A Mixed-Methods Study of Two Modes of the Circle of Security
Purpose: This study compared the impact, challenges, and benefits of the Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) intervention across two delivery modes: group center-based (GCCOS-P) and individual home-based (IHCOS-P). Methods: This mixed-methods study compared the impact of the COS-P on parental refle...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research on social work practice 2022-01, Vol.32 (1), p.49-60 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 60 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 49 |
| container_title | Research on social work practice |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Sadowski, Christina Goff, Rachel Sawyer, Neroli |
| description | Purpose:
This study compared the impact, challenges, and benefits of the Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) intervention across two delivery modes: group center-based (GCCOS-P) and individual home-based (IHCOS-P).
Methods:
This mixed-methods study compared the impact of the COS-P on parental reflective functioning and parental stress across two delivery modes: GCCOS-P (n = 7) and IHCOS-P (n = 7). It compared the challenges and benefits of each, from the qualitative perspectives of participants (n = 2 IHCOS-P; n = 3 GCCOS-P) and facilitators (n = 4).
Results:
Quantitative statistical analysis comparing pre- and postintervention measures suggest that each delivery mode was equally effective in reducing parental stress and generally noneffective with respect to parental reflective functioning. Challenges and benefits of each mode, inherent in the peer/shared learning environment of the GCOS-P and the individualized, flexible delivery of the IHCOS-P, were identified.
Discussion:
This study adds to knowledge about the widely utilized COS-P, highlighting challenges and benefits of two modes of delivery. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10497315211009315 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2606095707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10497315211009315</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2606095707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-cfcd8adde60c3b08f8695c20d4a97d336d45468fa91bc7033cec4a00b98a6fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKw0AUHUTBWv0AdwHXqfdmMjMZcFOKVqHFRes6TOZhU6pTZxI0f29CBBfi6p7DPQ84hFwjzBCFuEXIpaDIMkQA2YMTMkHGslSwAk973P_TQXBOLmLcAyDNuJyQu3myrr-sSde22XkTk03Tmi7xLtl--mTtjY0DaXY2WdRBH-zANla3oW66S3Lm1CHaq587JS8P99vFY7p6Xj4t5qtUU8yaVDttCmWM5aBpBYUruGQ6A5MrKQyl3OQs54VTEistgFJtda4AKlko7lRFp-RmzD0G_9Ha2JR734b3vrLMOHCQTIDoVTiqdPAxBuvKY6jfVOhKhHIYqfwzUu-ZjZ6oXu1v6v-Gb50LZOM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606095707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Mixed-Methods Study of Two Modes of the Circle of Security</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Sadowski, Christina ; Goff, Rachel ; Sawyer, Neroli</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadowski, Christina ; Goff, Rachel ; Sawyer, Neroli</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
This study compared the impact, challenges, and benefits of the Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) intervention across two delivery modes: group center-based (GCCOS-P) and individual home-based (IHCOS-P).
Methods:
This mixed-methods study compared the impact of the COS-P on parental reflective functioning and parental stress across two delivery modes: GCCOS-P (n = 7) and IHCOS-P (n = 7). It compared the challenges and benefits of each, from the qualitative perspectives of participants (n = 2 IHCOS-P; n = 3 GCCOS-P) and facilitators (n = 4).
Results:
Quantitative statistical analysis comparing pre- and postintervention measures suggest that each delivery mode was equally effective in reducing parental stress and generally noneffective with respect to parental reflective functioning. Challenges and benefits of each mode, inherent in the peer/shared learning environment of the GCOS-P and the individualized, flexible delivery of the IHCOS-P, were identified.
Discussion:
This study adds to knowledge about the widely utilized COS-P, highlighting challenges and benefits of two modes of delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10497315211009315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attachment ; Benefits ; Challenges ; Home based ; Learning environment ; Mixed methods research ; Parental stress ; Parents & parenting ; Security ; Shared learning ; Statistical analysis ; Stress</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2022-01, Vol.32 (1), p.49-60</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-cfcd8adde60c3b08f8695c20d4a97d336d45468fa91bc7033cec4a00b98a6fab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-cfcd8adde60c3b08f8695c20d4a97d336d45468fa91bc7033cec4a00b98a6fab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2040-1912</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10497315211009315$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497315211009315$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadowski, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goff, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Neroli</creatorcontrib><title>A Mixed-Methods Study of Two Modes of the Circle of Security</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><description>Purpose:
This study compared the impact, challenges, and benefits of the Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) intervention across two delivery modes: group center-based (GCCOS-P) and individual home-based (IHCOS-P).
Methods:
This mixed-methods study compared the impact of the COS-P on parental reflective functioning and parental stress across two delivery modes: GCCOS-P (n = 7) and IHCOS-P (n = 7). It compared the challenges and benefits of each, from the qualitative perspectives of participants (n = 2 IHCOS-P; n = 3 GCCOS-P) and facilitators (n = 4).
Results:
Quantitative statistical analysis comparing pre- and postintervention measures suggest that each delivery mode was equally effective in reducing parental stress and generally noneffective with respect to parental reflective functioning. Challenges and benefits of each mode, inherent in the peer/shared learning environment of the GCOS-P and the individualized, flexible delivery of the IHCOS-P, were identified.
Discussion:
This study adds to knowledge about the widely utilized COS-P, highlighting challenges and benefits of two modes of delivery.</description><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Challenges</subject><subject>Home based</subject><subject>Learning environment</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Parental stress</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Shared learning</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKw0AUHUTBWv0AdwHXqfdmMjMZcFOKVqHFRes6TOZhU6pTZxI0f29CBBfi6p7DPQ84hFwjzBCFuEXIpaDIMkQA2YMTMkHGslSwAk973P_TQXBOLmLcAyDNuJyQu3myrr-sSde22XkTk03Tmi7xLtl--mTtjY0DaXY2WdRBH-zANla3oW66S3Lm1CHaq587JS8P99vFY7p6Xj4t5qtUU8yaVDttCmWM5aBpBYUruGQ6A5MrKQyl3OQs54VTEistgFJtda4AKlko7lRFp-RmzD0G_9Ha2JR734b3vrLMOHCQTIDoVTiqdPAxBuvKY6jfVOhKhHIYqfwzUu-ZjZ6oXu1v6v-Gb50LZOM</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Sadowski, Christina</creator><creator>Goff, Rachel</creator><creator>Sawyer, Neroli</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-1912</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>A Mixed-Methods Study of Two Modes of the Circle of Security</title><author>Sadowski, Christina ; Goff, Rachel ; Sawyer, Neroli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-cfcd8adde60c3b08f8695c20d4a97d336d45468fa91bc7033cec4a00b98a6fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Challenges</topic><topic>Home based</topic><topic>Learning environment</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Parental stress</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Shared learning</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadowski, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goff, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Neroli</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadowski, Christina</au><au>Goff, Rachel</au><au>Sawyer, Neroli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Mixed-Methods Study of Two Modes of the Circle of Security</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>49-60</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
This study compared the impact, challenges, and benefits of the Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) intervention across two delivery modes: group center-based (GCCOS-P) and individual home-based (IHCOS-P).
Methods:
This mixed-methods study compared the impact of the COS-P on parental reflective functioning and parental stress across two delivery modes: GCCOS-P (n = 7) and IHCOS-P (n = 7). It compared the challenges and benefits of each, from the qualitative perspectives of participants (n = 2 IHCOS-P; n = 3 GCCOS-P) and facilitators (n = 4).
Results:
Quantitative statistical analysis comparing pre- and postintervention measures suggest that each delivery mode was equally effective in reducing parental stress and generally noneffective with respect to parental reflective functioning. Challenges and benefits of each mode, inherent in the peer/shared learning environment of the GCOS-P and the individualized, flexible delivery of the IHCOS-P, were identified.
Discussion:
This study adds to knowledge about the widely utilized COS-P, highlighting challenges and benefits of two modes of delivery.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10497315211009315</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-1912</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-7315 |
| ispartof | Research on social work practice, 2022-01, Vol.32 (1), p.49-60 |
| issn | 1049-7315 1552-7581 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2606095707 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Attachment Benefits Challenges Home based Learning environment Mixed methods research Parental stress Parents & parenting Security Shared learning Statistical analysis Stress |
| title | A Mixed-Methods Study of Two Modes of the Circle of Security |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Mixed-Methods%20Study%20of%20Two%20Modes%20of%20the%20Circle%20of%20Security&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Sadowski,%20Christina&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=49-60&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10497315211009315&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2606095707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606095707&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10497315211009315&rfr_iscdi=true |