A comparison study of CNN denoisers on PRNU extraction

Performance of the sensor-based camera identification (SCI) method heavily relies on the denoising filter in estimating Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU). Given various attempts on enhancing the quality of the extracted PRNU, it still suffers from unsatisfactory performance in low-resolution imag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2021-12
Hauptverfasser: Zeng, Hui, Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini, Deng, Kang, Peng, Anjie, Goljan, Miroslav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Zeng, Hui
Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini
Deng, Kang
Peng, Anjie
Goljan, Miroslav
description Performance of the sensor-based camera identification (SCI) method heavily relies on the denoising filter in estimating Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU). Given various attempts on enhancing the quality of the extracted PRNU, it still suffers from unsatisfactory performance in low-resolution images and high computational demand. Leveraging the similarity of PRNU estimation and image denoising, we take advantage of the latest achievements of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based denoisers for PRNU extraction. In this paper, a comparative evaluation of such CNN denoisers on SCI performance is carried out on the public "Dresden Image Database". Our findings are two-fold. From one aspect, both the PRNU extraction and image denoising separate noise from the image content. Hence, SCI can benefit from the recent CNN denoisers if carefully trained. From another aspect, the goals and the scenarios of PRNU extraction and image denoising are different since one optimizes the quality of noise and the other optimizes the image quality. A carefully tailored training is needed when CNN denoisers are used for PRNU estimation. Alternative strategies of training data preparation and loss function design are analyzed theoretically and evaluated experimentally. We point out that feeding the CNNs with image-PRNU pairs and training them with correlation-based loss function result in the best PRNU estimation performance. To facilitate further studies of SCI, we also propose a minimum-loss camera fingerprint quantization scheme using which we save the fingerprints as image files in PNG format. Furthermore, we make the quantized fingerprints of the cameras from the "Dresden Image Database" publicly available.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2607473301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607473301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26074733013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mQwc1RIzs8tSCzKLM7PUyguKU2pVMhPU3D281NISc3LzyxOLSpWAMoEBPmFKqRWlBQlJpdk5ufxMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GZTfXEGcP3YKi_MLS1OKS-Kz80qI8oFS8kZmBuYm5sbGBoTFxqgB1YjSV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607473301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison study of CNN denoisers on PRNU extraction</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Zeng, Hui ; Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini ; Deng, Kang ; Peng, Anjie ; Goljan, Miroslav</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Hui ; Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini ; Deng, Kang ; Peng, Anjie ; Goljan, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><description>Performance of the sensor-based camera identification (SCI) method heavily relies on the denoising filter in estimating Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU). Given various attempts on enhancing the quality of the extracted PRNU, it still suffers from unsatisfactory performance in low-resolution images and high computational demand. Leveraging the similarity of PRNU estimation and image denoising, we take advantage of the latest achievements of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based denoisers for PRNU extraction. In this paper, a comparative evaluation of such CNN denoisers on SCI performance is carried out on the public "Dresden Image Database". Our findings are two-fold. From one aspect, both the PRNU extraction and image denoising separate noise from the image content. Hence, SCI can benefit from the recent CNN denoisers if carefully trained. From another aspect, the goals and the scenarios of PRNU extraction and image denoising are different since one optimizes the quality of noise and the other optimizes the image quality. A carefully tailored training is needed when CNN denoisers are used for PRNU estimation. Alternative strategies of training data preparation and loss function design are analyzed theoretically and evaluated experimentally. We point out that feeding the CNNs with image-PRNU pairs and training them with correlation-based loss function result in the best PRNU estimation performance. To facilitate further studies of SCI, we also propose a minimum-loss camera fingerprint quantization scheme using which we save the fingerprints as image files in PNG format. Furthermore, we make the quantized fingerprints of the cameras from the "Dresden Image Database" publicly available.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Cameras ; Estimation ; Fingerprints ; Image databases ; Image quality ; Image resolution ; Noise reduction ; Nonuniformity ; Training</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-12</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Kang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Anjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goljan, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison study of CNN denoisers on PRNU extraction</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Performance of the sensor-based camera identification (SCI) method heavily relies on the denoising filter in estimating Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU). Given various attempts on enhancing the quality of the extracted PRNU, it still suffers from unsatisfactory performance in low-resolution images and high computational demand. Leveraging the similarity of PRNU estimation and image denoising, we take advantage of the latest achievements of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based denoisers for PRNU extraction. In this paper, a comparative evaluation of such CNN denoisers on SCI performance is carried out on the public "Dresden Image Database". Our findings are two-fold. From one aspect, both the PRNU extraction and image denoising separate noise from the image content. Hence, SCI can benefit from the recent CNN denoisers if carefully trained. From another aspect, the goals and the scenarios of PRNU extraction and image denoising are different since one optimizes the quality of noise and the other optimizes the image quality. A carefully tailored training is needed when CNN denoisers are used for PRNU estimation. Alternative strategies of training data preparation and loss function design are analyzed theoretically and evaluated experimentally. We point out that feeding the CNNs with image-PRNU pairs and training them with correlation-based loss function result in the best PRNU estimation performance. To facilitate further studies of SCI, we also propose a minimum-loss camera fingerprint quantization scheme using which we save the fingerprints as image files in PNG format. Furthermore, we make the quantized fingerprints of the cameras from the "Dresden Image Database" publicly available.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Fingerprints</subject><subject>Image databases</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Image resolution</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>Nonuniformity</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mQwc1RIzs8tSCzKLM7PUyguKU2pVMhPU3D281NISc3LzyxOLSpWAMoEBPmFKqRWlBQlJpdk5ufxMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GZTfXEGcP3YKi_MLS1OKS-Kz80qI8oFS8kZmBuYm5sbGBoTFxqgB1YjSV</recordid><startdate>20211206</startdate><enddate>20211206</enddate><creator>Zeng, Hui</creator><creator>Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini</creator><creator>Deng, Kang</creator><creator>Peng, Anjie</creator><creator>Goljan, Miroslav</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211206</creationdate><title>A comparison study of CNN denoisers on PRNU extraction</title><author>Zeng, Hui ; Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini ; Deng, Kang ; Peng, Anjie ; Goljan, Miroslav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26074733013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Fingerprints</topic><topic>Image databases</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Image resolution</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>Nonuniformity</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Kang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Anjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goljan, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeng, Hui</au><au>Morteza Darvish Morshedi Hosseini</au><au>Deng, Kang</au><au>Peng, Anjie</au><au>Goljan, Miroslav</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A comparison study of CNN denoisers on PRNU extraction</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-12-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Performance of the sensor-based camera identification (SCI) method heavily relies on the denoising filter in estimating Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU). Given various attempts on enhancing the quality of the extracted PRNU, it still suffers from unsatisfactory performance in low-resolution images and high computational demand. Leveraging the similarity of PRNU estimation and image denoising, we take advantage of the latest achievements of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based denoisers for PRNU extraction. In this paper, a comparative evaluation of such CNN denoisers on SCI performance is carried out on the public "Dresden Image Database". Our findings are two-fold. From one aspect, both the PRNU extraction and image denoising separate noise from the image content. Hence, SCI can benefit from the recent CNN denoisers if carefully trained. From another aspect, the goals and the scenarios of PRNU extraction and image denoising are different since one optimizes the quality of noise and the other optimizes the image quality. A carefully tailored training is needed when CNN denoisers are used for PRNU estimation. Alternative strategies of training data preparation and loss function design are analyzed theoretically and evaluated experimentally. We point out that feeding the CNNs with image-PRNU pairs and training them with correlation-based loss function result in the best PRNU estimation performance. To facilitate further studies of SCI, we also propose a minimum-loss camera fingerprint quantization scheme using which we save the fingerprints as image files in PNG format. Furthermore, we make the quantized fingerprints of the cameras from the "Dresden Image Database" publicly available.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-12
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2607473301
source Free E- Journals
subjects Artificial neural networks
Cameras
Estimation
Fingerprints
Image databases
Image quality
Image resolution
Noise reduction
Nonuniformity
Training
title A comparison study of CNN denoisers on PRNU extraction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20study%20of%20CNN%20denoisers%20on%20PRNU%20extraction&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Zeng,%20Hui&rft.date=2021-12-06&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2607473301%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607473301&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true