Spatial variation in populist right voting in Austria, 2013–2017

The recent wave of populism sweeping Europe and the Americas generated considerable interest among political scientists, economists, sociologists and to some extent, geographers. The vast majority of these studies focuses on individual voter decisions or national comparisons over time but neglects t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political geography 2021-10, Vol.90, p.102461, Article 102461
Hauptverfasser: Essletzbichler, Jürgen, Moser, Mathias, Derndorfer, Judith, Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102461
container_title Political geography
container_volume 90
creator Essletzbichler, Jürgen
Moser, Mathias
Derndorfer, Judith
Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra
description The recent wave of populism sweeping Europe and the Americas generated considerable interest among political scientists, economists, sociologists and to some extent, geographers. The vast majority of these studies focuses on individual voter decisions or national comparisons over time but neglects the within-country spatial variation of the populist vote. This paper addresses this shortcoming and applies spatial econometric techniques to explore possible explanations for spatial variation in the increase of the populist right vote between the 2013 and 2017 national elections in Austria for 2118 municipalities. Spatial variation in voting shares can result from (1) compositional effects, regional differences in the composition of voters with different characteristics, (2) broad spatial, historically evolved institutional differences, such as membership to one of the nine states, (3) unequal integration of different types of regions into the global economy, such as peripheral regions, central urban regions, old industrial regions or tourist areas, (4) spatial vote spillovers due to localized social networks, and (5) unobserved spatial processes. We find that the populist right vote gains in Austrian municipalities are affected by all processes, but that the type of regions becomes insignificant once we correct for unobservable spatial structures in the regression framework. The increase in the share of foreigners, the share of foreigners, income and inequality levels, educational differences, selected state membership, as well as spatial spillovers of populist right voting are all important to explain spatial variation in the rise of the populist right vote.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102461
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605659271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0962629821001219</els_id><sourcerecordid>2605659271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2951-bded48e9a6a705fb390d3306785ac50ceb653f7a7f766827ad111dd7099ba1543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoPPBS82jpJm6S5COviFyx4UM8hbdI1pTY1aRe8-R_8h_4Ss9Szl3nDzHtvmIfQOYYMA2ZXbTa4bmtcRoDgOCIFwwdogUuepxQEO0SLWEnKiCiP0UkILQAI4LBAN8-DGq3qkp3yNnauT2yfDG6YOhvGxNvt25js3Gj77X6xmsIYeZcJAZz_fH1H4KfoqFFdMGd_uESvd7cv64d083T_uF5t0poIitNKG12URiimONCmygXoPAfGS6pqCrWpGM0brnjDGSsJVxpjrDUHISqFaZEv0cXsO3j3MZkwytZNvo8nJWFAGRWE48gqZlbtXQjeNHLw9l35T4lB7tOSrZzTkvu05JxWlF3PMhM_2FnjZait6WujrTf1KLWz_xv8AqZnczE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605659271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial variation in populist right voting in Austria, 2013–2017</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Essletzbichler, Jürgen ; Moser, Mathias ; Derndorfer, Judith ; Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra</creator><creatorcontrib>Essletzbichler, Jürgen ; Moser, Mathias ; Derndorfer, Judith ; Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra</creatorcontrib><description>The recent wave of populism sweeping Europe and the Americas generated considerable interest among political scientists, economists, sociologists and to some extent, geographers. The vast majority of these studies focuses on individual voter decisions or national comparisons over time but neglects the within-country spatial variation of the populist vote. This paper addresses this shortcoming and applies spatial econometric techniques to explore possible explanations for spatial variation in the increase of the populist right vote between the 2013 and 2017 national elections in Austria for 2118 municipalities. Spatial variation in voting shares can result from (1) compositional effects, regional differences in the composition of voters with different characteristics, (2) broad spatial, historically evolved institutional differences, such as membership to one of the nine states, (3) unequal integration of different types of regions into the global economy, such as peripheral regions, central urban regions, old industrial regions or tourist areas, (4) spatial vote spillovers due to localized social networks, and (5) unobserved spatial processes. We find that the populist right vote gains in Austrian municipalities are affected by all processes, but that the type of regions becomes insignificant once we correct for unobservable spatial structures in the regression framework. The increase in the share of foreigners, the share of foreigners, income and inequality levels, educational differences, selected state membership, as well as spatial spillovers of populist right voting are all important to explain spatial variation in the rise of the populist right vote.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-6298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Austria ; Electoral geography ; FPÖ ; Geographers ; Global economy ; Income inequality ; Local government ; Membership ; National elections ; Noncitizens ; Peripheral regions ; Political scientists ; Populism ; Regional differences ; Regional variations ; Social networks ; Spatial dependence ; Spillover effect ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Political geography, 2021-10, Vol.90, p.102461, Article 102461</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2951-bded48e9a6a705fb390d3306785ac50ceb653f7a7f766827ad111dd7099ba1543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2951-bded48e9a6a705fb390d3306785ac50ceb653f7a7f766827ad111dd7099ba1543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8821-0541</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102461$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Essletzbichler, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moser, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derndorfer, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial variation in populist right voting in Austria, 2013–2017</title><title>Political geography</title><description>The recent wave of populism sweeping Europe and the Americas generated considerable interest among political scientists, economists, sociologists and to some extent, geographers. The vast majority of these studies focuses on individual voter decisions or national comparisons over time but neglects the within-country spatial variation of the populist vote. This paper addresses this shortcoming and applies spatial econometric techniques to explore possible explanations for spatial variation in the increase of the populist right vote between the 2013 and 2017 national elections in Austria for 2118 municipalities. Spatial variation in voting shares can result from (1) compositional effects, regional differences in the composition of voters with different characteristics, (2) broad spatial, historically evolved institutional differences, such as membership to one of the nine states, (3) unequal integration of different types of regions into the global economy, such as peripheral regions, central urban regions, old industrial regions or tourist areas, (4) spatial vote spillovers due to localized social networks, and (5) unobserved spatial processes. We find that the populist right vote gains in Austrian municipalities are affected by all processes, but that the type of regions becomes insignificant once we correct for unobservable spatial structures in the regression framework. The increase in the share of foreigners, the share of foreigners, income and inequality levels, educational differences, selected state membership, as well as spatial spillovers of populist right voting are all important to explain spatial variation in the rise of the populist right vote.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Electoral geography</subject><subject>FPÖ</subject><subject>Geographers</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>National elections</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Peripheral regions</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Regional differences</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Spatial dependence</subject><subject>Spillover effect</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>0962-6298</issn><issn>1873-5096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoPPBS82jpJm6S5COviFyx4UM8hbdI1pTY1aRe8-R_8h_4Ss9Szl3nDzHtvmIfQOYYMA2ZXbTa4bmtcRoDgOCIFwwdogUuepxQEO0SLWEnKiCiP0UkILQAI4LBAN8-DGq3qkp3yNnauT2yfDG6YOhvGxNvt25js3Gj77X6xmsIYeZcJAZz_fH1H4KfoqFFdMGd_uESvd7cv64d083T_uF5t0poIitNKG12URiimONCmygXoPAfGS6pqCrWpGM0brnjDGSsJVxpjrDUHISqFaZEv0cXsO3j3MZkwytZNvo8nJWFAGRWE48gqZlbtXQjeNHLw9l35T4lB7tOSrZzTkvu05JxWlF3PMhM_2FnjZait6WujrTf1KLWz_xv8AqZnczE</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Essletzbichler, Jürgen</creator><creator>Moser, Mathias</creator><creator>Derndorfer, Judith</creator><creator>Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-0541</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Spatial variation in populist right voting in Austria, 2013–2017</title><author>Essletzbichler, Jürgen ; Moser, Mathias ; Derndorfer, Judith ; Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2951-bded48e9a6a705fb390d3306785ac50ceb653f7a7f766827ad111dd7099ba1543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Electoral geography</topic><topic>FPÖ</topic><topic>Geographers</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>National elections</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Peripheral regions</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Regional differences</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Spatial dependence</topic><topic>Spillover effect</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Essletzbichler, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moser, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derndorfer, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Essletzbichler, Jürgen</au><au>Moser, Mathias</au><au>Derndorfer, Judith</au><au>Staufer-Steinnocher, Petra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial variation in populist right voting in Austria, 2013–2017</atitle><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>90</volume><spage>102461</spage><pages>102461-</pages><artnum>102461</artnum><issn>0962-6298</issn><eissn>1873-5096</eissn><abstract>The recent wave of populism sweeping Europe and the Americas generated considerable interest among political scientists, economists, sociologists and to some extent, geographers. The vast majority of these studies focuses on individual voter decisions or national comparisons over time but neglects the within-country spatial variation of the populist vote. This paper addresses this shortcoming and applies spatial econometric techniques to explore possible explanations for spatial variation in the increase of the populist right vote between the 2013 and 2017 national elections in Austria for 2118 municipalities. Spatial variation in voting shares can result from (1) compositional effects, regional differences in the composition of voters with different characteristics, (2) broad spatial, historically evolved institutional differences, such as membership to one of the nine states, (3) unequal integration of different types of regions into the global economy, such as peripheral regions, central urban regions, old industrial regions or tourist areas, (4) spatial vote spillovers due to localized social networks, and (5) unobserved spatial processes. We find that the populist right vote gains in Austrian municipalities are affected by all processes, but that the type of regions becomes insignificant once we correct for unobservable spatial structures in the regression framework. The increase in the share of foreigners, the share of foreigners, income and inequality levels, educational differences, selected state membership, as well as spatial spillovers of populist right voting are all important to explain spatial variation in the rise of the populist right vote.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102461</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-0541</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-6298
ispartof Political geography, 2021-10, Vol.90, p.102461, Article 102461
issn 0962-6298
1873-5096
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2605659271
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Academic achievement
Austria
Electoral geography
FPÖ
Geographers
Global economy
Income inequality
Local government
Membership
National elections
Noncitizens
Peripheral regions
Political scientists
Populism
Regional differences
Regional variations
Social networks
Spatial dependence
Spillover effect
Voters
Voting
Voting rights
title Spatial variation in populist right voting in Austria, 2013–2017
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20variation%20in%20populist%20right%20voting%20in%20Austria,%202013%E2%80%932017&rft.jtitle=Political%20geography&rft.au=Essletzbichler,%20J%C3%BCrgen&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=90&rft.spage=102461&rft.pages=102461-&rft.artnum=102461&rft.issn=0962-6298&rft.eissn=1873-5096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102461&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605659271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605659271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0962629821001219&rfr_iscdi=true