The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): final results of a comparative survey analysis of 21,265 students in 33 countries

PurposeThis paper presents the complete findings from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS), the world's largest study of tertiary students' format preferences and behaviors. The analysis of ARFIS proceeded in two stages. This paper reveals results from the second stage f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reference services review 2021-12, Vol.49 (3/4), p.250-266
Hauptverfasser: Mizrachi, Diane, Salaz, Alicia M., Kurbanoglu, Serap, Boustany, Joumana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 266
container_issue 3/4
container_start_page 250
container_title Reference services review
container_volume 49
creator Mizrachi, Diane
Salaz, Alicia M.
Kurbanoglu, Serap
Boustany, Joumana
description PurposeThis paper presents the complete findings from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS), the world's largest study of tertiary students' format preferences and behaviors. The analysis of ARFIS proceeded in two stages. This paper reveals results from the second stage for the first time and compares them with the earlier results. The authors then present and discuss the results from the combined datasets of 21,266 students in 33 countries.Design/methodology/approachA total of 44 members in the ARFIS research team distributed an online survey composed of 22 Likert-style, multiple choice and open-ended questions to tertiary students on their format preferences and behaviors. Inferential statistical analysis was used on participant responses, and descriptive statistics analysis was used on the combined amalgamated dataset.FindingsMajorities of students in all countries consistently show preference for reading their academic texts in print. However, variations of preferences do occur between countries. Overall, the language of a reading does not affect reading format preferences, but national scores on this question are greatly diverse.Originality/valueARFIS is the largest study of its kind created through a collaboration of researchers in countries on six continents, collecting data in more than 20 languages. The sample size, rigorous statistical analysis and consistency of results strengthen the reliability of the findings. Analysis of the first dataset has received widespread recognition, but this paper is the first to publish the second dataset and the complete amalgamated results.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/RSR-04-2021-0012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2607100577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607100577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a61170f5dc3dc00975207d7377b05fd696b29a4e19a1942462deba60edff78fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rGzEQhkVpoG6Se46CXhrINqOPlbK9GRM3BkPATs5CXo0ahf1wpV2D_0J-dbV1KQQ6F8HwPC-MXkKuGHxjDO5uN9tNAbLgwFkBwPgHMuNQyoJppj6SGUAFhRZcfiKfU3qFaVQ1I29PL0jntXXYhppu0LrQ_aTLPrZ2oKtuwNjZIfSdbeh2GN2Rfp1vlqvt9Xfqw7SMmMZmSLT31NK6b_c2Zv6ANI3xgEdqM3RM4Q_A2Q1XJU05B7vshI4KkaWxG2LAdEHOvG0SXv59z8nz8v5p8VCsH3-sFvN1UUshh8IqxjT40tXC1fksXXLQTgutd1B6pyq145WVyCrLKsml4g53VgE67_Wd34lzcn3KfbGN2cfQ2ng0vQ3mYb420w6E4rIU6sAy--XE7mP_a8Q0mNd-zF_SJMMVaAZQap0pOFF17FOK6P_FMjBTOya3Y0CaqR0ztZOV25OCLUbbuP8Z7_oUvwG9mo6y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607100577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): final results of a comparative survey analysis of 21,265 students in 33 countries</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><creator>Mizrachi, Diane ; Salaz, Alicia M. ; Kurbanoglu, Serap ; Boustany, Joumana</creator><creatorcontrib>Mizrachi, Diane ; Salaz, Alicia M. ; Kurbanoglu, Serap ; Boustany, Joumana</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis paper presents the complete findings from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS), the world's largest study of tertiary students' format preferences and behaviors. The analysis of ARFIS proceeded in two stages. This paper reveals results from the second stage for the first time and compares them with the earlier results. The authors then present and discuss the results from the combined datasets of 21,266 students in 33 countries.Design/methodology/approachA total of 44 members in the ARFIS research team distributed an online survey composed of 22 Likert-style, multiple choice and open-ended questions to tertiary students on their format preferences and behaviors. Inferential statistical analysis was used on participant responses, and descriptive statistics analysis was used on the combined amalgamated dataset.FindingsMajorities of students in all countries consistently show preference for reading their academic texts in print. However, variations of preferences do occur between countries. Overall, the language of a reading does not affect reading format preferences, but national scores on this question are greatly diverse.Originality/valueARFIS is the largest study of its kind created through a collaboration of researchers in countries on six continents, collecting data in more than 20 languages. The sample size, rigorous statistical analysis and consistency of results strengthen the reliability of the findings. Analysis of the first dataset has received widespread recognition, but this paper is the first to publish the second dataset and the complete amalgamated results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-7324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-1716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/RSR-04-2021-0012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Amalgamation ; Collaboration ; College students ; Comparative analysis ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Datasets ; E-books ; Format ; Graduate students ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Information literacy ; Library and information sciences ; Medical research ; Pandemics ; Preferences ; Quantitative analysis ; Questions ; Reading comprehension ; Reliability analysis ; Researchers ; Statistical analysis ; Student attitudes ; Students ; University students</subject><ispartof>Reference services review, 2021-12, Vol.49 (3/4), p.250-266</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a61170f5dc3dc00975207d7377b05fd696b29a4e19a1942462deba60edff78fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a61170f5dc3dc00975207d7377b05fd696b29a4e19a1942462deba60edff78fb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6187-9723 ; 0000-0002-9561-9978 ; 0000-0001-7015-4089</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RSR-04-2021-0012/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,967,11635,27924,27925,52689</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03624536$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mizrachi, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salaz, Alicia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurbanoglu, Serap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boustany, Joumana</creatorcontrib><title>The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): final results of a comparative survey analysis of 21,265 students in 33 countries</title><title>Reference services review</title><description>PurposeThis paper presents the complete findings from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS), the world's largest study of tertiary students' format preferences and behaviors. The analysis of ARFIS proceeded in two stages. This paper reveals results from the second stage for the first time and compares them with the earlier results. The authors then present and discuss the results from the combined datasets of 21,266 students in 33 countries.Design/methodology/approachA total of 44 members in the ARFIS research team distributed an online survey composed of 22 Likert-style, multiple choice and open-ended questions to tertiary students on their format preferences and behaviors. Inferential statistical analysis was used on participant responses, and descriptive statistics analysis was used on the combined amalgamated dataset.FindingsMajorities of students in all countries consistently show preference for reading their academic texts in print. However, variations of preferences do occur between countries. Overall, the language of a reading does not affect reading format preferences, but national scores on this question are greatly diverse.Originality/valueARFIS is the largest study of its kind created through a collaboration of researchers in countries on six continents, collecting data in more than 20 languages. The sample size, rigorous statistical analysis and consistency of results strengthen the reliability of the findings. Analysis of the first dataset has received widespread recognition, but this paper is the first to publish the second dataset and the complete amalgamated results.</description><subject>Amalgamation</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>E-books</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Information literacy</subject><subject>Library and information sciences</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>0090-7324</issn><issn>2054-1716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rGzEQhkVpoG6Se46CXhrINqOPlbK9GRM3BkPATs5CXo0ahf1wpV2D_0J-dbV1KQQ6F8HwPC-MXkKuGHxjDO5uN9tNAbLgwFkBwPgHMuNQyoJppj6SGUAFhRZcfiKfU3qFaVQ1I29PL0jntXXYhppu0LrQ_aTLPrZ2oKtuwNjZIfSdbeh2GN2Rfp1vlqvt9Xfqw7SMmMZmSLT31NK6b_c2Zv6ANI3xgEdqM3RM4Q_A2Q1XJU05B7vshI4KkaWxG2LAdEHOvG0SXv59z8nz8v5p8VCsH3-sFvN1UUshh8IqxjT40tXC1fksXXLQTgutd1B6pyq145WVyCrLKsml4g53VgE67_Wd34lzcn3KfbGN2cfQ2ng0vQ3mYb420w6E4rIU6sAy--XE7mP_a8Q0mNd-zF_SJMMVaAZQap0pOFF17FOK6P_FMjBTOya3Y0CaqR0ztZOV25OCLUbbuP8Z7_oUvwG9mo6y</recordid><startdate>20211208</startdate><enddate>20211208</enddate><creator>Mizrachi, Diane</creator><creator>Salaz, Alicia M.</creator><creator>Kurbanoglu, Serap</creator><creator>Boustany, Joumana</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-9723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-9978</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-4089</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211208</creationdate><title>The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): final results of a comparative survey analysis of 21,265 students in 33 countries</title><author>Mizrachi, Diane ; Salaz, Alicia M. ; Kurbanoglu, Serap ; Boustany, Joumana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a61170f5dc3dc00975207d7377b05fd696b29a4e19a1942462deba60edff78fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amalgamation</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>E-books</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Information literacy</topic><topic>Library and information sciences</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mizrachi, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salaz, Alicia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurbanoglu, Serap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boustany, Joumana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Reference services review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mizrachi, Diane</au><au>Salaz, Alicia M.</au><au>Kurbanoglu, Serap</au><au>Boustany, Joumana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): final results of a comparative survey analysis of 21,265 students in 33 countries</atitle><jtitle>Reference services review</jtitle><date>2021-12-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>250-266</pages><issn>0090-7324</issn><eissn>2054-1716</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis paper presents the complete findings from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS), the world's largest study of tertiary students' format preferences and behaviors. The analysis of ARFIS proceeded in two stages. This paper reveals results from the second stage for the first time and compares them with the earlier results. The authors then present and discuss the results from the combined datasets of 21,266 students in 33 countries.Design/methodology/approachA total of 44 members in the ARFIS research team distributed an online survey composed of 22 Likert-style, multiple choice and open-ended questions to tertiary students on their format preferences and behaviors. Inferential statistical analysis was used on participant responses, and descriptive statistics analysis was used on the combined amalgamated dataset.FindingsMajorities of students in all countries consistently show preference for reading their academic texts in print. However, variations of preferences do occur between countries. Overall, the language of a reading does not affect reading format preferences, but national scores on this question are greatly diverse.Originality/valueARFIS is the largest study of its kind created through a collaboration of researchers in countries on six continents, collecting data in more than 20 languages. The sample size, rigorous statistical analysis and consistency of results strengthen the reliability of the findings. Analysis of the first dataset has received widespread recognition, but this paper is the first to publish the second dataset and the complete amalgamated results.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/RSR-04-2021-0012</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-9723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-9978</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-4089</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-7324
ispartof Reference services review, 2021-12, Vol.49 (3/4), p.250-266
issn 0090-7324
2054-1716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2607100577
source Emerald Complete Journals
subjects Amalgamation
Collaboration
College students
Comparative analysis
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Datasets
E-books
Format
Graduate students
Humanities and Social Sciences
Information literacy
Library and information sciences
Medical research
Pandemics
Preferences
Quantitative analysis
Questions
Reading comprehension
Reliability analysis
Researchers
Statistical analysis
Student attitudes
Students
University students
title The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): final results of a comparative survey analysis of 21,265 students in 33 countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A24%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Academic%20Reading%20Format%20International%20Study%20(ARFIS):%20final%20results%20of%20a%20comparative%20survey%20analysis%20of%2021,265%20students%20in%2033%20countries&rft.jtitle=Reference%20services%20review&rft.au=Mizrachi,%20Diane&rft.date=2021-12-08&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=250-266&rft.issn=0090-7324&rft.eissn=2054-1716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/RSR-04-2021-0012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2607100577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607100577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true