Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands

Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:River research and applications 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1471-1479
Hauptverfasser: Briggs, Mark K., Poulos, Helen M., Renfrow, Jeffrey, Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier, Larson, David, Manning, Patricia, Sirotnak, Joseph, Crawford, Kelon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1479
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1471
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 37
creator Briggs, Mark K.
Poulos, Helen M.
Renfrow, Jeffrey
Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier
Larson, David
Manning, Patricia
Sirotnak, Joseph
Crawford, Kelon
description Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.3858
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605514350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605514350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh44023fDRt4t02dAqDwdDrkDYnW2dtZtJV9u_tnHjn1Tk878M58CJ0S8mIEsLGIZgRl0KeoQEVXCQ0zfLzv12oS3QV45YQmkslB2g52_h3sNjv2wc8NW1bV80aV01nYtUBXlemaXFpGsCm9n3SbgCvKo_nwTQWxtNgOo-nPlgIdU_iNbpwpo5w8zuH6O3p8XX2nCyW85fZZJGUTHGZWGrBFRJywYRyDKAAJ52DIs1EybhNWSZ7CrmyjquSUKF6zIgyisqyIHyI7k53d8F_7iG2euv3oelfapYRIWjKxdG6P1ll8DEGcHoXqg8TDpoSfaxL93XpY129mpzUr6qGw7-eXq0mP_43HllrZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605514350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Briggs, Mark K. ; Poulos, Helen M. ; Renfrow, Jeffrey ; Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier ; Larson, David ; Manning, Patricia ; Sirotnak, Joseph ; Crawford, Kelon</creator><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Mark K. ; Poulos, Helen M. ; Renfrow, Jeffrey ; Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier ; Larson, David ; Manning, Patricia ; Sirotnak, Joseph ; Crawford, Kelon</creatorcontrib><description>Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.3858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Arundo donax ; Community composition ; Controlled burning ; Fires ; Herbicides ; Indigenous plants ; invasive grasses ; Invasive plants ; invasive species management ; Management ; Monitoring ; Plant communities ; Prescribed fire ; Recovery ; Regrowth ; Rio Bravo ; Rio Grande ; riparian restoration ; Riparian vegetation ; River flow ; Rivers</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1471-1479</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0686-9770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.3858$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.3858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Mark K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulos, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrow, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirotnak, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Kelon</creatorcontrib><title>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Arundo donax</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Controlled burning</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>invasive grasses</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>invasive species management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>Rio Bravo</subject><subject>Rio Grande</subject><subject>riparian restoration</subject><subject>Riparian vegetation</subject><subject>River flow</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh44023fDRt4t02dAqDwdDrkDYnW2dtZtJV9u_tnHjn1Tk878M58CJ0S8mIEsLGIZgRl0KeoQEVXCQ0zfLzv12oS3QV45YQmkslB2g52_h3sNjv2wc8NW1bV80aV01nYtUBXlemaXFpGsCm9n3SbgCvKo_nwTQWxtNgOo-nPlgIdU_iNbpwpo5w8zuH6O3p8XX2nCyW85fZZJGUTHGZWGrBFRJywYRyDKAAJ52DIs1EybhNWSZ7CrmyjquSUKF6zIgyisqyIHyI7k53d8F_7iG2euv3oelfapYRIWjKxdG6P1ll8DEGcHoXqg8TDpoSfaxL93XpY129mpzUr6qGw7-eXq0mP_43HllrZA</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Briggs, Mark K.</creator><creator>Poulos, Helen M.</creator><creator>Renfrow, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</creator><creator>Larson, David</creator><creator>Manning, Patricia</creator><creator>Sirotnak, Joseph</creator><creator>Crawford, Kelon</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-9770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</title><author>Briggs, Mark K. ; Poulos, Helen M. ; Renfrow, Jeffrey ; Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier ; Larson, David ; Manning, Patricia ; Sirotnak, Joseph ; Crawford, Kelon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Arundo donax</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Controlled burning</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>invasive grasses</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>invasive species management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>Rio Bravo</topic><topic>Rio Grande</topic><topic>riparian restoration</topic><topic>Riparian vegetation</topic><topic>River flow</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Mark K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulos, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrow, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirotnak, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Kelon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briggs, Mark K.</au><au>Poulos, Helen M.</au><au>Renfrow, Jeffrey</au><au>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</au><au>Larson, David</au><au>Manning, Patricia</au><au>Sirotnak, Joseph</au><au>Crawford, Kelon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1471</spage><epage>1479</epage><pages>1471-1479</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.3858</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-9770</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1471-1479
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2605514350
source Wiley Journals
subjects Aquatic habitats
Arundo donax
Community composition
Controlled burning
Fires
Herbicides
Indigenous plants
invasive grasses
Invasive plants
invasive species management
Management
Monitoring
Plant communities
Prescribed fire
Recovery
Regrowth
Rio Bravo
Rio Grande
riparian restoration
Riparian vegetation
River flow
Rivers
title Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A08%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choked%20out:%20Battling%20invasive%20giant%20cane%20along%20the%20Rio%20Grande/Bravo%20Borderlands&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Briggs,%20Mark%20K.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1471&rft.epage=1479&rft.pages=1471-1479&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.3858&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605514350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605514350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true