CONSTITUTIONAL PANDEMIC SURVEILLANCE
How do people view governmental pandemic surveillance? And how can their views inform courts considering the constitutionality of digital monitoring programs aimed at containing the spread of a highly contagious diseases? We measure the perceived intrusiveness of pandemic surveillance through two na...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of criminal law & criminology 2021-09, Vol.111 (4), p.909-959 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 959 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 909 |
| container_title | The journal of criminal law & criminology |
| container_volume | 111 |
| creator | KUGLER, MATTHEW B. OLIVER, MARIANA |
| description | How do people view governmental pandemic surveillance? And how can their views inform courts considering the constitutionality of digital monitoring programs aimed at containing the spread of a highly contagious diseases? We measure the perceived intrusiveness of pandemic surveillance through two nationally representative surveys of Americans. Our results show that even at the height of a pandemic people find surveillance for public health to be more intrusive than surveillance for traditional law enforcement purposes. To account for these strong privacy concerns, we propose safeguards that we believe would make cell phone location tracking and other similar digital monitoring regimes constitutionally reasonable. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2606935537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A689168713</galeid><jstor_id>48633482</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A689168713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g416t-f7afeacfb010a2788dda13085e2eee671774d96fc974c69253346b4b291b361d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0EtLw0AQAOAgCtbqTxAKevEQ2Ueyj2OItQZiIjb1umySSUhJE82moP_elRakUMSZw8DwzewyJ86EYIZcRIl_6kwQktj1MJPnzoUxa_QTwps4t2GaLLMoW2VRmgTx7CVIHubPUThbrl7f5lEcB0k4v3TOKt0auNrXqbN6nGfhkxuniygMYre2m0e34roCXVQ5wkgTLkRZakyR8IEAAOOYc6-UrCok9womiU-px3IvJxLnlOGSTp2b3d73of_YghnVut8OnX1SEYaYpL5P-a-qdQuq6ap-HHSxaUyhAiYkZoJjapV7RNXQwaDbvoOqse0Df3_E2yxh0xRHB-4OBqwZ4XOs9dYYFS2Tf1uxiP_6-N4WfdtCDcoePEwP_fXOr83YD-p9aDZ6-FKeYPa8gtBvlKuXDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606935537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CONSTITUTIONAL PANDEMIC SURVEILLANCE</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>KUGLER, MATTHEW B. ; OLIVER, MARIANA</creator><creatorcontrib>KUGLER, MATTHEW B. ; OLIVER, MARIANA</creatorcontrib><description>How do people view governmental pandemic surveillance? And how can their views inform courts considering the constitutionality of digital monitoring programs aimed at containing the spread of a highly contagious diseases? We measure the perceived intrusiveness of pandemic surveillance through two nationally representative surveys of Americans. Our results show that even at the height of a pandemic people find surveillance for public health to be more intrusive than surveillance for traditional law enforcement purposes. To account for these strong privacy concerns, we propose safeguards that we believe would make cell phone location tracking and other similar digital monitoring regimes constitutionally reasonable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-4169</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-0325</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Northwestern University</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Balancing tests (Law) ; Cellular telephones ; Contact tracing ; Coronaviruses ; Courts ; COVID-19 ; Crime prevention ; Criminal investigations ; CRIMINOLOGY ; Electronic surveillance ; Evaluation ; Exceptions (Law) ; Government information ; Government regulation ; Infectious diseases ; Intrusiveness ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Mobile phones ; Pandemics ; Privacy ; Privacy, Right of ; Probable cause ; Public health ; Public health administration ; Public opinion ; Quarantine ; Right of privacy ; Safeguards ; Safety and security measures ; Search & seizure ; Sentinel health events ; Sentinel surveillance ; Smartphones ; Surveillance ; Third party ; Tracking ; Warrantless searches</subject><ispartof>The journal of criminal law & criminology, 2021-09, Vol.111 (4), p.909-959</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 by Matthew B. Kugler & Mariana Oliver</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Northwestern University, School of Law</rights><rights>Copyright Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law) Fall 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48633482$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48633482$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12845,27344,33774,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KUGLER, MATTHEW B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLIVER, MARIANA</creatorcontrib><title>CONSTITUTIONAL PANDEMIC SURVEILLANCE</title><title>The journal of criminal law & criminology</title><addtitle>Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology</addtitle><description>How do people view governmental pandemic surveillance? And how can their views inform courts considering the constitutionality of digital monitoring programs aimed at containing the spread of a highly contagious diseases? We measure the perceived intrusiveness of pandemic surveillance through two nationally representative surveys of Americans. Our results show that even at the height of a pandemic people find surveillance for public health to be more intrusive than surveillance for traditional law enforcement purposes. To account for these strong privacy concerns, we propose safeguards that we believe would make cell phone location tracking and other similar digital monitoring regimes constitutionally reasonable.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Balancing tests (Law)</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Contact tracing</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>CRIMINOLOGY</subject><subject>Electronic surveillance</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exceptions (Law)</subject><subject>Government information</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intrusiveness</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Mobile phones</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Privacy, Right of</subject><subject>Probable cause</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health administration</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Quarantine</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Safeguards</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Search & seizure</subject><subject>Sentinel health events</subject><subject>Sentinel surveillance</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Third party</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Warrantless searches</subject><issn>0091-4169</issn><issn>2160-0325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0EtLw0AQAOAgCtbqTxAKevEQ2Ueyj2OItQZiIjb1umySSUhJE82moP_elRakUMSZw8DwzewyJ86EYIZcRIl_6kwQktj1MJPnzoUxa_QTwps4t2GaLLMoW2VRmgTx7CVIHubPUThbrl7f5lEcB0k4v3TOKt0auNrXqbN6nGfhkxuniygMYre2m0e34roCXVQ5wkgTLkRZakyR8IEAAOOYc6-UrCok9womiU-px3IvJxLnlOGSTp2b3d73of_YghnVut8OnX1SEYaYpL5P-a-qdQuq6ap-HHSxaUyhAiYkZoJjapV7RNXQwaDbvoOqse0Df3_E2yxh0xRHB-4OBqwZ4XOs9dYYFS2Tf1uxiP_6-N4WfdtCDcoePEwP_fXOr83YD-p9aDZ6-FKeYPa8gtBvlKuXDQ</recordid><startdate>20210922</startdate><enddate>20210922</enddate><creator>KUGLER, MATTHEW B.</creator><creator>OLIVER, MARIANA</creator><general>Northwestern University</general><general>Northwestern University, School of Law</general><general>Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law)</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210922</creationdate><title>CONSTITUTIONAL PANDEMIC SURVEILLANCE</title><author>KUGLER, MATTHEW B. ; OLIVER, MARIANA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g416t-f7afeacfb010a2788dda13085e2eee671774d96fc974c69253346b4b291b361d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Balancing tests (Law)</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Contact tracing</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>CRIMINOLOGY</topic><topic>Electronic surveillance</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exceptions (Law)</topic><topic>Government information</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intrusiveness</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Mobile phones</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Privacy, Right of</topic><topic>Probable cause</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health administration</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Quarantine</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Safeguards</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Search & seizure</topic><topic>Sentinel health events</topic><topic>Sentinel surveillance</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Third party</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Warrantless searches</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KUGLER, MATTHEW B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLIVER, MARIANA</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The journal of criminal law & criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KUGLER, MATTHEW B.</au><au>OLIVER, MARIANA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CONSTITUTIONAL PANDEMIC SURVEILLANCE</atitle><jtitle>The journal of criminal law & criminology</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology</addtitle><date>2021-09-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>959</epage><pages>909-959</pages><issn>0091-4169</issn><eissn>2160-0325</eissn><abstract>How do people view governmental pandemic surveillance? And how can their views inform courts considering the constitutionality of digital monitoring programs aimed at containing the spread of a highly contagious diseases? We measure the perceived intrusiveness of pandemic surveillance through two nationally representative surveys of Americans. Our results show that even at the height of a pandemic people find surveillance for public health to be more intrusive than surveillance for traditional law enforcement purposes. To account for these strong privacy concerns, we propose safeguards that we believe would make cell phone location tracking and other similar digital monitoring regimes constitutionally reasonable.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Northwestern University</pub><tpages>51</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-4169 |
| ispartof | The journal of criminal law & criminology, 2021-09, Vol.111 (4), p.909-959 |
| issn | 0091-4169 2160-0325 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2606935537 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Analysis Balancing tests (Law) Cellular telephones Contact tracing Coronaviruses Courts COVID-19 Crime prevention Criminal investigations CRIMINOLOGY Electronic surveillance Evaluation Exceptions (Law) Government information Government regulation Infectious diseases Intrusiveness Law enforcement Laws, regulations and rules Mobile phones Pandemics Privacy Privacy, Right of Probable cause Public health Public health administration Public opinion Quarantine Right of privacy Safeguards Safety and security measures Search & seizure Sentinel health events Sentinel surveillance Smartphones Surveillance Third party Tracking Warrantless searches |
| title | CONSTITUTIONAL PANDEMIC SURVEILLANCE |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CONSTITUTIONAL%20PANDEMIC%20SURVEILLANCE&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20criminal%20law%20&%20criminology&rft.au=KUGLER,%20MATTHEW%20B.&rft.date=2021-09-22&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=959&rft.pages=909-959&rft.issn=0091-4169&rft.eissn=2160-0325&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA689168713%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606935537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A689168713&rft_jstor_id=48633482&rfr_iscdi=true |