsQEgomODiEzmNcQc52IpyQV4vtUk-ROqGrp9wMG7Y0IzC3o9ItQvJbbZpwBip72g_P55wPmly-zWGogt6j3Trp4iRzoukjKJpi3T1jGZLb3Gc1r0zx-qIwXk7wziA_PvyxoG15-Sk033Ei_f7jNxf_rhbXRc3v65-rr7fFEaUkAq9FnUnwMi6MiXnokXowLLOykpo3eq6lVVroTEWuLZlaypZY2WFqYRpQNbijHw5cMfgf08Yk9r5KQx5pOKSsTZLgSZ3yUOXCT7GgJ0ag9vr8EcxULNytVNH5WpWrg7Kc_DbIYj5D48Og4rGZadoXUCTlPXuf4h_YIuPSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2611916908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing envelope airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses built in the Czech Republic in the period of 2006–2019</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Böhm, Martin ; Beránková, Jitka ; Brich, Jiří ; Polášek, Marek ; Srba, Jaromír ; Němcová, Dana ; Černý, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Martin ; Beránková, Jitka ; Brich, Jiří ; Polášek, Marek ; Srba, Jaromír ; Němcová, Dana ; Černý, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In this research, 558 family timber-frame houses newly built in the period of 2006–2019 in the Czech Republic were assessed in terms of their airtightness. The air leakage through the building envelope was evaluated via the ‘blower-door’ method, and the most important parameters affecting the airtightness of these types of buildings were simultaneously evaluated. In low-energy houses with natural ventilation, the mean air change rate at a pressure difference of 50 Pa (ACH50) was ascertained as 1.03 h−1, and in low-energy houses with mechanical ventilation and heat recovery, the average ACH50 value was 1.07 h−1. Passive houses had an average ACH50 value of 0.44 h−1. The positive effects of mandatory regulations and government subsidies were demonstrated. The ACH50 values improved with each new year of construction; this trend was especially evident for low-energy houses. A very significant influence was also found from the company conducting the construction and the construction technology being employed; an on-site construction method achieved lower ACH50 values than a method based on panel construction with a higher degree of prefabrication. The ACH50 values were also affected by the presence of a chimney and/or type of the interior airtight vapour barrier. In particular, a brick chimney body impaired the ACH50 values. Timber-frame houses with a vapour-permeable air barrier systems generally had smaller air leakage rate values than houses with a polyethylene vapour barrier. However, neither the internal building volume nor the envelope area were found to be significant parameters in terms of airtightness for the lightweight timber-frame residential houses. •The airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses was assessed.•The air change rate at 50 Pa was significantly lower than that in the past.•The value of the air change rate ascertained at 50 Pa was 0.92 h−1 for 558 houses.•A very significant influence was found in terms of the company conducting the construction.•An on-site construction method can be used to build houses with very low ACH50 values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107687</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air change rate ; Air leakage ; Airtightness ; Blower-door ; Building envelopes ; Construction ; Construction materials ; Energy ; Evaluation ; Green buildings ; Heat recovery ; Houses ; Leakage ; Lightweight ; Mechanical ventilation ; Parameters ; Polyethylene ; Polyethylenes ; Prefabrication ; Residential areas ; Residential building ; Subsidies ; Timber ; Timber framed ; Timber-frame houses ; Vapors ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2021-05, Vol.194, p.107687, Article 107687</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ab37f30c675c42239e0f0d1fd653aa9a79659d08cd02ad49c567e5d3c53c80673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ab37f30c675c42239e0f0d1fd653aa9a79659d08cd02ad49c567e5d3c53c80673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107687$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beránková, Jitka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brich, Jiří</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polášek, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srba, Jaromír</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Němcová, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černý, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing envelope airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses built in the Czech Republic in the period of 2006–2019</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>In this research, 558 family timber-frame houses newly built in the period of 2006–2019 in the Czech Republic were assessed in terms of their airtightness. The air leakage through the building envelope was evaluated via the ‘blower-door’ method, and the most important parameters affecting the airtightness of these types of buildings were simultaneously evaluated. In low-energy houses with natural ventilation, the mean air change rate at a pressure difference of 50 Pa (ACH50) was ascertained as 1.03 h−1, and in low-energy houses with mechanical ventilation and heat recovery, the average ACH50 value was 1.07 h−1. Passive houses had an average ACH50 value of 0.44 h−1. The positive effects of mandatory regulations and government subsidies were demonstrated. The ACH50 values improved with each new year of construction; this trend was especially evident for low-energy houses. A very significant influence was also found from the company conducting the construction and the construction technology being employed; an on-site construction method achieved lower ACH50 values than a method based on panel construction with a higher degree of prefabrication. The ACH50 values were also affected by the presence of a chimney and/or type of the interior airtight vapour barrier. In particular, a brick chimney body impaired the ACH50 values. Timber-frame houses with a vapour-permeable air barrier systems generally had smaller air leakage rate values than houses with a polyethylene vapour barrier. However, neither the internal building volume nor the envelope area were found to be significant parameters in terms of airtightness for the lightweight timber-frame residential houses. •The airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses was assessed.•The air change rate at 50 Pa was significantly lower than that in the past.•The value of the air change rate ascertained at 50 Pa was 0.92 h−1 for 558 houses.•A very significant influence was found in terms of the company conducting the construction.•An on-site construction method can be used to build houses with very low ACH50 values.</description><subject>Air change rate</subject><subject>Air leakage</subject><subject>Airtightness</subject><subject>Blower-door</subject><subject>Building envelopes</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Heat recovery</subject><subject>Houses</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Lightweight</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Polyethylenes</subject><subject>Prefabrication</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential building</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Timber framed</subject><subject>Timber-frame houses</subject><subject>Vapors</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9q3DAQh0VpoJs_r1AEPXs7kmzZvrUsTVIIFEICuQmtNN7V4rVcSU5oTrnkCfKGfZLKbPbci4SG-X0z-gj5zGDJgMmvu-V6cr3F4XHJgbNcrGVTfyAL1tSikE358JEsQEgomODiEzmNcQc52IpyQV4vtUk-ROqGrp9wMG7Y0IzC3o9ItQvJbbZpwBip72g_P55wPmly-zWGogt6j3Trp4iRzoukjKJpi3T1jGZLb3Gc1r0zx-qIwXk7wziA_PvyxoG15-Sk033Ei_f7jNxf_rhbXRc3v65-rr7fFEaUkAq9FnUnwMi6MiXnokXowLLOykpo3eq6lVVroTEWuLZlaypZY2WFqYRpQNbijHw5cMfgf08Yk9r5KQx5pOKSsTZLgSZ3yUOXCT7GgJ0ag9vr8EcxULNytVNH5WpWrg7Kc_DbIYj5D48Og4rGZadoXUCTlPXuf4h_YIuPSA</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Böhm, Martin</creator><creator>Beránková, Jitka</creator><creator>Brich, Jiří</creator><creator>Polášek, Marek</creator><creator>Srba, Jaromír</creator><creator>Němcová, Dana</creator><creator>Černý, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Factors influencing envelope airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses built in the Czech Republic in the period of 2006–2019</title><author>Böhm, Martin ; Beránková, Jitka ; Brich, Jiří ; Polášek, Marek ; Srba, Jaromír ; Němcová, Dana ; Černý, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ab37f30c675c42239e0f0d1fd653aa9a79659d08cd02ad49c567e5d3c53c80673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air change rate</topic><topic>Air leakage</topic><topic>Airtightness</topic><topic>Blower-door</topic><topic>Building envelopes</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Heat recovery</topic><topic>Houses</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Lightweight</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Polyethylenes</topic><topic>Prefabrication</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential building</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Timber framed</topic><topic>Timber-frame houses</topic><topic>Vapors</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beránková, Jitka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brich, Jiří</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polášek, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srba, Jaromír</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Němcová, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černý, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Böhm, Martin</au><au>Beránková, Jitka</au><au>Brich, Jiří</au><au>Polášek, Marek</au><au>Srba, Jaromír</au><au>Němcová, Dana</au><au>Černý, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing envelope airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses built in the Czech Republic in the period of 2006–2019</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>194</volume><spage>107687</spage><pages>107687-</pages><artnum>107687</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>In this research, 558 family timber-frame houses newly built in the period of 2006–2019 in the Czech Republic were assessed in terms of their airtightness. The air leakage through the building envelope was evaluated via the ‘blower-door’ method, and the most important parameters affecting the airtightness of these types of buildings were simultaneously evaluated. In low-energy houses with natural ventilation, the mean air change rate at a pressure difference of 50 Pa (ACH50) was ascertained as 1.03 h−1, and in low-energy houses with mechanical ventilation and heat recovery, the average ACH50 value was 1.07 h−1. Passive houses had an average ACH50 value of 0.44 h−1. The positive effects of mandatory regulations and government subsidies were demonstrated. The ACH50 values improved with each new year of construction; this trend was especially evident for low-energy houses. A very significant influence was also found from the company conducting the construction and the construction technology being employed; an on-site construction method achieved lower ACH50 values than a method based on panel construction with a higher degree of prefabrication. The ACH50 values were also affected by the presence of a chimney and/or type of the interior airtight vapour barrier. In particular, a brick chimney body impaired the ACH50 values. Timber-frame houses with a vapour-permeable air barrier systems generally had smaller air leakage rate values than houses with a polyethylene vapour barrier. However, neither the internal building volume nor the envelope area were found to be significant parameters in terms of airtightness for the lightweight timber-frame residential houses. •The airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses was assessed.•The air change rate at 50 Pa was significantly lower than that in the past.•The value of the air change rate ascertained at 50 Pa was 0.92 h−1 for 558 houses.•A very significant influence was found in terms of the company conducting the construction.•An on-site construction method can be used to build houses with very low ACH50 values.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107687</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2021-05, Vol.194, p.107687, Article 107687
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2611916908
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Air change rate
Air leakage
Airtightness
Blower-door
Building envelopes
Construction
Construction materials
Energy
Evaluation
Green buildings
Heat recovery
Houses
Leakage
Lightweight
Mechanical ventilation
Parameters
Polyethylene
Polyethylenes
Prefabrication
Residential areas
Residential building
Subsidies
Timber
Timber framed
Timber-frame houses
Vapors
Ventilation
title Factors influencing envelope airtightness of lightweight timber-frame houses built in the Czech Republic in the period of 2006–2019
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A21%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20envelope%20airtightness%20of%20lightweight%20timber-frame%20houses%20built%20in%20the%20Czech%20Republic%20in%20the%20period%20of%202006%E2%80%932019&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=B%C3%B6hm,%20Martin&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=194&rft.spage=107687&rft.pages=107687-&rft.artnum=107687&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107687&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2611916908%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2611916908&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132321000986&rfr_iscdi=true