Economic theology: a question of academic primacy? A response to Beltramini
The Handbook's target audience - secular social scientists and economists, that is people who often think that theology has nothing to tell them - simply switches off when they hear 'economic theology'. [...]talking about God on the one hand, and talking about theology or in terms of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ephemera 2021-08, Vol.21 (3), p.229-231 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 231 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 229 |
| container_title | Ephemera |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Schwarzkopf, Stefan |
| description | The Handbook's target audience - secular social scientists and economists, that is people who often think that theology has nothing to tell them - simply switches off when they hear 'economic theology'. [...]talking about God on the one hand, and talking about theology or in terms of theology on the other, does clearly not have to mean the same thing. If the debate really is to continue, a hope stated in the last sentence of the review, theologically minded people might be well advised to first kindle curiosity rather than to insist on the illegitimacy of liberal secularism as the outcome of the debate. the author Stefan Schwarzkopf is Associate Professor at the Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2608502627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608502627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26085026273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEsKwjAUAIMoWD93eOC6kKZt2rgRlYrg1n0JMdWUNq8m7aK394MHcDWLGWZCgijJ4pDlnE9JwGjKwigRYk4W3teUpiISWUAuhUKLrVHQPzQ2eB-3IOE5aN8btIAVSCVv-hN0zrRSjTvYg9O-Q-s19AgH3fROtsaaFZlVsvF6_eOSbE7F9XgOO4ffY1nj4OxblYzTPKWMsyz-r3oB86o-JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2608502627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic theology: a question of academic primacy? A response to Beltramini</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Schwarzkopf, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The Handbook's target audience - secular social scientists and economists, that is people who often think that theology has nothing to tell them - simply switches off when they hear 'economic theology'. [...]talking about God on the one hand, and talking about theology or in terms of theology on the other, does clearly not have to mean the same thing. If the debate really is to continue, a hope stated in the last sentence of the review, theologically minded people might be well advised to first kindle curiosity rather than to insist on the illegitimacy of liberal secularism as the outcome of the debate. the author Stefan Schwarzkopf is Associate Professor at the Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2052-1499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leicester: Nick Butler (On Behalf of the Editorial Collective of Ephemera)</publisher><subject>13th century ; Debates ; God ; Handbooks ; Religion ; Social sciences ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Ephemera, 2021-08, Vol.21 (3), p.229-231</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Economic theology: a question of academic primacy? A response to Beltramini</title><title>Ephemera</title><description>The Handbook's target audience - secular social scientists and economists, that is people who often think that theology has nothing to tell them - simply switches off when they hear 'economic theology'. [...]talking about God on the one hand, and talking about theology or in terms of theology on the other, does clearly not have to mean the same thing. If the debate really is to continue, a hope stated in the last sentence of the review, theologically minded people might be well advised to first kindle curiosity rather than to insist on the illegitimacy of liberal secularism as the outcome of the debate. the author Stefan Schwarzkopf is Associate Professor at the Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School.</description><subject>13th century</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Handbooks</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>2052-1499</issn><issn>1473-2866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjEsKwjAUAIMoWD93eOC6kKZt2rgRlYrg1n0JMdWUNq8m7aK394MHcDWLGWZCgijJ4pDlnE9JwGjKwigRYk4W3teUpiISWUAuhUKLrVHQPzQ2eB-3IOE5aN8btIAVSCVv-hN0zrRSjTvYg9O-Q-s19AgH3fROtsaaFZlVsvF6_eOSbE7F9XgOO4ffY1nj4OxblYzTPKWMsyz-r3oB86o-JQ</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Schwarzkopf, Stefan</creator><general>Nick Butler (On Behalf of the Editorial Collective of Ephemera)</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Economic theology: a question of academic primacy? A response to Beltramini</title><author>Schwarzkopf, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26085026273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>13th century</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Handbooks</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Ephemera</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwarzkopf, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic theology: a question of academic primacy? A response to Beltramini</atitle><jtitle>Ephemera</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>229-231</pages><issn>2052-1499</issn><eissn>1473-2866</eissn><abstract>The Handbook's target audience - secular social scientists and economists, that is people who often think that theology has nothing to tell them - simply switches off when they hear 'economic theology'. [...]talking about God on the one hand, and talking about theology or in terms of theology on the other, does clearly not have to mean the same thing. If the debate really is to continue, a hope stated in the last sentence of the review, theologically minded people might be well advised to first kindle curiosity rather than to insist on the illegitimacy of liberal secularism as the outcome of the debate. the author Stefan Schwarzkopf is Associate Professor at the Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School.</abstract><cop>Leicester</cop><pub>Nick Butler (On Behalf of the Editorial Collective of Ephemera)</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2052-1499 |
| ispartof | Ephemera, 2021-08, Vol.21 (3), p.229-231 |
| issn | 2052-1499 1473-2866 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2608502627 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| subjects | 13th century Debates God Handbooks Religion Social sciences Theology |
| title | Economic theology: a question of academic primacy? A response to Beltramini |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A38%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20theology:%20a%20question%20of%20academic%20primacy?%20A%20response%20to%20Beltramini&rft.jtitle=Ephemera&rft.au=Schwarzkopf,%20Stefan&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=229-231&rft.issn=2052-1499&rft.eissn=1473-2866&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2608502627%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2608502627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |