Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding

Adhesive joints are increasingly used in industry for a wide variety of applications because of their favorable characteristics such as high strength-to-weight ratio, design flexibility, limited stress concentrations, planar force transfer, good damage tolerance, and fatigue resistance. Finding the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-04
Hauptverfasser: Morales-Hernández, Alejandro, Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez, Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse, Couckuyt, Ivo, Jordens, Jeroen, Witters, Maarten, Bart Van Doninck
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Morales-Hernández, Alejandro
Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez
Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse
Couckuyt, Ivo
Jordens, Jeroen
Witters, Maarten
Bart Van Doninck
description Adhesive joints are increasingly used in industry for a wide variety of applications because of their favorable characteristics such as high strength-to-weight ratio, design flexibility, limited stress concentrations, planar force transfer, good damage tolerance, and fatigue resistance. Finding the optimal process parameters for an adhesive bonding process is challenging: the optimization is inherently multi-objective (aiming to maximize break strength while minimizing cost), constrained (the process should not result in any visual damage to the materials, and stress tests should not result in failures that are adhesion-related), and uncertain (testing the same process parameters several times may lead to different break strengths). Real-life physical experiments in the lab are expensive to perform. Traditional evolutionary approaches (such as genetic algorithms) are then ill-suited to solve the problem, due to the prohibitive amount of experiments required for evaluation. Although Bayesian optimization-based algorithms are preferred to solve such expensive problems, few methods consider the optimization of more than one (noisy) objective and several constraints at the same time. In this research, we successfully applied specific machine learning techniques (Gaussian Process Regression) to emulate the objective and constraint functions based on a limited amount of experimental data. The techniques are embedded in a Bayesian optimization algorithm, which succeeds in detecting Pareto-optimal process settings in a highly efficient way (i.e., requiring a limited number of physical experiments).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2611012973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2611012973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26110129733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUtqAzEQREUgYJP4Dg1eD8xI_mZrEnKA7E1bats9zEiKuieBHMDntiA5QFa1qKr3HszcOtc1u5W1M7MQ6du2tZutXa_d3NwOKYoW5EgBxmlQbtKpJ6_8RZCy8sg_qJwipDPkkjyJQCDhS4SMBUdSKgIcQUiV40Xgm_UK4rF4goCKL4ARMOeB_S9JE2C4VkZVnFIM9fVsHs84CC3-8sks314_Du9NVX5OJHrs01RirY5203VtZ_db5_63ugMy-VQ6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2611012973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Morales-Hernández, Alejandro ; Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez ; Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse ; Couckuyt, Ivo ; Jordens, Jeroen ; Witters, Maarten ; Bart Van Doninck</creator><creatorcontrib>Morales-Hernández, Alejandro ; Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez ; Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse ; Couckuyt, Ivo ; Jordens, Jeroen ; Witters, Maarten ; Bart Van Doninck</creatorcontrib><description>Adhesive joints are increasingly used in industry for a wide variety of applications because of their favorable characteristics such as high strength-to-weight ratio, design flexibility, limited stress concentrations, planar force transfer, good damage tolerance, and fatigue resistance. Finding the optimal process parameters for an adhesive bonding process is challenging: the optimization is inherently multi-objective (aiming to maximize break strength while minimizing cost), constrained (the process should not result in any visual damage to the materials, and stress tests should not result in failures that are adhesion-related), and uncertain (testing the same process parameters several times may lead to different break strengths). Real-life physical experiments in the lab are expensive to perform. Traditional evolutionary approaches (such as genetic algorithms) are then ill-suited to solve the problem, due to the prohibitive amount of experiments required for evaluation. Although Bayesian optimization-based algorithms are preferred to solve such expensive problems, few methods consider the optimization of more than one (noisy) objective and several constraints at the same time. In this research, we successfully applied specific machine learning techniques (Gaussian Process Regression) to emulate the objective and constraint functions based on a limited amount of experimental data. The techniques are embedded in a Bayesian optimization algorithm, which succeeds in detecting Pareto-optimal process settings in a highly efficient way (i.e., requiring a limited number of physical experiments).</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Adhesive bonding ; Adhesive joints ; Bonded joints ; Constraints ; Damage tolerance ; Design optimization ; Design parameters ; Evolutionary algorithms ; Experiments ; Fatigue failure ; Fatigue strength ; Gaussian process ; Genetic algorithms ; Machine learning ; Multiple objective analysis ; Optimization ; Pareto optimization ; Process parameters ; Strength to weight ratio</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-04</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morales-Hernández, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couckuyt, Ivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordens, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witters, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bart Van Doninck</creatorcontrib><title>Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Adhesive joints are increasingly used in industry for a wide variety of applications because of their favorable characteristics such as high strength-to-weight ratio, design flexibility, limited stress concentrations, planar force transfer, good damage tolerance, and fatigue resistance. Finding the optimal process parameters for an adhesive bonding process is challenging: the optimization is inherently multi-objective (aiming to maximize break strength while minimizing cost), constrained (the process should not result in any visual damage to the materials, and stress tests should not result in failures that are adhesion-related), and uncertain (testing the same process parameters several times may lead to different break strengths). Real-life physical experiments in the lab are expensive to perform. Traditional evolutionary approaches (such as genetic algorithms) are then ill-suited to solve the problem, due to the prohibitive amount of experiments required for evaluation. Although Bayesian optimization-based algorithms are preferred to solve such expensive problems, few methods consider the optimization of more than one (noisy) objective and several constraints at the same time. In this research, we successfully applied specific machine learning techniques (Gaussian Process Regression) to emulate the objective and constraint functions based on a limited amount of experimental data. The techniques are embedded in a Bayesian optimization algorithm, which succeeds in detecting Pareto-optimal process settings in a highly efficient way (i.e., requiring a limited number of physical experiments).</description><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Adhesive joints</subject><subject>Bonded joints</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Damage tolerance</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fatigue failure</subject><subject>Fatigue strength</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Strength to weight ratio</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUtqAzEQREUgYJP4Dg1eD8xI_mZrEnKA7E1bats9zEiKuieBHMDntiA5QFa1qKr3HszcOtc1u5W1M7MQ6du2tZutXa_d3NwOKYoW5EgBxmlQbtKpJ6_8RZCy8sg_qJwipDPkkjyJQCDhS4SMBUdSKgIcQUiV40Xgm_UK4rF4goCKL4ARMOeB_S9JE2C4VkZVnFIM9fVsHs84CC3-8sks314_Du9NVX5OJHrs01RirY5203VtZ_db5_63ugMy-VQ6</recordid><startdate>20230410</startdate><enddate>20230410</enddate><creator>Morales-Hernández, Alejandro</creator><creator>Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez</creator><creator>Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse</creator><creator>Couckuyt, Ivo</creator><creator>Jordens, Jeroen</creator><creator>Witters, Maarten</creator><creator>Bart Van Doninck</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230410</creationdate><title>Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding</title><author>Morales-Hernández, Alejandro ; Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez ; Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse ; Couckuyt, Ivo ; Jordens, Jeroen ; Witters, Maarten ; Bart Van Doninck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26110129733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Adhesive joints</topic><topic>Bonded joints</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Damage tolerance</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fatigue failure</topic><topic>Fatigue strength</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Strength to weight ratio</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morales-Hernández, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couckuyt, Ivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordens, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witters, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bart Van Doninck</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morales-Hernández, Alejandro</au><au>Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez</au><au>Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse</au><au>Couckuyt, Ivo</au><au>Jordens, Jeroen</au><au>Witters, Maarten</au><au>Bart Van Doninck</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-04-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Adhesive joints are increasingly used in industry for a wide variety of applications because of their favorable characteristics such as high strength-to-weight ratio, design flexibility, limited stress concentrations, planar force transfer, good damage tolerance, and fatigue resistance. Finding the optimal process parameters for an adhesive bonding process is challenging: the optimization is inherently multi-objective (aiming to maximize break strength while minimizing cost), constrained (the process should not result in any visual damage to the materials, and stress tests should not result in failures that are adhesion-related), and uncertain (testing the same process parameters several times may lead to different break strengths). Real-life physical experiments in the lab are expensive to perform. Traditional evolutionary approaches (such as genetic algorithms) are then ill-suited to solve the problem, due to the prohibitive amount of experiments required for evaluation. Although Bayesian optimization-based algorithms are preferred to solve such expensive problems, few methods consider the optimization of more than one (noisy) objective and several constraints at the same time. In this research, we successfully applied specific machine learning techniques (Gaussian Process Regression) to emulate the objective and constraint functions based on a limited amount of experimental data. The techniques are embedded in a Bayesian optimization algorithm, which succeeds in detecting Pareto-optimal process settings in a highly efficient way (i.e., requiring a limited number of physical experiments).</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-04
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2611012973
source Free E- Journals
subjects Adhesive bonding
Adhesive joints
Bonded joints
Constraints
Damage tolerance
Design optimization
Design parameters
Evolutionary algorithms
Experiments
Fatigue failure
Fatigue strength
Gaussian process
Genetic algorithms
Machine learning
Multiple objective analysis
Optimization
Pareto optimization
Process parameters
Strength to weight ratio
title Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T16%3A59%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Constrained%20multi-objective%20optimization%20of%20process%20design%20parameters%20in%20settings%20with%20scarce%20data:%20an%20application%20to%20adhesive%20bonding&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Morales-Hern%C3%A1ndez,%20Alejandro&rft.date=2023-04-10&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2611012973%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2611012973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true