A Scoping Review of Publicly Available Language Tasks in Clinical Natural Language Processing
Objective: to provide a scoping review of papers on clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks that use publicly available electronic health record data from a cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: We searched six databases, including biomedical research and computer science literature da...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2021-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Gao, Yanjun Dligach, Dmitriy Christensen, Leslie Tesch, Samuel Laffin, Ryan Xu, Dongfang Miller, Timothy Uzuner, Ozlem Churpek, Matthew M Afshar, Majid |
description | Objective: to provide a scoping review of papers on clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks that use publicly available electronic health record data from a cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: We searched six databases, including biomedical research and computer science literature database. A round of title/abstract screening and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers. Our method followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 35 papers with 47 clinical NLP tasks met inclusion criteria between 2007 and 2021. We categorized the tasks by the type of NLP problems, including name entity recognition, summarization, and other NLP tasks. Some tasks were introduced with a topic of clinical decision support applications, such as substance abuse, phenotyping, cohort selection for clinical trial. We summarized the tasks by publication and dataset information. Discussion: The breadth of clinical NLP tasks keeps growing as the field of NLP evolves with advancements in language systems. However, gaps exist in divergent interests between general domain NLP community and clinical informatics community, and in generalizability of the data sources. We also identified issues in data selection and preparation including the lack of time-sensitive data, and invalidity of problem size and evaluation. Conclusions: The existing clinical NLP tasks cover a wide range of topics and the field will continue to grow and attract more attention from both general domain NLP and clinical informatics community. We encourage future work to incorporate multi-disciplinary collaboration, reporting transparency, and standardization in data preparation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2609878938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2609878938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26098789383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE8LgjAcQEcQJOV3-EFnYW357yhSdIiQ8hoyZcpsbLY5o2-fh-jc6R3e4y2QRyjdBcmekBXyre0xxiSKSRhSD90zuDV6EKqDK58Ef4FuoXC1FI18QzYxIVktOZyZ6hzrOJTMPiwIBbkUSjRMwoWNzsz8JYXRDbd2fm7QsmXScv_LNdoeD2V-Cgajn47bseq1M2pWFYlwmsRJShP6X_UBkIxDMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2609878938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Scoping Review of Publicly Available Language Tasks in Clinical Natural Language Processing</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Gao, Yanjun ; Dligach, Dmitriy ; Christensen, Leslie ; Tesch, Samuel ; Laffin, Ryan ; Xu, Dongfang ; Miller, Timothy ; Uzuner, Ozlem ; Churpek, Matthew M ; Afshar, Majid</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yanjun ; Dligach, Dmitriy ; Christensen, Leslie ; Tesch, Samuel ; Laffin, Ryan ; Xu, Dongfang ; Miller, Timothy ; Uzuner, Ozlem ; Churpek, Matthew M ; Afshar, Majid</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: to provide a scoping review of papers on clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks that use publicly available electronic health record data from a cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: We searched six databases, including biomedical research and computer science literature database. A round of title/abstract screening and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers. Our method followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 35 papers with 47 clinical NLP tasks met inclusion criteria between 2007 and 2021. We categorized the tasks by the type of NLP problems, including name entity recognition, summarization, and other NLP tasks. Some tasks were introduced with a topic of clinical decision support applications, such as substance abuse, phenotyping, cohort selection for clinical trial. We summarized the tasks by publication and dataset information. Discussion: The breadth of clinical NLP tasks keeps growing as the field of NLP evolves with advancements in language systems. However, gaps exist in divergent interests between general domain NLP community and clinical informatics community, and in generalizability of the data sources. We also identified issues in data selection and preparation including the lack of time-sensitive data, and invalidity of problem size and evaluation. Conclusions: The existing clinical NLP tasks cover a wide range of topics and the field will continue to grow and attract more attention from both general domain NLP and clinical informatics community. We encourage future work to incorporate multi-disciplinary collaboration, reporting transparency, and standardization in data preparation.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Biomedical materials ; Domains ; Electronic health records ; Informatics ; Literature reviews ; Natural language processing ; Standardization</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-12</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dligach, Dmitriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesch, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laffin, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Dongfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzuner, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Churpek, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshar, Majid</creatorcontrib><title>A Scoping Review of Publicly Available Language Tasks in Clinical Natural Language Processing</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Objective: to provide a scoping review of papers on clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks that use publicly available electronic health record data from a cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: We searched six databases, including biomedical research and computer science literature database. A round of title/abstract screening and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers. Our method followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 35 papers with 47 clinical NLP tasks met inclusion criteria between 2007 and 2021. We categorized the tasks by the type of NLP problems, including name entity recognition, summarization, and other NLP tasks. Some tasks were introduced with a topic of clinical decision support applications, such as substance abuse, phenotyping, cohort selection for clinical trial. We summarized the tasks by publication and dataset information. Discussion: The breadth of clinical NLP tasks keeps growing as the field of NLP evolves with advancements in language systems. However, gaps exist in divergent interests between general domain NLP community and clinical informatics community, and in generalizability of the data sources. We also identified issues in data selection and preparation including the lack of time-sensitive data, and invalidity of problem size and evaluation. Conclusions: The existing clinical NLP tasks cover a wide range of topics and the field will continue to grow and attract more attention from both general domain NLP and clinical informatics community. We encourage future work to incorporate multi-disciplinary collaboration, reporting transparency, and standardization in data preparation.</description><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjE8LgjAcQEcQJOV3-EFnYW357yhSdIiQ8hoyZcpsbLY5o2-fh-jc6R3e4y2QRyjdBcmekBXyre0xxiSKSRhSD90zuDV6EKqDK58Ef4FuoXC1FI18QzYxIVktOZyZ6hzrOJTMPiwIBbkUSjRMwoWNzsz8JYXRDbd2fm7QsmXScv_LNdoeD2V-Cgajn47bseq1M2pWFYlwmsRJShP6X_UBkIxDMg</recordid><startdate>20211207</startdate><enddate>20211207</enddate><creator>Gao, Yanjun</creator><creator>Dligach, Dmitriy</creator><creator>Christensen, Leslie</creator><creator>Tesch, Samuel</creator><creator>Laffin, Ryan</creator><creator>Xu, Dongfang</creator><creator>Miller, Timothy</creator><creator>Uzuner, Ozlem</creator><creator>Churpek, Matthew M</creator><creator>Afshar, Majid</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211207</creationdate><title>A Scoping Review of Publicly Available Language Tasks in Clinical Natural Language Processing</title><author>Gao, Yanjun ; Dligach, Dmitriy ; Christensen, Leslie ; Tesch, Samuel ; Laffin, Ryan ; Xu, Dongfang ; Miller, Timothy ; Uzuner, Ozlem ; Churpek, Matthew M ; Afshar, Majid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26098789383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dligach, Dmitriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesch, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laffin, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Dongfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzuner, Ozlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Churpek, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshar, Majid</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Yanjun</au><au>Dligach, Dmitriy</au><au>Christensen, Leslie</au><au>Tesch, Samuel</au><au>Laffin, Ryan</au><au>Xu, Dongfang</au><au>Miller, Timothy</au><au>Uzuner, Ozlem</au><au>Churpek, Matthew M</au><au>Afshar, Majid</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A Scoping Review of Publicly Available Language Tasks in Clinical Natural Language Processing</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-12-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Objective: to provide a scoping review of papers on clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks that use publicly available electronic health record data from a cohort of patients. Materials and Methods: We searched six databases, including biomedical research and computer science literature database. A round of title/abstract screening and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers. Our method followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 35 papers with 47 clinical NLP tasks met inclusion criteria between 2007 and 2021. We categorized the tasks by the type of NLP problems, including name entity recognition, summarization, and other NLP tasks. Some tasks were introduced with a topic of clinical decision support applications, such as substance abuse, phenotyping, cohort selection for clinical trial. We summarized the tasks by publication and dataset information. Discussion: The breadth of clinical NLP tasks keeps growing as the field of NLP evolves with advancements in language systems. However, gaps exist in divergent interests between general domain NLP community and clinical informatics community, and in generalizability of the data sources. We also identified issues in data selection and preparation including the lack of time-sensitive data, and invalidity of problem size and evaluation. Conclusions: The existing clinical NLP tasks cover a wide range of topics and the field will continue to grow and attract more attention from both general domain NLP and clinical informatics community. We encourage future work to incorporate multi-disciplinary collaboration, reporting transparency, and standardization in data preparation.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2021-12 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2609878938 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Biomedical materials Domains Electronic health records Informatics Literature reviews Natural language processing Standardization |
title | A Scoping Review of Publicly Available Language Tasks in Clinical Natural Language Processing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T03%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20Scoping%20Review%20of%20Publicly%20Available%20Language%20Tasks%20in%20Clinical%20Natural%20Language%20Processing&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Gao,%20Yanjun&rft.date=2021-12-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2609878938%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2609878938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |