Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams

Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2021-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1-16, Article 02429
Hauptverfasser: Vincent, Anna E. S., Hoellein, Timothy J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 31
creator Vincent, Anna E. S.
Hoellein, Timothy J.
description Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles < 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eap.2429
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2610116106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27092258</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27092258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFTEQhoMo9kPBP6AEvBFkaz42m-SyHFsrFOpF70M2Oys57CZrkqX035vTczyCIDQXyYR55mXmHYTeUXJBCWFfwC4XrGX6BTqlmutGCMVe1pgI2hDZ0RN0lvOW1MMYe41OeMuJ1h05RearzyX5fi0-BmzDgEuyIS8xFRxHPHuX4jLZXLx7yo4-AF5sqv91sgVwTD9tqMnZlgIJ-4DX1NuAqyrYOb9Br0Y7ZXh7eM_R_fXV_eamub379n1zeds4LqluhrGFlmrXdi2oQXPqgPRSDlZzp5VsQfNROak1lUooBU5RCZ1z0CvBO83P0ae97JLirxVyMbPPDqbJBohrNkwIwduK8op-_AfdxjWF2pxhHSWU1qv7K1jnzznBaJbkZ5seDSVm57mpnpud5xX9cBBc-xmGI_jH5Ap83gMP0McxOw_BwRGrS-nqhIKq3X5opdXz6Y0vdre5TVxDqaXNodRP8Pjfjs3V5Y9D5-_3_DaXmI48k0QzJhT_DTfItL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610116106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Vincent, Anna E. S. ; Hoellein, Timothy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Anna E. S. ; Hoellein, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><description>Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles &lt; 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2429</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34309960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic animals ; Aquatic biota ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic habitats ; Benthos ; Biota ; Degradation ; Downstream ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; freshwater ; Freshwater resources ; Habitats ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Litter ; Mathematical analysis ; Microplastics ; Mineralization ; Oceans ; Organic matter ; Particulate Matter ; Particulate organic matter ; Plastic debris ; Plastic pollution ; Plastics ; pollution ; Pollution abatement ; Pollution dispersion ; Pollution prevention ; Retention ; Rivers ; Science &amp; Technology ; Spatial distribution ; spiraling ; Streams ; Surface water ; Turnover rate ; Velocity ; Water circulation ; Water column ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2021-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1-16, Article 02429</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2021 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>15</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000687451800001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4218-1749 ; 0000-0002-9201-3225</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27092258$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27092258$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,39263,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34309960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Anna E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoellein, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>ECOL APPL</addtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles &lt; 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets.</description><subject>Aquatic animals</subject><subject>Aquatic biota</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Microplastics</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Particulate Matter</subject><subject>Particulate organic matter</subject><subject>Plastic debris</subject><subject>Plastic pollution</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>pollution</subject><subject>Pollution abatement</subject><subject>Pollution dispersion</subject><subject>Pollution prevention</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>spiraling</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Turnover rate</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFTEQhoMo9kPBP6AEvBFkaz42m-SyHFsrFOpF70M2Oys57CZrkqX035vTczyCIDQXyYR55mXmHYTeUXJBCWFfwC4XrGX6BTqlmutGCMVe1pgI2hDZ0RN0lvOW1MMYe41OeMuJ1h05RearzyX5fi0-BmzDgEuyIS8xFRxHPHuX4jLZXLx7yo4-AF5sqv91sgVwTD9tqMnZlgIJ-4DX1NuAqyrYOb9Br0Y7ZXh7eM_R_fXV_eamub379n1zeds4LqluhrGFlmrXdi2oQXPqgPRSDlZzp5VsQfNROak1lUooBU5RCZ1z0CvBO83P0ae97JLirxVyMbPPDqbJBohrNkwIwduK8op-_AfdxjWF2pxhHSWU1qv7K1jnzznBaJbkZ5seDSVm57mpnpud5xX9cBBc-xmGI_jH5Ap83gMP0McxOw_BwRGrS-nqhIKq3X5opdXz6Y0vdre5TVxDqaXNodRP8Pjfjs3V5Y9D5-_3_DaXmI48k0QzJhT_DTfItL4</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Vincent, Anna E. S.</creator><creator>Hoellein, Timothy J.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-1749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-3225</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</title><author>Vincent, Anna E. S. ; Hoellein, Timothy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-df4e419c464e8d931ce0b77da93c9874e93f8c799178588ec817e6cceb853693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic animals</topic><topic>Aquatic biota</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Microplastics</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Particulate Matter</topic><topic>Particulate organic matter</topic><topic>Plastic debris</topic><topic>Plastic pollution</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>pollution</topic><topic>Pollution abatement</topic><topic>Pollution dispersion</topic><topic>Pollution prevention</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>spiraling</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Turnover rate</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Anna E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoellein, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vincent, Anna E. S.</au><au>Hoellein, Timothy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><stitle>ECOL APPL</stitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><artnum>02429</artnum><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Plastic litter is accumulating in ecosystems worldwide. Rivers are a major source of plastic litter to oceans. However, rivers also retain and transform plastic pollution. While methods for calculating particle transport dynamics in rivers are well established, they are infrequently used to quantify the transport and retention of microplastics (i.e., particles &lt; 5 mm) in flowing waters. Measurements of microplastic movement in rivers are needed for a greater understanding of the fate of plastic litter at watershed and global scales, and to inform pollution prevention strategies. Our objectives were to (1) quantify the abundance of microplastics within different river habitats and (2) adapt organic matter “spiraling” metrics to measure microplastic transport concurrent with fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). We quantified microplastic and FPOM abundance across urban river habitats (i.e., surface water, water column, benthos), and calculated downstream particle velocity, index of retention, turnover rate, and spiraling length for both particle types. Microplastic standing stock was assessed using a habitat-specific approach, and estimates were scaled up to encompass the study reach. Spatial distribution of particles demonstrated that microplastics and FPOM were retained together, likely by hydrodynamic forces that facilitate particle sinking or resuspension. Microplastic particles had a higher downstream particle velocity and lower index of retention relative to FPOM, suggesting that microplastics were retained to a lesser degree than FPOM in the study reaches. Microplastics also showed lower turnover rates and longer spiraling lengths relative to FPOM, attributed to the slow rates of plastic degradation. Thus, rivers are less retentive of microplastics than FPOM, although both particles are retained in similar locations. Because microplastics are resistant to degradation, individual particles can be transported longer distances prior to mineralization than FPOM, making it likely that microplastic particles will encounter larger bodies of water and interact with various aquatic biota in the process. These empirical assessments of particle transport will be valuable for understanding the fate and transformation of microplastic particles in freshwater resources and ultimately contribute to the refinement of global plastic budgets.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34309960</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2429</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-1749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-3225</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2021-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1-16, Article 02429
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2610116106
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Aquatic animals
Aquatic biota
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic habitats
Benthos
Biota
Degradation
Downstream
Ecology
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
freshwater
Freshwater resources
Habitats
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Litter
Mathematical analysis
Microplastics
Mineralization
Oceans
Organic matter
Particulate Matter
Particulate organic matter
Plastic debris
Plastic pollution
Plastics
pollution
Pollution abatement
Pollution dispersion
Pollution prevention
Retention
Rivers
Science & Technology
Spatial distribution
spiraling
Streams
Surface water
Turnover rate
Velocity
Water circulation
Water column
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
title Distribution and transport of microplastic and fine particulate organic matter in urban streams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A21%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20and%20transport%20of%20microplastic%20and%20fine%20particulate%20organic%20matter%20in%20urban%20streams&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Vincent,%20Anna%20E.%20S.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.artnum=02429&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2429&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27092258%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610116106&rft_id=info:pmid/34309960&rft_jstor_id=27092258&rfr_iscdi=true