Curbing overstocking on rangeland through subsidies, rewards, and herders’ social capital: Lessons from Qinghai province, China

Restoring rangeland ecology, a goal set by the Rangeland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward (REPSR) scheme of China, depends on how effectively livestock overload can be curbed. Besides subsidies and rewards, herders' individual social capital also bears an important weight on their willi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of rural studies 2021-10, Vol.87, p.361-374
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Rui, Shao, Liqun, Chen, Haibin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue
container_start_page 361
container_title Journal of rural studies
container_volume 87
creator Ding, Rui
Shao, Liqun
Chen, Haibin
description Restoring rangeland ecology, a goal set by the Rangeland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward (REPSR) scheme of China, depends on how effectively livestock overload can be curbed. Besides subsidies and rewards, herders' individual social capital also bears an important weight on their willingness to lower stocking rate. Social network offers an invisible conduit for herders to build up social capital, thus quantifying social capital through social network analysis is more straightforward than simply using proxy indicators, an approach commonly adopted so far. Based on a questionnaire survey on 288 households in Qinghai province, the effects of social capital and the REPSR compensation on stocking rate are empirically examined, replacing the traditional proxies of social capital with herders' ability to obtain information and resources as well as the restrictions imposed by social norms from social networks. Social capital is found to have a statistically significant impact on stocking rate, but tradeoffs exist among various network pathways. Herders’ acquisition of policy information and stall-feeding skills through social networks contributes to lower stocking rate, but acquisition of grazing experience, funds and machinery service exerts counteracting effects. A U-shaped relationship occurs between stocking rate and compensation amount offered by the REPSR: with the increase of compensation amount, herders lower stocking rate first and then increase it. To improve the effectiveness of the REPSR scheme, a refinement on the compensation scheme tailored to differential scales of household rangeland operation is the key, meanwhile weaving and harnessing social network to improve policy publicity and enforcement as well as knowledge sharing and production cooperation between herdsmen also deserve more attention. •Effects of ecological compensation and social capital on stocking rate are examined.•Herders' social capital is quantified by matrix operation on social networks.•A U-shaped relationship is found between stocking rate and compensation amount.•Tradeoffs exist in the impacts of differential network pathways on stocking rate.•Key network actors are identified and their potential leadership is explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2606931416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S074301672100293X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2606931416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-456fbdb5296223b3a755d21ec3f9d7d8e69d9d436dbfd8940197b8aed030e8bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMGO0zAQhiMEEmXhFZAljmzC2E6cmBMoggWpEkKCs-XYk8ahaxc76YobPAavt0-CSxeucPJY_r-Z8VcUTylUFKh4MVdzXGNaVlsxYLQCWQHr7hUb2rW8pFyy-8UG2pqXOd0-LB6lNAPQFiTbFD_6NQ7O70g4Yu4RzJffF0-i9jvca2_JMsWw7iaS1iE56zBdkog3OtpcnN4njDazt99_khSM03ti9MEtev-SbDGl4BMZY7gmH3PnSTtyiOHovMFL0k_O68fFg1HvEz65Oy-Kz2_ffOrfldsPV-_719vS8BqWsm7EONihYVIwxgeu26axjKLho7St7VBIK23NhR1G28kaqGyHTqMFDtgNhl8Uz8598_yvK6ZFzWGNPo9UTICQnNZU5JQ4p0wMKUUc1SG6ax2_KQrqpFvN6o9uddKtQKqsO4PPz-ANDmFMxmH-4l8YAFromlrQXFGa093_p_ssc3HB92H1S0ZfnVHMso4Oo7rDrYtoFmWD-9euvwD7_bDh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606931416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Curbing overstocking on rangeland through subsidies, rewards, and herders’ social capital: Lessons from Qinghai province, China</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Ding, Rui ; Shao, Liqun ; Chen, Haibin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Rui ; Shao, Liqun ; Chen, Haibin</creatorcontrib><description>Restoring rangeland ecology, a goal set by the Rangeland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward (REPSR) scheme of China, depends on how effectively livestock overload can be curbed. Besides subsidies and rewards, herders' individual social capital also bears an important weight on their willingness to lower stocking rate. Social network offers an invisible conduit for herders to build up social capital, thus quantifying social capital through social network analysis is more straightforward than simply using proxy indicators, an approach commonly adopted so far. Based on a questionnaire survey on 288 households in Qinghai province, the effects of social capital and the REPSR compensation on stocking rate are empirically examined, replacing the traditional proxies of social capital with herders' ability to obtain information and resources as well as the restrictions imposed by social norms from social networks. Social capital is found to have a statistically significant impact on stocking rate, but tradeoffs exist among various network pathways. Herders’ acquisition of policy information and stall-feeding skills through social networks contributes to lower stocking rate, but acquisition of grazing experience, funds and machinery service exerts counteracting effects. A U-shaped relationship occurs between stocking rate and compensation amount offered by the REPSR: with the increase of compensation amount, herders lower stocking rate first and then increase it. To improve the effectiveness of the REPSR scheme, a refinement on the compensation scheme tailored to differential scales of household rangeland operation is the key, meanwhile weaving and harnessing social network to improve policy publicity and enforcement as well as knowledge sharing and production cooperation between herdsmen also deserve more attention. •Effects of ecological compensation and social capital on stocking rate are examined.•Herders' social capital is quantified by matrix operation on social networks.•A U-shaped relationship is found between stocking rate and compensation amount.•Tradeoffs exist in the impacts of differential network pathways on stocking rate.•Key network actors are identified and their potential leadership is explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Compensation ; Cooperation ; Ecology ; Enforcement ; Farmers ; Geography ; Grazing ; Households ; Human ecology ; Livestock ; Livestock production ; Network analysis ; Norms ; Pastoralism ; Public Administration ; Publicity ; Qinghai province ; Rangeland conservation ; Rangelands ; Regional &amp; Urban Planning ; Reinforcement ; Rewards ; Social capital ; Social interactions ; Social network ; Social network analysis ; Social networks ; Social norms ; Social organization ; Social Sciences ; Social skills ; Statistical analysis ; Stocking ; Stocking rate ; Subsidies ; Weaving</subject><ispartof>Journal of rural studies, 2021-10, Vol.87, p.361-374</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>15</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000708546100011</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-456fbdb5296223b3a755d21ec3f9d7d8e69d9d436dbfd8940197b8aed030e8bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-456fbdb5296223b3a755d21ec3f9d7d8e69d9d436dbfd8940197b8aed030e8bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4291-7979 ; 0000-0002-1929-6687</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,33781,39264,46002</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Haibin</creatorcontrib><title>Curbing overstocking on rangeland through subsidies, rewards, and herders’ social capital: Lessons from Qinghai province, China</title><title>Journal of rural studies</title><addtitle>J RURAL STUD</addtitle><description>Restoring rangeland ecology, a goal set by the Rangeland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward (REPSR) scheme of China, depends on how effectively livestock overload can be curbed. Besides subsidies and rewards, herders' individual social capital also bears an important weight on their willingness to lower stocking rate. Social network offers an invisible conduit for herders to build up social capital, thus quantifying social capital through social network analysis is more straightforward than simply using proxy indicators, an approach commonly adopted so far. Based on a questionnaire survey on 288 households in Qinghai province, the effects of social capital and the REPSR compensation on stocking rate are empirically examined, replacing the traditional proxies of social capital with herders' ability to obtain information and resources as well as the restrictions imposed by social norms from social networks. Social capital is found to have a statistically significant impact on stocking rate, but tradeoffs exist among various network pathways. Herders’ acquisition of policy information and stall-feeding skills through social networks contributes to lower stocking rate, but acquisition of grazing experience, funds and machinery service exerts counteracting effects. A U-shaped relationship occurs between stocking rate and compensation amount offered by the REPSR: with the increase of compensation amount, herders lower stocking rate first and then increase it. To improve the effectiveness of the REPSR scheme, a refinement on the compensation scheme tailored to differential scales of household rangeland operation is the key, meanwhile weaving and harnessing social network to improve policy publicity and enforcement as well as knowledge sharing and production cooperation between herdsmen also deserve more attention. •Effects of ecological compensation and social capital on stocking rate are examined.•Herders' social capital is quantified by matrix operation on social networks.•A U-shaped relationship is found between stocking rate and compensation amount.•Tradeoffs exist in the impacts of differential network pathways on stocking rate.•Key network actors are identified and their potential leadership is explored.</description><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock production</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Pastoralism</subject><subject>Public Administration</subject><subject>Publicity</subject><subject>Qinghai province</subject><subject>Rangeland conservation</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Regional &amp; Urban Planning</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social network</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social skills</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Stocking rate</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Weaving</subject><issn>0743-0167</issn><issn>1873-1392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMGO0zAQhiMEEmXhFZAljmzC2E6cmBMoggWpEkKCs-XYk8ahaxc76YobPAavt0-CSxeucPJY_r-Z8VcUTylUFKh4MVdzXGNaVlsxYLQCWQHr7hUb2rW8pFyy-8UG2pqXOd0-LB6lNAPQFiTbFD_6NQ7O70g4Yu4RzJffF0-i9jvca2_JMsWw7iaS1iE56zBdkog3OtpcnN4njDazt99_khSM03ti9MEtev-SbDGl4BMZY7gmH3PnSTtyiOHovMFL0k_O68fFg1HvEz65Oy-Kz2_ffOrfldsPV-_719vS8BqWsm7EONihYVIwxgeu26axjKLho7St7VBIK23NhR1G28kaqGyHTqMFDtgNhl8Uz8598_yvK6ZFzWGNPo9UTICQnNZU5JQ4p0wMKUUc1SG6ax2_KQrqpFvN6o9uddKtQKqsO4PPz-ANDmFMxmH-4l8YAFromlrQXFGa093_p_ssc3HB92H1S0ZfnVHMso4Oo7rDrYtoFmWD-9euvwD7_bDh</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Ding, Rui</creator><creator>Shao, Liqun</creator><creator>Chen, Haibin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-7979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-6687</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Curbing overstocking on rangeland through subsidies, rewards, and herders’ social capital: Lessons from Qinghai province, China</title><author>Ding, Rui ; Shao, Liqun ; Chen, Haibin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-456fbdb5296223b3a755d21ec3f9d7d8e69d9d436dbfd8940197b8aed030e8bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock production</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Pastoralism</topic><topic>Public Administration</topic><topic>Publicity</topic><topic>Qinghai province</topic><topic>Rangeland conservation</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Regional &amp; Urban Planning</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social network</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social skills</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Stocking rate</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Weaving</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Haibin</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of rural studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Rui</au><au>Shao, Liqun</au><au>Chen, Haibin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Curbing overstocking on rangeland through subsidies, rewards, and herders’ social capital: Lessons from Qinghai province, China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rural studies</jtitle><stitle>J RURAL STUD</stitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>361</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>361-374</pages><issn>0743-0167</issn><eissn>1873-1392</eissn><abstract>Restoring rangeland ecology, a goal set by the Rangeland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward (REPSR) scheme of China, depends on how effectively livestock overload can be curbed. Besides subsidies and rewards, herders' individual social capital also bears an important weight on their willingness to lower stocking rate. Social network offers an invisible conduit for herders to build up social capital, thus quantifying social capital through social network analysis is more straightforward than simply using proxy indicators, an approach commonly adopted so far. Based on a questionnaire survey on 288 households in Qinghai province, the effects of social capital and the REPSR compensation on stocking rate are empirically examined, replacing the traditional proxies of social capital with herders' ability to obtain information and resources as well as the restrictions imposed by social norms from social networks. Social capital is found to have a statistically significant impact on stocking rate, but tradeoffs exist among various network pathways. Herders’ acquisition of policy information and stall-feeding skills through social networks contributes to lower stocking rate, but acquisition of grazing experience, funds and machinery service exerts counteracting effects. A U-shaped relationship occurs between stocking rate and compensation amount offered by the REPSR: with the increase of compensation amount, herders lower stocking rate first and then increase it. To improve the effectiveness of the REPSR scheme, a refinement on the compensation scheme tailored to differential scales of household rangeland operation is the key, meanwhile weaving and harnessing social network to improve policy publicity and enforcement as well as knowledge sharing and production cooperation between herdsmen also deserve more attention. •Effects of ecological compensation and social capital on stocking rate are examined.•Herders' social capital is quantified by matrix operation on social networks.•A U-shaped relationship is found between stocking rate and compensation amount.•Tradeoffs exist in the impacts of differential network pathways on stocking rate.•Key network actors are identified and their potential leadership is explored.</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.028</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-7979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-6687</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-0167
ispartof Journal of rural studies, 2021-10, Vol.87, p.361-374
issn 0743-0167
1873-1392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2606931416
source Sociological Abstracts; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Compensation
Cooperation
Ecology
Enforcement
Farmers
Geography
Grazing
Households
Human ecology
Livestock
Livestock production
Network analysis
Norms
Pastoralism
Public Administration
Publicity
Qinghai province
Rangeland conservation
Rangelands
Regional & Urban Planning
Reinforcement
Rewards
Social capital
Social interactions
Social network
Social network analysis
Social networks
Social norms
Social organization
Social Sciences
Social skills
Statistical analysis
Stocking
Stocking rate
Subsidies
Weaving
title Curbing overstocking on rangeland through subsidies, rewards, and herders’ social capital: Lessons from Qinghai province, China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T16%3A28%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Curbing%20overstocking%20on%20rangeland%20through%20subsidies,%20rewards,%20and%20herders%E2%80%99%20social%20capital:%20Lessons%20from%20Qinghai%20province,%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rural%20studies&rft.au=Ding,%20Rui&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=361-374&rft.issn=0743-0167&rft.eissn=1873-1392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2606931416%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606931416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S074301672100293X&rfr_iscdi=true