Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams
Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2021-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1-16, Article 02429 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Vincent, Anna E. S. Hoellein, Timothy J. |
description | Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles < 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eap.2429 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2610116106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27092258</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27092258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFTEQhoMo9kPBP6AEvBFkaz42m-SyHFsrFOpF70M2Oys57CZrkqX035vTczyCIDQXyYR55mXmHYTeUXJBCWFfwC4XrGX6BTqlmutGCMVe1pgI2hDZ0RN0lvOW1MMYe41OeMuJ1h05RearzyX5fi0-BmzDgEuyIS8xFRxHPHuX4jLZXLx7yo4-AF5sqv91sgVwTD9tqMnZlgIJ-4DX1NuAqyrYOb9Br0Y7ZXh7eM_R_fXV_eamub379n1zeds4LqluhrGFlmrXdi2oQXPqgPRSDlZzp5VsQfNROak1lUooBU5RCZ1z0CvBO83P0ae97JLirxVyMbPPDqbJBohrNkwIwduK8op-_AfdxjWF2pxhHSWU1qv7K1jnzznBaJbkZ5seDSVm57mpnpud5xX9cBBc-xmGI_jH5Ap83gMP0McxOw_BwRGrS-nqhIKq3X5opdXz6Y0vdre5TVxDqaXNodRP8Pjfjs3V5Y9D5-_3_DaXmI48k0QzJhT_DTfItL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610116106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Vincent, Anna E. S. ; Hoellein, Timothy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Anna E. S. ; Hoellein, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><description>Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles < 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2429</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34309960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic animals ; Aquatic biota ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic habitats ; Benthos ; Biota ; Degradation ; Downstream ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; freshwater ; Freshwater resources ; Habitats ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Litter ; Mathematical analysis ; Microplastics ; Mineralization ; Oceans ; Organic matter ; Particulate Matter ; Particulate organic matter ; Plastic debris ; Plastic pollution ; Plastics ; pollution ; Pollution abatement ; Pollution dispersion ; Pollution prevention ; Retention ; Rivers ; Science & Technology ; Spatial distribution ; spiraling ; Streams ; Surface water ; Turnover rate ; Velocity ; Water circulation ; Water column ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2021-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1-16, Article 02429</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2021 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>15</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000687451800001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4218-1749 ; 0000-0002-9201-3225</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27092258$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27092258$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,39263,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34309960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Anna E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoellein, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>ECOL APPL</addtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles < 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets.</description><subject>Aquatic animals</subject><subject>Aquatic biota</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Microplastics</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Particulate Matter</subject><subject>Particulate organic matter</subject><subject>Plastic debris</subject><subject>Plastic pollution</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>pollution</subject><subject>Pollution abatement</subject><subject>Pollution dispersion</subject><subject>Pollution prevention</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>spiraling</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Turnover rate</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFTEQhoMo9kPBP6AEvBFkaz42m-SyHFsrFOpF70M2Oys57CZrkqX035vTczyCIDQXyYR55mXmHYTeUXJBCWFfwC4XrGX6BTqlmutGCMVe1pgI2hDZ0RN0lvOW1MMYe41OeMuJ1h05RearzyX5fi0-BmzDgEuyIS8xFRxHPHuX4jLZXLx7yo4-AF5sqv91sgVwTD9tqMnZlgIJ-4DX1NuAqyrYOb9Br0Y7ZXh7eM_R_fXV_eamub379n1zeds4LqluhrGFlmrXdi2oQXPqgPRSDlZzp5VsQfNROak1lUooBU5RCZ1z0CvBO83P0ae97JLirxVyMbPPDqbJBohrNkwIwduK8op-_AfdxjWF2pxhHSWU1qv7K1jnzznBaJbkZ5seDSVm57mpnpud5xX9cBBc-xmGI_jH5Ap83gMP0McxOw_BwRGrS-nqhIKq3X5opdXz6Y0vdre5TVxDqaXNodRP8Pjfjs3V5Y9D5-_3_DaXmI48k0QzJhT_DTfItL4</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Vincent, Anna E. S.</creator><creator>Hoellein, Timothy J.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-1749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-3225</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</title><author>Vincent, Anna E. S. ; Hoellein, Timothy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic animals</topic><topic>Aquatic biota</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Microplastics</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Particulate Matter</topic><topic>Particulate organic matter</topic><topic>Plastic debris</topic><topic>Plastic pollution</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>pollution</topic><topic>Pollution abatement</topic><topic>Pollution dispersion</topic><topic>Pollution prevention</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>spiraling</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Turnover rate</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Anna E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoellein, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vincent, Anna E. S.</au><au>Hoellein, Timothy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><stitle>ECOL APPL</stitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><artnum>02429</artnum><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles < 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34309960</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2429</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-1749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-3225</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2021-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1-16, Article 02429 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2610116106 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Aquatic animals Aquatic biota Aquatic ecosystems Aquatic habitats Benthos Biota Degradation Downstream Ecology Ecosystem Environmental Monitoring Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences & Ecology freshwater Freshwater resources Habitats Life Sciences & Biomedicine Litter Mathematical analysis Microplastics Mineralization Oceans Organic matter Particulate Matter Particulate organic matter Plastic debris Plastic pollution Plastics pollution Pollution abatement Pollution dispersion Pollution prevention Retention Rivers Science & Technology Spatial distribution spiraling Streams Surface water Turnover rate Velocity Water circulation Water column Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis |
title | Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A21%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20and%20transport%20of%20microplastic%20and%20fine%20particulate%20organic%20matter%20in%20urban%20streams&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Vincent,%20Anna%20E.%20S.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.artnum=02429&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2429&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27092258%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610116106&rft_id=info:pmid/34309960&rft_jstor_id=27092258&rfr_iscdi=true |