Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure

We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with woo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements 2021-11, Vol.9 (4), p.365-380
Hauptverfasser: Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne, Forth, Shaun Anthony, Sheldon, Robert Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 380
container_issue 4
container_start_page 365
container_title International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements
container_volume 9
creator Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne
Forth, Shaun Anthony
Sheldon, Robert Philip
description We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs.
doi_str_mv 10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2609112528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2609112528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1850-e774670ca4727c53d35b4a1c167ea7756b945ee6e9ff742961139f97178f10163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wFPAczTf2RxlbVVoqwftNWTTRFK2uzXJFvrv3VLx9A4vw8zwAHBH8APlWjzWy9kSrTVaccSkQKzCF2BCMZcIC8Ev_zWX12Ca8xZjTJXmQugJaD5sKtG28GDbuLEl9h3sA6znz7BpbS4wx93Qnv-xgxa6WI7Z2b2HvjvE1Hc73xUYvC1Dit03zCUNbtRjZLCxHZK_BVfBttlP_-4N-JrPPutXtHh_eaufFsiRSmDkleJSYWe5osoJtmGi4ZY4IpW3SgnZjJO9l16HoDjVkhCmg1ZEVYFgItkNuD_n7lP_M_hczLYfUjdWGiqxJoQKWo0uena51OecfDD7FHc2HQ3B5oTTnHCatTYrbkacZsTJfgFUq2ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2609112528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne ; Forth, Shaun Anthony ; Sheldon, Robert Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne ; Forth, Shaun Anthony ; Sheldon, Robert Philip</creatorcontrib><description>We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-0546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-0554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Southampton: W I T Press</publisher><subject>Blast loads ; Buildings ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Experiments ; Failure modes ; Mathematical models ; Peak pressure ; Plywood ; Pressure gages ; Pressure gauges ; Scale models ; Simulation ; Structural damage ; Structural failure ; Structural response ; Wood framed</subject><ispartof>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements, 2021-11, Vol.9 (4), p.365-380</ispartof><rights>2021. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.witpress.com/journals/cmem or in accordance with the terms at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), if applicable</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forth, Shaun Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, Robert Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</title><title>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements</title><description>We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs.</description><subject>Blast loads</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Peak pressure</subject><subject>Plywood</subject><subject>Pressure gages</subject><subject>Pressure gauges</subject><subject>Scale models</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>Structural failure</subject><subject>Structural response</subject><subject>Wood framed</subject><issn>2046-0546</issn><issn>2046-0554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wFPAczTf2RxlbVVoqwftNWTTRFK2uzXJFvrv3VLx9A4vw8zwAHBH8APlWjzWy9kSrTVaccSkQKzCF2BCMZcIC8Ev_zWX12Ca8xZjTJXmQugJaD5sKtG28GDbuLEl9h3sA6znz7BpbS4wx93Qnv-xgxa6WI7Z2b2HvjvE1Hc73xUYvC1Dit03zCUNbtRjZLCxHZK_BVfBttlP_-4N-JrPPutXtHh_eaufFsiRSmDkleJSYWe5osoJtmGi4ZY4IpW3SgnZjJO9l16HoDjVkhCmg1ZEVYFgItkNuD_n7lP_M_hczLYfUjdWGiqxJoQKWo0uena51OecfDD7FHc2HQ3B5oTTnHCatTYrbkacZsTJfgFUq2ig</recordid><startdate>20211116</startdate><enddate>20211116</enddate><creator>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</creator><creator>Forth, Shaun Anthony</creator><creator>Sheldon, Robert Philip</creator><general>W I T Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211116</creationdate><title>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</title><author>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne ; Forth, Shaun Anthony ; Sheldon, Robert Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1850-e774670ca4727c53d35b4a1c167ea7756b945ee6e9ff742961139f97178f10163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blast loads</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Peak pressure</topic><topic>Plywood</topic><topic>Pressure gages</topic><topic>Pressure gauges</topic><topic>Scale models</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>Structural failure</topic><topic>Structural response</topic><topic>Wood framed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forth, Shaun Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, Robert Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</au><au>Forth, Shaun Anthony</au><au>Sheldon, Robert Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</atitle><jtitle>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements</jtitle><date>2021-11-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>365-380</pages><issn>2046-0546</issn><eissn>2046-0554</eissn><abstract>We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs.</abstract><cop>Southampton</cop><pub>W I T Press</pub><doi>10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-0546
ispartof International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements, 2021-11, Vol.9 (4), p.365-380
issn 2046-0546
2046-0554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2609112528
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Blast loads
Buildings
Computational fluid dynamics
Experiments
Failure modes
Mathematical models
Peak pressure
Plywood
Pressure gages
Pressure gauges
Scale models
Simulation
Structural damage
Structural failure
Structural response
Wood framed
title Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partial%20validation%20of%20CFD%20blast%20simulation%20in%20a%20cityscape%20environment%20featuring%20structural%20failure&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20computational%20methods%20and%20experimental%20measurements&rft.au=Burrows,%20Stephanie%20Jeanne&rft.date=2021-11-16&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=365-380&rft.issn=2046-0546&rft.eissn=2046-0554&rft_id=info:doi/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2609112528%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2609112528&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true