Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure
We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with woo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements 2021-11, Vol.9 (4), p.365-380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 380 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 365 |
container_title | International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne Forth, Shaun Anthony Sheldon, Robert Philip |
description | We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2609112528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2609112528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1850-e774670ca4727c53d35b4a1c167ea7756b945ee6e9ff742961139f97178f10163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wFPAczTf2RxlbVVoqwftNWTTRFK2uzXJFvrv3VLx9A4vw8zwAHBH8APlWjzWy9kSrTVaccSkQKzCF2BCMZcIC8Ev_zWX12Ca8xZjTJXmQugJaD5sKtG28GDbuLEl9h3sA6znz7BpbS4wx93Qnv-xgxa6WI7Z2b2HvjvE1Hc73xUYvC1Dit03zCUNbtRjZLCxHZK_BVfBttlP_-4N-JrPPutXtHh_eaufFsiRSmDkleJSYWe5osoJtmGi4ZY4IpW3SgnZjJO9l16HoDjVkhCmg1ZEVYFgItkNuD_n7lP_M_hczLYfUjdWGiqxJoQKWo0uena51OecfDD7FHc2HQ3B5oTTnHCatTYrbkacZsTJfgFUq2ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2609112528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne ; Forth, Shaun Anthony ; Sheldon, Robert Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne ; Forth, Shaun Anthony ; Sheldon, Robert Philip</creatorcontrib><description>We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-0546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-0554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Southampton: W I T Press</publisher><subject>Blast loads ; Buildings ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Experiments ; Failure modes ; Mathematical models ; Peak pressure ; Plywood ; Pressure gages ; Pressure gauges ; Scale models ; Simulation ; Structural damage ; Structural failure ; Structural response ; Wood framed</subject><ispartof>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements, 2021-11, Vol.9 (4), p.365-380</ispartof><rights>2021. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.witpress.com/journals/cmem or in accordance with the terms at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), if applicable</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forth, Shaun Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, Robert Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</title><title>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements</title><description>We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs.</description><subject>Blast loads</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Peak pressure</subject><subject>Plywood</subject><subject>Pressure gages</subject><subject>Pressure gauges</subject><subject>Scale models</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>Structural failure</subject><subject>Structural response</subject><subject>Wood framed</subject><issn>2046-0546</issn><issn>2046-0554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wFPAczTf2RxlbVVoqwftNWTTRFK2uzXJFvrv3VLx9A4vw8zwAHBH8APlWjzWy9kSrTVaccSkQKzCF2BCMZcIC8Ev_zWX12Ca8xZjTJXmQugJaD5sKtG28GDbuLEl9h3sA6znz7BpbS4wx93Qnv-xgxa6WI7Z2b2HvjvE1Hc73xUYvC1Dit03zCUNbtRjZLCxHZK_BVfBttlP_-4N-JrPPutXtHh_eaufFsiRSmDkleJSYWe5osoJtmGi4ZY4IpW3SgnZjJO9l16HoDjVkhCmg1ZEVYFgItkNuD_n7lP_M_hczLYfUjdWGiqxJoQKWo0uena51OecfDD7FHc2HQ3B5oTTnHCatTYrbkacZsTJfgFUq2ig</recordid><startdate>20211116</startdate><enddate>20211116</enddate><creator>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</creator><creator>Forth, Shaun Anthony</creator><creator>Sheldon, Robert Philip</creator><general>W I T Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211116</creationdate><title>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</title><author>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne ; Forth, Shaun Anthony ; Sheldon, Robert Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1850-e774670ca4727c53d35b4a1c167ea7756b945ee6e9ff742961139f97178f10163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blast loads</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Peak pressure</topic><topic>Plywood</topic><topic>Pressure gages</topic><topic>Pressure gauges</topic><topic>Scale models</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>Structural failure</topic><topic>Structural response</topic><topic>Wood framed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forth, Shaun Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, Robert Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burrows, Stephanie Jeanne</au><au>Forth, Shaun Anthony</au><au>Sheldon, Robert Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure</atitle><jtitle>International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements</jtitle><date>2021-11-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>365-380</pages><issn>2046-0546</issn><eissn>2046-0554</eissn><abstract>We demonstrate the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a pressure-impulse failure model to predict blast loading and structural damage in a geometrically complex cityscape. The simulated loading is compared against experimental results for 69 g PE4 in a 1/50th scale model with wood-framed and plywood-faced buildings; data were collected from 11 pressure gauges throughout. In the initial simulation, geometric features were modeled as perfectly rigid, whereas buildings in the experiment failed: the resulting differences between the model and experiment allowed us to evaluate CFD when failure occurs. Simulated peak pressures during the first positive phase were still within 20% of experiment at most pressure gauges. However, errors in first phase impulses were around 40%, suggesting that building-failure effects are greater toward the phase end. Then, to model building-failure effects, we attempted to fit pressure-impulse failure curves to the plywood-faces: this proved too simplistic to produce realistic blast wave behavior due to the various, complex failure modes. This work illustrates key limitations of available CFD software and the pressure-impulse fail- ure model – both industry-standard tools to determine structural response to blast. We conclude that stronger coupling between blast loading and structural response is needed where significant failure occurs.</abstract><cop>Southampton</cop><pub>W I T Press</pub><doi>10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-0546 |
ispartof | International journal of computational methods and experimental measurements, 2021-11, Vol.9 (4), p.365-380 |
issn | 2046-0546 2046-0554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2609112528 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Blast loads Buildings Computational fluid dynamics Experiments Failure modes Mathematical models Peak pressure Plywood Pressure gages Pressure gauges Scale models Simulation Structural damage Structural failure Structural response Wood framed |
title | Partial validation of CFD blast simulation in a cityscape environment featuring structural failure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partial%20validation%20of%20CFD%20blast%20simulation%20in%20a%20cityscape%20environment%20featuring%20structural%20failure&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20computational%20methods%20and%20experimental%20measurements&rft.au=Burrows,%20Stephanie%20Jeanne&rft.date=2021-11-16&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=365-380&rft.issn=2046-0546&rft.eissn=2046-0554&rft_id=info:doi/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N4-365-380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2609112528%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2609112528&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |