Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands
Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | River research and applications 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1471-1479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1479 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1471 |
container_title | River research and applications |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Briggs, Mark K. Poulos, Helen M. Renfrow, Jeffrey Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier Larson, David Manning, Patricia Sirotnak, Joseph Crawford, Kelon |
description | Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rra.3858 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605514350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605514350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh44023fDRt4t02dAqDwdDrkDYnW2dtZtJV9u_tnHjn1Tk878M58CJ0S8mIEsLGIZgRl0KeoQEVXCQ0zfLzv12oS3QV45YQmkslB2g52_h3sNjv2wc8NW1bV80aV01nYtUBXlemaXFpGsCm9n3SbgCvKo_nwTQWxtNgOo-nPlgIdU_iNbpwpo5w8zuH6O3p8XX2nCyW85fZZJGUTHGZWGrBFRJywYRyDKAAJ52DIs1EybhNWSZ7CrmyjquSUKF6zIgyisqyIHyI7k53d8F_7iG2euv3oelfapYRIWjKxdG6P1ll8DEGcHoXqg8TDpoSfaxL93XpY129mpzUr6qGw7-eXq0mP_43HllrZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605514350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Briggs, Mark K. ; Poulos, Helen M. ; Renfrow, Jeffrey ; Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier ; Larson, David ; Manning, Patricia ; Sirotnak, Joseph ; Crawford, Kelon</creator><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Mark K. ; Poulos, Helen M. ; Renfrow, Jeffrey ; Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier ; Larson, David ; Manning, Patricia ; Sirotnak, Joseph ; Crawford, Kelon</creatorcontrib><description>Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.3858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Arundo donax ; Community composition ; Controlled burning ; Fires ; Herbicides ; Indigenous plants ; invasive grasses ; Invasive plants ; invasive species management ; Management ; Monitoring ; Plant communities ; Prescribed fire ; Recovery ; Regrowth ; Rio Bravo ; Rio Grande ; riparian restoration ; Riparian vegetation ; River flow ; Rivers</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1471-1479</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0686-9770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.3858$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.3858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Mark K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulos, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrow, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirotnak, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Kelon</creatorcontrib><title>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Arundo donax</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Controlled burning</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>invasive grasses</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>invasive species management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>Rio Bravo</subject><subject>Rio Grande</subject><subject>riparian restoration</subject><subject>Riparian vegetation</subject><subject>River flow</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh44023fDRt4t02dAqDwdDrkDYnW2dtZtJV9u_tnHjn1Tk878M58CJ0S8mIEsLGIZgRl0KeoQEVXCQ0zfLzv12oS3QV45YQmkslB2g52_h3sNjv2wc8NW1bV80aV01nYtUBXlemaXFpGsCm9n3SbgCvKo_nwTQWxtNgOo-nPlgIdU_iNbpwpo5w8zuH6O3p8XX2nCyW85fZZJGUTHGZWGrBFRJywYRyDKAAJ52DIs1EybhNWSZ7CrmyjquSUKF6zIgyisqyIHyI7k53d8F_7iG2euv3oelfapYRIWjKxdG6P1ll8DEGcHoXqg8TDpoSfaxL93XpY129mpzUr6qGw7-eXq0mP_43HllrZA</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Briggs, Mark K.</creator><creator>Poulos, Helen M.</creator><creator>Renfrow, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</creator><creator>Larson, David</creator><creator>Manning, Patricia</creator><creator>Sirotnak, Joseph</creator><creator>Crawford, Kelon</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-9770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</title><author>Briggs, Mark K. ; Poulos, Helen M. ; Renfrow, Jeffrey ; Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier ; Larson, David ; Manning, Patricia ; Sirotnak, Joseph ; Crawford, Kelon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-d1defb8e75259f2eebef8ffeb465c23d42682eee79df39c0159c23209a918cb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Arundo donax</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Controlled burning</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>invasive grasses</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>invasive species management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>Rio Bravo</topic><topic>Rio Grande</topic><topic>riparian restoration</topic><topic>Riparian vegetation</topic><topic>River flow</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Mark K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulos, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrow, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirotnak, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Kelon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briggs, Mark K.</au><au>Poulos, Helen M.</au><au>Renfrow, Jeffrey</au><au>Ochoa‐Espinoza, Javier</au><au>Larson, David</au><au>Manning, Patricia</au><au>Sirotnak, Joseph</au><au>Crawford, Kelon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1471</spage><epage>1479</epage><pages>1471-1479</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Along the U.S.‐Mexico border, an aggressive non‐native grass, giant cane (Arundo donax), grows in dense, nearly impenetrable stands along hundreds of kilometers of the Rio Grande/Bravo (RGB). Between 2008 and 2018, a diverse, multisector binational‐team repeatedly treated giant cane with prescribed fire and herbicide along 90 km of this binational river to restore aquatic and riparian habitat and native plant community composition. The large geographic scale, binational management response, treatment methods used, and development of a long‐term monitoring program to quantify treatment impacts on the RGB's riparian plant community underscore the unique aspects of this effort. Results of this decade‐long management experiment indicate that (i) the combination of a primary treatment of giant cane (using prescribed fire followed 4–6 weeks later by herbicide treatment of regrowth) and a secondary treatment (spot treatment of regrowth one or more years following primary treatment) was effective in reducing the extent and distribution of giant cane at relatively low cost, (ii) giant cane re‐establishment following treatment is often not rapid, nor dramatic; and (iii) as revealed by analysis of riparian vegetation monitoring data, eradication of dense stands of giant cane have fostered significant and long‐term reduction in giant cane cover and recovery of native woody riparian plant taxa. Important caveats to the long‐term viability of managing giant cane hinge on better understanding the consequences of herbicide use, securing funding to cover the cost of re‐treatment, and continuing river flow management focused on promoting the recovery of native riparian obligate plants over non‐natives.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.3858</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-9770</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-1459 |
ispartof | River research and applications, 2021-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1471-1479 |
issn | 1535-1459 1535-1467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2605514350 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Aquatic habitats Arundo donax Community composition Controlled burning Fires Herbicides Indigenous plants invasive grasses Invasive plants invasive species management Management Monitoring Plant communities Prescribed fire Recovery Regrowth Rio Bravo Rio Grande riparian restoration Riparian vegetation River flow Rivers |
title | Choked out: Battling invasive giant cane along the Rio Grande/Bravo Borderlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A08%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choked%20out:%20Battling%20invasive%20giant%20cane%20along%20the%20Rio%20Grande/Bravo%20Borderlands&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Briggs,%20Mark%20K.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1471&rft.epage=1479&rft.pages=1471-1479&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.3858&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605514350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605514350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |